HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

religious intolerance

Violating Someone’s ‘Religious Sensibilities’

Orginally published on Wednesday, June 08, 2005 at 11:01 AM
by Todd Rhoades

I don’t usually get too political here, but this just seems outlandish.  Two schools in Orange County have decided not to hold their graduation ceremonies at Saddleback Church because they didn’t want to violate anyone’s ‘religious sensibilities’.

The OC Register writes, " The changes came after Marc Lipoff, a senior at Northwood High in Irvine, balked at his school?s plan to once again hold its graduation ceremony at Saddleback Church. "

The anti-defamation league was also contacted during the process.  Since attendance is compulsary in Califronia, graduation ceremonies should be held in a non-sectarian venue.  So, church 'buildings' are out.

Both schools involved sent a survey out beforehand asking if anyone had a problem having the graduation at a church (as they have done in past years).  That's when Mr. Lipoff (no pun intended) made his protest known.

"We felt there was legitimacy to their concern," Superintendant Dean Waldfogel said. "We were happy to be able to move that. Our purpose, of course, was never to violate anyone?s religious sensibilities."

Lipoff said he would be uncomfortable in a Christian church setting: "I don?t feel comfortable being at a church, whether it?s graduation, or whatever it?s for. Being at a public school, I shouldn?t have to go to a church."

The main problem?  Saddleback's twenty foot cross.  The Anti Defamation League spokesman said, "All it did was confirm (our concerns)."

Saddleback's executive pastor Glen Kreun said he was "saddened" that the crosses inside the sanctuary offended some. "We won?t compromise our beliefs and change or modify our worship center because someone is offended," he said in an e-mail.

Is it just me, or is this way overboard?  Seems pretty easy these days to violate someone's religious sensibilities, doesn't it?  I'd love to hear your thoughts...


This post has been viewed 252 times so far.


 TRACKBACKS: (0) There are 26 Comments:

  • Posted by bernie dehler

    Sounds fair, not to have public ceremonies in a church.  Would you like it if the church was a Mormon church or Jehovah Witness’ church or a mosque?  We need to play fair-- if it’s ok for us, it’s ok for them too.

    ,,,Bernie
    http://freegoodnews.blogspot.com

  • Posted by

    Is it just me, or is this way overboard?  Seems pretty easy these days to violate someone’s religious sensibilities, doesn’t it?  I’d love to hear your thoughts…

    It reminds me of the verse “train up a child in the way he should go and when he grows old, he shall not depart from it"… so at least we know where the parents stand.

    It’s mainly about 15 minutes.  The spot light can be on “me” now for my 15 minutes… no different than the guy who sued for having to say the pledge of allegiance with the words under God (actually sued in his daughter’s behalf I believe).  It’s about fame and fortune, nothing else.

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    Bernie,

    Good point… but I don’t think it would bother me to have a graduation service in a mosque or temple or LDS building.  It’s a secular gathering in a building. 

    Now if it were to be some type of multi-faith ‘spiritual-type’ event, then I’d have a problem on different grounds, but probably not for this.

    Todd

  • Posted by bernie dehler

    Todd says:
    “Good point… but I don’t think it would bother me to have a graduation service in a mosque or temple or LDS building. It’s a secular gathering in a building.”

    Would it bother you if were held at an Athiest’s meeting place-- would you want to expose your friends and family to opposite (and strong) beliefs?  In the same way, non-Christians have the same negative feelings about going into a church… why can’t we respect that for a public gathering?

    If the nation were mostly Christian, no problem.  Now the USA is more diverse.  This is not necessarily bad; it means the mission field is bigger in the USA that it has ever been…

    ...Bernie
    http://freegoodnews.blogspot.com

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    “Would it bother you if were held at an Athiest’s meeting place-- would you want to expose your friends and family to opposite (and strong) beliefs?”

    I don’t know that athiests really have a meeting place, but if it was for a secular graduation cermony, then I’d be ok with it.  Hopefully my family and friends would realize that we were there for a graduation and not for a religious education.

    My main point is that we are too policically correct.  We keep bending further and further to accomodate, and I think it’s getting rather silly.

    Todd

  • Posted by pjlr

    “Would it bother you if were held at an Athiest’s meeting place-- would you want to expose your friends and family to opposite (and strong) beliefs?”

    Most graduations are.  They’re called universities, colleges and public high schools smile

    I’d say let the kid miss his graduation.  He wasn’t going to a church service.  We’ve had neighborhood watch groups, a polling station, blood drives etc. in the church.  It’s downright silly to suggest that having a graduation ceremony in a church building would be violating anyones sensibilities.

  • Posted by Blair Frodelius

    You know what, Mr. Lipoff?  I don’t feel comfortable being in a public school. Armed guards and metal detectors notwithstanding.  Sheesh…

  • Posted by bernie dehler

    Atheists really do meet together. See:

    http://www.unitedstatesatheists.com/

    ...Bernie
    http://freegoodnews.blogspot.com

  • Posted by bernie dehler

    Todd, when you click on all these on the left column, they all say they are June 8:

    The Clown Eucharist
    Outreach at Gay Pride Day
    Violating Someone’s ‘Religious Sensibilities’
    The Blogging Bozo

    Still got issues…

    ...Bernie

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    No Bernie...those dates are correct. I’ve just added a lot of posts today… I’m trying to pick things up a bit from just one posting a day to several.  Hope you enjoy some of them.  smile

    Todd

  • Posted by

    BeHim:

    “Seems pretty easy these days to violate someone’s religious sensibilities, doesn’t it?”

    Yep.  (Especially on Todd’s blog! smile )

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    Let’s not go there Ricky smile

  • Posted by

    wink

  • Posted by

    I guess my feelings is that if these are secular schools (it doesn’t say whether or not they are) then they should be able to choose the venue for their graduation without being questioned.

    Where I live, the public schools mostly use a local community college and many of the Christian schools (at least the ones that are close to my denomination) use the sanctuary of the church I attend.

    On the other hand, if these are Christian schools that are opting to not have their graduation ceremony in a church, it would be wise to let their students (and parents) that if you are truly following Christ in the way that He taught - the world is not going to love you!  Do what pleases God, not what pleases the world (or the rest of the “church” - if they’re not pleased with you pleasing God)

  • Posted by Marc Lipoff

    Hi Everyone,

    As I was reading all these posting, I think that many of you were misinformed. First of all, I did this not at all for the fame and publicity. Actually this all happened over a month ago and between then and now, I was deciding whether I should let the public know about it or not because of the obvious ramifications of the situation.

    Also, I see the point that the church is just being used as a facility and none of it religous aspects are being put upon the graduates; however, there were two other possible facitilies. One was the football field, which all other local high schools use, and the UCI Bren Center, which is hosting it now.

    It doesnt matter what I feel about the situation. It doesnt matter whether Im Jewish, Christian, or Athiest. The Frist Amendment protects the rights of citizens and this situation bordered on infringing on the right of the graduates.

    Additionally, the Supreme Court has ruled that high school graduation is not voluntary because it is “one of life’s most significant occasions.” So, I shouldnt have to decide whether Im going or not based on the religiousity of the venue. There is a clear seperation of church and state, and if I have to make that decision in a public school, then I really doubt that I was out of line.

    Finally, if you were wondering, after talking to many students at my school (and teachers), many agree with me and are happy that I stood up for something that they didnt have the courage to do.

    Marc Lipoff

  • Posted by Marc lipoff

    I almost forgot, I was never asked whether I disagreed with it or not. I never heard of a vote on it. And, the faculity never had a vote on it either.

    Marc Lipoff

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    Thanks for chiming in Marc at the MMI Blog over the weekend.  You sound like an intelligent young man.

    The thing that made me post this in the first place is that it just seems that people’s sensitivities (on both sides of the issue) are just a little short-sighted I think.

    My big idea was that this was just the use of a building for a graduation; not an attempt by the school or the church involved to indoctrinate anyone.  As I’ve said above, I really wouldn’t have been concerned if this public school event was held in an athiest’s meeting place or a temple or a mosque for that matter.  Only because there was no religious or spiritual purpose or agenda behind the meeting.  I guess I just don’t see what the big deal is in having to go into a church building for a graduation.  In that way, it seems that stories like this make a big deal out of nothing.  And I hope you can see how people can feel (even wrongly) that this is something that people do for fame or publicity.  To make this a constitutional issue seems a little overboard to me… even if there were other non-religious venues available.

    Thanks again for being straightforward and posting here.  I think you’re a stand-up guy.  If you’d like to continue the discussion here, please feel free.  I enjoy a good discussion (even debate!) as long as everyone keeps it friendly and civil.  It helps me to understand where you’re coming from; and hopefully you’ll see some new perspectives as well.  smile

    Todd Rhoades
    MMI Blog Moderator

  • Posted by

    Marc

    Did you parents encourage you to speak up?

    Or was this decision made with 100% no outside influence?

    BeHim

  • Posted by

    This decision was made 100% on my own. My parents supported me in my decision, but they never urged me to speak up.

    Marc

  • Posted by

    I find that very interesting Marc.  I just wondered what outside influences helped you move to make that kind of decision.

    Do you attend church?  Believe in God?  How did you find out about this web site?

  • Posted by

    Essentially, I made the dedision to not attend graduation on my own. My family was fine with that although they recommended that I do something other than just not go.

    I am Jewish and I am quite active in a local youth group. What I learned while apart of it was probably the biggest factor in the decision. After telling the director that I wasnt going to go to my graduation, she recommended that I call the ADL.

    Then, the ADL took over, which was really easy because they took care of everything and couldnt disclose my name (for privacy reasons). But when the time came to deicde whether or not to pursue a law suit, then I had to make the big choice. I thought that I wouldnt rreally respect myself after it was over had I not pursued the law suit. I would have been backing down from a fight only because I was afraid of what my peers would say.

    Some people were telling me how many times my name came up on google, so I decided to google for my name, which is the way I found this site.

    -Marc

  • Posted by

    I see, so the graduation director did have some outside influence in recommending the ADL.  I was wondering how they became involved.

    So do you feel better about pursuing the law suit?  If so, in what way?  What do you hope to achieve and change by pursuing the law suit?

    Do you plan to attend college and in what field?

    Are you a Messianic Jew, Orthodox or from a more “liberal” Temple?  You don’t have to answer that if you don’t want, just asking questions to get a feel for your belief system and see what makes you think the way you do.

  • Posted by

    Yes, the director of the youth group did recommend the ADL to me, but I did know some people that worked there before all of this.

    I cant pursue the law suit now because there is nothing to sue over now. The school voluntarily changed graduation from the church to the UCI Bren Center after receiving word that I was planning to sue them. Also, I think that some people misunderstand what the law suit would mean. Essentailly, I would have filed for an injunction to have it moved. The school district would have not been responsible for any direct costs (though lawyers and such would cost some money). I do somewhat wish that there was a law suit so that this gray area of the law would have been resolved for future graduation is this country.

    Next year I am attending Berkeley and am currently going to major in Civil Engineering (no, not Politcal Science). I do however, plan to take part in the political aspect of the university. 

    My family goes to a Reform temple, but I would consider myself more conservative. I guess my Judaism did play a part in the decision, but I think it was more because I am a man of principle. If you arent Jewish, then I cant really explain it that well, but Jews tend to stick together and stand up for what they believe. Maybe it is because of the Holocaust and continuing anti-Semitism in the world.

  • Posted by

    Yes, the director of the youth group did recommend the ADL to me, but I did know some people that worked there before all of this.

    I cant pursue the law suit now because there is nothing to sue over now. The school voluntarily changed graduation from the church to the UCI Bren Center after receiving word that I was planning to sue them. Also, I think that some people misunderstand what the law suit would mean. Essentailly, I would have filed for an injunction to have it moved. The school district would have not been responsible for any direct costs (though lawyers and such would cost some money). I do somewhat wish that there was a law suit so that this gray area of the law would have been resolved for future graduation is this country.

    Next year I am attending Berkeley and am currently going to major in Civil Engineering (no, not Politcal Science). I do however, plan to take part in the political aspect of the university. 

    My family goes to a Reform temple, but I would consider myself more conservative. I guess my Judaism did play a part in the decision, but I think it was more because I am a man of principle. If you arent Jewish, then I cant really explain it that well, but Jews tend to stick together and stand up for what they believe. Maybe it is because of the Holocaust and continuing anti-Semitism in the world.

  • Posted by

    Marc, I just want to say that I greatly appreciate the calm and rational reasoning you are presenting.  Far too often, people on all sides of issues such as this turn it into a big emotional thing, and I don’t sense that from you at all.

    I wish you all the best at Berkeley and in your future.

  • Page 1 of 2 pages

     1 2 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: