HOME | CHURCH JOB OPENINGS | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT US

image

Calvin College Losing Professors Over the Issue of Church Membership

Orginally published on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 at 7:41 AM
by Todd Rhoades

If you're on the tenure track at Calvin College, you must attend a church within the college's denomination. When one African American (who was hired to teach race and gender relations) decided she felt more at home in a church from a different denomination, the college had a situation on their hands.

According to MLive.com, "Denise Isom, the associate professor who last fall was the center of a church membership controversy at Calvin College, now says she's leaving the school because of it. The fallout also includes Susan Hasseler, associate dean of the department, who will become a dean at Messiah College near Harrisburg, Pa., and Rachel Reed, an assistant professor, who has not found another position.

"I resigned in protest and made sure the college understood that with two letters," said Reed, who now manages the three grants awarded to her. "To stay would send the message that I think it's OK to treat people this way. I felt I had no choice other than to resign."

The Calvin board in October denied Isom’s appeal for an exemption to Calvin’s rule that professors on a tenure track attend a church with ties to the CRC.

Isom, who is black, said she tried CRC churches, but felt most at home at Messiah Missionary Baptist Church, a Grand Rapids congregation that is predominantly black.

“I’m sad for this situation, and it’s been very difficult for me,” said Isom, 42. “I’d love to see faculty, staff and students continue to push on this. Maybe this difficult moment will be part of the move to the future.”

Calvin Provost Claudia Beversluis said she hoped to find a way to keep Isom on campus, but Isom said that probably would have removed her from tenure consideration, so it was best for her to find another job.

“I believe that the Calvin administration and board made a huge error in their decision about Denise Isom’s exception request,” Hasseler said. “It is essential to the Reformed mission of Calvin College to do everything possible to keep committed Christian scholars of color like Denise. She is truly irreplaceable.”

Isom had been recruited from Chicago through a fellowship to attract minorities to Calvin.

You can read the whole article here.

Are the days of demanding a college employee attend one of an approved list of churches over?  Is this a reasonable request from the college?  And, if it was in the contract of the employee, is it wrong to expect her to abide by her agreement?


This post has been viewed 738 times so far.



  There are 9 Comments:

  • Posted by Kevin Bussey

    If it is in your contract then you must abide by it.  If you don’t want to go to one of the denominations churches then don’t take the job.

  • Posted by Andy Wood

    Agreed.  That said, the whole issue of the relationships between schools (K-PhD) and their sponsoring churches or denominations is one of curious interest.  I wonder how often these rules are enforced or demanded out of conviction, and how often they’re out of expediency.  In this situation, for example, what if Calvin College can no longer retain quality faculty?  Will it develop a more lenient posture?

    School, like individuals, often make their decision, not because they’ve seen the light, but because they’ve felt the heat.

  • Posted by

    I guess I’m just wondering exactly what the reasoning is behind the rule in the first place?  Are they just certain that “their churches” are all in line and teaching the same doctrine?  Are other churches completely out of line with that doctrine or would some meet their criteria?  In short, why is this necessary?

    I can understand that a Christian school would want teachers to attend church faithfully, and can even see that they would want that church’s doctrine to line up with what they teach, but outside of that just don’t quite get it.

    As for the other part of the question - it was in the contract so it’s understood up front that this is part of the deal.  Perhaps an exception can be made or not, but it was spelled out on the contract. Is it unreasonable to request this?  I don’t know.  Apparently she was able to find other employment so it wasn’t stopping her from working.  Sounds like the school is losing out more than she is on this deal, especially with some press attention to it now.  And yes, I agree with Andy’s comments that sometimes we don’t see the light, but feel the heat.  I’m guilty of that as much as anyone else.

  • Posted by Randy Ehle

    This is similar to the Wheaton prof issue - if you sign a contract that says you’ll do something, then decide not to do it, then the contract is violated and terminated.  A question may be raised over whether the instructor initially signed the contract as a non-tenure track professor; if so, I wonder if the move to tenure track stipulates a change in or renegotation of the contract. 

    As for whether ...the days of demanding a college employee attend one of an approved list of churches [are] over, I doubt it.  There will always be schools whose convictions include some type of association with or separation from (fill in the blank).  How to handle those requirements will involve varying degrees of integrity; for example, I was recently talking with one graduate of a Southern Baptist seminary that gave a significant tuition break to members of SB churches.  This person (and some others) couldn’t find a SB church anywhere near the school that had a conservative theology, so their response was to form their own SB church.  That’s probably not the best reason to start a new church, <i>imo<i>.  Other responses may be to quietly ignore, openly defy, calmly try to change the rule, etc.  But the situation won’t soon pass.

  • Posted by Brian Jones

    My two cents…

    Honestly, this is the practice in just about every evangelical college I’ve ever interacted with. It’s"industry standard” if you will, as it is contractual.

    While I understand this professor’s need for spiritual and cultural affinity (Calvin is a pretty homogeneous place), she knew the rules going into it and shouldn’t have kicked up dirt on the way out.

    It’s hard to raise $ for a school from a denomination’s core constituency when the professors aren’t loyal to that same group.

  • Posted by kent

    I understand the contractional issues. I may understand the need to demonstarte loyalty to the constituency of faculty to the chruch at large. But I struggle with that.

    Which is perferrable, the best possible faculty for the school orthose who will toe the party line? I believe ti is a bad policy. Our denomination school does not requirethat the teachers attend one of our churches. We do require that they are followers of Christ but whether or not attend a certain congregation. is not an issue. I also doubt that the rank and file of our tribe knows or cares wherethey worship.

  • Posted by bishopdave

    I went to denominational college and seminary, and there was no doubt that one (faculty or admin employees) had to be active members of the denominational churches. It did in fact, I think, create a shallower gene pool. While we were never tainted with the evils of liberal faculty, except for reading assignments we weren’t exposed to much outside the tradition.

  • Posted by

    Did Dr. Isom know of the requirement in the contract to be a member of the Christian Reformed Church?  Most definitely.  Did she fully know how closed a society the CRC can be and how much she would be viewed as “the other” and would never be offered a worship environment or church family in the CRC that would be sanctuary?  She probably had no way of knowing that. Does Calvin truly want to reform the world, or does it simply want to gate off its own little corner of it?

  • Posted by

    Maybe there is a deeper reason for this event.  I do believe that a peron should agree and abide by predisclosed rules or to gracefully move to another ministry.  I also believe a person should live out their conviction.  Then there must be another purpose.  I believe that maybe an internal look should be takes as to why there has not been a great effort to start a church in the vicinity of your school.  Are there no African-Americans w/i your denomination to help students of color to practice the reformed faith and conviction without denying theirculture and ethnic uniqueness.  Uniqueness is not wrong always, just different.

    I am not CRC but am an African-American who was the first to be hired as a full time professor at Dallas Bible College.  I thank God that men of God like Dr. Doiron never made me conform since I was called of God to Pastor.  I found very few points of contention betwen being Baptist and the Bible/Fellowship Church movement.  I never received anything less that superior evaluations from Administration or students.  The Church I pastored had a great diversity and some of the faithful members were actually the children of some Pastors of the largests churches in Dallas.

    Crc, is the Lord telling you to really embrace a multi-cultural ministry by mission work and the establishing a church that would allow and recrit minorities.  Choosing to be around people that you are more easily able to identify with is neither wrong or sinful.

    Dr JB Rodgers

  • Page 1 of 1 pages

Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: