Orginally published on Wednesday, July 02, 2008 at 7:16 AM
by Todd Rhoades
Cal Thomas writes: "David Brody first broke the story on his blog "The Brody File." Obama's campaign for the conservative Christian vote, which has largely gone to the Republican presidential candidate in recent elections, has been dubbed the "Joshua Generation Project." Joshua, Moses' successor, led the Israelites into the Promised Land. It wasn't the group that fled Egypt in the Exodus, though. They died in the wilderness, lacking faith in God's promise. It was the next generation that Joshua led into Canaan. Apparently, if we have enough faith in Obama, he will lead us all into a new America, but if we vote for John McCain, we will demonstrate a lack of faith (in Obama) and die in the political badlands.
Obama is better at biblical language and imagery than any Democrat in modern times. He certainly beats Howard Dean, now the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, who once offered Job as his favorite New Testament book.
Obama has declared himself a committed Christian. He can call himself anything he likes, but there are certain markers among the evangelicals he is courting that one must meet in order to qualify for that label...
Cal then goes on to give some Obama quotes on his faith:
“I’m rooted in the Christian tradition… I believe there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.”
“The difficult thing about any religion, including Christianity, is that at some level there is a call to evangelize and proselytize. There’s the belief, certainly in some quarters, that if people haven’t embraced Jesus Christ as their personal savior, they’re going to hell.”
“I don’t presume to have knowledge of what happens after I die. When I tuck in my daughters at night and I feel like I’ve been a good father to them, and I see that I am transferring values that I got from my mother and that they’re kind people and that they’re honest people, and they’re curious people, that’s a little piece of heaven.”
Cal Thomas’ conclusion:
“Any first-year seminary student could deconstruct such “works salvation” and wishful thinking. Obama either hasn’t read the Bible, or if he has, doesn’t believe it if he embraces such thin theological wisps.
Obama can call himself anything he likes, but there is a clear requirement for one to qualify as a Christian and Obama doesn’t meet that requirement. One cannot deny central tenets of the Christian faith, including the deity and uniqueness of Christ as the sole mediator between God and Man and be a Christian. Such people do have a label applied to them in Scripture. They are called “false prophets.”
What do YOU think?
You can read the whole article here...
This post has been viewed 2173 times so far.
There are 49 Comments:
Hey youre not weird for hanging out with a Neo-Pagan! If we don’t associatte with pagans how will they ever know the love of Christ?
Good post Daniel, the whole deal is a strange twist in this new day of politics…
I’m sorry to see the same old “Christians can only be Republican” logic here, just not in so many words.
I consider the war in Iraq and our health care system to be serious national sins on the order of slavery. Our society is based on dog-eat-dog capitalism, not Christian love.
I’d say we’re reaping the fruits of that approach right now.
If the fruits of Obama turn out to be a health care system that doesn’t deprive the poor of life-giving care (yes, I know anyone can go to an emergency room. Ever tried to get a colonoscopy or mammogram there? Or pediatric care?), I call that Christian fruit.
If the fruits of Obama turn out to be fewer women and children killed in Iraq, I call that Christian fruit.
If the fruits of Obama start protecting our environment for future generations, I call that Christian fruit.
If the fruits of Obama move us to a society where big business and lobbyists—that is, money—aren’t the primary decision makers, I call that Christian fruit.
I’m a born-again Christian and I’m voting for Obama.
Joe,
Quick comment on this:
If the fruits of Obama lead to same-sex marriage nation-wide - is that Christian fruit? It’s only a small step from there to the way Canada is - freedom to teach and preach from the Bible is restricted. Let’s be honest - that’s where this whole debate is going.
If the fruits of Obama lead to more abortions performed - is that Christian fruit?
These are issues that Obama is clearly on the record as standing for.
As for big-money - how is he going to stop that influence? It’s just a matter of _whose_ big money we’re talking about. (I’m probably being a little cynical here, but let’s face it - lobbying isn’t going away anytime soon and it affects all parties in Congress, not just Republicans.)
Now, from a non-religious standpoint - have you ever experienced our Government providing services to people in a way that wasn’t completely messed up? I’ve been through the government health wringer and it’s a mess. I don’t anticipate that getting better just because they’re going to go nation-wide with it. Government health-care is not going to solve anything except how to waste more of the taxpayers’ money. It’s kind of like our representatives and Social Security - they have a completely different retirement system, why should they care that Social Security is a dying system? Getting government OUT of these businesses will do more to help them than putting more government in. Our social programs are a mess across the board. We sink more money in now and get very little to show for it.
And no - Christians can’t only be Republicans. I admire people who are Democrats and want to help people, but I think the way to help them is to give them a small amount of help and a nudge to self-sufficiency, not to baby-sit them from cradle to grave. That ties in with NT thinking of not giving a free ride to people who won’t (not can’t) work. We agree on a lot of the outcomes, but not the methods. And for the record, I’m Independent - not Republican. I’ll vote for whoever is the most qualified for office and I think will make good decisions. Religion plays some part in that, but no more than character, their record, etc.
Thanks Peter, you stole my thunder.
I think most of us would agree that once we are justified through grace by faith, there is a change, internally and externally.
We repent, or turn away from sin and while we all fall short, we instantly recognize our shortcomings moving forward.
My understanding of the Word tells me there will be fruit as a result of our justification, such as love, and these fruit will be exemplified through our works - - deeds and truth, not just by tongue and words (1 John 3:18).
So my question to Obama apologists, is how can you possibly support gay unions, an attack on God’s design of family, how can you support abortion and partial birth abortion. How can you support a man who beleives in LIVE BIRTH ABORTION? How do you support an attack on God’s sanctity of life?
How do you justify Obama’s stance that there are many paths to God, that works will get us to heaven, and his denial of the one, unforgivable sin that leads to hell?????
We dont need any red herrings about the war or Bush that serve as intereference for this topic. They have nothing to do with Obama’s version of the truth.
My prayer for all of you as well as myself, is for clarity of His Law, and that we seek His truth through His Law.
Peace and Grace
Matt, you write:
What is behind this “mistrust” of Obama, someone who for more than two decades has demonstrated in very real, tangible ways the evidence of a vibrant faith in Jesus Christ?
Perhaps it is Obama’s belief in Live Birth Abortion, perhaps it is his suport of gay unions, perhaps its his education in a Muslim school in Jakarta, perhaps its his being raised by an aetheist and muslim(s), perhaps its his relativism and his view on many oaths to God. Perhaps its becasue every muslim organization in the world support him, perhaps its because of his support from Hamas, Castro, Chavez.
You claim “he’s been walking in faith???
Have you investigated his church’s theology???
Do you know anything about “Black libertaion theology” that is preached at that church? Have you read anyhting on James Cone, the man who basically created this new theology...which ties Muslim tenents with Christian?
Lets see what Cone wrote and you tell me if this matches up with what the Word tell you:
“Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community ... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love. “
Sorry, thats change I will not believe in.
2 Timothy 4:3,4–”For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires; and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.”
Cal Thomas is a superb journalist. I think he’s right. But in this case, it doesn’t matter.
The question we must answer in this election is who is best equipped to lead. This is a critical, pivotal time. A very tough time for many of us. Strong leadership and solid policy are the keys.
Hopefully those leadership skills and policy decisions are guided by a sound spiritual foundation, but we can’t put our hope solely in that. Probably many/most of our country’s leaders are not in a committed, growing relationship with Jesus. We want to believe they are and cling to any little statement that helps us believe they are, but the reality is it just ain’t so.
It is not a requirement for a candidate to be a Christian to be a great president. but when a candidate courts religious people and claims Christianity, he then is put under the scrutiny of such claims. A person cannot claim foul when after they say… I am a Christian if their policy is not informed by faith. What many applaud Obama for is what many others decry Christianity for.
We teach out kids to be consistent with belief and behavior, even at a high cost. Psalm 15 says the man of God swears even to his own hurt… In other words, his walk ad talk line up even if it costs him. This is my struggle with Obama.
This is not the standard we hold for preachers but not politicians rather it is the standard for those who say they know Christ.
“What many applaud Obama for is what many others decry Christianity for.”
Spot on.
LS, and others, Cal Thomas is NOT right here. It is just plain wrong to claim that someone is not even really a Christian because you believe their theology is flawed or incorrect in some way. And to me the fact that Thomas’ claims are so over the top is evidence that this is a political hatchet job by a party hack. This was not journalism. Some people lose all sense of fairness and decorum in the political season.
Thomas accuses Obama of not being a Christian over quotes like; “I believe there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.”
And yet Cal Thomas loves President Bush who said in an interview with Charlie Gibson of ABC about 4 years ago;
Charlie Gibson: Do we all worship the same God, Christians and Muslims?
President Bush: I think we do. We have different routes of getting to the Almighty.
Charlie Gibson: Do Christians and non-Christians, do Muslims go to heaven in your mind?
President Bush: Yes, they do. We have different routes of getting there.
And later, less than a year ago on Oct 4 2007, Bush said: I believe that all the world, whether they be Muslim, Christian, or any other religion, prays to the same God.
If that’s not a universalist statement I don’t know what is.
Whether you like Obama or not, and I’m not a big fan, claiming that he’s not really a Christian is wrong. I presume he believes that he was taught in his church, so to say that he’s not even really a Christian because of flawed theological beliefs is to make the same claim about every member of his church because they were taught the same thing.
Personally, I trust that as he matures as a Christian the Holy Spirit will correct any flaws in his beliefs. I also trust the Holy Spirit will do the same for me.
I disagree with the Episcopal Church (and parts of several other denominations) on their beliefs and teaching about homosexuality being acceptable to God, but I won’t go so far as to claim that everyone in the Episcopal Church is not really Christian.
Cal Thomas, and Baptist Press, is biased and just plain wrong here, imho.
WOW!!!
How much do we look and sound like the world?
When the righteous increase, the people rejoice, But when a wicked man rules, people groan.
Hey there guys & gals; It appears to me that neither candidate really is a committed folower of Jesus Christ. So, lets evaluate them by other standards - like who can “Lead”?
As others have said, it is probably more important who our next president chooses to be his advisors and department chiefs. They will have more influence on future policy (etc.) than either candidates “faith”.
I find it a bit “curious” that so many evangelical Christians (of which I am only one) consider Obama not a “true” Christian because of some “liberal” beliefs—but at the same time rant and rave about our nation being a “Christian” nation. Is there a different standard for an individual to be a Christian as opposed to a nation?”
If we spent more time actually “doing” the work of evangelism; and less time on finding fault with non or new-evangelicals—the whole thing could become moot.
Do we practice what we preach—or believe what we practice. I’m confused.
We’re voting for a president folks, not the next leader of the NEA! Obama’s views aren’t that different from many that sit in our pews each week and like it or not, he has to have a broad appeal. Christians are not the only ones voting and I haven’t seen a successul politician yet that hasn’t tried to reach a variety of people.
I can’t believe anyone calling themselves a christian would vote for someone who favors abortion.
There is a very clear difference in voting records. Mcain, christian or not has the good sense to be against killing babies. Obama has the most liberal voting record in the entire Senate, even more so than Nancy Pelosi. You will be guilty of their blood on your hands. This election will settles the issue by determing the fate of the Supreme Court. A vote for Obama is a vote for killing the innocent. God will not hold guiltless those who kill or condone the killing of the innocent.
going back to the beginning of this whole discussion, i have a question: are we to assume that if one candidate is a christian and the other is not, that the christian candidate is automatically the best choice??…
do we take this approach to choices we make in other areas of our lives (such as regarding our health)?? in other words, if a christian neurosurgeon got C’s in med school, while an unbelieving neurosurgeon got A’s,, which doctor would we choose to perform brain surgery on our child??
Well for what it’s worth - we’re not a Christian nation. Maybe sad, but definitely true. We have a lot of Christians, or at least people who claim to be Christians, but we don’t have the fruit as a nation.
As for picking a candidate based solely on faith - I think that would be foolish. Of everyone I remember running, Mike Huckabee probably was the most “Christian” candidate, but probably one of the worst choices for president. Mr. Obama invites us to consider him as a Christian, and we have done so. I find that whatever he has been taught is Christianity does not line up with the Bible. That being aside, I wouldn’t vote for him even if most of what he said did line up with the Bible because his voting record does not fall in line with God’s word. I would also not vote for him because I feel that a lot of his ideas, while maybe well-meaning, would actually hurt our society more than they would help.
Change just for its own sake is not always good. We have a lot of people who don’t like where we are right now as a nation and figure that anyone in the opposing party would be good because it would be “change”. However, that same change will most likely lead to higher taxes, more judges who make decisions based on current trends rather than actual law, and creating a mess of our health care system on the order of Social Security (which is scheduled to be FAR in the red within the next 40 years).
Sadly, I don’t think either of the major candidates are the best person to lead our country, so I’m once again forced to choose the lesser of two evils. In this case, it’s going to be harder for me to vote than it has been in a while - just because I don’t really like my choices but I can’t justify throwing away a vote to Mr. Obama.
“Look, I’ve got two daughters, 9 years old and 6 years old,” Obama said. “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
Whistleblower Jill Stanek, a Chicago nurse, described the practice of killing babies in what is now known as “live-birth abortion.” Illinois tried to stop the practice. But in 2002, as state legislator there, Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies who were “accidentally” born alive during attempts to abort them.
“I could not bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone in a soiled utility room, so I cradled and rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived,” Stanek told the U.S. Congress, describing one such case. “He was too weak to move very much, expending any energy he had trying to breathe. Toward the end he was so quiet that I couldn’t tell if he was still alive unless I held him up to the light to see if his heart was still beating through his chest wall.”
As concerns the Induced Infact Liability Act bill, read the text of it… There is a question of its constitutionality, plus it may well be a veiled attempt to put abortion clinics out of business, all the while likely making prenatal care and obgyn followup a rarity. Things rarely operate in a vacuum.
Ultimately though, if an infant is likely to live, it will recieve care… and its unlikely that insurance will cover it, thus the medical facility will have to eat the cost anyhow.. yet in some ways its an ins co nightmare. Ie what the bill would do, is send obgyn malpractice premiums through the roof… and those folks are already in short supply. In passing this… how many non aborted babies would die, due to inadequate or untimely care, do to an exodus of physicians.
If folks really wanted to end abortion, they would understand it is a matter of the heart, not the law that will make a difference.... and secondly… to change hearts, its going to cost them dearly. But folks are cheap, and its easier to armchair quaterback while babies die.... than it is to make a real difference in the lives of young women and their children. (yes, a few churches do provide a support system for young moms to be… and beyond in order to prevent abortion.... but doing so hits folks in the pocketbook so it is a rarity) Instead folks will try to do the law thing… it has not happened in 30+ years, and its unlikely to change.... if you do want to see abortion end, be prepared to pay, and make hard choices, as doing so will impact your lifestyle. The church can step up, the question is, will members be willing to do so, and as usually, the answer is no. God will judge.... nor for a law or lack there of, but for what is on peoples hearts.
Obama is a Christian, and he lives his faith… granted his views on the destiny of the unevangelized are not aligned with those of US evangelicals, but they are shared with over 50% of the Christians on the planet. Its unlike the nearly 30% of US protestant Christians who ascribe to Nestorianism.... a much more dangerous thing, than Obama’s vague soteriological issue as concerns faith and works.
Rev Wright is a man of God, and virtually no one, no how after hearing him for 20 years is not going to have the word of God impact their life. One may not like liberation theology, but grab any one of Rev Wrights mp3’s and you will hear the Gospel is preached plain as day time and time again. (he does come down hard and call folks to repentance.... that is not ear tickling, and many will likely be offended, but it is the Gospel in its entirety, a somewhat rare thing today.
Amen to mnphysicist. I have been voting for Republicans for over 20 years over the pro-life issue, believing that they would work to reverse Roe v. Wade, or put in Supreme Court justices that will. Nothing has changed, nor do I believe that it will via legislation. As mnphysicist said, it’s a matter of changing hearts. If any of the above commenters think that McCain is going to reverse abortion law, I think you’ll find you’re sadly mistaken. McCain is not so much pro-life as pro states rights. At best he will kick the issue back to the states. How many states, then, do you think will put in place a comprehensive abortion ban?
MN;
Youre ears have certainly been tickled...you claim we will have to pay heavily if abortion were outlawed. We already PAY $300 million a year to HAVE ABORTIONS done.
You justify the Obama’s stance on LIVE BIRTH ABORTION using his own words...consitutionality....if OBAMA and you beleive that it was unconsitutional, why did it PASS as law???? Wow, not only was Obama morally wrong in actively fighting against a law that protecrted babies from dying after parturition, but he and YOU are clearly wrong on the consitutionality of a law that has passed.
We all do realize that Jesus elected Obama don’t we? “The powers that be are ordained by God...” Seeing this is irrefutable, Obama will either be a vessel of honor or dishonor. Our job is to pray for him to be a vessel of honor. I he is not, God will derive glory whether he be a Pharoah or a Joseph. This discussion about his faith should pretty much be over by now, eh?
Page 2 of 2 pages
< 1 2