HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

America’s Fifty Most Influential Churches

Orginally published on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 at 8:42 AM
by Todd Rhoades

The Church Report Magazine is out with their annual list of the 50 most influential churches in America. This was compiled from about 2000 surveys that were returned to the magazine. It is an interesting list (as usual). This year's most influential church is...

Willow Creek Community Church.  #2 is Saddleback.  Rounding out the top ten are:  Northpoint (Andy Stanley); Fellowship Church (Ed Young); Lakewood Church (Joel Osteen); Southeast Christian (Bob Russell; Dave Stone); Life Church (Craig Groeschel); Potter’s House (T. D. Jakes); Brooklyn Tabernacle (Jim Cymbala); and North Coast Church (Larry Osborne).

It’s interesting to me that six of the top ten churches on this list are leaders in the multi-site movement.

You can find the whole ‘top 50’ list here at The Church Report...

What is your response to the list.  (I know that popularity contests aren’t great for churches), but what do you think?  What church(es) influence your local body?  Who would you add, or subtract, or move up or down on the list?

Just for fun…

Todd


This post has been viewed 7446 times so far.


 TRACKBACKS: (1) There are 28 Comments:

  • Posted by

    To each of you… bravo for your insight.  Just a couple points… I am a former HMB now called North American Mission Board, SBC, church planter (missionary).  My wife and I and countless other good intentioned, hard working, evangelistic Christians worked hard to win souls and establish new churches in the Northeast, just to be left on the field without strong enough support to get these mission churches off the ground.  In the south SBC churches prosper and for years were the majority in the Christian community.  I had one church that told me they were “turned off” by my begging for support.  With a family to care for and bills that were unpaid, we left the field after 4+ years.  My five page final report to the mission board centered on one theme.  I leave the field with a task unfinished due to the casual attitude of Christians toward winning the lost to Christ.  I told them that the American church would give our government permission to eliminate our Christian foundings and that we would be a country of little or no influence soon.  At the same time the SBC IMB was bringing in record offerings for foreign missionary work.  We sure missed the mark of Matt 28.  Less than 15% of Americans attend a religious service on the weekends.  Most come to be entertained.  Less than 1% have ever shared their faith with another person. 
    On another point two large SBC churches in Dallas weren’t even mentioned… FBC and Second Baptist Church.  At one time FBC, Houston was the largest in the country.  We attended a Willow Creek/SBC affiliated church for 5 years before we moved.  They are still growing and are blessed with attendance of 400-500 weekly.  Our prayers for all churches big and small.

    Lord help us to win those that will be saved and make disciples out of them so that they may endure.  Even so, Come Lord Jesus!

  • Posted by

    If it is not taken seriously as a measure of success and influence, the poll is harmless and thought provoking, but here’s a serious take on the poll in regards to its design.

    Looking at it from a scientific point of view, at first the survey does not seem to be designed well. The lack of a definition of influence is troubling. Did any survey participant list a church because of the church had a negative influence?

    Also, only using an opinion poll to measure influence probably would not be as accurate as using additional data available to help formulate a list. For example, a researcher could also take into account the amount of church missions giving per year, percentage of church members involved in a ministry, number of times the church’s name was in the news or media, number of conversions recorded by the church per year, number of church members per capita of the metropolitan area the church is located, number of church sponsored community projects per year, number of churches planted by the church, number of ministers that were “groomed” in the churche and now pastor another church, etc.

  • Posted by

    I was interested to see Briarwood Presbyterian Church in Alabama on the list. Last week I attended a “Church Health” conference in Australia which was conducted by Briarwood Presbyterian Church, with Harry Reeder as the main speaker.  The conference was called “Embers to a Flame”. It helped us Aussie church leaders to seek after church health rather than church growth. There was a strong encouragement for us to be committed to Bible teaching, prayer and discipling as the means of feeding (and consequently growing) God’s church. The pre-eminence of the gospel of the death and resurrection of Jesus for the forgiveness of sins and life everlasting was very, very heartening.

    Harry Reeder had an evident appreciation of the spiritual warfare encountered by pastors in struggling churches and did not provide us with a slick formula promising that we could grow mega-churches. Rather, he taught from Ephesians, the importance of nourishing God’s people and allowing God to grow our churches. 

    There are some churches which I pray would be less influential. But I am surely thankful for churches such as Briarwood Presbyterian which use the gifts God has given them to influence others so that God would be honoured through more churches proclaiming the saving message of the cross.

  • Page 2 of 2 pages

     <  1 2
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: