HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

Bill Hybels Responds to “Reveal” Criticism

Orginally published on Monday, June 09, 2008 at 7:17 AM
by Todd Rhoades

A couple of weeks ago, Christianity Today ran an article entitled, "Willow Creek's Huge Shift" (subtitled Influential Mega Church Moves Away from Seeker Sensitive Services). Here's how the article started: “After modeling a seeker-sensitive approach to church growth for three decades, Willow Creek now plans to gear its weekend services toward mature believers seeking to grow their faith." Recently, Jim Millado sat down with Bill Hybels so that he could respond. It seems that from Bill's perspective, enough was enough, and it was time to set the record straight. Here are a few comments from Hybels on the situation (and on other reports that have come out from Reveal). You can also watch the video of the interview...



"I think it was an unfortunate article that was written without a proper understanding of what we’re actually doing these days. I mean, we have had the same one sentence mission statement for 32 years. We’re trying to turn irreligious people into fully devoted followers of Christ. We have never been more committed to either side of that mission statement. Some of the changes we’re making right now around Willow are to increase our evangelistic effectiveness. One of our big three strategic plan initiatives right now is raising the risk level as we point people to faith in Christ."

You might remember the first blog post that got all this controversy started was from Christianity Today's Out of Ur Blog. Their initial blog post was titled, "Willow Creek Repents". Hybels responded to that blog post as well: "I think every evangelical knows that’s kind of a loaded up term, and I think someone wanted to get some action on a blog, and I think it was very unfortunate and quite disingenuous to title the article that way. But such as it is, I will be the first to say we learn and grow at Willow. We make no apologies for wanting to get better at leading this church."

Go, Bill!

You can watch a video of the interview here, or read some other commentary on this interview from Dave Ferguson or Tony Morgan.

A couple of things for your input:

1.  What did you think of Bill’s response?  Clear?  Will it have an impact?  Was it necessary?

2.  It seems that much of the push-back seems to come initially from Christianity Today.  Is there a rub between CT and WC?  Or is CT just looking for a scoop to get more readers?  Any thoughts?


This post has been viewed 4348 times so far.


  There are 138 Comments:

  • Posted by

    It is not the pastors job to care for people, it is the pastors job to create the system by which people are cared for or to lead the poeple who are responsible to create the system. 

    It is unrealistic for a person to expect the pastor to do all the care or to be personally involved with every parishioner.

  • Posted by

    Leonard – it’s really not unrealistic for the pastor to do the care giving if his/her church stays under 200 or so.  But dare I say, it’s not very “biblical” (which I believe is your point).

    Wendi

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    JOB,

    One last thing about this exchange. You and I, I suspect define discipleship differently. You might put the ability to define and explain the words justification, sanctification, and propitiation way higher on the list than I would. At the top of the list of my discipleship list is LIVING like Jesus. I’m really quite over churches filled with people who know all the stuff, but who don’t inspire any sense of awe, because nobody lives like Jesus, nobody loves beyond themselves. If must only have one, I will take the latter, as that is how people will know us.

    It’s far easier, in my experience, to teach somebody who loves like Jesus more about what it means to trust and believe in Him than it is to teach someone who understands all about how to trust and believe in Him how to love like Him more.

    Too many people are “educated” beyond their obedience. And as a pastor, I have to say that Leonard… You are SO right! Wendi, I agree with you except that I’ve been in churches of way less than 100 where the pastor couldn’t care for everybody.

  • Posted by

    Wendi,

    “You believe it is biblical for a church to remain small enough for the pastor to know every member of his/her flock?”

    Yes I do.  I think the reason there is much confusion in this area is because we have confused the roles of apostles - evangelists-pastors-deacons-elders-teachers. 

    “To stay small, a church, at some point, would have to say they have enough Christians and they’re done reaching out and evangelizing. “

    Not really, you start new churches as needed. Don’t they do this with multi-site?  Take a group of believers from an existing fellowship and launch a new site.  My issue with multi-site is that they have “point pastor” and the new churches aren’t soverign.

    “JOB, every church grows if it is healthy – whether or not they focus on growth.”

    Let’s not forget transfer growth which is an ugly reality . Rich Tatum made some great observations about this.  Not all growth is healthy. And anyway every church has a growth plateau based on the population of their area. That’s why I mentioned gas prices.  Is it really good that people travel 1/2 hour by car passing many good faith communities to choose the one for their liking?  I don’t think it is. 

    That’s all I have time for right now.

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    Wow, JOB, it IS all about size?

    There were 3000 added on the day of Pentecost, there is no indication anywhere that they divided into separate churches, but stayed “one church” (that seemed to meet in small groups in homes, much like many of ours). And they were adding DAILY to their number from the get go, so they started as a mega-church and grew from there!

    Your position is scripturally untenable. I can see EASILY from Scripture that a pastor is to equip his church to do ministry, but to say that a church must divide once it reaches a certain side? Sorry, but that is simply an opinion you hold and not even close to a scriptural proposition.

    (However, I agree STRONGLY with you that a person should be part of a church in their community. It’s too bad that so many people feel compelled to drive as far as they do because the church in their community is doing little or nothing to communicate the Gospel in a fashion that makes sense to them.)

  • Posted by

    Peter,

    On the day of Pentecost there were people from many different areas other then Jerusalem. They came there to celebrate the feast of Pentecost as all Jews were required. 

    “5Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven”

    The Jerusalem church didn’t start 3000 strong that day.

    Happy Fathers Day everyone.

  • Posted by

    Peter,

    Another thought on Fathers Day.  What makes my method unscriptural and others not?  According to you “the methods must change ......” You should be applauding me.

    Leonard,

    “It is not the pastors job to care for people ......”

    Something drastically has changed in 15 years.  My father was asked to speak to the chapel at my bible college around 15 years ago.  The compliment that I kept hearing from the professors about my Dad was “there is a man with a Pastor’s heart”.  I know they weren’t refering to the size of his church because it wasn’t big.  So what possibly could they have meant?  I know.

    Happy Fathers Day Dad.  If more Pastors were like you I wouldn’t feel the need to have this discussion.

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    JOB writes [On the day of Pentecost there were people from many different areas other then Jerusalem.] Hmmm… sounds like a lot of our cities, like DC, NY, Chicago…

    Please look again at Acts and count the times the book records the sentiment that the numbers of believers in the church were growing. I count several. Now count the time that they sub-divided those churches, as I think you are suggesting. I couldn’t find any. I also can’t recall any exhortation to do so in any epistle.

    Sorry, JOB, I’m convinced you don’t get it, and I think I need to leave it at that. You’ll only be happy in a small church, I’ll only be happy in a church where people are being made into disciples from being total non-God-followers. I hope the small churches can do that, I hope yours can, few of the ones around here can.

  • Posted by

    JOB,

    This is a part of the endless junk that becomes pointless.  You pulled my words out of context.  It is a pastors job to create and lead.  This means he is equipping people so better care is happening. 

    I am sure that I am not much like your dad, he sounds like a great guy.  I guess after nearly 30 years in ministry, God still has room for people to be different.

  • Posted by

    Leonard,

    It’s a Pastors job to do both.  Disciple and teach others to do the same. 

    Peter and Leonard,

    I can see your both getting frustrated.  I’m not but that’s ok.  Happy Fathers day and God Bless

  • Posted by

    JOB –

    I appreciate and have often heard the term “a pastor’s heart.” But don’t you think the term reflects our western understanding of the role of a pastor over a correct biblical understanding of the role?  The closest thing I know of to a NT job description for pastors is the passage Peter cited from Eph. 4, and it doesn’t mention caretaking but does indicate that the pastor’s job is to equip (katartismos). Only used once in the NT, the word is also translated perfect or prepare.  It describes helping people fulfill their ultimate purpose.  This emphatic preposition, to me, doesn’t imply the kind of personal caretaking that is implied by the “pastor’s heart” description. 

    And regarding the idea of large church found in scripture – you may be right that many of those Pentecost converts returned to their homes (way more than 3000 when you consider women and children).  Nevertheless, the Jerusalem church had certainly become a mega-church by the time Peter and John stood before the Sanhedrin (4:4).  By then, this local church had grown to 5000+ men (probably over 10,000 total).  I really doubt if this church’s’ pastor, Jesus’ brother James would have been able to personally care for more than a very small fraction of his church.  If caring for the congregation is a function of the pastor, this church had to have had a very large pastoral staff.

    JOB – you didn’t really respond to my question.  Would you agree that a church that continues with the same attendance (large or small) year after year, having not planted other churches, is unhealthy?  If a church is reaching and discipling lost people, it will grow, right?

    Hope all you guys had a great fathers day.

    Wendi

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    JOB,

    Not frustrated at all, but I am enjoying this conversation. It’s just a little wearying to realize that much of your negative opinions of large “seeker” churches is merely based on your contention (which cannot be biblically supported in my view) that a church must be small. So, I hope you can see that this is your preference only and not the way that all should do it. But I’m doubtin’ it.

  • Posted by

    Wendi,

    “Would you agree that a church that continues with the same attendance (large or small) year after year, having not planted other churches, is unhealthy?  If a church is reaching and discipling lost people, it will grow, right?”

    It depends.  There are so many other factors involved that are involved in numerical growth.  For example, a church could be in a growth decline because of the population statistics in the area, a large company closes down etc. A church’s people can be reaching others for Christ at their jobs and in other areas and the new believers can attend other churches.  My Dad’s church didn’t win any numerical growth awards but he trained about 1/2 dozen men that now Pastor their own churches.  And let’s not forget that if a church’s growth stays the same for many many years it is a good sign that families are continuing in the faith which I still believe is the best discipleship “program “ out there.  But of course there are some dead churches out there where the people have no interest in reaching out to their communites. I’m with you in rebuking them but they are stil God’s sheep and need to be treated like it.

    I’ll get back to you later Peter.

  • Page 6 of 6 pages

    « First  <  4 5 6
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: