MondayMorningInsight.com > Florida Pastor Cleans House: Fires SIX Staff Pastors

HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

Florida Pastor Cleans House: Fires SIX Staff Pastors

Orginally published on Sunday, November 16, 2008 at 11:25 PM
by Todd Rhoades

After being on the job just a year, Dr. Mark Cummins did the unthinkable: He fired six of his staff pastors; six pastors who were considered loyalists of the previous, long-term pastor. According to Ocala.com, the firings have caused a major rift in one of the areas largest and most prominent churches. in 2007, Cummings came on staff as the pastor, replacing 20 year veteran Rev. Ed Johnson. What was the main reason for the firings? The church is not really saying... other than an email sent to church elders on Halloween from the six staff that called the senior pastor "manipulative," "dishonest," and "untrustworthy". They followed up that email, calling for a meeting with the deacons, but were referred to the church's personnel committee. A meeting with the personnel committee lasted for nine hours, according to the Ocala newspaper...

After the meeting, the Senior Pastor was cleared of any wrongdoing. In an attempt to bring some reconciliation to the staff, the deacons scheduled individual meetings with the six pastors for November 4. When none of the six showed up for the meeting, the six were fired.

Last Sunday, during the service, some members ‘shouted down’ Dr. Cummins, forcing him to cut the service short. According to the newspaper, a ‘couple hundred’ worshipers crowded the altar, chanting “We want the truth”.

Dr. Cummins says he hopes for reconciliation with the fired pastors.

Whenever I report a story such as this, inevitably I will get emails telling me not to spread this bad stuff around. I totally understand. However, the reason I do report such things is I think they make great studies for every pastor and church to consider. Here are some examples:

1. If you’re the senior pastor of a church with multiple staff, what would you do if you had a situation of staff mutiny?

2. If you have one person who needs to be fired, that’s tough enough. But what if the problem extends to more than one staff members, or a group of staff members? Are you willing to take the risk to do what you need to do?

3. If you’re a staff member and you have a problem with your senior pastor, how do you proceed? Forming a coalition and emailing bad stuff and blowing off meetings with the personnel team didn’t work in this case? How should you voice your concern?

4. What would you do if you were shouted down in a service, or if a good number of your people started chanting ‘we want the truth’.

5. How do you respond to the secular press, who always seem to have a heyday with this kind of thing?

Without knowing the situation, it is impossible to know if these staff members had a valid complaint; or if they were just a bunch of trouble makers. And that is not really the point of this point. The point of this post is to see how things can go so, so wrong… and think through how you might respond to such a situation. That could have a huge benefit you in the future of your ministry.

So… what are your answers to the above questions? I’d love to hear your thoughts!

Todd
Follow me on Twitter for updates like this throughout the day!

You can read more here and here.

This post has been viewed 6128 times so far.

There are 72 Comments:

Posted by

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 2:04 PM

Kareem,
I think you’re missing some of the facts that came out outside of the article that Todd linked to. Check out Kevin’s site for a more complete set of links and comments on this issue. Also look through the comments at the original site and the more investigative piece. It seems that these people were not the ones who spread the e-mails and they never actually got the meeting they requested. I appreciate you stepping in and trying to present another side to this and definitely appreciate the view from your perspective. From my reading on this it sounds very much like these people were not treated fairly and were not causing a mutiny of any sort - they had valid concerns that they wanted to address and were not allowed to do so in a fair manner. From everything I’ve read, they have kept quiet since their dismissal and have not stepped forward to give interviews or cause lots of chaos. The stories I’ve read sound very much like this is something that was brought about by the manner in which this situation was handled.

My current church went through something similar to this before I joined it and there was a whole lot of healing needed to move past that time. This story reads very much like the situation we were in at that time where people who had valid concerns were silenced as much as possible.
Posted by

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 2:26 PM

Peter according to the links provided…

The committee took up the complaint at that marathon meeting and cleared Cummins of any wrongdoing. In an attempt to reconcile the dispute and the allegations, the panel scheduled individual meetings with the six disgruntled pastors on Nov. 4.

When none of them showed to defend their assertions, they were fired by the personnel committee with a letter signed by Cummins; Terry Upton, president of the church’s trustees; and Jeff Ruttenber, the chairman of the deacon team.

from my reading of the links, they were given very much a fair opportunity… in both links it states they failed to show up to the meeting scheduled for each one of them…

Martin,
I believe this church has proven their record of accountability… the staff at the church is pretty much the same staff that was put in place by the previous pastor...and there were no complaints about accountability…

letters were signed by two of the top officals within the Baptist Church...the chairman of the Trustees and the chairman of the Deacons…

all of the proper protocol was established…
Posted by

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 2:51 PM

People. I am from the church He killed. How can a pastor do what he did and move to another church and do the same.NO accountability
Posted by Martin Davis

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 3:04 PM

This is an issue for another thread (and I’ll be posting a piece on this tonight on my blog site, http://faithandfumbleswriter.typepad.com), but there’s an important distinction to be made--that between process and accountability.

Churches have lots of process, but very little accountability. What’s the difference? More on my website tomorrow.
Posted by

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 5:37 PM

Kareem:

I think you missed the point of my comment. I believe from what we have read, right, wrong or indifferent, how this situation has been handled calls into question Dr. Cummins qualifications as an elder. If you have a staff mutiny, it seems it would be the tip of the iceburg, not the iceburg itself.

How this thing has gotten completely out of control gives anyone of us little assurance that this is the only thing going on. We are talking about the governing of a church. I think God puts these qualifications in place to avoid these situations.

These men leading the church should be peacable. People come with many problems and sinful natures too. Feeding them, correcting them, loving them and protecting them is not a job for every man and impossible to do without God. I don’t believe Dr. Cummins is protecting his flock at this point in time.

I guess what I am saying is if you have these issues in your church, it is time to look long and hard at the men leading the church. You shouldn’t be deciding what to do if this happens, you should be making sure you are leading in a way to insure this never happens!This look also applies to the men who were fired as well. If the church decides to examine the men’s claims, they should be held to the 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 standards when the church evaluates how they conducted themselves.

I can say without hesitation if this happened to my husband, even if he was right, he would step down. Your good reputation in the community is a qualification for an elder. There is no halfway point in this. My husband holds himself to a higher standard because of the calling God has placed on his life.
Posted by

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 9:27 PM

Todd Rhoades made the statement at the end of his post “Without knowing the situation, it is impossible to know if these staff members had a valid complaint; or if they were just a bunch of trouble makers...” In conflicts as this, when in position of arbitrator, it serves as an advantage to enter in not knowing the situation, and thus more discerning - possibly. But being outside the situation also can serve as a disadvantage at times and makes you ignorant and ill informed to intelligently comment on something of such grave importance. The latter is the case here.

At the same time the Lord urged us to not be judgmental (as many are crying out in favor of Cummins) the Word also urges us to be constantly discerning and that “the prophets are subject to the prophets.” Kevin, and the literal hundreds (I being one of them) that have been through it with Cummins and begged FBCO not to call this guy are using that biblical discernment and wisdom in making sense of this as well as warning others.

Mr. Rhoades and many of those commenting here in protection of such men as Cummins should know better if they have any ministry experience. Cummins has proved himself a modern day Diotrephes to the “t”.

How can I say this? Because I was one of his casualties. I was a missionary from and long time member of FBCWH. I long had suspicions of him but blew them off as my idiocy. I was eager to meet him.

As I was calling for an appointment to meet with my new pastor, I get a letter stating I was dropped and with no explanation. I finally got a meeting and only said smiling and with hand out to shake hands “hi, I think something is ....” and he took the next 45 minutes and charged me with “spiritual embezzlement” (I am quoting) and proceeded to tear me up. I broke down in tears. I didn’t even know him or he me. Then said my former pastor said all these things - he didn’t and was incensed to be accused of such a thing.

I won’t go on...but literally HUNDREDS of us have been through it - that is pretty overwhelming evidence. I called their staff (s so many did) and begged them not to call him in Ocala, they ignored us. It was/is cultish and scary. Again, “Diotrephes loves to have the preeminence...”

Diotrephes is alive and well in men like him and we who are in ministry should know better and need to shield the weak of the flock from them as we are held accountable to do so. The shepherds carries both a staff and a club - we have put away the club and the wolves have moved in in droves.

Ok, I’m done. (Todd, you may have opened a can of worms with this one - next subject?)
Posted by

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 12:09 AM

To Trent Kirkland,

I respect the fact that you show loyalty to Mark Cummins. I think everybody shares my opinion. I have have known him for a couple of years as my parents both held positions of leadership in First Baptist Church of West Hollywood. My father was the Vice President of the church and the associated school and my mother was the womens ministry director. My parents played a role in the hiring of Mark Cummins.

Even though Mr Cummins is your mentor and best friend that does not mean he is incapeable of doing wrong. After knowing him for 20 years this is probably very hard for you to hear people say things like this about him. I assure you it is not unwarrented. If you look at his record over the past few years you will start to see a pattern forming. Either Mark is the most intelligent person on earth and everybody else is wrong or he is making terrible decisions and trying to make them looks like good ones to the people who seem to be feeding his ego.

I too had a very high opinion of Mark Cummins because simply put, he is an easy guy to like. That was until I heard him publicly lie and bad mouth one of my mentors, Pastor Bud McCord, from behind the pulpit. I realized then that he may not be the man of character that I once thought he was. After he manipulated people, spoke negatively of people, fired people for no reason, lied from the pulpit etc… people began catching on to his lies, his disregard for others and total lack of respect for the people who were in his position before him.

Now I do not know the full story of what happened in Ocala but I have seen first hand the way he treats people who trust him. I believe that if you were there to see the other side of the story rather than his one sided story, you would agree that he has not acted as a man of God. He has hurt a lot of people and done a lot of damage to churches and to the cause that he was hired for.

I too have no problem attaching my name to my opinion which is shared by a lot of hurting people because of your mentor and best friend.

Sadly I think you may be wrong about Mark not being a church killer as this is the second one in just a few years he has played a major role in killing. You are right about Mark being a leader though. I believe he could be making a huge difference in the community and the world if he would only lead in the right direction. That is the real reality that these people of Ocala and those in Hollywood now live with.

I agree Mark didnt have to fire those 6 pastors. He didnt have to fire the pastors from Hollywood either. He didnt have to take away a home and a car from Pastor McCord. He didnt have to stop supporting the missionaries and former pastors of FBCWH but he did. He was very succesful at destroying a lot of things that FBCWH stood for.

I am not going to fill this response with bible verses or try and preach to anybody here. I’m simply going to tell you how it is and how it has been for the last few years. How dare Mark Cummins come into our homes and lie to our faces. How dare he talk bad about our family members and then blame us for not being “right” with God when we become angry with him. Out of respect for my family and who they were and still are to our extended family in Hollywood I will not say anything more.

Matthew Crump
Posted by

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 2:53 AM

Rev Kareem:

I have reread your posts. I appreciate your position, but I must say there seems to be no room for the possibility of sinfulness on the part of the senior pastor.

The pastor only being accountable to God is a very dangerous place for him to be. In our church, we believe the pastor to be the first among equals. Each of these men hold one another accountable to God’s standard for leading His church. (After reading your posts, I am sure you disagree with that. ) These men not only hold one another accountable, but affirm God’s leading to one another as well.

I still believe the particulars of the situation have become secondary and this situation has brought reproach upon Dr. Cummins. I understand there is the possibility that he did everything correctly, but he must be above reproach and my OPINION is that is no longer true.

1. If we were to have a staff mutiny, I believe my pastor would be a peacemaker and attempt to be just. Before the meeting, ask if the six men would be willing to sit down with him and work through it.

2. Our church believes so strongly in making sure the men who lead us meet the qualifications in 1 Timothy and Titus that I just cannot see this ever happening. Since we are governed by a board of elders, their unanimous decision with biblical explanation of the firing is the very least we would expect as a church. I can assure you if there was a biblical problem, our church would have exercised church discipline before it got to this point in hopes of reconciliation. If it was merely the wrong fit in the ministry team, I believe my pastor would pray and patiently wait for God to move them out of the way. I do have a hard time imagining God would say “Go fire all of them!” I recognize He could, but it is just hard for me to imagine.

3. We hear grievances on the pastor on the testimony of two or more witnesses. These witnesses can take their testimony to the elders who meet weekly and they would evaluate it apart from the senior pastor. Also: Our elders (including the senior pastor) are affirmed yearly. If anyone has a grievance with any of them, the church member must write their BIBLICAL grievance and must sign their name. Two or more of the same grievance would get looked into...I am not aware of this ever happening.

4. I think my pastor would have already dealt with the situation leading up to this so something like this did not happen. He would have the reasons out there for everyone to filter through the Bible. He would not hide his reasons or the process. If they yelled him down during the service, at that moment he would set up a time other than the service to answer their questions. He is a gentle, just, and peaceable man.

5. Again, I cannot see this happening at my church because of how we are governed. The men who lead my church would not let something like this happen unless they had lost their biblical moorings. As my pastor is transparent as well as loving, I think he would be honest. But if it got to this point, sadly, I know he would step down...even if he was completely right.

My post had more to do with a challenge to us all to take how are pastors deal with these situations through the qualifications they must have. I think “above reproach” is a simple one to evaluate. Do you think Dr. Cummins is still above reproach? Do you think the members of his church do? Do the members think he was just? Do they think he was respectable in how he dealt with it? Do the members believe he still has a good reputation with those outside the church? I believe the church members must answer these questions about their pastor. It only takes one “No” to require the pastor to step down.

I am sorry my post got under your skin, so to speak. Being the wife of a church leader, these were merely my thoughts on the situation. My impressions of your posts are that you think God is more interested in the ends, what the pastor is accomplishing, rather than the means, how he is accomplishing them. I happen to believe who he is as a pastor and how he is accomplishing things is equally important as what he gets accomplished.
Posted by

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 9:14 AM

FLMom,
I agree 100% that a pastor is to live up to the qualifications Paul set out in his Epistles… I agree that the pastor is to be a man of high esteem...and is to walk worthy of his calling… I understand there are many questions as regards to Cummins leadership qualifications… but we must also look at the fact that they called him to pastor despite his questionable leadership style… that’s just like saying, “we’re going to cast lots on you and if you fall out being good then we’ll live with the praise of calling you, but if by some reason you do something bad then we’ll shun you…” I agree if they had stayed true to the Bible as their source for calling him to pastor then maybe they wouldn’t be in this situation today… but how many ministries actually follow the Biblical standards for calling pastors? Many would call a pastor based upon his ability to emotionalize the people… many would call a pastor based upon his popularity and many other criteria… Thank God for organisms that calls pastors based on the Scripture…

Personally if I’m under a leader who’s not living up to the Biblical standard, I would personally remove myself from that ministry… (I did it before in the past when I was under a leader who wasn’t…) I have personal experience with being under a pastor who constantly lied from the pulpit, who’s personal lifestyle was a hindrance on the ministry, who didn’t live up to the Biblical qualifications for pastors, who has killed a ministry that was once flourishing… from a personal viewpoint, I was under a pastor who came in and didn’t use the associate pastors that were already there before he arrived… I experienced this first hand the wolves in sheep clothes… God spoke to my heart to step down and leave that ministry… (I was the Youth Pastor with a ministry that started out with 10 active youth and when I left we had well over 100 active youth)… it was a hard pill to swallow, but I had to be obedient to God… God told me not to fight… I sat down with that pastor and told him my concerns…. But nothing changed… I obeyed God and right now I’m under the leadership of a sr. pastor that lives up to the Biblical standard set out in the Bible… not only did I leave but 3 other pastors left as well… and we’re all flourishing in the ministry… God allowed us to experience that to help us in our ministries…

The pastor being accountable to God is the most severe place to be… who better to chastise God or man? I believe God still chastise today…

What send a question in my mind are the six men not showing up for the meeting…

I appreciate your stance on Biblical qualifications… and if I sound offended, I apologize… I was just bringing out the questions that Todd raised… and you’re right, this shouldn’t have went this far… this should have been addressed a long time ago… in the end we have to respect this pastors decisions and pray for healing of those affected and pray for God’s will for that ministry… and for those that has been affected by pastor Cummins ministry I pray for you as well… I pray that this was a learning experience that would make you better… as being a person that sat in your seat and walked in your same shoes many times situations like this make people bitter… I pray that you could heal and move forward in the work of the Lord…
Posted by

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 12:12 PM

Rev Kareem:

My husband also left a church due to a respectful disagreement with the pastor. We also left quietly. Very few people knew why we left. Those who knew why and those who didn’t still respected our desire to obey God and they knew our character. We still pray for them, they still pray for us. We recognize the church is universal and we are still family.

“But how many ministries actually follow the Biblical standards for calling pastors?” That is the hardest hitting and saddest part of your post because of the answer. You are right, not many churches use these standards. It is almost as if most of our churches are merely looking for a motivational speaker. I find it hard to imagine Peter or Paul fitting that mold.

You are right pointing out people at FBCO knew of the potential problems with Dr. Cummins leadership style and chose to call him anyway. I wonder if those in leadership made the information available to the members. If they did not make the information available, can we not understand, atleast in part, their frustration as a church body? It is not my understanding that the six pastors had anything to do with the yelling incident on Sunday, but rather the church members.

Are these circumstances something God would use to chastise a pastor? I just don’t know the answer to that. What is our God going to use to hold a pastor accountable? Is that what God is doing in this situation? This church must answers those questions for themselves as a local body.

I am not a member of this church and I do not know Dr. Cummins, but I am praying for them and trusting a God who has promised that all things work together for good, to those who love God and are called according to His purpose.

This tragic situation magnifies the very serious need for qualified men to lead the church.

It has been encouraging to dialog with you.
Posted by

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM

FLMom…
same here… TGBTG…
Posted by

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 3:19 PM

I am a member of FBC Ocala and would like to let you know that so far the TRUTH has not come out. Just for clarification Mr. Kirkland we did not receive any email or automated voice message as you have so erroneously stated and we did not know anything about the firings until we received a one sided letter from the church signed by the Chair, Deacon Team, President, Chair of Trustees and Mark. The following Sunday in church Mark started a sermon and had it flow right into his monologue of the series of events that led to the firings. Mark is the one who took a church service and turned it into a business meeting, all those “couple hundred” people wanted was the TRUTH . I feel that the six would be wasting their time trying to tell their side to the biased deacons and personel committee and it should be done with the entire church in attendance with a vote following the meeting. I think that this will not happen because someone has something to hide. Why all the secrecy Mark? Could it be that your true agenda is to change the name of our church and rewrite the bylaws so that you have complete control? Are you trying to do to us what you did to FBC West Hollywood? By the way FBCWH was the church I accepted Christ as my Savior in and am just saddened by the way you divided it. Can we look for that here too? Will you bring down the membership like you did to FBCWH from 1,000 to 300? Romans 16:17 AVOID DIVISIVE PERSONS Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them. For those who are such do not serve our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly, and by smooth words and flattering speech decieve the hearts of the simple. For your obedience has become known to all. Therefore I am glad on your behalf; but I want you to be wise in what is good, and simple concerning evil. And the God of peace will crush Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you Amen. I ask everyone that reads this blog to please pray for our church and the the will of God be done and all glory to Him.
Posted by

Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 3:27 PM

K.D.
our prayers would continue to be with you’ll… sometimes God has to subract in order to save...consider Gideon and how God had to subtract down to 300… we must remember that God’s ways and thoughts are different from ours… sometimes we get caught up in the number game that we loose sight of who’s in control… God told Gideon that the number had to be reduced so that they’ll know it was Him that delivered them… we never know… somebody may be delivered by this whole event… the key thing we all must do is pray that God’s will (not our own) be done…
Posted by

Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 6:14 PM

I need to correct a statement on my comment. I was for some reason under the impression that my father was the VP of the church and school in Hollywood while I was away at school. It has been brought to my attention that this was not the case. I am sorry if that caused any confusion for anybody who read it. It sure did for me haha

Matt
Posted by

Sunday, November 23, 2008 at 10:24 PM

Check out this link for more Truth.

http://www.fbctruth.com

And please use the Truth to form your opinions. Using hearsay and your own opinion to form another opinion just doesn’t do anyone any good.
Posted by Nick Sunderson

Friday, November 28, 2008 at 7:03 PM

Very fascinating argument.

alabama craft fairs
Posted by Tye

Monday, December 01, 2008 at 10:27 AM

This is a very interesting situation to me since this is precisely what happened to me at my last church, with the exception that there were no meetings offered for reconciliation. Also, I never sent out an email voicing displeasure or speaking negatively about the church.

Note: I was permitted to stay on until I found another permission, yet I considered myself to be fired.

When a senior pastor comes into a church with an existing staff I believe he has an obligation to work with that staff, building bridges, utilizing their gifts and talents, even if a reorganization is needed.

So, did anyone address the concerns of the six staff pastors? I would think not because the new senior pastor was given absolute authority over the staff.

This is a dangerous situation for any church and in the end hurts everyone, not to mention the associates who poured their lives into the church prior to the new pastor’s arrival.
Posted by jessica

Sunday, December 07, 2008 at 7:02 AM

I would suggest bringing your own involvement to select a suitable candidate. I’d want to know how many of the six will truly get involved and discharge their duties?
http://vacationrentalhotspots.com/florida-panhandle-vacation-rentals
Posted by Dave Douglas

Monday, January 05, 2009 at 11:48 AM

I’m a bit late in this discussion, having just picked up on it today. I seem to see things a bit differently than most postings here. I’ve been on support Pastoral staff for large and small churches for more than 25 years. While never a Sr. Pastor, I have been worship pastor, tech minister, adult bible teacher, pulpit supply and evangelist.

I’m very familiar with the style of church and the baptist way of leadership. I have been thoroughly disgusted with the demi-gog spirit of many pastors over the years, the attitude that seems to exist in some that God whispers secret instructions to one or two and the rest of us simply nod our heads and follow like simpletons. I believe this undermines the work of the Holy Spirit in churches, and it destroys the function of spiritual gifts in church structure also.

God’s design for the church is that His people be unleashed for ministry. The anarchial design limits the vision of the church to the nearsightedness of one leader, thus we miss the balance of gifts the church needs in order to be more effective to the community, both saved and lost.

In my personal history with sr. types, I’ve watched the hand of God unravel each one who led their church in this manner. One committed adultery, another absconded with church funds and misappriated them into his personal accounts, another went through 8 ministers of music in 12 years because he couldn’t take his hands off that area of ministry to allow the ones called to it to function. When a new pastor came to one of our churches, I did a cold resignation on him after hearing him cuss and slam doors around the office.

The key to being Christlike in the church is allowing ourselves to be held accountable for our actions, our attitudes, our style of leadership and our personal lives. Biblically, we call this sincerity. Being the same everwhere at all times. It’s sad that so many enter ministry without a clear understanding that it is about servanthood not power. The model is Christ - he GAVE all for us, not to dominate, rule, control or have power, but to love us. Too bad many sr’s don’t understand the concept of loving people.
Posted by pass4sure

Thursday, February 19, 2009 at 4:36 AM

I would like to come here to introduct Top 5 pass4sure certification exams including many popular Microsoft and Cisco exams <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Cisco/642-901.html>642-901</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Cisco/650-251.html>650-251</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Cisco/642-446.html>642-446</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Cisco/642-383.html>642-383</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Microsoft/70-294.html>70-294</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Cisco/640-863.html>640-863</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Cisco/642-456.html>642-456</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Microsoft/70-237.html>70-237</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Cisco/642-825.html>642-825</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/CompTIA/220-601.html>220-601</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/Microsoft/70-236.html>70-236</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/VMware/VCP-310.html>VCP-310</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.nl/IBM/000-071.html>000-071</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/000-071.html>000-071</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/70-236.html>70-236</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/220-601.html>220-601</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/642-901.html>642-901</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/70-237.html>70-237</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/640-863.html>640-863</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/642-456.html>642-456</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/VCP-310.html>VCP-310</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/642-825.html>642-825</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/642-446.html>642-446</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/642-383.html>642-383</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/70-294.html>70-294</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.co.uk/650-251.html>650-251</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Cisco/642-383.html>642-383</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Cisco/650-251.html>650-251</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Microsoft/70-294.html>70-294</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Microsoft/70-237.html>70-237</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Microsoft/70-236.html>70-236</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/VMware/VCP-310.html>VCP-310</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Cisco/642-901.html>642-901</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Cisco/642-446.html>642-446</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Cisco/642-825.html>642-825</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/IBM/000-071.html>000-071</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/CompTIA/220-601.html>220-601</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Cisco/640-863.html>640-863</a> <a href=http://www.pass4sure.eu/Cisco/642-456.html>642-456</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Microsoft/70-237.html>70-237</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-825.html>642-825</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Microsoft/70-236.html>70-236</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/VMware/VCP-310.html>VCP-310</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-456.html>642-456</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/IBM/000-071.html>000-071</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Microsoft/70-294.html>70-294</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-901.html>642-901</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-446.html>642-446</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/650-251.html>650-251</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/640-863.html>640-863</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/CompTIA/220-601.html>220-601</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-383.html>642-383</a> exams, each one are very important in IT industry today.
Posted by

Thursday, February 19, 2009 at 4:39 AM

<a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Microsoft/70-237.html>70-237</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-825.html>642-825</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Microsoft/70-236.html>70-236</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/VMware/VCP-310.html>VCP-310</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-456.html>642-456</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/IBM/000-071.html>000-071</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Microsoft/70-294.html>70-294</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-901.html>642-901</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-446.html>642-446</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/650-251.html>650-251</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/640-863.html>640-863</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/CompTIA/220-601.html>220-601</a> <a href=http://www.passforsure.ca/Cisco/642-383.html>642-383</a>
Posted by tower defense

Monday, March 23, 2009 at 7:04 AM

When a senior leader does not treat the people who hold these beliefs in line with said beliefs, they are called a liar, dishonest, power hungry, deceptive and many worse things. Some people blog about them with statements like “I heard” or “someone said”

Page 3 of 3 pages

« First < 1 2 3

Post Your Comments:

Hi... I'm Todd Rhoades. I'm a Christ-follower, husband, father and I love to connect leaders with other leaders. Hopefully you'll find something here at MMI you like and will return often. If you want, you can find out more about me or follow my every step on Twitter.