HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

Defining “Churches That Don’t Give a Rip”

Orginally published on Tuesday, November 01, 2005 at 10:48 AM
by Todd Rhoades

OK… we’ve had some great conversations in the past week on a couple of different posts here at the blog.  Here’s a brief update if you’re just now joining the conversation:  It all started with this post that had a quote by Pastor Bill Hybels (of Willow Creek fame)…

"The average church on the corner of Elm and Vine doesn't give a flying rip about people far from God. They're an annoyance. They use bad words. They sleep in the wrong bed. They drink too much booze. They're an annoyance."

Many people took offense to this comment.  I later clarified my thoughts on the quote in a subsequent post here.

Besides getting off the subject too many times to count... that individual post got way too long; so we'll start over here.

I've done numerous posts on uneffective churches here before (like this post).  Overall, I think many, if not most people think that there are a lot of churches that are dead out there and have not future.  But when you try to define who they are (like saying that many churches don't give a rip about the lost), many of the same people get all up in arms and get way too defensive.

I've found this to be true in my own denomination/conference.  We have our share of dead churches; but no one will ever move to shut any of them down.  And to hear some of the dying churches talk; things are either 1.  rosey; or 2.  terrible because they get no help from other 'more blessed' churches.

So... here is your assignment.  What is a dead church?  What kind of church should you leave if you're the pastor of?  What is it about a church that makes it ineffective to the point that it should just close?  What do you take out of a church that just makes it a social club?  Are there really churches beyond repair?  What percentage of the 300,000 churches in America fit into this category?  10%?  20%?  The majority?  What's your take?

I realize there are a lot of questions there.  I guess the two main things I'd like to hear... How would you describe a 'dead church' and when, if ever, do you think a church should shut down because of ineffectiveness?

(NOTICE:  This is not about mega-churches.  This post is not about tithing.  It's not about anything other than what causes churches to be dead).  Anything off topic will be deleted.

You have the microphone...


This post has been viewed 567 times so far.


 TRACKBACKS: (0) There are 37 Comments:

  • Posted by Bernie Dehler

    But Peter, I was talking about the false prosperity gospel teachers, and how they should be opposed (regardless of whether they are mega-pastors or mini-pastors), and you were reacting to that specifically, as if they should not be addressed, because it would be stating what you are against.

    Apostle Paul says:

    Galatians 1:6-8
    6I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— 7which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. 8But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!

  • Posted by

    Bernie,

    I am one of five pastors in a church of about 1000 people, growing all the time, and since we are SS, that means we have a lot of new believers and not-yet-believers here.

    I am VERY busy in my job, and as such I do NOT have time to crusade against those you speak of, no matter how wacky they are. I’m too busy doing the positive work of the Gospel in my community, the true Gospel, the Gospel of grace, where sinful man meets God because of the blood of Christ. It’s what I’m called to do. I’ll leave it to you to crusade against them, if it is your calling and function. But I really don’t think it is everybody’s function to do that.

    And by the way, our church is very much NOT dying, and that is because we focus on our function, we focus on reaching the person who is far from God with the message of God’s grace in Jesus Christ. God has made it clear to us that THAT is our purpose and our function, and we are very dedicated to it.

    In fact, getting back to the original question, perhaps churches die because they lose sight of their function? their purpose? Any thoughts out there? And here’s another thought… Perhaps sometimes a church NEEDS to close its doors. Here’s a couple analogies. Eventually all the film processing places will go out of business because of the digital revolution. They had a purpose and function, but no longer. Someday, this planet will run out of oil. The refineries will shut down. They had a purpose and function, but no longer.

    Perhaps some churches are not built to last, in that they are only able to reach a certain people-group that then dies out. If they close their doors, and another church in town is reaching the next generation, is that necessarily always a bad thing?

    I’m not saying either way… I’m asking? Any thoughts on that?

  • Posted by

    AL SAYS IT RIGHT HERE!!

    “What makes churches die?  Christ is not lifted up and man is.” (Posted by: Al | Nov 1, 2005)

    I’d also add that people perish for lack of God’s word.  FEED THEM HIS word, not ours. It’t about the only thing the world isn’t offering them.

  • Posted by JB Skaggs

    A primary issue is that 1st World culture is changing.  Society is becoming more and more electronically connected and physically disconnected.  Even in third world countries where people lack clothing and cars- many have cell phones. People would rather sacrifice time to their online lives than the sweat and labor to maintain real world relationships.  This slippage into electronic life is frightening and as society slips so will the church.

    People today have become coursened and impatient and therefore have little time for the slowpoke speed of real life interaction.  Kids join a church and then expect instantaneous change in themselves and others.  Then if the church responds in its predictable slow real world manner the kids quit.  Pastors expect the elderly to respond in the 21st century manner of right here right now.  The young fear tradition and the old fear change and it is the church that suffers.  The church once was a center for education and community- it has been replaced in many parts by the internet, wal mart, and the cell phone.  Elders were once mentors- and as such they were the wisdom of the youth and the youth were their strength- but this has become corrupted by the youth hungering for the elderly’s wealth and ridiculing the elder’s wisdom.  While the elderly make no time for the young- instead buying them off with money and toys rather than discipline and training.  And it is our pastors who most poignantly suffer- alone and distrusted by both sides.  So both worlds withdraw one to their church buildings the other to the coffee shops and internet chat rooms.

    The problem isn’t so much what is the church doing wrong- but will it survive in a world where entertainment outranks even govt politics?  If the church then becomes just another venue of entertainment- will the numbers justify the means?

    Churches really are changing but so is the world- I think the word is polarization. People are isolating themselves more and more- while communicating more and more electronically and I don’t know of an easy answer on how the church can respond.

    But I do know that the church will survive- maybe not in it’s current form.  But God will keep His Church alive.

    JB Skaggs

  • Posted by Bernie Dehler

    Peter said:
    “I am VERY busy in my job, and as such I do NOT have time to crusade against those you speak of, no matter how wacky they are.”

    But Peter, you can do this in the course of your “business.” When you preach the gospel, give some current good and bad examples of what you are comparing and contrasting with.  This provides clarity.  When you explain what grace is, also explain what it isn’t, and why other doctrines are perversions (prosperity gospel, mormonism, catholicism (with regards to ‘penance’), legalism, religiousity, etc.).  Yes, you may have a Mormon, Catholic, Jehovah Witness, or Benny Hinn fans in your audience, but don’t shrink back from proclaiming the truth boldly.  This ignorance is killing Christianity, keeping us lukewarm, and making a mockery of our faith.  I hope you worry more about losing a soul than you do losing a donor.

    ...just my opinion.

    ...Bernie

  • Posted by Randy Seiver

    It is always amazing to me how many Christian leaders subscribe to the adage, “He that tooteth not his own horn, the same shall not be tooted.” It doen’t matter how busy we are with our positive message in a “large and growing ministry” (somehow that always needs to work its way into the conversation), we need to take the time to say something negative about the devastating doctrines that are pervading the modern church. Positive truth is often impossible to grasp apart from setting it in bold relief to the error surrounding it.

  • Posted by Brian La Croix

    I don’t have a problem addressing negative doctrines and teachings, but I do it in the context of the messages as I go through a particular book of the Bible.  Right now we’re going through Matthew, and we’ve addressed a number of beliefs that are contrary to Scripture.

    Unfortunately, there are too many pastors who think that their job is to talk about the negative every week.  Every message is “agin’” something, rather than on the positive message of Scripture.  Is it any wonder that some churches are more identified with what they are against rather than what they’re for?

    Do the Scriptures address negative things and heresy?  Yup.  But is the overall tone of the Bible negative?  Nope!

    Don’t ignore sin, heresy, etc., but it shouldn’t be the focus every week.

    I think that some of the churces that “don’t give a rip” are so focused on this, that they will never care about reaching people because they’re more concerned about screening out those who aren’t “agin” everything they are, whether the concern is Scriptural or not.

    Brian

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    I’d be interested in hearing more about your ministry, Randy.

    Todd

  • Posted by

    “But Peter, you can do this in the course of your “business.” “

    Sure I can speak against things I’m against in the normal course of my life, but it STILL won’t be my crusade. My “crusade” is for the Gospel of Christ - The good news that there is a way out, a way to know God, a way to live forever. That is my crusade.  There are far too many churches in the area I live that don’t seem to “give a rip.” Churches that are so hyper-legalistic that people end up just not coming. The irony is, that so many of the folks that end up staying and growing at our “non-legalistic” church actually end up behaving like the “legalists” want them to anyway! THAT’s the power of grace!

    Let’s ALL “give a rip”! The Holy Spirit will settle all the small stuff if we will just commit to loving on people and living/preaching the Gospel!

  • Posted by Randy Seiver

    Todd,

    I assume since my latest post here is the nearest “Randy” antecedent, it is my ministry you are interested in knowing more about. If you will send me your e mail address again, I will be happy to tell you what I have been involved in over the past 30 years. My ministry has primarily been one of Bible Teaching and now church planting.

  • Posted by Randy Seiver

    Brian,

    I think yours is the right approach.  I have never been a snake hunter, but, the reptile rights bunch notwithstanding, I do not hesitate to kill a snake when it crosses my path. Snake hunting will quickly get us sidetracked. There is too much for us to be for to spend our time being against everything.

  • Posted by Tim Ritter

    Here’s the paradox.
    We have a hard time defining a dead church, but other people don’t.  Except in areas that have very small stable populations, if a church isn’t growing it is exactly because something in it “smells dead” to those outside looking in.  People in this culture are largely attracted to things that are challenging, thriving, and growing. 
    Well over half of the current church would seem to be dead in this sense.  I don’t think those we want to reach are just staying outside, I think they are actively running away from much of what the church in the US today is, or at least what it appears to be.  “They will know us by the love we have for one another” has never been more timely.
    The bigger problem, or at least one that is harder to see, is the large dead churches.  I am very SS in my approach, really ST or PM even.  Most large or mega churches I have seen or been a part of in some way DEPEND on people growing spiritually and giving of themselves in more ways than financially.  People today need to serve and involve themselves in a greater cause, and we see this trend responded to both inside and outside the church.  The large, dead churches I speak of have been hinted at already in posts above.  TBN, faith movement churches, etc.  Lot of them out there, but attacking them is not the solution either.  That repels people from our real mission.  Let’s reach people in the best ways we can, stop the infighting, and let our light shine in such a way that those shining lights that don’t reflect Christ are simply outshone.  Put the spotlight on grace and the gospel, stop pointing it in each others eyes, and we’ll see the kingdom advance. 
    Lost and broken people can not, will not, and should not join in a fight that isn’t theirs.  There is a real battle out there, and it does involve them, but that’s not what the dead churches, or many of the live ones even, have been really showing to the world.

  • Page 2 of 2 pages

     <  1 2
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: