HOME | CHURCH JOB OPENINGS | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT US

image

Rick Warren Video:  Rick on Reveal and the new SBC Study…

Orginally published on Friday, April 25, 2008 at 8:01 AM
by Todd Rhoades

We had an opportunity to interview Rick Warren at the Exponential Conference yesterday. (Actually, I had to leave for the airport just before the interview started, but Scott Hodge and Chris Elrod managed to record it on for all of you). Rick had some really great things to say. He is very passionate about the Kingdom, and very proud of his church...

Scoll down to watch this video… NOTE:  you have to go in a couple minutes before Rick enters the room…

I’m working to chop this up a bit, but for now, here’s the raw footage.  Thanks go out to Scott Hodge and Chris Elrod, my partners in crime…


This post has been viewed 3491 times so far.



  There are 22 Comments:

  • Posted by travis Spencer

    Chris Elrod was reading my blog out loud at the beginning of this video. My little touch of fame with rick warren.

  • Posted by

    Really appreciate this excellent 40 minutes of teaching. Very insightful. My sincere thanks to Rick for taking the time to do the interview and thanks to you for asking great questions.

  • Posted by Camey

    “Come and see.” “Come and die.”

    This makes me think of what is happening at our physical church building this morning. There are students ages 13 to 19 spending their Saturday morning receiving training because they are committed to going on a mission trip this summer. They can’t just sign up two days before and pay their money and go. They have a checklist of things they have to complete before being able to go and do. It takes months to a year to complete this checklist. These students know how to share their faith because they learn how to.

    We are seeing students coming to Christ and they are being baptized due in part to our students and adults being ALIVE and PRESENT in our community. Not absent.... And yes… we are affliated with the SBC…

    And yes, I stand by my comment on the post about Ed’s news on the SBC. It is not about denominations or being non-denominational. We must simply stop being consumed with that and all the other nonsense that can bring about.

    If we are to be His body… Let’s start being His hands and feet and etc.... now.. today.. this moment.

  • Posted by

    He said towards the end that his goal is to trigger a second Reformation.  More of a “deeds, not creeds,” philosophy.  Something just doesn’t feel right about this one…

    --
    CS

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    CS,

    Funny, it feels totally right to me. Western Christians have been far too interested in believing the right things ABOUT Jesus or merely believing IN Jesus rather than believing JESUS and as a consequence believing the things that Jesus believed… the kind of faith that makes us do things and reorder our life.

    Far too many Western Christians do NOT have that faith. We need it. That is what RW is calling for.

  • Posted by

    Could only listen to about 15 minutes (darn, having a job always gets in the way).  What I did hear made it so clear that he is deeply committed to helping people find Jesus and grow into committed and fully functioning disciples.  Come and see to come and die . . . great words. 

    CS – I’m surprised that you take issue with deeds over creeds.  The pattern in your posts here at MMI seems to argue that there must be visible fruit (deeds) to authenticate people’s public commitment to belief in Jesus (creeds).

    I maintain that the first reformation was great, but incomplete.  It succeeded in giving the Word of God back to the people, but failed to fully give the ministry of the faith to the people of faith.  We need a second reformation and are heading toward it.

    Wendi

  • Posted by michaeldanner

    I appreciate the interview.  I heard Rick articulating more of a “Deeds AND Creeds” philosophy.  I think it would be short sighted to believe a focus on deeds will not impact our understanding of creeds.  We have to pay attention to both so we don’t lose orthodoxy as we add/emphasize orthopraxis.  But doing the things Jesus told us to do the way Jesus told us to do them is critical for the church.  I think that is what Rick is getting at.

    There is a lot in that 40 min. interview!

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    Perhaps our kind moderator will be good enough to nip the Rick-bashing in the bud on this thread.

  • Posted by

    Wendi:

    “CS – I’m surprised that you take issue with deeds over creeds.  The pattern in your posts here at MMI seems to argue that there must be visible fruit (deeds) to authenticate people’s public commitment to belief in Jesus (creeds).”

    Yes, I do believe in deeds authenticating creeds.  If we have mere beliefs and do not act on them, or they have not changed our lives to the point where we want to do things for Christ, it makes those beliefs pretty null.  A good chunk of the Book of James deals with this. 

    I do take issue with deeds OVER creeds, which is the sense of where I think things are going.  Many pastors recently have had this philosophy of, “It doesn’t matter what you believe just so long as you do something for Jesus.” Some of these pastors, like Steven Furtick, then go afterwards as far as making fun of people who want hermeneutics and doctrinal knowledge in their churches.  If we don’t have knowledge, our actions can be misguided.  If we don’t have actions, our knowledge is for nought.  Both must be put in play equally.  And, like I agree with Peter, many people for years have not followed this.

    With Rick Warren’s track record of taking Scripture out of context, using copious quantities of (bad) translations to jam in points, and saying many things that cannot be found in the Bible or run contrary to the Bible, frankly, I cannot trust him in leading an effort like this.  When I hear him use such words as a “Second Reformation,” my spider sense starts going pretty high.

    --
    CS

  • Posted by michaeldanner

    Just dealing with the interview (not Rick-bashing) I was a bit surprised to hear him say “Just show me a verse and I’ll...” referring to the women in ministry issue.  It raised the “proof text” red flag in my mind.  However,I’m not concerned with his (Rick’s) pragmatism - Father, Son and Spirit seem pretty pragmatic too.

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    CS,

    This argument has been discussed and over-discussed on this site (and I’m trusting that Todd will, because of that, ask us to cease with it here), but suffice to say that many of us who find less fault with Rick will argue that he has been quoted out of context and misquoted as much as or more than any other contemporary Christian leader. I find his beliefs to be orthodox.

  • Posted by

    Yeah, no Rick bashing here… I guess you had to be there to hear and see it for yourself.  The arguments are old and tired; and things that we won’t really re-hash here. 

    Thanks for understanding…

    Todd

  • Posted by Derek

    Great insight into the heart and passion of Rick Warren. One of his closing lines expressed his desire to move people “from selfish consumerism to unselfish contribution.”

    Exactly. Rick is so right on. Third-world missions, spiritual maturity, rejecting consumerism....Rick is right on in my book.

    CS - Give me a break. What doesn’t feel right about deeds in addition to creeds. Sounds like, I dunno...maybe James 2!

    Derek

  • Posted by

    The problem with what Olvier has said about Warren is that the same can be said about some of the greatest churches in America.  Falwell (love him or love him) couldn’t preach a sermon worth the time to listen.  But he grew a geat church, an amazing university, and had a world wide ministry.  The similarity between Warren and Falwell has been amazing.  If you had the opportunity as I did, to listen to Falwell many times, you’d have seen that what he had in common with Warren, was that he was a very, very confident leader.  Hey, maybe what we really need are leaders.... I love doctrine and accuracy.  I’m a pastor who preaches and teaches in a more academic way.  But I’ll never bring as many to Chirst as Warren or Falwell because these men have been annointed with Leadership. They have been powerful confident leaders and if you don’t like what they have done, either do it better or stop whinning and get out of the way…

  • Posted by

    Derek:

    “CS - Give me a break. What doesn’t feel right about deeds in addition to creeds. Sounds like, I dunno...maybe James 2!”

    Again, it’s more of the deeds OVER creeds that I get the impression to where this mentality is leading.  I even cited James as well.  Check my post again, please.

    --
    CS

  • Posted by Derek

    CS,

    I think your impression is based on your pre-determined bias you have towards Warren. He didn’t say deeds OVER creeds. He says that the deeds have been lacking.

    I cannot believe that anyone can listen to that 40 minute interview and continue to nit-pick RW. I agree with Peter, Warren is well within orthodoxy even if he uses a hodge-podge of translations in his preaching.

    I am not looking for a RW debate. I am too worn out for that.

    Derek

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    Yeah,

    Let’s all actually put this argument down on BOTH “sides” of it.

    CS, thanks by the way for being polite and respectful in the issues you brought up. Deeds OVER creeds (which is not, i believe what RW was talking about although I understand and appreciate your specific concerns a bit) is, you are right, a position to be avoided.

    But either way, I think Todd would LOVE for us to let it drop.

  • Posted by

    Then this really isn’t a discussion if critique aren’t allowed is it?  a few of you are even worried that you might be bothering Todd!  be careful, you’ll be banned too!

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    Oliver,

    It only means that it’s not the discussion that perhaps you want to have. Don’t fret, there are PLENTY of places on the internet to have that discussion.

  • Posted by

    Im actually not trying to bash RW, I am just asking about our presuppositions.  for example pezz makes a great point, its true that some leaders don’t have depth but grow large churches.  But what are these people being attracted to?  this still seems to presuppose that a large church is good regardless of the quality or doctrine.  Look, I apologize to anyone if I have offended, and I won’t RW bash.  I don’t want to detract from my main point.  The main point here is the Reveal study and RW response to it.  He seems to think that unlike willow his church doesn’t have a problem.  That he has addressed this from day one.  I doubt that.  Is that RW bashing?  why do people have to start a line with “ I am not RW basing...but”?.  My point is simply to say RW is factually wrong often.  Is that RW bashing?  To say he has grown to the size of a small Beluga whale is RW bashing.  To critique his approach isn’t.  Besides, do you think Jesus was criticized for Pharisee bashing?  WWJD, maybe Jesus wouldn’t be allowed to post either! I also forget my comments aren’t welcomed, so I won’t post on this topic again.  promise.

  • Posted by

    Looks like Way of The Master Radio picked up on this video and had analyzed some of it on a recent broadcast:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVth6gtHBNk

    --
    CS

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    CS,

    I couldn’t really get past the totally false information about the REVEAL survey: what it was and what it showed. WOTM seems more interested in entertaining on the radio than reporting real truth.

  • Page 1 of 1 pages

Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: