HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

92% of Senior Pastors Consider Themselves Effective

Orginally published on Wednesday, March 08, 2006 at 1:00 PM
by Todd Rhoades

EffectiveFrom Barna.org

(Ventura, CA) – More than nine out of every ten Senior Pastors of Protestant churches – 92% - now consider themselves to be effective leaders. This is a dramatic increase since 2001, when less than three-fourths of all Senior Pastors deemed themselves to be effective leaders.

But another striking finding from the new research conducted by The Barna Group is how few Senior Pastors believe that they are effective at strategic  leadership. While a large majority contends that they are gifted at motivating people, only one out of every seven Senior Pastors (14%) say that they are effective at thinking and acting strategically.

In most cases, if there is a strategic leader in the leadership mix of a church, it is either a staff person or a lay leader. Because less than one out of every five Protestant congregations employ ministry staff, that means most of the strategic leadership in churches must come from congregants.

Challenges Regarding Strategic Leadership

The Barna studies also indicated that more often than not, the strategic leader is mistakenly perceived to be a manager and gets assigned to overseeing details rather than anticipating and planning for potential opportunities and challenges. This occurs because few pastors understand the different types of leaders – directing, strategic, team-building and operational – and how to best operate in a team-based environment with them. Consequently, pastors are inclined to attribute the overt characteristics of strategic leaders – such as their attention to detail, their desire for efficiency and their insistence upon careful organization – to be the marks of a manager.

The attributes that are often criticized or misdiagnosed include their critical manner (which reflects their innate perfectionism), their demanding nature (resulting from their need for truth and integrity), and their need to plan everything (as a result of their analytical drive). Sometimes they are deemed to lack faith in God because of their proclivity to plan for every contingency.

In many churches, those who possess the strategic leadership aptitude are questioned as to their leadership abilities because their approach to leading is so different from that of the Senior Pastor – who, in most cases, is a Directing leader. The Directing leader majors on motivation, empowerment, resource acquisition and vision casting – all areas that Strategic leaders realize are critical to success, but which are skills not among their dominant competencies. The best situation is when a Directing and Strategic leader work in tandem to pursue a shared vision. Sadly, the research indicates that Strategic leaders are more likely to be dismissed as too critical, overly analytical, and impersonal to be given the chance to create innovative strategies and plans for ministry expansion and impact.

Implications for Ministry

The research conducted by The Barna Group discovered some interesting correlations between the absence of a Strategic leader and the condition of a local church. First, churches without a pastor, staff member or key elder in a recognized strategic leader position tend to remain numerically small. Such churches average fewer than 100 adults in weekly attendance. Second, these are churches that are significantly behind the curve in adopting new approaches to ministry. One example is the failure to embrace new technological tools for ministry. That condition is partly a result of the budget limitations attributable to limited attendance, but also relates to the narrower thinking common to such ministries. Third, churches that do not esteem and release the strategic abilities of these leaders are more likely to be in a constant state of crisis due to the failure to anticipate foreseeable problems that ultimately hinder the ministry. The absence of a Strategic leader typically produces more restricted analysis of situations and less effective problem-solving skills within the leadership ranks of the church.

Addressing the Need

The importance of finding and incorporating the skills of a strategic leader were amplified by George Barna, who has conducted research regarding leadership for more than two decades. “No single individual can provide the full extent of leadership competencies required by a complex organization, such as a church. The most effective organizations blend the talents and views of the four types of leaders into an effective team, usually driven by the Directing leader but greatly enhanced by the special gifts of the other three types of leaders.”

The author of a half-dozen books about leadership, Barna also noted, “Strategic leaders refuse to jump on the bandwagon of the latest and greatest fads, which sometimes makes them seem stodgy or disinterested. They rarely get caught up in the enthusiasm of ideation sessions and initially blanch at the level of risk that is required by the emotional decisions promoted by fellow leaders. In the end, though, the contribution of the Strategic leader is profound. They bring balance, wisdom and well-conceived plans to the process. On their own, Strategic leaders are ineffective. But when they are a valued member of a dynamic team, they enhance the leadership of their colleagues and the impact of their organization.”


This post has been viewed 185 times so far.


 TRACKBACKS: (1) There are 9 Comments:

  • Posted by Brad

    Great post! I have found that many people misunderstand or misinterpret strategically wired individuals. It’s great for Barna to be affirming the need for different leadership types in churches. Thanks!

  • Posted by

    I read the foreword or beginning of a book a couple of years ago, something about flyfishing and fellowship and friends or something like that and it astonished me.

    The author or commentator on the author stated the church was growing like wild fire, all across the board, small groups, discipleship classes, attendance, conversions, everything.

    I couldn’t help but think what my pastor said when I discipled with him.... “The world will go the way the church first goes”

    Meaning, even though all this practical growth (ie. effectiveness) was taking place, the world wasn’t really changing.  In fact, the church is.

    Divorce among believers is equal to or greater than unbelievers.  Addictions, manifistations of blantant sin and even gross and open rebellion (like the BTK) are also very prevalent in the church and even in the leadership (BTK).  etc.

    Which brings to mind Jesus talking about salt losing it’s saltiness.  I wonder if Our Lord could have been talking about this false premise.  It would tie into the “Lord Lord” Scripture as well as the “love of many will grow cold”.

    It is all related isn’t it?  I mean if we’re really being 92% effective wouldn’t there be allot less fornication, adultry, pornography, murdering, lacivisciness (sp)?  or are we deceiving ourselves into thinking we are doing what is Right and True because I mean… “look at the numbers” surely the numbers tell the story.

    Could it be we’re doing what WE (autonomously) think is right and not necessarily what God has Exactly Called us to do?

    I ask because millions have bought rocks and called them pets, everyone knows what “can you hear me now” means and many of us remember growing up with “where’s the beef"… they are all VERY slick marketing campaigns to sell possibly questionable items.

    Have we been deceived into marketing plans being the reason for the numbers and a “culturally relavent” (read that “NEW") message to keep them coming back and make conversions (sales) as the right and true fable?

  • Posted by

    [Meaning, even though all this practical growth (ie. effectiveness) was taking place, the world wasn’t really changing. In fact, the church is].

    That is so True!  Think about it, is the World getting more like the church, or is the Church getting more like the World?

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    I think the problem, Kent, is not the church becoming more like the world, but rather the church being ineffective within the world it is placed in.

    I know that you’d love to point the finger at the churches you consider ‘worldly’; but in many cases it is these churches that actually ARE effecting change in their communities.

    You have to be careful when painting with a broad brush in this areas about churches… but I think that at least some of today’s church’s ineffectiveness is because we quite frankly don’t know how to relate to the fornicators, adulterers, and sinners that we try (many times very lamely) to reach.

    Todd

  • Posted by

    [but I think that at least some of today’s church’s ineffectiveness is because we quite frankly don’t know how to relate to the fornicators, adulterers, and sinners that we try (many times very lamely) to reach].

    I’ll agree with that.

    But when the church’s statistics among professing believers are increaingly as BeHim pointed out in the following statement; [Divorce among believers is equal to or greater than unbelievers. Addictions, manifistations of blantant sin and even gross and open rebelion], it doesn’t take a rocket science degree to see who is being molded to the greater degree and in what direction.

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    Sure… for once we are in agreement.  Maybe I read something into your post (from your other posts) that you were placing the blame on the churches who you would consider worldly (the SS, Granger-style churches).  Those churches are in the minority.  There is no doubt that there is a huge problem with the American church today.  I’m with you there!

    Todd

  • Posted by Robert

    You know, this brings up something interesting.  Has anyone looked up to see what the statistics on these things… like divorce is among denominations… or between seeker style churches and fundamentalist churches or charismatics… I’m just curious if one stream has a better handle on this or if it is across the board.

  • Posted by

    92% of Senior Pastors Consider Themselves Effective

    Well according to one other poll, pastors thought their congregations were ok. If we were to ask them, the answer might be closer to 29%.

    Point of view is the true test of effectiveness.

    I know that I am 100% effective all the time… just ask my wife!

  • Posted by

    Maybe they should be graded by their associate pastors. That would most likely be more accurate.

  • Page 1 of 1 pages

Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: