HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

Los Angeles Times Details Fallout Between Chuck Smith and his Pastor Son

Orginally published on Thursday, September 14, 2006 at 10:00 AM
by Todd Rhoades

For Pastor Chuck Smith, the big issues are undebatable. For Chuck Smith Jr., also a pastor, it's not so crystal clear. Something had to give. This Los Angeles Times article reveals some of the details between Calvary Chapel founder Chuck Smith; and his son, Chuck Jr. that let to the son leaving the denomination his dad started...

From his pulpit in Santa Ana, Chuck Smith’s voice thunders with certainty. He denounces homosexuality as a “perverted lifestyle,” finds divine wrath in earthquakes and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and promises imminent Armageddon in a deep, sure voice.

If his message is grim, the founder of the Jesus People and the Calvary Chapel movement bears the ruddy good cheer of a 79-year-old believer who insists he has never known a day’s doubt or despair.

From the pulpit of Capo Beach Calvary, 25 miles south of his father’s church, Chuck Smith Jr.’s voice trembles with vulnerability and grapples with ambiguity. Without a trace of fire and brimstone, he speaks of Christianity as a “conversation” rather than a dogma, plumbs such TV shows as “The Simpsons” for messages, and aims to reach “generations of the post-modern age” that distrust blind faith and ironclad authority.

There is a tradition among superstar evangelists like Chuck Smith the elder of bequeathing the pulpit to a son. Billy Graham did it, as did Robert H. Schuller.

However, it has been ages since anyone considered the younger Smith a possible successor to his father’s 15,000-congregation ministry, the symbolic center of a network of independently run Calvary churches: about 1,000 across the United States, including two of the three largest non-Roman Catholic churches in California, plus radio and TV ministries.

Instead, critics whispered that the son was a dangerous impostor. Last year, those whispers exploded into a full-blown din. Online protests and fliers distributed at the younger Smith’s church demanded that he drop the “Calvary” name because of his increasingly liberal drift on such non-debatable issues as the evil of homosexuality and the promise of hell for unbelievers. “What will it take for Chuck Sr. to stop the nepotism?” blogged Calvary congregant Jackie Alnor, one of the critics leading the charge. “Does his son have to burn incense to Isis and Zeus before he is disfellowshipped from a Bible-believing fellowship of churches?”

By last spring, one thing had become clear to Smith Jr.: Sprawling as it was, the church his father had built — the place that once embraced a generation of drug-addled hippies and helped change the way many Americans worshipped — had little room left for him.

You can read the rest of the article here; then return to MMI to leave your comments…

Todd


This post has been viewed 4077 times so far.


 TRACKBACKS: (0) There are 106 Comments:

  • Posted by Heath Hiatt

    I’m in ministry with my dad, and it has been a slight strain on our relationship.  but we both decided long ago that we are father and son first and co-pastors second.  the situation here must be done gently and lovingly, but must be done.  I just hope each of them parts ways peacefully, and keeps the dad-son stuff the real focus.

  • Posted by Andy McAdams

    It’s amazing to me that Chuck Jr. is branded to have liberal leaning and called an imposter because of his desire to direct his message toward more positive life changes rather that hammer at lifestyle, and yet I heard almost nothing from that same denomination during the mess with Skip Heitzig at Calvary in Albuquerque NM.  Perhaps a stand was taken by some of the church’s main leaders and Chuck Sr. himself but I couldn’t find anything. 

    As I remember the beginning of Calvary Chapel and as one of those former “Jesus People” I can remember the call to a new height and the lack of finger pointing toward others that approached ministry differently.  I was refreshed as I sat and listened to Chuck at the Costa Mesa church (and tent) and was liberated from the entanglements of denominationalism and had the freedom to worship and love God from the heart.  It was a positive message.  A message that spoke to my heart where God was once again alive.  It was a message that never attacked those within the body, yet now it does so, within the family.  Sad!

    Seems things have changed in 30 years.

  • Posted by

    I’ve always had a problem with families dominating a single church or ministry. It’s the apparent lack of accountability to the congregation.

    Please don’t get me wrong, I’m not accusing any ministry of wrongdoing, but when the pastor is the President & CEO and the wife is the administrator and the son is the student pastor and the daughter is the children’s minister where is the accountability factor? All ministers need to be accountable to someone.

    In families there will always be arguments and disagreements and sometimes this will spill out into the operation of the ministry. Even worse when the sins of the son or father spill out and cause the ministry to stumble. There have been many examples of this in the past. The only thing that comes out of this is that it stains the cause of Christ to those who are watching.

    To use my church’s mission statement, “We need to be living proof of a loving God to a watching world.” How is having a single family control a ministry show proof that God is the difference when we won’t submit ourselves to the authority of others?

  • Posted by

    This is just a sad story.  I could give opinions about denominations and all that, but at the end of the day I’m seeing a father and son tearing apart.  Somehow I don’t think this is good for either of their churches.  Most importantly it’s not good for them.  Very sad.

  • Posted by eric

    First, it said Chuck Sr. and Jr. pastored only in the same movement not in the same church.

    Second, this is a perfect example of what is going on in the large scale for those who align themselves with the emerging church and those who do not. (I know there is some middle ground, but it IS a generalization). It just so happens this rift is within a family and being made public by the local paper.

    Third, this also shows what happens to a ministerial family when a minister put his ministry to his church above ministry to his family.

  • Posted by

    A statement near the end of the article says “The breakup with Calvary Chapel, as he [Chuck Jr.] sees it, was a good and inevitable thing. He wasn’t abiding by house rules, so it was only fair he go.” That was the best statement in the article.

    Too bad that Jr. didn’t simply go to his dad years earlier, once his differences with Calvary Chapel became clear, and say “let’s have our churches part ways without fanfare so that the parting doesn’t become divisive to the larger body and a distraction to those we both want to reach.” Or too bad dad, who had to have seen the writing on the wall years earlier, didn’t do the same.

    Although I think I would align more theologically and philosophically with Jr., his failure to take this step does disappoint me.  Yet . . . in the “family business” I know that’s a hard step to take.  It can only be more difficult now that so many of Chuck Sr.’s followers have campaigned against Jr., camps have been solidly formed and their parting has captured media scrutiny.  I think it should have been possible for these men who love one another to orchestrate a parting was much more kingdom focused.

    The LA Times painted Sr. as a judgmental, arrogant exclusivist and tyrant; and Jr. as completely loving and compassionate, but theologically and socially liberal, maybe even a universalist.  In all likelihood, neither is an accurate picture.

    Sad, very very sad.

    Wendi

  • Posted by

    It is interesting that those who preach tolerance seem to have the least amount of tolerance for those who disagree with their point of view. 

    This article really isn’t about the differences between a father and a son; it is a full scale attack on any type of Christianity that dares to say with certainty “thus says the Lord.” Chuck Smith Sr. is the latest whipping boy for the religious left to attack because he defies the sensibilities of the “common man” and preaches that Jesus is the “way the truth and the life and no one comes to the father but through him!”

  • Posted by Daniel

    Al… just wanted to point out that, if one trusts the article, the ‘intolerance’ seems to be coming from the Sr. (rather than the Jr.) side of the spectrum (no need to politicize this as ‘religious right’ and ‘religious left’ by the way, since nothing is said about politics).  You’re welcome to believe that non-fundamentalists spend their days looking for conservatives to be scandalized by, but I’m not sure you can do it from this article.
    Cheers,
    -Daniel-

  • Posted by

    I suspect that there is a lot less here than meets the eye… (Thanks for your comments Wendi, it saved me from having to type very much...)

  • Posted by

    Since I work for Pastor Chuck and my picture was on the front page of that LA Times story along with him, let me tell you that Chuck Smith is not a tyrant or intolerant. The man is loving and gracious and very faithful.

    Regarding his relationship with His son, that is really none of my business. I see the fruit of Pastor Chucks parenting by looking at the many years that his son has ministered in the same church. I have to believe that when a man raises up a son who becomes a minister for many years, He has done a fine job…

  • Posted by Daniel

    Ken--thanks for your input.  I certainly didn’t mean to make any character judgment on either pastor.  My comment was intended as a counterpoint to Al’s.  Perhaps I should have simply followed Wendi and Peter’s example and bit my tongue.
    Cheers,
    -Daniel-

  • Posted by

    Daniel if you don’t see the trend in the media today to attack anyone who dares stand for the simple biblical truth that Jesus is the only way, truth and life, then, my friend, I don’t know what to say.  It is always interesting to me that the Jr. was applauded for his “tolerance” and “open mindedness” to suggest that Jesus might not be the “only way,” while the Sr. was castigated for his “hard core” stands on Jesus Christ and the sin of homosexuality.  Believe me Daniel I don’t have a dog in this fight; I am sure God is blessing the Jr. as he has done the Sr.  I am making an observation that this has been the thrust of the MSM since prayer was kicked out of school, to tare down biblical pronouncements of truth with “commons sense” and “broader thinking.”

    Later,
    Al

  • Posted by Ed Vasicek

    Whether Chuck Sr. was right or wrong, I do not know, but my sympathies are with him.  In this age of relativism, the following verse may not as well be in the Bible:

    Matthew 10:37
    “Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.”

    Most people change the rules when it comes to family, and even a number of comments above seem to put family relationships at the top of the list, even ahead of God. Whether these issues are serious enough to break off fellowship may be a matter of debate, but for many Christians, NO matter is serious enough.  And that’s sad.

  • Posted by

    Ed, I have to disagree with you.  I don’t see any comments here suggesting anyone should put family before God.

    It was pointed out that we all have a responsibility to minister to our own families, and someone suggested perhaps Chuck Sr. put ministering to his church before ministering to his family, but that’s not the same as saying you should put family before God.

    I definitely see my responsibility for the spiritual needs of my family as greater than my responsibility to my church, but that doesn’t mean I put my family before God.

    The Apostle Paul said in 1 Tim 5:8, “But if any provide not for his own, and especially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” I’m not sure this is exactly what Paul was talking about but he does place an emphasis on family.

  • Posted by

    Maybe I’m missing something.  I dont’ see what’s so “SAD” about the article in terms of the ministry “split”.  The saddest thing to me as a son and a father is the fact that for years, the only guidance Jr was able to receive from Sr. for the most part was from the pulpit, or a book or on TV.  As a preacher’s son, I’m quite familiar with the problem of a pastor maintaining his ministry and being the “good guy” to everyone else, but really being clueless about how to relate to his son.  In spite of their history, though, it seems that they’ve been able to continue and perhaps even thrive relationally.  But, regarding the split, I don’t see a major father/son divide, just the recognition that Jr. certainly is not on the same page with the Calvary churches and therefore shouldn’t be associated with them, and really should be pleased to disassociate himself with them based on his current ministry direction.  And as far as the media coverage, I think it could be a wonderful thing for Southern California and the rest of the nation to see two men working toward the same essential goal (for others to know Christ) in different ways and instead of being diametrically opposed (as many of the church members seem to desire), they maintain their close, loving father/son relationship.  What an example that could be, not only to the polarized Church as a whole, but also to Washington DC and the rest of our political landscape.  How awesome is it that ALL things can work together for good for those who are in Christ.  Let’s pray that that will be the end result of this story.

  • Posted by

    I found it very interesting to read everyone’s comments.  I am in Wendy’s camp.  We attend Capo Beach Calvary.  (See we haven’t been using Calvary Chapel in our name for a long time.) We are not like CC now.  I understand what Chuck, Jr. is teaching.  I came from a very legalist fundmentalist church - The Foursquare Church.  Now I would have never gone to a church where people stood up and spoke in toungs because I was embarrased to bring my friends.  I couldn’t, at that time, been able to explain what was happening.  I do now and have the gift of toungs. I loved the fact that Chuck Sr. did not do not this.  I went there for a couple of years and got closer to God. I loved his teaching.  But Churches are full of human people and we all make mistakes.  As soon as I divorced my Husband (because he was abusing me.) We went to marriage councling.  I said what he did to me and this wonderful Christian counslor made a golf date with my abuser!  And on top of that, my Bible Study girlfriends never called me turned their back on me and told me I was following my worldly friends.  I tell you all of these personal things to make a point.

    The youth of today will not stand for anything phony.  They want the real Jesus like the kids in the 60’s wanted.  The loving, tender, caring, non-judgemental Jesus.  I believe that Chuck Jr.is teaching the same Jesus that his Father taught!  But he is doing so in their language.  That we can find Jesus in Art, Icons in the Catholic Church is only ART (we are not bowing and worshiping the art), Music. kids gave gone back almost to the folk singers of the 60’s. I love Rock!  Prayer. you can kneel or light a candle.  It’s only because you want to.  No one is telling you what can or can not do.  Chuck is teaching us to be real christians.  So you can see there is no break between Chuck, Sr. and Chuck Jr.  Chuck Sr. is coming to our church to talk on last two Thursdays of this Month (that could always change).  So if you are interested in hearing what The Man as to say at CBC come and hear it for yourself. 

    PS excuse my spelling, I am tired and I want to go to bed!  God bless you all.  Remember that the greatest comandment was Love or was it that Love your neighbor thing.  Oh I have to go to sleep.

  • Posted by

    It is really sad that the church as a whole has gotten away from it’s primary mission: The Great Commandment and The Great Commision.

    It is not the job of the church to judge others for their sin.  That is the job of the Holy Spirit.
    We are to preach that good news, nothing more.  Sermons on homosexuality, abortion, family values, gay marriage, the list goes on, is a pure sign of a church of judgementalism and legalism, neither of which are biblical.

    Love God, Love Everyone, Preach The Gospel, Make Disciples, Baptize.  That is the ONLY mission of the church.  Anything else is outside of none of your business, the pastor’s business, the denominations business, it’s ALL God’s Business, no matter how you choose to “interpret’ scripture.  Let the Holy Sprit have to job of conviction.  We need not preach “what” sin “is” or “isn’t”.  God loves everyone, it’s time the church started acting like it instead of.  Is homosexuality wrong?  Let the Holy Spirit convict.  Is abortion a sin? Let the Holy Spirit Convit, or not!  What we need in the church today is a return to God’s values, and the Bible is very clear about what those are, and they do not include judging others and being a legalist.  The question to be answered is this:  What is the mission of the church?  Think about it.
    What is sin for me, may not be sin for you.  Chewing gum.

  • Posted by Pastor Dave

    Truth is the basis for fellowship!

    Can two walk together unless they agree?

    Amen to the Sr!  Preach the truth!  OhMe to the Jr!  “A wandering star… a wavering soul… a wolf with itching ears” (if he condones homesexuality while he ridicules faith and authority).  I hope the article us unfare in its portrayal.

    Gini - on spelling . . . At least you were tired and have an excuse - Eye jus’ cain’t sppelll. . . grin

  • Posted by

    Pastor Dave and Peter D:

    Thanks for the joke on the “i can’t sppell...” I can’t either and I am just too lazy to use spell check.  I usually do this later at night so I am tired.

    But......

    I think you are being too hard on Chuck Jr.  I know him and know what he teaches as I have sit in his church for 15 years.  He has always told us to think for ourselves and do not take every thing he says at face value.  He explains his position on all subjects.  He wants us to be authnic Christians.  He wants us to be non-judgemental.  You know what, that is really hard for Christians.  They want little cookie cutter christians about their church. We let sinners (which we all are) into our church.  This includes the bikers, hippies, gays, the gothics...... How else are they going to hear the love of God and the sacrafice of Jesus for our sins?  We have Jesus in our hearts and we still sin, how can we you say a gay"s sin is worse than mine.  Sin is sin. or should I say - missing the mark (of perfection) is missing the mark. 

    I also believe that Catholics are christians.  They believe in Jesus Christ (the same Jesus), the trindity and the saving Blood of Jesus.  There are even Spirit Filled Catholic!  Some blogs have a hard time with that but just LOOK at the way Jesus lived his life.  Being with sinners and loving everyone!  What Jesus wanted us to do is sin no more but you know we all do and he wants us to TRY not to sin.

    Some Christians will be surprised at who will make it into Heaven and who won’t.  Don’t you know by now not to believe News Artilces.  Chuck Jr. does not cry and tremble when he teaches!  He does not toss aside the bible and he knows God his authority. CHUCK SMITH SR. IS COMING TO OUR CAPO BEACH CALVARY ON THURSDAY NIGHT AT 6:30PM IF YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM HIM.  God Bless.  Gini

  • Posted by Pastor Dave

    Gini - as long as we are calling the gay lifestyle sin - then AMEN - I can dialogue with you.  Gay’s are welcome to come to my church - and I will preach to them that they must repent of their sin of homosexuality… before God destroys them.  My sins are BIG sins too (and ultimately the wages of all sin is death - eternally) - but the timing and intensity of God’s wrath upon various types of sin (while we are still upon this planet) does indeed vary. 

    I disagree with anyone who wants to make sinners feel more comfortable in their sin… Not saying Jr. actually does that - he was accused of it though.

    And, I know - don’t trust the MSM.

    grin

  • Posted by

    II was saved at 18., grew up at the feet of Chuck Smith, Greg Laurie and Raul Ries. But after a while I noticed something that disturbed me. WE had an arrogance and pride about ourselves. We were the cool church, the with it church, we wore shorts and t shirts to church. We wore our freedom like a diamond ring. We were better than everyone else. Then one day, I shared this with a brother at CC. Soon I was the black sheep of our church.

    After 8 years I left CC, and church altogether. Then I realized that I needed to put my eyes on Jesus and not man.  Today I pastor a Non-Denominational church, and it is like pulliong teeth to even have lunch with a CC Pastor, let alone try to have one speak at your church. CC is a denomination that tries too hard to be exclusive. I feel for the the Smith Family and for the church in general.

  • Posted by

    Thank You Pastor Dave -

    Yes, I call it sin because the Bible calls it sin.  I do not see where you see different levels of sin?  Sin is sin.  If someone came to our church being gay and they received Christ.  We would not ask them to leave just because they are gay and did not change their life style but struggled with it.  I think this is where we differ.  Let me see if I understand what you are saying.  Would you say to that person because you have not stopped sinning you can not come to our church?  We do not tell couples (male and female) that they must stop living together or we will kick you out of our church.  Please, see what we do, is to give them the truth.  The Holy Spirit will convict them of their sin.  Do you not see that christians are getting a bad rap for not fellowshipping with gays?  We want to get them to continue to fellowship with christians.  We continue to pray for them but judge them no.  Some critize Chuck, jr. because he “allows too much sin in our church.” Where else can they go, but to God?  Where is the Love?  I love those who continue to sin beause I am one of them. 

    I worked in the beauty business for years and Accounting offices and have met many gays.  I like them.  They can be fun and the best girlfriend a girl could have.  I have watched a friend die from AIDS while christians sung praise songs over him.  I am sure I will see him in heaven.  I have no Heaven or Hell to send anyone to.  Our God is a great God and probably has more mercy and grace to give than we can imagine. 

    Pastor Rene - I understand what you are saying.  I too have left churches because I have been hurt by “christians”.  Just remember churches are made up of humans and there are NO perfect churches!  I agree that leaving was the right thing to do.  Keeping your eyes on Jesus is the most important thing to do.  Don’t get caught up in bashing the old church just move on.  Please don’t feel sad for Chuck and his Dad because they still have a great relationship.  Some people just can’t stand that thought.

    God Bless, again and may the love of Jesus be with you.  Gini

  • Posted by Pastor Dave

    Gini - you said, “We do not tell couples (male and female) that they must stop living together or we will kick you out of our church”

    Have you ever read I Corinthians 5 where the Bible says “It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you.. 2 And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you....  In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.”

    Yes - if they will not repent and change - they should be disciplined by the church.

    Are all sins equal - would you happily fellowship with a “Christian” pedophile, or a “Christian” canibal or a “Christian” racist.  It is true that God can forgive any sin - but he commands us to “...come out from among them, and be separate… and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.” (2 Co 6:17) I’m not trying to preach at you - just wondering were your open acceptance fits in the light of the scripture. 

    2Th 3:14 “And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.”

    Please don’t get angry with me - I do honestly want to know what you think about these things.  Homosexuality is an abomination to God and we are to hate what he hates.  Jr. should know that…

    Puzzled in MD,
    Pastor Dave

  • Posted by

    Oh, I was waiting for all the things you said to me Pastor Dave and I still love you.  I try not judge.  I do have relatives that hate blacks and use the N word.  I still love them but I would tell them ‘’what you say hurts my heart because I have black friends that I love.’’ No, I would not turn my back on those - how would they learn and yes I would countinue to fellowship with them.  Why?  Because how can they learn Jesus loves the black person?  and turn from their attitude (sin).

    Yes I would fellowhip with a couple that live together for the same reason.  I want them to see Jesus in the relationship that my Husband and I have.  I do not tell them it’s OK (I know what the bible says) but I encourage them to talk about marriage and see the beauty in marriage.  Believe me, you will see people change.  Let the Holy Spirit do the work he was designed for.
    I have been that girl and my life changed.  You do not want them to go out the door hateing Christians and NEVER going back to church.  Christianity can hurt people.  I believe they will come to understand how sacred marriage and why.

    I’m sorry but Christian Pedophile is an oxymoron.  You can’t be a christian and hurt children.  No I would not fellowship with him.  I would be too worried about our children in the church.  You see that type of sin could hurt some one.  I have never met a christian canibal.

    Let me ask you Pastor Dave, the last two were a little out there.  Are you saying that If I did not protect the church from bigots and unmarried people they would influence other to do what they are doing?  Why didn’t you just come out and say that?  Are you saying one apple will spoil the whole bunch?  If you try to kick out all that sin no one would be in your church!!

    I find it funny that homosexuals want to get “married” and our young people want to “live together?” Think about it.  Yes, you are correct about scripture - God hates sin but again I say he also hates gossipers and we all do that!  I don’t like this “hate the sin but love the sinner” we give to homosexuals.  I have heard so many throw that right back to the Christian right.  I ask you are we winning them to Christ????  NO!  We win more with love than we win with beating them over the head with scripture.  And screaming REPENT!!!  TURN OR BURN!!!

    So yes JR knows his bible very well.  He says go help the homosexual with Aids.  Baby sit for the couple that is not married.  Go out and DO SOMETHING for the hurting people of this world.  Do you get what I mean Pastor Dave.  In love, Gini

  • Posted by

    Gina –

    I’ve been reading with interest your conversation with Pastor Dave.  This morning you seem to be saying that there are certain sins which are personal and private and don’t hurt anyone but the person sinning.  I think this is a wrong view of sin.  Sin separates all of humanity and creation from God, who desperately loves the sinner.  That hurts the heart of God, and should hurt ours too.  When we sin our relationship with God is broken or compromised.  When we know that is the case with a brother or sister, to say “they are just hurting themselves,” is demonstrating our own hearts aren’t breaking over the hurt they are bringing to God’s heart.  Sin hurts, plain and simple.

    The passages Pastor Dave references about discipline of a brother or sister in sin assumes deep and devoted relationships between people. You are right that we must love people, but love includes admonishment and discipline.  As parents we know that it is not loving to allow our children to do anything and everything they please, leaving our parenting to nothing more than modeling (although modeling validates our words).  Sometimes we tell our children what they can and cannot do.  It should be the same in the relationships with people in our churches.  Build friendships, demonstrate devotion and love, earn the right to live in mutually accountable relationships.

    That said, I think the issue here between Chuck’s Jr. and Sr. responses to “societal sin” (homosexuality in particular) is driven home by my comments above.  I’ve had conversations with neither man so am making some big assumptions here.  However, my hunch would be that Sr. believes the church’s role is to point out sins of those outside the faith and be the keeper of societal morality.  My hunch would be that Jr. differs with his dad on that point, believing that the mandate for the church is to keep her own house and not the morals of those outside the faith.  That when it comes to the issues you and Dave have been discussing, it is right to talk about sin and challenge people to live pure and holy lives. But I believe that scripture teaches us that those discussions, especially difficult ones, must happen within the context of relationships.  Perhaps that is what you are saying also.

    Wendi

  • Page 1 of 5 pages

     1 2 3 >  Last »
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: