Orginally published on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 7:50 AM
by Todd Rhoades
My friend Mark Wilson had a great post over at his Revitalize Your Church Blog... Remember Elmer Towns huge book from back in 1969? (Quite frankly, I don't because I was five... but I digress). Anyway, in the book, Elmer named the largest 10 Sunday Schools in the country. Back then, Sunday School attendance was measured (only because more people used to attend Sunday School than worship services). How are those top churches from 1969 doing today? Check it out... then read the commentary and comments over at Revitalize Your Church...
1. Akron Baptist Temple, Akron, OH
1968—5762
2008—2000
2. Highland Park Baptist Church, Chatanooga, TN
1968—4821
2008—no response
3. First Baptist Church, Dallas, TX
1968—4731
2008—2600
4. First Baptist Church, Hammond, IN
1968—3978
2008—12,000 (did not respond—this figure comes from Outreach Magazine)
5. Canton Baptist Temple, Canton, OH
1968—3581
2008—1500
6. Landmark Baptist Church, Cincinnati, OH
1968—3540
2008—1200
7. Temple Baptist Church, Detroit, MI (Now Northridge Church)
1968-- 3400
2008—13,865
8. First Baptist Church, Van Nuys, CA
1968—2847
2008—does not exist
9. Thomas Road Baptist Church, Lynchburg VA
1968—2640
2008—17,445
10. Calvary Temple, Denver, CO
1968—2453
2008—3500
Here is a bit of the Introduction from this classic book. Elmer Towns writes:
Why do some Sunday Schools grow in attendance at fantastic rates to unbelievable sizes,
and others stagnate? Some Sunday Schools reach a vast number of people, win hundreds to
Christ, and have a large teaching ministry. Others seem to die in the delivery room.
Why?
I have been in some churches that seem to have all the ingredients for expansion yet they
remain inhibited year after year. Other churches I would write off the possibility list, stating,
“They can’t grow in that location or in that building.” But they continue to expand.
Why?
What is the secret to Sunday School expansion? Is there some magical formula to be
applied for growth? Does correct theological doctrine produce a rise in attendance figures?
Many years ago I asked if there existed a set of laws that automatically built attendance when
applied.
Years ago the Southern Baptist Convention released a filmstrip, The Laws of Sunday
School Growth, that reflects the Convention’s strategy for growth. These laws were restated by
J. N. Barnette in his study book The Pull of the People, Convention Press, 1956. Many Sunday
School authorities outside the ten million member Southern Baptist Convention look to the laws
of Sunday School growth as expressed by the Southern Baptist as an infallible guide to Sunday
School expansion. Yet these laws of Sunday School growth are either ignored or broken by many
of the ten largest Sunday Schools. In fact, most of the ten largest Sunday Schools in America do
not follow these laws of Sunday School growth, yet continue to grow.
Why?
Six of the Sunday Schools among the ten largest are listed in the yearbook of The Baptist
Bible Fellowship, Springfield, Missouri. Only one of the ten largest Sunday Schools is from a
Southern Baptist Church. May we conclude that the Baptist Bible Fellowship has better laws for
Sunday School growth, or that perhaps the laws for Sunday School growth as expressed by the
Southern Baptist Convention are not as effective as once believed? Maybe the youthful
enthusiasm of the Baptist Bible Fellowship produces more dedication and hard work than the
older, more formal Southern Baptist Denomination. The Baptist Bible Fellowship does seem to
be more effective in building larger Sunday Schools.
Why?
An interesting prediction was made by Dr. John Rawlings, minister of Landmark Baptist
Temple, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Vice President of Baptist Bible College, Springfield, Missouri. He
feels that in the next ten years the Baptist Bible Fellowship will have between twenty-five and fifty
churches averaging over three thousand in Sunday School. Today, there are only seven Sunday
Schools that average that high in attendance and five of these Sunday Schools are listed in the
Baptist Bible Fellowship Yearbook. If the Baptist Bible Fellowship works as hard in the next ten
years as it has in the past ten years it probably will prove Rawlings correct.
This book is written to help many struggling Sunday Schools wanting to grow. Small
works drain the vision and enthusiasm of faithful lay workers and clergymen. Nothing is more
discouraging than to pour energy, hope and prayers into a Sunday School, then see it defiantly
refuse to expand. A stagnant Sunday School eats the heart and desire out of workers.
The example of these ten churches can help small Sunday Schools spot weaknesses and
plan fruitful programs. Their principles of growth may rejuvenate a discouraged pastor, giving
him a new vision of the work. A successful man surely does not follow the example of failure.
The author gets disturbed at some of the lectures given at Sunday School conventions and
Christian education conferences. Speakers with little experience in building attendance at Sunday
School give lectures on outreach and expansion. Principles are suggested to help Sunday Schools
grow in attendance, when in fact, the application may deter the outreach and growth of a work.
And then some people are up in the air. Ivory towers are fine, but very few people live there.
Solid research is needed in Sunday School outreach and expansion.
I was greatly impressed with the ministers, staff and the congregations that I visited in the
ten largest Sunday Schools project. Much is heard today about the dying church institution. The
ten largest Sunday Schools have life, and you feel as if you are “where the action is” when you
visit their services. The lost are being converted, prayers are being answered, and progress is
evident. I wished I lived close enough so my family and I could attend one of these churches,
But I do not give a “blanket” approval to all I saw in the ten largest Sunday Schools.
Some of the churches have features I think are not educationally sound. But this study is not to
express my opinions. I have attempted to remain objective, and report the facts as they exist.
The purpose of this study was to determine why these ten Sunday Schools became the largest in
the United States not to examine the all round effectiveness of their programs. I have not tried to
criticize these Sunday Schools, but to communicate those principles that have caused them to
grow.
Read more here at Revitalize Your Church…
Interesting Question: No doubt that many of today’s top ten churches may be either much larger, or even non-existent in 40 years. Which of today’s top ten churches do you think will continue to grow tremendously through 2048; and which ones do you think will be much smaller? And, of course, why?
This post has been viewed 2003 times so far.
There are 10 Comments:
As I recall, Sunday school was instituted as a way to get people more literate so that they could read God’s word at a time when many people didn’t get any other schooling, and a time when vast numbers of people couldn’t read.
The result is that within just a few decades we were nearly (or really… can’t remember now) the most literate country on the planet.
It was the RIGHT tool for the time.
But that was nearly two centuries ago. What are we doing as church leaders to institute efforts which will improve our world and bolster our people’s faith like the Sunday School initiative did in the 19th century? We should ask that question rather than try to figure out how to make a two-century-old model work in 2008. Churches that will still be around in 30 years will continue to ask the right questions of themselves. Those that will be gone won’t.
Peter:
Interesting thoughts. I had to do a little research about this topic and I have a different slant on it.
I believe Sunday School to still be a valuable resource when there are no Bible studies or other means of Christian education around. The amount of knowledge of the Bible and quantity of study has decreased dramatically over the years; ask the average person to name the Four Gospels, and they would be hard pressed to do so. Sunday School is great in its ability to lay down that foundational knowledge and the basics of theology, doctrine, and hermeneutics.
I took a quick look at Wikipedia to check the literacy levels for the United States. The articles show that while our nation is (allegedly) 99% literate, that degree of literacy is pretty bad, overall. The one article had said:
“These studies assert that 46 to 51 percent of U.S. adults read so poorly that they earn significantly below the threshold poverty level for an individual.”
When I see numbers like this, even the utility of Sunday School as a literacy vehicle still has some merit. State-sponsored education, in theory, should be able to provide, but there remains this gap. It is possible that the idea of Sunday School may be from an earlier era, yet a need can still be met. (Even Scientologists still work on getting literacy projects going today.)
If there are suitable Bible studies still around, I could see how those would complement or supplement Sunday School. But, I know that if my church had a Sunday School curriculum, I would join. I still see the merit here.
--
CS
CS writes [I believe Sunday School to still be a valuable resource when there are no Bible studies or other means of Christian education around.] yeah, I’ll grant you you may be right on that.
and [When I see numbers like this, even the utility of Sunday School as a literacy vehicle still has some merit.] I agree with that also. I’ve been in Sunday Schools that were taught by people who had such a bad grasp of the english language, of history, and of geography that I wanted to scream, though, so great care should be taken with what is taught and who is teaching, more than sometimes is, apparently.
But I maintain that looking at this as a key “discipleship engine” for the 21st century church overall is folly.
Sunday School can be effective at transferring information (aka knowledge), but it is a largely ineffective means of transforming lives. (We are seldom transformed merely by information.) Interestingly, after perusing this post, I went to Christianity Today and read an article called “The Poverty of Love”, by Bradley Nassif (http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2008/may/11.34.html). Nassif is an Eastern Orthodox theologian and “a courageous and enthusiastic pioneer of Orthodox-evangelical dialogue around the world.”
His article is well worth the read, and touches on some of the things that we need to consider when thinking about things like Sunday School, church programs, small groups, etc. He looks at the lives of the desert fathers - lives focused on repentance, active love for God and neighbor, hunger for God.... He talks about how “Under Emperor Constantine, large numbers joined the church for the social privileges it bestowed” and noted that this growth in nominal Christianity was a driving force for flights to the desert.
Here is one paragraph worth copying: “Serapion lamented, ‘The prophets wrote books. Then came our ancestors who lived by them. Those who came later understood them from the heart. Then came the present generation who copied them but put them on their shelves unused.’ I imagine that those reading this article have more Bible knowledge than they will ever put into practice in their lifetime. Yet it’s not more knowledge we need; it’s more love and obedience.”
Maybe we ought to take our focus off the number of people in attendance and put it on the lives that are truly transformed. I haven’t figured out how to measure that in my own life, let alone for a church, but I am certain that numbers alone are a woefully inadequate measuring stick.
Randy:
“Sunday School can be effective at transferring information (aka knowledge), but it is a largely ineffective means of transforming lives. (We are seldom transformed merely by information.)”
Absolutely right. But without the knowledge, how do we know whether or not the transformation was something God would have wanted? We have to have a balance between the two, and I see a lack in the modern church of basic knowledge. We have, like the quote you cited, more Bible knowledge available to us than any other time in history, but the application of knowledge into the minds of people is so shy of anything Berean-like.
--
CS
#1 and #5 from Akron/Canton, OH! Amazing! And in that same era Rex Humbard’s Cathedral of Tomorrow was also in Akron.
Interesting thoughts. I had to do a little research about this topic and I have a different slant on it.But I would buy tiffany rings
Todd,
Thanks again for posting these figures. We have been talking it over on Said at Southern and it seems like the small group vs. Sunday school debate is alive and well.
In terms of kids Sunday school, which is my area, I think Sunday morning is still our best chance to do formal teaching when the most # of children are on campus.
I wonder how many of those numbers were children vrs adult Sunday school and which churches were doing aggressive bus ministries.
Randy:
The comments by Nassif are nothing new ... the OT had them, Jesus spoke them, and every pastor (or at least I hope every pastor) prays on the considers that very question today ... how to encourage others to allow God to rid their hearts of a “works” or “knowledge” mentality and have that transferred to a “love” mentality?
But we must remember that without knowledge there can be no growth in true love that is from God. That’s why we need to be “transformed” by the “renewing of our minds.” Without such renewal in our thinking transformation cannot take place.
So there is the age-old connundrum ... how to faciliate education while encouraging that education to be trusted to the point that people will make different life decisions based on their knowledge of God and themselves.
Sunday schools as a way of helping in literacy only worked because people attended. They are not attending any longer and there are more educational outlets then ever before so in my opinion Sunday schools will be morphing into more of a community or fellowship time. At least in our church ...
Say hello to mom and dad for me. How was there most recent trip??
Phil
As I recall my early teens and the years when there was heavy emphasis on SS (Remember the March to Sunday School In March Contests/), the purpose of SS was not only to teach and educate, but was to evangelize. So many unchurched children have found the Lord because someone invited or took them to SS. Many of them (maybe even you) are now the pastors, missionaries, and Christian leaders on this day.
Sunday School by far was (and still could be) the most effective means of winning children (and ultimately their parents) and then make disciples.
We are selling our ministry and our Lord short by devaluating or de-emphasizing SS in current church life, I believe.
WOuld everyone who was first introduced to Christ in SS please stand up an say—let’s make SS what it should be again.
Page 1 of 1 pages