HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

Hullabaloo in Kalamazoo:  Billboards Confront Strip Club Patrons with Bible Verse on Lust

Orginally published on Monday, December 15, 2008 at 8:27 AM
by Todd Rhoades


It's all happening in Kalamazoo, MI:

A billboard next to Deja Vu (An adult entertainment club): "Anyone that looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart" (Matthew 5:28.

Another billboard outside a Planned Parenthood, "How is an unborn baby not a human being?" (Jeremiah 1:5)

And yet another outside two bars known to have gay and lesbian customers: "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman: that is detestable." (Leviticus 18:12)

Could it be that the people who read these signs will never accept Jesus because they want no part of a Jesus is just as condemning as these signs?

There.  I got your attention.

Did Jesus condemn sin?  Absolutely.

Does the Bible tell us right from wrong on sexual matters, lust, and the sanctify of life?  Yeppers.

Did Jesus treat people in the same way these signs do?  Never?

How did Jesus treat the woman at the well?  Or Zachaeus?  Or the rich, young ruler?  Or the prostitute?  Did he carry a sign or rent a billboard?  Did he immediately condemn them before talking with them?

All of the above signs will lead you to a website called JesusChrist1st.com, which, I’m quite sure Jesus would not recommend.

How did Jesus act when meeting the adulterer or the fornicator or the pervert or the prostitute?  That seems to be the first question we should ask ourselves.  Then we should try to treat them as Jesus would, and minister to them as Jesus would.

Question for you… WHAT IF:  Signs like this actually turn more people AWAY FROM Jesus than lead people TO Jesus?  I, for one, think they do.  I wonder, in eternity, if people that use this form of evangelism will be cheered for the tens they have impacted FOR Christ; or judged for the thousands they have turned AWAY FROM Christ.

What do you think?

If you liked this story, send this link to a friend or twitter it:  http://tr.im/2apr


This post has been viewed 2729 times so far.


  There are 98 Comments:

  • Posted by

    So between apathy or doing something… which did these Christians choose?

    I used to live in Kalamazoo, and I’d drive by that sign often without ever praying for the girls stripping, or the men going in, or the households being impacted by it.  I just didn’t bother with it because I was on my way to work the five jobs I was holding down to pay the rent and take care of my family… because a church had laid me off because of personality differences.

    Don’t worry, I’m healthy and serving again.  But something tells me there is more wrong with the church (myself included) than these signs.

  • Posted by billboards

    In a world filled with hypocricy, i dont see how these people can focus on the minutia which is just a byproduct of a bigger problem.  Sure, i know the hurt and pain that these issues can cause.

    Many will swipe at the branches of evil, but few strike the root.  Strike the root!

    Dont waste ur time and money on minor details of a bigger problem.

  • Posted by

    We had a billboard ministry for a few years.  We tried different approaches.  ALL WERE CRITICIZED.  I won’t repeat the calls...and some were from “concerned Christians.” The truth is being a Christian and being a community of Christ [often with a building] is offensive.  We offend non-believers by our existence as we remind those who are lost that there is a God.  A God who will hold them accountable for their sins unless they repent.  Sometimes we must be like the old prophets and stand up and warn people of sin and its consequences.  Sometimes we must be like a tender mother nursing a hurting child who must tell the child that the medicine for their sinful soul is Christ.  One other aspect over looked is the autonomy of the local church.  If the local church is led by the Holy Spirit to put up a sign that says, “Adultery is sin....” then who are we to judge.

  • Posted by

    I agree with you, Todd.  Although there is a slim chance that someone might read one of these signs and rethink their actions, chances are greater that more of an impact can be made by one-on-one contact.  Why not station people outside of these establishments to engage the patrons in meaningful dialogue versus an in-your-face Scripture passage that is devoid of context?

  • Posted by

    I wonder if the harshness (perceived or otherwise) of these messages compare to when Jesus said:
    “And if your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell.  And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell.” Matthew 5:29-30.
    Maybe it was OK because he said it outside the continental US???  Thank you Jesus!!

  • Posted by Nik BaDee

    I stumbled across your blog when a pastor friend of mine reposted the “state of Illinois” thing on Facebook.  A little background, I spent the first 25 years of my life in church and left about six months ago.  I got tired of the condemnation and the fakeness and the backstabbing, just for starters.  Your blog is a breath of fresh air.  You’re calling a spade a spade, and that’s appreciated.  Hopefully, your message will be spread and help SOMETHING to click in the minds of Christians.  I’ve been saying for months now, “I have no problem with God, but his PR department needs a complete overhaul.” Thank you for what you are doing.

  • Posted by

    Nik, you have expressed something that I’ve long believed.  Many people don’t have trouble with Jesus, but rather with the Church and how we have presented Him.

  • Posted by

    Zad is right in his comments of stoning the prophets… what Zad is saying if I’m correct is there’s a need for the signs in a day in time in which we live… we can’t preach the love of Jesus without first preaching the sins of the world… when we first tell them about their sins the love of Jesus is seen… it’s like holding a beautiful diamond against a black case… the diamond can be seen without the case and be beautiful...but the diamond seen against the black case brings the appreciation and beauty out more fully… Jesus is similar to the diamond and our sins are similar to the black case… we could preach the love of Jesus plain and it be good… but when we preach the love of Jesus against the black drop of our sins there’s a more fuller appreciation and beauty…

    I too appreciate the John Pippers, John Calvin, Martin Luthers, A.W. Tozers… who preached the Gospel without fear of hurting people feelings… I believe it was Jesus that said, “friends of the world are enemies of God...and friends of God would be enemies of the world"… many today are more concerned with church attendance rather than discipleship… I know individuals who sat under the preaching of the love only Gospel… these individuals expressed their lack of growth because they were made comfortable in their sins because the preacher only preached the love of Christ… these individuals backslid from the church and after years joined our fellowship… and when they joined they expressed their spiritual growth and their appreciation for what Christ did for them on the cross because they were made aware of their sins… unless we make the people aware of their sins they’ll never have a full appreciation for the work of the cross… preaching without the cross is just motivational speaking… all preaching is defined by the cross… and the cross show us our sinfulness…

    as a young pastor in my early 30’s I was convicted of the people need of the Word of God… in my early ministry I was caught up in just preaching the love of Christ… because I wanted to befriend the people and I didn’t want to offend anybody… but the Holy Spirit convicted me of that style of preaching… sure the people were coming by the 100’s… but God told me to feed His sheep… I realized I was giving the people junk food rather than a full course meal… the love Gospel must accompany the sins of the people…

    on the average how many advertisements do we see regarding God’s Word on a daily basis… for many of us...none… unless we’re in tuned to the Word networks… when we turn on the television we don’t see commercials that advertise God’s Word… the schools many of our children attend are prohibited from using God’s Word...so it’s a relief to see God’s Word being advertised in the midst of the communities in which we live… we can’t worry about how many people who’s distrubed by the Word… many are disturbed because the Word messed up their high or joy in committing the acts they were about to do or did… the billboards brings about repentance to those of us who are tempted on a daily basis… I once struggled with temptations.... and to see a sign that reminds me of the danger of the temptations… is a sign of relief and re-affirming God’s Word in me… to have young teenage children reminded that their bodies are the temple of God is relief… to have drug dealers know about the sins they’re committing… to have remind homosexuals and lesbians that their lifestylse are an abomination to God is relief… our children are around sin 24/7… and they need to be reminded of God’s Word 24/7…

    as I once state… I minister in Newark, NJ were temptations are strong… and most of these establishments has destroyed and still are destroying many of families… the end result is the rise of crime, the destruction of a City… and lost value of life… I see the end result… I’ve ministered to the end result… to people who’ll find a way to manipulate… unless we show them the result of their sins they’ll stay in their sins… God’s Word must accompany God’s love… the way we present Jesus to the Word is by the just of God along with the grace of God…

    do you know why many are turned off from the church, its not our method of how we preach Christ its more so how we live Christ… when the world looks at many congregations they don’t see any difference between them and us… and there ought to be a difference between the two…

    we must model the love of Christ.... and we can’t say we love somebody and not warn them about the danger of their sins… when I see my children doing something wrong I’m not going to say, God loves you with outh first warning and correcting them… by telling them God loves them without informing them of their wrong doing would just be like the religious leaders of Paul’s time who said should we sin more so that grace may abound more… as a loving parent i must first correct them and then assure them that God loves them in spite of their shortcommings…

    Rev. K

  • Posted by

    Zad & CS –

    I really can’t see from your responses to me yesterday how you showed Jesus ever used methods similar to taking out a billboard to point out the sins of people he’d never personally encountered.  His prophetic words to the Pharisees, broods of vipers, might correctly be said to the Christians who put up the billboards, whitewashed tombs who point out the sins of others but unwilling to acknowledge their own. 

    There is no evidence from scripture that the people I mentioned expressed conviction until AFTER their encounter with Jesus.  For the purposes of this discussion CS, what I mean by the term “relationship” is at the very least a personal encounter.  Except for the Pharisees, who were not the average pagan on the street, Jesus never pointed out sin without encountering the person.  The story of the rich young ruler isn’t about how his chariot drove by a sign that convicted his heart but he was unwilling to respond, it is a story about his encounter with the living and breathing person of Jesus.  Same with the story of the woman at the well (though I disagree that the conversation started on a sour note, BEFORE Jesus told her about her many husbands, he offered her living water so she would thirst no more.

    There is nothing prophetic about taking out billboards to point out the sins of the community, unless it is an example of Ezek 16:49, which reminds us that the sin of Sodom which was despicable to the Lord was that “she and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.”

    Wendi

  • Posted by

    Nik and Pat:

    “Nik, you have expressed something that I’ve long believed.  Many people don’t have trouble with Jesus, but rather with the Church and how we have presented Him.”

    This is like saying, “I like you, but I hate your wife.” The truth is that people like their own conceptions of Jesus, which are idols in their own minds.  But once they are confronted with a Jesus that tells them to repent of their sins and turn from their actions, knowing who He truly is, they despise Him.  This is why Paul said in Romans that we are, “enemies of God.” The Church is just the current Body of Christ, and that is why we are hated as well.

    Wendi:

    “I really can’t see from your responses to me yesterday how you showed Jesus ever used methods similar to taking out a billboard to point out the sins of people he’d never personally encountered.”

    Here’s the question of the hour: was this way that Jesus spoke with people about sins prescriptive for us in sharing our faith with others?  It may be a preferred means, but it does not have to be the only means.

    In line with the theme of using impersonal means (billboards) to cause conviction, it doesn’t take having a physical personal encounter with someone to become convicted of sins.  If it were so, we wouldn’t have the number of Christians in South Korea, for instance, because missionaries primarily left Bibles for them during a period of time when they were not physically welcome.  People are convicted all the time presently by Jesus’ words in reading Bibles left by the Gideons in hotel rooms.

    Even within the Bible, we have evidence of people being convicted of sins and coming to faith through the written word, without a personal encounter.  Citing Josiah again, that is an excellent example of someone having only the Word of God and being convicted.  Likewise, the Ethiopian eunuch was reading Isaiah as a part of his conversion (yes, Philip did help ratify it). 

    So, the argument of, “Jesus never did it, therefore we shouldn’t do it,” doesn’t quite hold up here.

    --
    CS

  • Posted by

    You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar...that’s all I’m sayin’…

  • Posted by

    CS – I don’t think I’m arguing “Jesus never did it.” I’m suggesting that since Jesus asked people to follow Him (which includes changing one’s life), it means we must study HOW He reached people in His context and do our best to apply His methods to our context.  I continue to maintain my point, Jesus appears to have intentionally avoided leading with “you are a terrible sinner . . .” and so should we.

    Leaving bibles in hotel rooms is not the same as billboards with one verse about adultery in the heart next to a strip club.  To use a similar method, we would put framed pictures of single bible verses about adultery on the walls of the hotel rooms.  Of course the Word can convict of sin, but I believe that this method is a human manipulation of God’s Word.

    Josiah discovered the law and the Holy Spirit convicted him.  Although it was not a personal relationship, he had a formal relationship with the people he called to repentance, he was their king.  Additionally, these were the people who had been given the law.  Although they had forgotten, they had knowledge of and access to God’s commands.  Passersby are subjects of the people who put up the billboards and it’s reasonable to assume that many are completely unaware of God’s law. 

    Now, if you can an example where Jesus started His encounter with a person (except for the Pharisees) by pointing out their sin, I will be happy to reconsider.  For now I maintain that these guys are completely missing Jesus instruction about how to reach people.

    Wendi

  • Posted by Toby

    Just a few questions for those of you who think that the signs are wrong (and I’m not necessarily saying I disagree with you): are you standing outside of strip clubs, befriending the people going in?  Are you standing outside of abortion clinics, preaching the Gospel to girls who are about to kill their babies?  When was the last time you went into a gay bar and started telling the patrons, “Jesus loves you”?

    If your answer to any of these questions is “no,” then what are you doing to bring those people to Jesus?

    Just something to think about. smile

  • Posted by

    “This is like saying, “I like you, but I hate your wife.”

    CS:  You’re exactly right--that is what people are saying.  Since you used this analogy, just because two people are married doesn’t mean that you will like both parties.  Sometimes, couples are avoided simply because one spouse repulses people.  Sad to say that in SOME instances our presentation of Christ has not been a compassionate one.  And when I say presentation of Christ, I am referring to all that we do in the Church, since everything we do SHOULD represent HIM.  When we run our churches like clubs, open only to those we deem acceptable, that is a turn-off.  By acceptable, I am NOT saying that we should not call sin sin.  We absolutely should, but there are ways to do it that are more effective than others.  At our church we have made a decision to accept people into our membership who were previously denied entrance because of a habit that previous leaders thought incompatible with our church doctrine.  Our new leadership, however has made the decision that we will make clear to people our position on the issue, make sure the habit it not hindering the person’s life and then accept them into membership with the understanding that they be open to the Spirit’s leading should He convict them on the practice or any other issue in their life.  BTW, the issue I’m referring to is not listed as sin in the Scripture.

  • Posted by

    Wendi:

    “Now, if you can an example where Jesus started His encounter with a person (except for the Pharisees) by pointing out their sin, I will be happy to reconsider.”

    James 4:6 says that God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble.  This was how Jesus reached out to people here on earth.  When someone came off as arrogant, He would slap them with the Law.  When someone was humble or their sin was already exposed, He offered them grace.

    So, looking for examples where Jesus pointed out sin by bringing up the Law and sin pretty quickly in some way, shape or form:

    -The Rich Young Ruler (Luke 18:18-25).  This conversation was all about keeping the Law, and Jesus exposed how his wealth was an idol to him.  He brought up his sin pretty quickly here.

    -The Woman At The Well (John 4).  The conversation started with Him asking her to draw water, and she replied back, “How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans.” In other words, “Just who do you think you are?” which is a pretty proud statement.  And then after the offer of living water, He clearly showed her her sin.

    -Reproving The Lawyers (Luke 11:45-52).  Here, amidst Jesus talking with scribes and Pharisees, a lawyer speaks up to Him, and gets a thorough smackdown.

    And, although you discounted the encounters with the Pharisees for some reason, those occasions are also perfect demonstrations of laying down the Law and exposing sin as well.  Just because they had a special place as the religious leaders of the day does not apply to an exemption from listing them as well and applying that to today’s world properly.

    Also, don’t forget the parables, which were spoken in the presence of others, kind of like a sideswipe.  Reflecting back to the focus of this post, the church could have put up a sign that said, “Would you be proud of your web browsing history?” next to the strip club, to emulate that concept.

    --
    CS

  • Posted by

    Toby, my personal call to ministry is in the area of discipleship and to train up believers in such a way that they can go out and effectively win people to Christ.  So, no, I am not nor do I feel led to stand outside of the establishments that you talked about, but often I engage people in conversations and get to know them and try to speak Truth into their lives.  I am not opposed to people being outside of these establishments.  Some people are called and especially gifted to do that.  Again, for me, it comes down to methodology.  What are people doing when they stand outside of these places?  Are they screaming in people’s faces, yelling vile things and holding up one-line Scriptures or are they engaging people in calm, reasonable ways?  ("Come, let us reason together.") BTW, we’ve become so focused on a few activities.  What about stopping your co-workers, neighbors or fellow parishoners from gossiping, coveting, stealing, OVEREATING, etc?  I think the Church is often guilty of holding up a few pet sins as the “biggies” as if as long people swear these off, they’re okay.

  • Posted by

    liberation...I’m not a liberalist in the sense as it is defined today… but I do agree with Jesus method of liberation… Jesus liberated the people in whom He came in contact with from their sins… and in order to be liberated from something you first must define what that which has you in bondage… like C.S. once stated, Jesus often used the situation to dictate the outcome… and in this case the situation is a perfect time to warn about the end result of the sins… if you are baking in your kitchen and your child walks toward the stove… are you going to let your child get burned and then say I love you… or, are you going to warn your child not to touch the stove because its hot and you’ll get burned? I’m afraid far too many are using the first method and allowing too many to get hurt and then covering it up with God loves you… instead of warning the people the danger that’s ahead…

    I’ll be suspect of a person who tells me they love me in Jesus name and fail to warn me that death is knocking on my door…

    I’m afraid the church has become a social club where many come to be entertained and leave worst than what they came in… The Bible is our tool for reaching the lost… any other way is reaching them in vain… Jesus said, “He who builds on His Word builds on a solid foundation...” the problem isn’t the Word it’s the christians lack of putting the Word into operation… It’s the Word that saves not how personal you’re with the people… if we try to save others than Jesus dying would be in vain… but we’re to present people the Word and allow God to do the saving… He commissioned us to go into the highways and byways and Preach His Word…

  • Posted by

    Excellent point about the difference between Christ and the Church.

    As Ghandi pointed out, “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

    The Church is perfectly capable of evil, being composed of 100% sinners.

    Like many here, I grew up in a “Christian” environment where condemning others seemed to be the only reason for the existence of the church.

    It was only when I experienced the love of Christ that I became a Christian.

    I think it is a perfectly legitimate point to make that many Christians drive more people away from Christ than create disciples.

    In fact, given that all Christians are sinners, it stands to reason that the same sins of condemnation, hypocrisy and even hate are just as present within the church as without.

    Just because these Christians use the gospel as a weapon does not mean it is not a weapon.

    To refer to yet another example above, the pack of churchy evil-doers who use soldier’s funerals to protest against homosexuality are not bringing the kingdom closer.

  • Posted by

    Wendi,

    Listen to these sweet words of blessed assurance

    “Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, AND HAS GIVEN US THE MINISTRY OF RECONCILIATION, that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, NOT IMPUTING THEIR TRESPASSES TO THEM and has committed us to the word of reconciliation."2nd Corinthians 5:18-19

    Brothers and sisters,

    Do we have hearts for, and testimony to the utterly absurdly and ridiculously surpassing extravagance of the grace of God. After Jesus is resurrected and He confronts the man who betrayed Him, He asks, “Do you love me?” and enjoins Peter as a consequence to feed his flock...AFTER JESUS HAS ALREADY FIXED BREAKFAST ON THE BEACH.

    The testimony of the scripture is the heart of God unreasonably, recklessly, with utter abandonment desiring, seeking, drawing the heart of sinners to Him.

    He isn’t anywhere depicted as a careful moralist stroking the long white beard and running a socratic chatechism: Do you know your sin? DO you confess your sin? Do you accept my death as your only atonement? (For extra points, “Was the work atonement completed on the cross on Friday or in the ascension on Saturday?)

    Jesus responds to the criminal next to him who says to Jesus “remember me” with the blessed assurance that hthat criminal will be in Paradise with Jesus that day.

    No confession, no Jesus prayer: Just, bam, you’re in the kingdom...I hear Him croaking aout of hHis parched throat, “Father I got the last one you had for us on my way up” And the angels danced and the seraphim sang and got fresh white togas and comfy slippers.

    Rev. K, and CS and all my other dear ones, IN ATHENS, Paul went to Mars Hill after wandering around Athens with its 200 plus idols and HE DIDNOT open his sermon with the fact that the Athenians were idolators, IN FACT TALK ABOUT GILDING THE LILLY, PAUL SAYS, “Men of Athens, I perceive that in all things I see you are very religious.” Check it out Acts 17:22. FURTHERMORE, HE NEVER tries to sell them on their sinfulness. The turning point is in verse 29 where he says “SINCE WE ARE OFFSPRING OF THE DIVINE ITS SILLY TO WORHIP STONES.” He then goes on to evangelize with the gospel of the resurrection.  Th Greeks characterize his message as “far out” call him a seed picker and invite Him to come back and talk some more.

    Paul reminds us that “In the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. (1 Corinthians 1:21)

    Yesterday the authorities found the bones of the little girl murdered in Florida, for the crime of which they are holding her mother.  “are we foolish enough to pray that she joins us in heaven, or do we need to hold up signs calling her a murderer.”

    It is what is in your heart as you read that that defines your relationship with the living risen savior.  “When did we see thee hungry or naked, or imprisoned? We would’ve held up a sign.

  • Posted by

    After reading all these posts I still am not sure that these signs are what everyone says they are. On the one hand I keep hearing that the church is missing it and on the other hand our country is drifting away from God’s Word - even going from post-Christian toward being anti-Christian. Something must be done and like every ministry attempt I’ve made I error on the side of doing.  Let’s pray for the glory of God to start in our hearts and sweep through our churches until we have another Great Awakening.

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    I think we should spend less time judging those outside.

    1 Corinthians 5, especially the end of the chapter.

  • Posted by

    Here is a recounting of coming to Christ__the awareness of sin was there; what was added was the alternative: Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.  God drew the sinner to want to surrender his life and his sin. The admonition neither confrontational nor impersonal.

    http://www.becausepeoplematter.com/marks_weblog/2008/12/of-korn-and-christmas.html

  • Posted by

    To some the preaching of the cross is foolishness, but unto us who are saved it is the power of God’s salvation…

    both a practical and propositional side of the Gospel are needed today…

    when preaching/witnessing/teaching we must always examine our motives…
    to condemn somebody means to attack them, to punish them, etc… when we present fallen mankind God’s Word we’re not out to attack them nor are we out to punish them… we’re out to reach them with the truth… The purpose is to win our fellow believer over from sin to righteousness… People may not hear us, but it is not our problem that they don’t hear. It is our problem if we don’t speak God’s Word to them. We are supposed to declare the gospel to them, and let God do what He wants (and when He wants) with His word

    Jesus throughout His ministry didn’t ignore sin… He couldn’t ignore it because of His righteous nature… If we do not challenge each other and confront each other of sin then we are in danger of playing a part of people falling deeper into their life of sin.

    many today are afraid of being rejected, many have a fear of confronting, a fear of seeming too spiritual… When we tell our selves that to love someone is to let their sin go and ignore their sin we ignore what real love is.

    Love was manifested perfectly in Jesus and in Jesus’ love He confronted sin. If you want to truly love someone, die to your fears and love by being a true brother/sister to them in all aspects of Jesus ministry. The loving father, who does not condemn but yet, does not ignore sin. I believe we end up sinning against our brother and sisters, our friends, when we “ignore sin” or just “let it go” Loving friends often remind us of things that we don’t want to deal with…

    Michael Dixon,
    Paul says in Romans 10:17, “Faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ.” The question I have for the Emergent Church is this:  how can people hear the content of the gospel without someone sharing it?  The gospel message is not fully communicated by living a noble and just lifestyle.  For, no amount of good deeds will teach the lost the propositional truth of God’s word. 

    As Paul says “Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved.” How then will they call on Him in whom they have not believed?  How will they believe in Him whom they have not heard?  And how will they hear without a preacher?” - Romans 10:13-14

    As wonderful as they are, acts of kindness and good deeds, by themselves, do not fully communicate Christ’s message; only a preacher, someone willing to audibly or visually pass on the information, will suffice.  Anyone can show kindness or help the needy:  Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Atheists, are all capable of doing “good works.” It is the propositional truth of the gospel that separates us from false religion and counterfeit faith.  It is the message of Jesus that contains the power to transform lives and bring healing to the world.

    without repentance of sin, men cannot have fellowship with God… (Old & New Testaments purpose of sacrifical offering) according to Ephesians 2:1, we are dead in our trespasses and sins and until we forsake them through repentance, we cannot be made alive in Christ. He that covers his sins shall not prosper, but whoso confesses and forsakes them shall have mercy… (Prov. 28:13)...When Peter preached on the Day of Pentecost, he commanded his hearers to repent “for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38). Without repentance, there is no remission of sins; we are still under His wrath. Peter further said, “Repent ...and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out” (Acts 3:19). We cannot be “converted” unless we repent. God Himself “commands all men everywhere [leaving no exceptions] to repent” (Acts 17:30). Peter said a similar thing at Pentecost: “Repent, and be baptized every one of you” (Acts 2:38).

    The thief on the cross confessed his sins… both thieves knew they were guilty and deserved to die for their crimes… only one thief saw that he deserved his punishment because he was a sinner… and that thief confessed with his mouth, “and we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward for our deeds: but this man hath done nothing amiss...” and then he said unto Jesus, Lord remember me when thou comest into thy kindgom…

    we must confess our sins in order to be saved…

    we cannot replace God’s Word with our human methods… we must give the world God’s Word…

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    I’m still waiting for somebody to explain why if Corinthians tells us not to judge those outside the church (specifically in matters of sexual sin in the immediate context)… how can we biblically justify using scripture billboards to judge those same individuals, and in a completely impersonal manner at that.

  • Posted by

    Peter:

    I see a difference in judging someone and warning someone about their sin.  Kind of like the watchman in Ezekiel 33.

    --
    CS

  • Page 3 of 4 pages

    « First  <  1 2 3 4 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: