HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME


image

“Let’s Face It… We’re Not Changing the World”

Orginally published on Thursday, December 28, 2006 at 1:39 PM
by Todd Rhoades

Here's an interesting quote from , CEO of (the giant computer company) recently featured in the magazine "". "Let's face it, we're not . We're building a product that helps people buy more crap and watch more porn." At least he's being honest...

I wonder how many of us as church leaders are being honest.  Our job IS to change the world.  Are we making a dent?  Or are we spending too much time keeping our internal systems humming along nicely and catering to those already in the Kingdom.  (Don’t get me wrong; discipleship is important and we need to do more of that too).

So, here’s a question for you as you end 2006:  What is your church doing to change the world (or at least your corner of it)?  Be honest.

About the Author: Todd Rhoades is the Managing Editor and Publisher of MondayMorningInsight.com (MMI as most of us know it). Besides spending a good amount of time maintaining this website, Todd is on the staff of Leadership Network, helping large churches to better connect, innovate, and multiply what they do best. Todd was also the founder of ChurchStaffing.com, until he sold the site in 2005. Todd lives with his wife, Dawn, and four children in Bryan, OH. He can be reached at .

TAGS:  ,


This post has been viewed 2259 times so far.


  There are 16 Comments:

  • Posted by Andrew Cairns

    Actually, I’m not all that sure that our job is to change the world. That’s a nice sentiment, but far from biblical.

    Our job, according to the Scriptures, is to love God and each other (especially the Bretheren) and in so doing validate for non-believers the message of the Gospel we proclaim. Even God is not about “changing the world” but bringing to salvation those who will believe (and according to Jesus that’s not a large percentage).

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    Andrew,

    You’re just using different language than I would.  Would you not agree that as people learn to love God and are introduced to the gospel they will in fact change the world around them?  If not; then much is in vain. 

    Maybe I should have said changing lives, rather than changing the world.

    Todd

  • Posted by

    Changing lives is our metric. It’s what we measure here. It’s our motto “Reaching people changing lives”. It’s our mission. It’s what we celebrate…

    But I agree that we don’t do it. We reach people, God changes lives. We get to be part of it. A lot more rewarding than selling hard drives it seems…

    You’re right, Todd. It is how we should measure things, and we should be honest about it.

  • Posted by Andrew Cairns

    Hey Todd,

    No, I disagree. I don’t think the Biblical record shows much change in the world around them at all. Amongst the believers and their families it certainly did, but outside of that the persecution only ever increased and the ‘worldly’ continued in their corrupt ways. The Church never has been anything other than a minority of the population and never has demonstrated any capacity whatsoever to “change the world”.

    That’s because we are not called to change the world, but to come out from it! Your comment “If not; then much is in vain” demonstrates my point. God is not interested in “fixing” the sinful. Israel was always to be ‘apart’ from the world and never to change them. Instead, their role was to act as a beacon for God. The Church is likewise not intended to be an agent for social action, but rather a set-apart (ie; holy) community of those removed from the corruption of the fallen. By the way we love each other the sinner may come to accept the Gospel.

    In any case, none of us can change a single life--if not our own then certainly not someone else’s--for that is the sole capacity of God Himself. Nothing we can do, in and of itself, can change one thing.

    As for pastors/congregants swapping internal administration for evangelism in the community and demonstrating God’s love where before they only knew selfishness ... I’m all for THAT!

  • Posted by

    Andrew writes [I don’t think the Biblical record shows much change in the world around them at all. ]

    Uhh… Pentecost?

  • Posted by Andrew Cairns

    Exactly Peter. What change was there? Pentecost saw the beginning of severe persecution, martyrdom, the forced dispersal of the Church, etc, etc. That is, the world did not change.

    What did change was THE CHURCH (which is my point). God is not about changing the world, but US. The Holy Spirit empowers us to do what we have been called to do: go wherever He leads, proclaim the Gospel, make disciples of Christ and actively work out our love for God in the way we love other people (especially other Christians). That’s it. No mention of changing the world there.

    And this is where I leave the discussion to others. I’m happy to debate theology but I don’t want to be perceived as a crank. BTW, I’m a former Pentecostal pastor of some years’ experience, now enjoying a Reformed church which embraces the Holy Spirit’s active ministry today, and not at all “anti” as that comment seems to suggest.

    In love,

  • Posted by

    Thanks Andrew.

    Pentecost changed the world forever, within four centuries, those who called themselves Christ-followers were the dominant religion in the world. I don’t think you’re a crank btw…

    The original post was, I think, about examining what we are doing in the church, a great thing to do, imho. Churches I’ve been in that didn’t floundered and failed. Churches I’ve been in that did… didn’t flounder… didn’t fail…

  • Posted by Daniel

    Andrew and Todd.  Would you both agree that our ‘job’ (I’d rather say ‘calling’) is to manifest God’s Reign (allowing the Spirit to work God’s ‘magic’, as it were, by sanctifying us--conforming us in every way to the image of the Son), and that God uses this to destroy the work of the enemy?  The new Israel in Christ (a.k.a. the Church) is a city on a hill which radiates Christ’s beauty and holiness.  The more we submit to God, the more the Spirit transforms us and our works.  The more our works are manifested in the world (e.g. acts of kindness, service, love, sacrifice, non-violence, etc.), the more the Body shines, and the more ‘outsiders’ are baptized into the fold.  Do both of you not agree that the Kingdom will one day fill the universe?  Christ’s glorious Reign will be manifested from one end of the cosmos to the other.  Whatever is not conformed to his image will be eradicated.  As disciples, we are co-laborers in that entreprise.
    Is this a fair synthesis of what both of you have been saying?  Andrew emphasizes the ‘smallness’ of our work (we don’t “fix” the world’s problems, rather, as a Body, we submit to Christ’s headship) and Todd emphasizes the globalness of its scope (the Spirit works through us to draw the whole world to Christ through the power of self-sacrificial love).  These need not be contradictory.
    -Daniel- grin

  • Posted by Andrew Cairns

    Okay, now THIS will be my last post! smile

    Peter: A very famous revolutionary once said, “It’s hard to remain revolutionary when you’re in government.” (At least that’s what I’d have liked one of them to say!) In other words, are we sure that what we’ve seen in the “established church” is that which Christ intended to establish in His Church? Jesus said only a few would take the narrow path, so arguably church growth is NO measure of anything worthwhile.

    Peter: Examining what we do in church is an outstanding thing to do. But please remember that unless God called you to be the shepherd you have very limited rights assess his performance and/or to suggest which paddocks and at what times the sheep need to be moved. Remember also that we’re to examine who we are and what we do IN THE LIGHT OF SCRIPTURE and not against any other measure (even if, in our own opinion, the world would be a better place if everyone believed and worshiped as we do).

    Daniel: I’m not into Latter Rain, Third Wave and Dominionism, thanks all the same. Christ’s reign will indeed fill everything at some point, but NOT while the Church exists in its present form on this present earth. What you’ve written could have come from any Gnostic text at all ... not convincing.

    And so, to quote a little book we like to read at this time of year, “to all a good night.”

  • Posted by Daniel

    I had never heard of Latter Rain, Third Wave or Dominionism before… so I had to look them up.  I’m not a part of them either as it turns out!
    As I understand it, Gnosticism emphasizes ‘secret’ knowledge and tends to vilify (or at least ignore) physical things (because spiritual things are supposedly ‘better’).  In what way was my post Gnostic?
    I fear differing eschatologies may be at play here.  I am much indebted to NT Wright and Andrew Perriman, and consequently have a very ‘open-ended’ eschatology.  Christ’s Kingdom fills the Earth in the fullness of time--and that’s as detailed as it gets for me.  I have no reason to think that the Church isn’t the primary means by which this is accomplished.  Even if this isn’t the case, as disciples we are called to be sanctified and to serve (in other words, to love God and to love others).  This changes the world.  Even if it’s only in ‘small’ ways.
    My two cents.
    -Daniel-

  • Posted by Leonard

    It is sort of funny (in a sad kind of way) to have a conversation on whether we are supposed to be changing the world when the cost of dying in sin without Christ is hell. 

    Church history does indeed indicate that the world has been changed by Christianity.  Printing, education, science, medicine, social justice, slavery are just some ways.  The Christian influence upon the West has had huge impact upon the world.  Nations, ideologies and morals are all measured to some degree against a backdrop of the influence of Christianity.  The savagery of the European countries was radically impacted by Christianity.  To say Christianity has not changed the world is just silly in my opinion. 

    As for the question in Todd’s post.  In the last 2 years our family of churches has build 20 or so houses in Mexico plus a huge orphanage.  We have build a battered women’s shelter in our county, build a 3 story hospital/clinic in Nigeria, built a Mobile Medical Clinic in North India. Rehabbed inner city schools playgrounds, renovated homes in our community, renovated a church in another city, planted 7 churches, given a couple hundred thousand dollars towards Aids in Africa, over 100,000 help to Hurricane Katrina relief, plus sever hundred volunteers to help and over 120,000 to Tsunami relief too.  On top of this we have supported missionaries, fed the homeless and between the 7 churches over 22,000 people celebrated the birth of Christ with us this Christmas Eve.  All in all, Pretty cool and Thank you JESUS for being worth it.

  • Posted by

    I would keep the original language - changin the world. The world is not an abstract entity, it is the united collection of individuals and we are called to change these individual people who are connected with others. Have we been successful? Debatable. Have we ever been successful? I do not know, and I do not think it matters to how I function. I am called to the here and now.

    How I am doing in Naperville, IL Not well. I can some small comfort that I do not make stuff that helps other buy crap and watch porn ,but beyond that we have not changed the environment of our little corner of the world. But we have not given up nor shall we.

    I claim Gal. 6:9. I will not grow weary of well doing and if I do not faint, then may be, prayerfully we will impact our community.

    In response to Andrew, I do think Jesus intended change, why else be witnesses inj Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and to the ends of the earth?

  • Posted by Ken

    The Great Commission implies that our mission is to change the world, or if you prefer, that Jesus would change the world through us.

    I am part of a very small church in the Northeast that is far too inwardly focused. And yet even at this church, we are making a difference in the community: taking care of one another’s needs, visiting those who are lonely, giving kids a chance to hear the gospel through some programs, doing work projects, and so forth.

    It seems we often have discussions about “not doing enough.” And it’s easy to wring our hands because the Christian media outlets focus on changing our nation - or world - in politically observable ways. Yet this kind of discussion can tend to overlook the positive difference every faithful church makes in its local community.

    As an example, think of all the churches that sent work teams down to New Orleans. This won’t make the newspapers, but the world is truly a better place as Christians exercise their faith OUT of the spotlight.

    So—from someone at a church of 50 people I say, let’s rejoice in what God is doing!

  • Posted by

    I’m not sure our church is at the place where they yet know their God or themselves well enough to change their world.  It’s what we are working towards and I see glimmers of hope in that quarter, but not actively happening as a church body.

    I have seen individual lives touched and changed one on one through personal relationships in our community.  People who have recognized their need for a Savior, through one on one ministry.  (52 this year and two more just this week).

    I think if that’s what God can do with 4 people committed to changing their personal world and community (my husband and I and one other couple) what could he do with our entire church?

    That’s my prayer for this year… that our church as a whole would becoming a passionate, outwardly focused body of believers.

  • Posted by

    I think his point is not are we changing the world but what are we changing it to.  Many false religions change lives so is that the metric.  No, it is the object of that change.  Too bad churches are making redefinitions away from God’s definition of change.

  • Posted by

    Quite a pithy conversation.  I look at it like this: we are surrounded by a storm (the world) and so many people (the unsaved) are being drenched. Now, we (the church) can try to stop the storm, or offer those stuck in it shelter under our umbrella (the unconditional love of God).  Translation: I can’t change the world, but I can offer people who are being destroyed by the world my love and the love of my savior. Does that end up changing the world? I guess I’ll let larger minds than mine figure that out. Peace.

  • Page 1 of 1 pages

Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: