HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

Helping People Leave Your Church Graciously

Orginally published on Monday, July 16, 2007 at 7:00 AM
by Todd Rhoades

Craig Groeschel is starting a new series this week at the LifeChurch.tv Swerve Blog on people who need to leave your church. Craig asserts that "occasionally, there are some church members who need to leave for the ministry to move forward. These people might be miserable. Maybe they hate change. Perhaps they care more about their own needs than the needs of others. If someone is directly opposed to the direction God is leading your church, we should do our best to lead them to embrace the vision. If you’ve tried and tried and continue to fail, you may need to gently, lovingly help them find another church." I wholeheartedly agree...

I think I touched on this last week… I am many times discouraged by the number of stories I hear about churches who are struggling because of people who are fighting tooth and nail against the leadership of the church.

As Craig points out, it’s important to leave the back door open a crack.  Some people in your church will, inevitably, keep your church from moving forward.  But how do you help these people either get the vision of your church or leave graciously?  That’s a great question, and I’m glad that Craig is tackling this subject.  We’ll be watching this week’s posts with you… it should be great.  Here’s post #1.

QUESTION FOR TODAY: Honestly now… do you feel like your church has people that need to leave?  Why do you feel this way?  How are these people derailing your churches mission and future?


This post has been viewed 2548 times so far.


  There are 43 Comments:

  • Posted by

    I don’t want to sound like a broken record (here’s something I have said before), but in my experience, if you keep the vision white hot, and make sure everybody knows that you are sold out to it and they should be too, you can and maybe should leave the back door “WIDE OPEN” for people to leave if it’s not for them. We will actually say it from the pulpit!

    I have maintained very few healthy relationships with people who’ve gone this way, but it’s worth trying to do.

  • Posted by

    Couple of quick hits:

    As for the whole concept of “helping people find another church"… I see it as no different than “moving” people within a church from one ministry to another. It is a very hard thing to do. But if you are committed to loving that person, have their needs before your own needs or desires, then I believe God will bless. If the individual resists, and will not submit or develops a bad attitude, that is a sin issue and should be dealt with differently. Also, if the person is a trouble maker in the first place, then “helping them find a new home” is not the right approach as you will be sending someone with a sin problem on to another pastor - what is right about that?

    To come back to a point i just made, you must have the person’s needs foremost in your mind. If you are doing this for self-serving reasons, I do not believe God will bless in the long run. We must have a clear distinction between a sin problem and a “family” issue…

    As a final comment, I think it is interesting how some pastors are willing to do this to staff, but not to board members or congregation members.... too many staff are being hurt in today’s churches by boards and senior pastors who are more concerned about keeping the back door tight (or their jobs), than they are about caring for their staff...ouch, sorry if I stepped on someone’s toes.... grin

    Nuff for now…

  • Posted by

    Well, Todd, I suppose I’m one of the 99%… at least I was, until this morning.  It’s tough leaving the comfort of the masses, even if it is online! smile

    Yes, I believe we have some people who need to leave.  No; actually, they need to actively seek God’s will for themselves, rather than seeking their own way.  Short of that—and all indications seem to point to their never achieving that—they need to remove themselves so that they stop hindering everyone else.  I’ve only been here 2 years, which isn’t very long to effect much positive change; especially for an older church that hasn’t experienced anything different for well over 30 years.  The majority of people are somewhat indifferent to seeing God do something new; there are a few who would like to see him do something, and there are those few who believe that we’re already doing what we should, and God just needs to stay back and let us do our thing.  The few who would like to see God do something new are intimidated, for some reason, by the ones that don’t want God interfering.  I suppose if I had a stronger personality, I’d actively try to convince them to change or leave.  Without any support from others in leadership, though, I don’t see that happening.

    If this church is going to throw off the mantle of slumber that has enveloped it, God will have to do something significant.  Frankly, I’m wondering if he’ll keep me here long enough to see that happen.

  • Posted by Vivian Sawyer

    after reading the first 2 postings, I am conflicted about my response.  We do indeed have people that have a problem with change and tend to cause dissention but the more I think about it, I realize that it is a heart issue and that we need to love them enough to speak the truth in love to them and confront them about their sinful attitude instead of just leaving the door open and hoping they’ll get the hint and leave.  Loving people is why the church exists, and if we only care about them when they are “behaving” we are missing the boat entirely.  There are some people that will leave because that’s their “solution” to problems they see in the church.  But as leaders we should be trying to preserve as many of them as we can by teaching them how to handle problems (including unwanted changes) in a biblical manner and by encouraging and challenging them to embrace the change and see how God intends to use it in the life of the church, but more importantly, in the life of the individual.

  • Posted by John Harvey

    I think people either need to begin shifiting paradigms or they need to shift churches. Our own church is seeing some great fruit from our small group ministry. People not connected to any chruch have joined, attendance at Life Groups is higher than it ever was for Sunday School and yet there are several people fighting us becasue we are doing something different. We still have Sunday School and Wednesday night, but they are not as emphasized because pepole are connecting in home bible studies. For some reason this is a bad thing in other peoples eyes.

    I want these people to stay and get on board. However I am tired of using my energy and the leadership of the chruch to try and keep these people happy. Maybe it would be best if they were to leave. Another interesting note that I have made is that the pepole who feel this way usually are not invested in any ministry area of the church.

  • Posted by

    Vivian writes [Loving people is why the church exists, and if we only care about them when they are “behaving” we are missing the boat entirely.] yes, we need to care about people when they are behaving. I would argue that althoug love is “the thing the church does”, it is not the reason the church exists. The church exists to make people into disciples (which, yes, we do by loving them), and if people aren’t on board with the way that your church does that, don’t you think the most loving thing to do is graciously show them the door and help them find their place in God’s big Kingdom rather than let them stay there and get disgruntled.

    For instance, if your church doesn’t do the “hymn” thing, and someone joins who thinks you should… Perhaps they are in the wrong place. The longer they stay, perhaps the worse it is for everybody!

    THAT’S love.

  • Posted by Jeff

    I began my 8th year here this month. Five years ago I did a sermon where I went through and did the “You may need to find a new church home if...” We had people who were doing all of the things mentioned in the article. The gist was get on board or find a place you can. I did it again the next year, but with a different format.

    And nobody left! The people who were causing the problems thought I was talking about everyone else and vice versa! Now it did energize the body, as preaching to the choir sometimes does. But the problem people stayed until about 18 months ago, and they slowly began to drift away. In most cases they did so without causing a big deal. Most chose to go in the summer or around Christmas vacation.

    There are still a few who will stay until they die, but they have virtually no influence. They are “ill-intentioned” dragons with no fire or teeth. They just take up space and smoke the place up every now and then!

  • Posted by John Harvey

    We deinfatley need to be loving to pepole. But how long do you allow people to be destructive in their behavior and comments before the leadership says enough? We need to understand that there are times that a parting is better for everyone. It does not mean we have to be nasty, but we must be honest and up front for the good of the entire body.

  • Posted by

    Frankly, no! At least that is the case right now. We have had people who “needed” to leave because they attached their own vision or agenda to our church and it was never going to work. I met with those individuals and “invited” them to search for another church in a positive manner. I explained that we were not driven by the same passion and recommended area churches better suited to their vision.

  • Posted by

    There are some in the church who needs to move.  The reason is simply that they are bullies and will never let the church serve in peace.  One in particular has a penchant of saying loudly that the church will close in x number of years. [Of course the church and its presumed closing date has passed several times.] And now is boycotting the church as long as “that person” is preaching.
    Why do these type of people need to go? Simply to stop the abuse of the rest of the church. 
    Why doesn’t the church stand up to them?  Because we are taught to be polite.
    The only problem I have with those who leave is that they will probably abuse the next church they enter.

  • Posted by

    I like what Peter had to say, that is, if the Vision is strong enough and clear; then those who do not strongly agree and fit into that vision need to find a place where they do.  Each church has chosen their leaders, with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and God has given them a vision for how they, in the place they are at, can fulfill the Great Commission and Kingdom Vision Jesus so clearly casted.  Each of us have God given personalities, talents, experience and spiritual gifts that uniquely fit us to a congregation which needs what we can provide.  God is not happy with complaining or rebellion so sometimes, as one pastor I’ve had has said, “blessed deletions” are necessary and welcome.

    Chuck Davis Sr.

  • Posted by Steve Nestor

    This probably hits every pastor square between the eyes.  I fo one, have an open back (and front) door policy.  I do not coddle those who get angry because I preach the truth or have an issue with the church.
    It is their choice to leave (thank you Jesus) or stay and get involved in the program.  Unfortunately, they want to stay and cause trouble.  Actually had a fellow once who said to me, “my job here is to cause trouble, keep things stirred up.” Apparently, he fell out of the boat a long time ago, and does not realize he is drowning on his own.  I think we, as pastors, should try to keep the flock, but not when they begin to stink.

  • Posted by

    OK, I took your challenge and here is my response.  I am incredibly blessed that I have an eldership team that is 100% committed to the ministry.  Nothing, not even people, can break it.  We had a person not long ago get mad at one of my preschool teachers.  I looked into the facts and found my teacher 100% in the right.  I told the disgruntled person our findings and she, after trying to fight back a little, left the church.  About 3 months went by and she came back to the church with a whole new attitude (praise God.) So yes, sometimes people need to be shown the door.  Thankfully in our church no one needs to find it at this time. - - Tetelestai! - D

  • Posted by

    Being a card carrying member of the “church of the month club” every time we have moved to a new city, I try to guide my “church-choice” by the words of my pastor, spiritual leader and friend.

    “When you find the perfect church, don’t join it you will ruin it!”

  • Posted by Leonard

    Asking people to leave is never easy but we are not just shepherds of people, we are stewards of vision, atmosphere, health of the church and more.  These are all things that if we are not great stewards of we will never keep the vision white hot.  The bible also says warn a divisive person once; again then have nothing to do with them.  Sort of a biblical version of three strikes and you are out.

  • Posted by

    It is easy for me to agree with most of the comments written already.  I know how to “lead” my church. I’ve read the leadership books. I’ll be sitting at Willow in just a couple weeks for my yearly pilgrimage to learn how to be a great “leader.” I know that leaders must make tough decisions in order for their organizations to grow and often times, these tough decisions involve people.

    On the other hand, I also know I am called to be a “shepherd.” God has entrusted me with a “flock” and I am responsible to love, tend, care, and nurture them. I wonder, should I be able to sleep at night knowing that I’ve left the back door open for a flock member who is not as easy to love? I wonder if there was an internationally satellite broadcast conference on shepherding and pastoring we might not rest so easy in our answering of this question.

  • Posted by Tye

    Nice job Todd! It worked!

    First, is the church based on servant leadership?
    Second, is the mission, vision, and values clearly presented through various forms?
    Third, the goal of the church is discipleship.

    The question is, after all the above, what do you do with someone who refuses to play a simple game of “follow the servant leader.” If they are unable to do that, they should probably find another place to serve, but only after all avenues have been exhausted.

    Make sense?

  • Posted by Leonard

    One of the primary tasks of shepherding is leadership.  M&M;we are not mearly to love, tend, care for and nurture them we are to lead them, discipline them, (shepherds of old actually broke the legs of wandering lambs) we are to show them the right paths, we are to guard them as well.  If there is a threat in the pen, a good shepherd will keep an open spot for that danger to leave.  I am sure you know this as well.

  • Posted by

    There are many churches where God needs to clean house.  Whether that be by us showing people the door or them leaving of their own accord.  Yes, we are shepherds, and just because we let a person leave does not mean that we are letting them leave the flock.  Remember, the church universal is the FLOCK.  Yes, some people need to leave, and the sooner the better.  Maybe your church needs to go from 5000 to 500 before God can do a work there.  I know that may be an exaggeration, but think about it.  My home church went from over 200 in attendance on Sundays to under 30.  And yes, that many people needed to go.  There was infighting and no peace. God did a miracle, and today that church is thriving.  The people that left still go to church elsewhere, and for the most part have found the part of the flock they should be in.

  • Posted by Tom

    Right now I can’t think of anyone about whom I would say, “It’s time he was encouraged to use his gifts elsewhere.” There are definitely people who are more in tune with the vision of the church and others who are more nostalgic for the church of years gone by.  But right now there is a spirit of grace and tolerance and we are going in the direction the leadership is leading.  My prayers these days are prayers of thanks.  It hasn’t always been this way, and it won’t always stay this way, but for this period of time it is going well, thank the Lord.

  • Posted by Vicki

    We DID have people who needed to leave - and most of them did - some left well and others did not.  This is a touchy subject for me because (as I said in a previous comment on another blog) I am a “lifer”.  Some of the people who left our church (and NEEDED to leave) were life long friends.  It was painful to say the least.  Some tried to badger the leadership into their way of thinking with treats, mistruth (just say it, lies...) and manipulation.  They gathered like minds together and had “prayer meetings”.  It was really ugly for about 6 months.  The longest 6 months of my life I might add.  I tried arguing with them (big mistake), but ultimately they chose to leave and when they did we (as a staff) decided to send them with our blessing.  We’ve committed to being open, friendly and welcoming when we see them even though it is awkward at times. 

    Yes there are folks that need to leave.  The key is having a unified leadership team.  Without that, the pastor is going to be hung out to dry.  We stood our ground, made some mistakes along the way, but ultimately were able to love the people who left as much as those who stayed.  After the dust settled, some have come back with a sweeter attitude. 

    The dissenters tried to derail the mission and oust the pastor, but they failed.  The church is stronger and healthier (though somewhat smaller in number) now than before. We are growing again.  There are still people problems, only now they are the problems that come with baby Christians instead of adolescent or adult problems.  I like it that way.

  • Posted by

    I tell my fellow pastors that we are just a couple of funerals away from real church growth. We have been transitioning from a small traditional syle church to a contemporary outside the four walls kind of church. There are some of the congregation, less than a handful that are not voiceing their unhappiness in the group but by their attitudes and through the grape-vine gossip are causing problems. I have been here over three years and I am about ready to call it quits if these attitudes can’t be changed. I have come close several times to asking those people to either come along or find another church. I have prayed that God would move them, either in attitude or out of the church. What boggles my mind though is the fact that these people cannot see the damage and hinderance they are to the body of christ.

  • Posted by

    After a pastor, staff, and/or lay leaders make a serious attempt (often requiring repeated exchanges) to communicate with an individual or group, and there is no “meeting of the minds” or willingness to change on the part of the aggrieved; yes, it’s helpful if those people leave a church where they can serve in harmony with the philosophy of the church they attend.

  • Posted by

    The question is there times to ask people to leave your church and the answer is not an easy one to say the least i have watch as God began to do great things at the church that i pastor. To answer the question there are times that for the health of the church that you must ask someone to leave and this is to be done with the right kind of attitude. This is to be done only after other we have exhausted all other means of restoration. I know that a lot of the problems could be avoided if only we would follow church discipline (a lost doctrine)and also if we would prepare our churches for the changes that will follow growth.I have a open door policy at the church that if you have a problem we will set down and discuss it and pray over it and come to an agreement if i am violating the scriptures then i am the one that must change if they are the ones in violation then they must change. H ere is the amazing thing i have discovered is that most people will stay if pastors are acessible to simply to listen to them and why i am here one of the things that Pastors try to do is change a church overnight it did not get in that shape overnight and it will not be straigten out overnight we as pastors need to exercise Godly patience. There are times that i have asked people to leave the church some over dicipline measures and some who wanted to change the whole direction of the church over a personal preference i lovingly try to tell the them of a church in the area that has those kind of ministry that they prefer and the key for a pastor is to keep the right attitude.There is a refreshing when God remove the hinderances

  • Posted by

    I think the inverse is often true of our churches: people want to leave, but feel they can’t because of the pressure to stay.

    Heck, if they want to leave, they must be backsliding, right? Or “losing the vision”, bitter, unable to change, or whatever other reason we conclude, conveniently excluding any possible positive reasons for their leaving. Because, of course, if someone is leaving our church for another, and it isn’t “understandable” (a new job out of state or something), it must be bad. But, just maybe, their reason is positive for their Christian life. That could, but does not necessarily mean something negative about our church!

    Why can’t we let people leave gracefully, instead of pressuring them not to leave or “gracefully” making them leave? Why not have both front and back doors wide open? We’re not a gang. We’re not faith in Jesus, but local fellowships together living out our faith in Jesus. Let’s live out our church’s vision, but not project problems onto those who leave. Talk to them. Understand them. Not everyone leaves because of “their issues.” Some will leave because they have issues, but some will leave because we have issues, and others still because they feel called elsewhere.

  • Page 1 of 2 pages

     1 2 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: