Aren’t kids great?
And aren’t kids with British accents REALLY great?
Todd
]]>Pastor Brian Jones tells of the response he got from one 'nationally recognized' pastor when Brian told him that he hadn't figured out the whole small group thing yet. Brian said the pastor's response was something like this:
“Well, Brian, that’s because they don’t work. Small groups are things that trick us into believing we’re serious about making disciples. The problem is 90 percent of small groups never produce one single disciple. Ever. They help Christians make shallow friendships, for sure. They’re great at helping Christians feel a tenuous connection to their local church, and they do a bang-up job of teaching Christians how to act like other Christians in the Evangelical Christian subculture. But when it comes to creating the kind of holistic disciples Jesus envisioned, the jury’s decision came back a long time ago—small groups just aren’t working.”
Wow. My experience in the church is that, many times, small groups DO NOT work. But sometimes they do.
But, that said, even when they do, this person is right, they many times take an inward rather than outward track.
What do YOU think? How do you make your small group make a difference. How do you make your small group be in the top 10% that actually create disciples (what we're all hoping to do!)
In full disclosure, we're hosting a new small group. Our first study is this weekend... so your input will help me much!
Todd
In Texas, there is a demonstration at the state capitol today. They're demanding that their state leaders begin taxing megachurches in the state in order to help local schools. The project is headed by the state's American Atheists. Their director, Joe Zamecki, has released a statement stating why he thinks this is a good thing. Read it, and see if he makes his point:
Public education in Texas is in a financial crisis. This year’s state legislature is about to slash spending on education, to include the laying off of possibly hundreds of teachers, and the closing of public schools all over the state. Apparently the state budget is short this year, by billions of dollars.
Right now, parents, students, teachers and others are rallying around their schools, and speaking out about the very real need to keep the teachers and schools we have now, as one of our state’s top priorities.
Meanwhile mega-churches and televangelists in Texas are doing very well. So the recurring theme of church taxation is in the air again, although it’s still a somewhat shocking idea to most people. Not so shocking as in the past.
Joel Osteen’s Lakewood Church alone is doing famously well, operating in the physically largest church building in the USA, tax free. Like so many Texas mega-churches, Joel and his church have the ease of marketing that some corporations have, so we feel that they and other successful mega-churches could help with public education too. We’ve proposed just a 1% tax on profits taken in by just the top 1% of the most profitable mega-churches and televangelists in Texas. They can easily afford it.
Not the small, poor churches we hear about so much. This is not an idea to harm or hinder any churches in their operations. We feel that giving churches blanket tax-exempt status is giving them a special privilege. The overwhelming financial success of some of those churches has some economists standing in awe. The idea isn’t new, and it isn’t going away, as long as Texas’ children have a grossly inferior system of education, a financial balance like this is needed.
Studies show that our state is lagging behind in education very badly, and knowing that the current legislature with the Texas governor are working hard together, it’s clear that spending cuts will happen before any tax increases or new taxes are implemented. So without that normal financial balance, Texans are considering alternatives. This is one idea for an alternative that could solve the issue of insufficient tax funds.
As unusual and unpopular as this type of idea is, it just needs to be said again, loudly. And for those who feel that a church tax would invite churches and religious activists into the public schools, the legislature, and other areas of secular government existence: too late. They’re already well established in those institutions, which is one reason why we have a state/church separation movement. They just need to pay their admission fee, finally. It would really help the people of Texas.
So... they don't want to tax the 'small, poor churches' just those that large churches that need to 'pay their admission fee'.
No word on how they would decide which churches are poor and which ones are rich.
They've vowed to protest every weekday outside the Texas capitol until lawmakers take action.
What do YOU think? Should churches be taxed? Why or why not? And regardless of your answer to that question... do you think laws will ever be changed to require churches to pay taxes?
Todd
Those labels are going away in 2011.
According to a report in Christianity Today, LifeWay had been thinking of getting rid of the labels for some time. They thought they would help readers, but just became controversial and ended up being “more trouble than they were worth.”
In the end, according to Chris Rodgers, LifeWay’s director of product standards and customer relations, “We should all read everything with discernment."
What do you think? Should LifeWay continue or discontinue the “Read with Discernment” program? And since they are a Southern Baptist owned store, what SHOULDN’T they sell (if anything)?
]]>
1. The Catholic Church: 68.1 million, up 1.49 percent.
2. Southern Baptist Convention: 16.2 million, down 0.24 percent.
3. The United Methodist Church: 7.8 million (U.S.), down 0.98 percent.
4. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints: 5.9 million (U.S.), up 1.71 percent.
5. The Church of God in Christ: 5.5 million, no change.
6. National Baptist Convention, U.S.A., Inc: 5 million, no change.
7. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America: 4.6 million, down 1.62 percent.
8. National Baptist Convention of America, Inc.: 3.5 million, no change.
9. Assemblies of God: 2.9 million, up 1.27 percent.
10. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.); 2.8 million, down 3.28 percent.
Any thoughts?
Todd
]]>You can read Brian’s thoughts here…
I know that many who are reading this right now are, unfortunately, in inwardly-focused churches. And you’re fighting like mad to change that.
What do YOU think of Brian’s assessment? What would you add or take off of the list.
And when is it ok for a church to be inwardly focused?
Todd
]]>“I’ve gone for 30 years now,” he wrote, “and in that time I have heard something like 203,000 sermons. But for the life of me, I can’t remember a single one of them. So, I think I’m wasting my time and the pastors are wasting theirs by giving sermons at all.”
OK… let’s have your best answer…
Todd
]]>I admit… I a tech geek, and am always trying out the new things. (Full disclosure, I’m also a streaming NetFlix guy).
What I’m finding is that I can watch just about anything on demand.
Another full disclosure… I also have a Roku, which I absolutely LOVE.
In fact, Using Roku to stream Hulu and NetFlix to my TV is really unbelievable.
Just about the only thing that I can’t get that I get on satellite is the live news channels and sports (wouldn’t miss the sports, but would miss the news).
Another cool feature of the Roku is the custom channels… especially the ones that churches (like Northland, A Church Distributed and LifeChurch.tv) have developed. HD streaming of some of the best church services and preaching in the country for free (after you purchase the $99 Roku) is really, really cool.
OK… so maybe you’re not as much of a tech geek as I am… but what are you testing out, tech-wise, that you’re really liking these days?
Todd
]]>Take a look at their vision for the next 5 years. It’s good stuff.
Here’s just part of it:
Read more at Tim Steven’s LeadingSmart.com blog.
]]>