Orginally published on Monday, October 03, 2005 at 11:35 AM
by Todd Rhoades
Talk about blowing any chances you have for outreach or evangelism in your community. Wow! This from STLToday.com. CENTRALIA, IL—The Rev. Johnnie Wilson II thought he was fair, giving this Tree City USA months to meet his call to collect $75,000 to spare a towering oak he considered a nuisance outside his flat-roofed church. But time has run out on this 14,000-resident town and the mighty tree said to predate its founding in 1853…
On Thursday, the spot where the cherished burr oak once stood was nothing but a sawdust-covered stump, six feet wide.
"It just seemed like a man of God would have cared more about God's creation," said Pam Ackerman, president of Centralia's Garden Club.
Wilson takes umbrage with being viewed as a villain, saying the tree dumped damaging limbs on his Bible Based Community Church and took up potential parking space. He said his appeal for $75,000 only drew angry letters and vandalism to his church.
"I would pray that people would just move on," he said Thursday, again stressing he had every right to do what he did with the tree on his property. "I pray that people would repent, to be quite honest, repent for the hatefulness, the narrow-mindedness. I'm not so much looking for an apology. I'm just looking for them to get their souls right."
[Todd's input... He wants them to repent... OVER A TREE.]
Allison Austin, who lives across the street from the church, called the tree's demise "terrible."
"I'm not a real environmental activist, but I'm saddened by anyone who would take a healthy tree and remove it," said Austin, who saw crews finish off the oak this week after a cutdown that began a couple of weeks ago. "It was a beautiful tree, a really lovely tree.
"He's not been a good neighbor."
The dispute had been brewing since at least June, when Wilson publicly declared the tree a "headache" outside the former synagogue he obtained about a year and a half earlier. He offered to spare the oak if locals mustered $75,000 to save it, saying "that's more than we have to do."
City Manager Grant Kleinhenz said the city offered to lease to Wilson for a $1 a strip of city-owned land for angled parking just outside the church. Wilson balked, citing among other things maintenance costs.
The city also said Wilson might have been able to strike a deal for a nearby state-owned lot that isn't used on Sundays. The pastor also rejected that, calling the lot too far away for children, elderly or special-needs worshippers.
Kleinhenz said the city offered to vacuum up the leaves and limbs for free -- the city usually charges for that service -- if Wilson's faithful could get them to the curb. No deal. Wilson said that would do nothing about the real problem of leaves piling up on the roof.
"We made every effort we could," Kleinhenz said Thursday, saying the city paying $75,000 was never a legal option and would have set bad precedent. "If you get into that, the next person holds you up for something else."
As part of the toppled oak's legacy, he said, the community's "tree board" is inventorying the city's trees at least a century old, then seeking commitments from property owners that such trees won't be downed unless declared dead or dangerous.
While calling the oak's demise "a very difficult decision on my part," Wilson said locals had ample time to open their hearts and wallets instead of penning venomous letters.
"If you're going to write a letter, then put a check in with the letter," he said. "This tree was God's creation and everything, but God gave us the ability to make things better."
This post has been viewed 433 times so far.
TRACKBACKS: (0)
There are 9 Comments:
Pastor Wilson,
You can have all the parking space you need, but no one in your neighborhood would like to come to your church!
What is the problem with pastors and trees? All my life, I have seen pastors cut down trees they considered a personal nuisance or that seemingly blacked the view of “their” church. It is purely self-centered and is a sign of a deeper inward problem. This man needs to leave the pulpit but there will always be those who worship him that will stand behind him.
I can just see it, a man of “god"(himself to be exact) holding the city hostage over a tree just because he is money-hungry. This whole story is beyond belief.
WOW - what a story. I believe that this pastors ministry is over in that community. It will be difficult for him to have much of an impact on the community after trying to hold the community financially hostage, almost to the point of extortion.
As far as Thomas’ post - Thomas, you must have been hurt by a pastor over something far more significant than a tree. To lump all pastors together and say you have seen repeatedly pastors “cut down trees they considered a personal nuisance or that seemingly blacked the view of ‘their’ church” is kind of off the point here. Obviously you have “issues” with authority figures in your life. As a pastor I can tell you that what you need to do is pray for your pastor that the decisions he makes in leading the church will represent the heart of God for that part of the body. If folks spent as much time praying for their pastor as they do being angry at and talking about their pastor I have a feeling that so many more churches would be being blessed with godly pastors who want nothing more than what God wants for HIS church!
Wait a minute. Remember that this is an article from a secular source that may not give the total picture, but may delight in making the church look bad. Think for a minute about a small church that has a tree dropping leaves on a flat roof. Every time it rains the gutters are clogged and overflow causing damage to the inside of the building. Was the $75,000 to be used to install a new style or type of roof? Don’t know, but could be. I have yet to see a church expand and not cut down trees, or how about the church that builds on the edge of town, taking out of production agricultural land that could be used to grow food to feed a starving world. I’m shure that somewhere a tree was cut down to make the lumber for your church, and for the papers that clutter your desk. OK enough of the sarcasm. Teh church should have the right to cut down a tree on the church property that needs to come down. It just apears that this pastor might not have handled the situation with grace. Neither did the people who sent the church nasty letters. Perhaps there may be a lot of people that need to repent.
Wow what a great story! God always seems to have a way to make us see how often our priorities are misplaced. Here a whole city is up in arms for the cutting down of an old tree and saying that a man of God should know better.
Yet we hardly whisper our disaproval of abortion that is killing our children in their infantcy, the fact that we euthanize the old and defenseless hardly catches our attention. I wonder what the children that have been aborted would have been? Preachers, lawyers, doctors, Moms or dads? I can only imagine how we could change the world for Christ if we would make such a fuss over better priorities.
Daniel Zepeda
There are slews of outsiders willing to run our churches without contributing anything of value. But busybodies will butt into anyone’s business. Historical districts dot my city with ridiculous regulations. One homeowner painted a horse scene on his garage door so vandals would pass by it to spray paint someone else’s house. But the city forced the owner to remove the mural because of historical reasons. At the most extreme end, preservationists tried (or may still be trying) to keep an old hospital building from modernizing to better serve the ill, injured, and dying.
Maybe this pastor does come across as a jerk, but no more of a jerk than megachurch pastors who insist on ever more expansions despite neighbors’ concerns about traffic (as if your some of your fellow pewwarmers do not burn rubber or cause traffic jams on the way out of the parking lot), noise, and other problems that come with church campuses the size of shopping malls.
I couldn’t agree more Daniel.
People will call for a pastor to “leave the pulpit” for a tree yet allow dozens and even thousands of false teachers to roam free - unchecked.
It’s as though 2 Timothy chapter 3 and 4 are for naught. We’re more worried about reaching out than equipping within.
You know guys, as a pastor it hurt me do this - but I had to insist on a 150 year old walnut tree to be cut down in our parking lot - because it was DEAD! And the agencies (and church members!!) that I had to wrestle with finally agreed with me (after much wrangling) - that the tree (which had huge limbs) - posed an actual threat to people and personal property.
“Let him who is without sin - cast the first ...” Pastors dont have issues with trees - how ridiculous is that. We do have issues when all things environmental prohibit the safe and sane development of our property. BTW - taking out one tree, by N. Cal standards, required us to plant 10 MORE somewhere on property.
At the same time, it is way over the top to call for ‘repentance’ over a tree. This guys frustration just spilled out. I do feel for the guy - it took us 8 months, and damage to some vehicles before our tree finally was returned to where it was headed anyway - the log pile. (And we did get eight more parking spots!!! and ten more trees!)
Sounds like he’s up a creek without a tree. The town sounds like it is going to “stick” him with the blame unless their “bark” is worse than their bite. He may have to make like a tree himself and “leaf”.
Page 1 of 1 pages