HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

“Just Believe What We Tell You And Shut Up”

Orginally published on Monday, December 05, 2005 at 4:00 AM
by Todd Rhoades

Churchlady To start off today's Monday Morning Insight, I have a bit of a quiz for you.  Here is a quote.  I want you to guess who it's from.  (No cheating... no googling on this one)  I'll let you know the answer at the end of this article.

This quote was made nearly 25 years old ago now, but still rings true in some churches; it definitely is believed by many of the unsaved we in our ministries are striving to reach. Here's the quote:

"I think many Christian teachers today are misrepresenting Christ. They're supposed to be representing Jesus, but they're not doing it very well. They're letting him down very badly, and that's a big turn off.

But there's this morbid side to the way many represent Christianity today, where you don't smile, because it's too serious...just believe what we tell you and shut up."

What a terribly serious charge against the church of Jesus Christ in America.

As church leaders, it is our job to represent Christ to a world who doesn't know him.  And how we make this presentation is of utmost importance.

Many times we argue about the right way to do church.  (Boy, did we have a discussion here about that last week!)  There are so many buzz words out there today... seeker-sensitive, seeker-driven, purpose-driven, multi-site, emergent; there are cowboy churches, hip-hop churches, even church services where pets are welcome.  We have traditional, blended, contemporary, unplugged, country, and even island style worship.

So, while we argue about the right way to do church; what style to use; when we meet; how we dress; whether to plant or go multi-site; whether to be seeker-sensitive or purpose-driven (or how evil both of those two methods are); the very people we are trying to reach many times look at most churches as the writer of the quote above did... they look at us Christians (and our churches) as a bunch of people who are against everything; very serious; who want only to ram our beliefs down their throat.  This image of Christianity must change.  And it's up to each of us in our communities to make sure that our church (in cooperation with the Holy Spirit) relates the life-changing message of Jesus Christ in a way that will resonate with unbelievers.

That doesn't mean we water down our message.  It doesn't mean that we don't discuss sin; or shy away from politically incorrect issues; or for individual's need for repentance.  It simply means that we position our message so that we don't appear stale; stagnant; humorless; irrelevant; and as the quote above says, "morbid".

It seems to me that maybe we're asking the wrong question.  Instead of "Is there a right way to do church?"  Maybe the question should be, "Is there a WRONG way to do church?"  And if there is, let's stop doing it! Last week we talked about the right ways to do church... what do you think are the wrong ways?

Oh, and who said the quote above?  Beatle George Harrison said this in an interview back in 1982.


This post has been viewed 849 times so far.


 TRACKBACKS: (0) There are 72 Comments:

  • Posted by

    “That doesn’t mean we water down our message.  It doesn’t mean that we don’t discuss sin; or shy away from politically incorrect issues; or for individual’s need for repentance.  It simply means that we position our message so that we don’t appear stale; stagnant; humorless; irrelevant; and as the quote above says, “morbid"."

    This is saying a LOT!

    We live in a Christian Political culture where there’s a distinct segment that preaches, “come to Christ for what He can bring you… happiness, riches, blessings, peace”. Is this preaching the gospel, the Good News, without preaching why we need the Good News? We need to be “saved”, but “saved” from what? The bible says we’re Children of Wrath, apart from Christ.

    Mostly, Christ was focused on turning the hearts of believers to the Father, and a realization of “I am nothing apart from Him”. He never watered anything down. He was firey!

    Christ, did, however, reach out to those that needed him (much to the chagrin of the Holy Pharases). Who needs Jesus, but sinners who are under Judgement, and are dead. Do healthy people need a doctor? Of course not.

    Why the offense from those caught in their sins? How easy is it for us to take our value in Christ (again, in CHRIST, not in ourselves), and get confused and project the image, “I’m better than you because I’m in Christ.”

    This is clearly still going on, and probably accounts for most of the rejection people have of “Christianity” and “Christians”.

    How do we extend the love for sinners that Christ modeled, but still teach the judgement on Sin (which is DEATH) that Christ taught in order to illecit the knowledge of sin, and repentence unto life!?

    Why is this so hard? Have we become so intellectual, going down no end of rabbit trails, that we’ve lost the simple gospel of Death to Sin, Life in Christ?

  • Posted by

    I realize that I am a little far down on this blog but, I agree with Craig. If we are constantly looking inside the walls of the church to find a solution then we might be looking in the wrong place. Let’s concentrate on those outside thye church walls and bringing them to Christ. Lets look at the community around us and see what their needs are and what therr makeup is and fashion the church according to their needs. Lets try to do church and be the church to those who need it most. Those outside those four walls.

  • Posted by

    As I read so many postings on this site, I keep running into what appears to me to be kind of a line of demarcation over a single but very much unsettled issue.  There have been many topics, but most of them end up casting the writers on one side of this line or the other.  I see it here again with these questions about misrepresenting Jesus and whether there is a right or wrong way to do Church.  It seems to me, if we are misrepresenting Jesus, it would take really sick audacity to even try to say we are doing Church right.

    I could very well be the most stupid writer amongst us, and I’m okay with that.  But I wonder if it might be a great deal more productive, or at least conclusive toward an agreeable answer (which by the way is more important than most of us realize), to identify the core issues that divide the well meaning, and for the most part, pure of heart camps here.  Would it damage any of us, if someone would call a spade a spade and reveal the line of separation?

    The continual spear chucking from one camp to the other is wasted time and energy, settles nothing, and is a far cry from the interaction that ought to exemplify dialogue, or even debate within the Kingdom of God.  In fact, it is this very stuff that “Harrison” says turned him from Christianity to Krishna!

    So, at the risk of being attacked and accused of heresy or just plain stupidity, I want to take a stab at suggesting what might possibly be at the core of what divides us.  I don’t believe it is about Church Growth.  I don’t believe it is about style, marketing, strategy or technique.  I don’t believe it is about urban or rural churches, small or mega-churches.  I don’t even believe it is about Biblical patterns, God’s patterns or man’s patterns.

    These are all systemic manifestations that simply point toward the underlying belief concerning where we ultimately land as relates to the Mission of the Church.

    I am (at this point in life) persuaded the real issue boils down to our perspective, paradigm and belief system about “the work of the ministry” as it is expressed in the relationship between “Evangelism” and “Discipleship.”

    So often within the context of the Church, as it is expressed by the evangelical community of believers in western civilization, these two particular manifestations of “the work of the ministry”, find themselves so intrinsically merged that the Kingdom intent of the Lord, for the full realization of each of them, in all of their purposed distinctiveness, ends up at best diluted, if not abandoned, in subjection to the Church’s mission and its programmed agenda under the auspices of their banner.

    This mission blurring merger has created a crippling paradoxical dilemma we must (in the interest of authentic Christianity) wrestle with as local fellowships if we are sincerely and equally committed to:
    1.  The full growth and development of our members (Disciples) in their process of maturing into the image and full stature of Christ (Discipleship).
    2.  Seeing the Kingdom of God extended through manifesting His presence, living as His witness and extension of His love, mercy and grace, while proclaiming His gospel of the Kingdom and leading as many as possible into relationship with Him and making disciples (Evangelism).

    Is it really Father’s intent that His mission and our mission be exactly the same, or is it possible they are purposed by Him to be uniquely different and distinct?

    How we answer that question is bound to have significant impact on the focus and the doing of our mission; or for this discussion, how we rightly represent Jesus and how we do Church.

    Please don’t have heart attacks screaming “Heresy” for fear I’m messing with the Sacred Cow of “The Great Commission”!  I’m really just asking if we might have the proverbial cart out in front of the horse.
    Is it possible the Lord never intended for us to single out the command He gave His Disciples in Matthew 28 to “Go into all the world....” (what we have chosen to call “The Great Commission”), and make it the above all number one priority and mission of the Church?  I’m sure we all agree it certainly is His mission to bring into Himself and His Kingdom every soul that will hear the Gospel and receive His gift of grace.  And He absolutely has chosen us as His Body in the earth to be His Witness as the conduit through which the power of His Love, His Word, His Gospel and His Holy Spirit flows… so that His mission will be accomplished. 

    With this in mind I’d like to suggest the possibility that Evangelization of the world unto its completeness, in fulfillment of The Great Commission and making the way for His return, just might be, 100% HIS MISSION, and 100% HIS RESPONSIBILITY. 

    This task of His mission is too huge for us!  Its strategy, architectural & engineering blueprints, demographical studies, spiritual mapping, battle plans, and everything else we do in the process...and more importantly the actual results, never have or ever will be possible to be managed by, and are absolutely incapable of being measured by any human means!  How can we who are not God ever measure or count with certainty who or how many have truly been saved and made disciples?  For us to take on the weight and responsibility of such a mission is to load us down with a burden that is heavier than we could even imagine.  To saddle us with requirement of fulfilling that mission is to bridle us with a yoke more difficult than creation could ever withstand.  And that could not be from God for the burden He gives us is light and the yoke He gives us is easy.

    But, He surely does have a mission for us!  And without reserve I believe we can say that our walking out that mission is an integral part and essential role in the accomplishment of His mission.  But because He is God and we are not, it seems appropriate that we should recognize the unique difference and distinction between His mission and ours. 

    What I am posturing is that our foremost mission could be to become (read John 17) one with each other just as Jesus and the Father are one.  If this could possibly be true, then our mission would be different than His mission to reach the world. It would be distinct in that we are the only entity in creation capable of accomplishing such a mission.  It would then be, uniquely our mission, and purposed by Father as such.  I do not believe that to embrace this very real possibility would be to abandon His mission or cease from our involvement in it.  When I listen to the heart of Jesus in Gethsemane, it seems to me it would be our greatest and purest form of representing Him, and in fact, place the Church in the most strategic place possible for seeing His mission accomplished.  I truly believe this posture could be the highest level of authentic commitment to The Great Commission we can have.

  • Posted by

    Mr.Pastor
    Are you at your church with the folks that want to be there on Sunday Night?

    Are you there on Wednesday Night for Mid-week Prayer and Bible Study with the folks
    that want to be there.

    JESUS said,” Where two or three are gathered in MY NAME,I am in the midst of them.”

    Remember that Fig Tree,JESUS was hungry
    he went to the tree there was no fruit,
    not even last season’s there.
    What did e say to that tree,
    What was seen the very next day when they passed by it?

    Enough Said
    John

  • Posted by

    Good quote from one of the men who helped introduce and promote “Hinduism” into our country as their followers being “star” struck listened and imulated their antics and beliefs.  Like George Harrison was a “christian” trying to tell “Christians” how to be “christians”.  Isn’t this the same as Howard Stern looking at Christians and telling them how to be “Christian.”

    Let me quote a line from the above article,
    “This image of Christianity must change.”

    As you put the word “must” to the word “Image” aren’t we listening to the same thing the article addressed, “Just listen and shut-up.”

    Wow—that word seeker-sensitive showed up again and we are off and running.

    Let’s quote the Bible here, 2nd Timothy 3:1F

    “1 But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. 2 People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, 4 treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God-- 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them.”

    What do we expect in the last days?  It’s here—let’s deal with it church!!!

  • Posted by Keith Jordan

    While the church has in many ways failed to reach the un-saved, and we have portrayed Jesus poorly in many instances, I still bel-ieve that we shouldn’t compromise with the world. When we start putting basketball goals in our sanctuaties and serving donuts and coffee during the worship service, we have defiled the sanctuary of Almighty God.
    While these things may “draw the crowds” we fail to teach the very important concept of reverence for God. We need to show the love of God, but we need to instill in people the reverence for God or as the Bible calls it “the FEAR of God”. We have raised a younger generation who fear nothing. I believe it is time that we return to solid Biblical teaching, a balance of the sound scriptural concepts that this country was founded on.
    As far as what the Beatles think about christianity, their opinion doesn’t concern me much remember the words of John Lennon “We’re bigger than Jesus Christ”

  • Posted by

    Keith

    Do you really think that those things are not being taught in the churches that “teach the Word”

    Believe it, there were LIBERALS 50 years ago, and 100 years ago and 150 years ago ETC ETC

    Technology has brought us much more aware of both the good and the bad.

    It is a today issue!

    Blessings

  • Posted by

    sorry for such a long post… I paired it down three times in hopes to get better at my communicating… again sorry.

    JCE, I agree, we MUST get to the CORE issues and go into the discussion knowing that if we cannot discuss Scriptural issues among church leaders, where are we going to do it?  With college professors?  With unbelievers?  With new Believers?

    You’ve broken the “core” into two camps:  “Evangelism” and “Discipleship” and I would like to suggest before analyzing these first, look at what they are built on:  teaching….

    because Evangelism and Discipleship are based on teaching (what we have been taught.. by men and what we understand in Scripture - which also is in many ways is viewed through the eyes of the person who taught us)… what if these things are wrong even just a little?

    I mean if we’re wrong about discipleship, wouldn’t that make our disciples wrong too? 

    What if we’re wrong about evangelism, wouldn’t that at the VERY least tarnish some or all of the evangelical efforts?  Both, things we all want to take serious. 

    Again, we’re not talking about methods or styles, it goes much deeper… it comes down to testing what we are REALLY teaching, in our “styles” and “methods”.

    Sooo… how do we know if the guy on TV is right or the guy on the radio is wrong?

    I truly believe this is where we MUST start:
    With questions like....
    Who Is God?  What is He?  What is He like? Etc…

    They may seem preliminary considering the audience but I think we can ALL learn from where we believe… where are worldview begins.  I don’t assume where I start is THE Truth, I test it with Scripture as a Bearean (sp) would.  Scripture will reveal my TRUE position EVERY time.

    Peter responding to my post:
    [You stated “As church leaders it is our job to teach those who God has placed in our care, who HE Is (His Charachter and Attributes - His Nature) and who we are IN Him and how we teach about God IS of utmost importance.” I think that is ONE of our jobs as church leaders, but when you look at what Paul, Peter, and others did in Acts, representing Christ to a world that doesn’t know Him is certainly part of it, too, wouldn’t you agree?]

    I would have to ask what you mean by “representing"… again, it isn’t something we “do”, it’s something we ARE.

    Using the book you referred to, Acts, you’ll see The Gospel is what Peter, Paul and others are exactly about.  They hold no punches in their presentations; they lay it out factually, using the Scripture (Old Testament) as their point of reference because of the authority behind it and they are very clear in their message.... BUT they also poured their lives into other Believers like Barnabus, Timothy, Titus, and Luke, etc.

    The point being that we as church leaders must learn to pour our lives into Believers that they too may be found representing Christ in His Fullness.  This is how we REALLY reach the world, when they see how we treat one another and glorify God for our good works.  Do we help someone in need?  Sure, but how much more important to help a Brother in need. OR for an opposite view, imagine if you had 5 older brothers and the oldest (wisest… most “pastoral”) was always going out looking for neighbors to take care of when your other 4 older brothers are desperate themselves for his assistance but he is too busy with the non-blood neighbors thinking that if he does enough, says enough and befriends enough, they will come, when in fact, our Father is the only one that adds blood relatives to our family (younger brothers – and in prayer, we hope, a MULTITUDE).

    The more we teach them about Who God Is the more excited AND thankful they will be about their Savior… No program or style will ever replace this Joy of Discipleship and rejoicing of evangelism (properly representing Christ in all we do and say).

    This requires constant training, supervision, dedication of time… sometimes meeting with men 4, 5 and 6 times a week, phone calls, emails, lunches and coffee.  They have to know you and your family and you have to know them and theirs.

    At the very least the pastor should pour his life into the elders and deacons (knowing that he cannot pour his life into hundreds - unless he is doing it through his friends and Brothers by his training them in sound teaching that never fails).

    So to be clear, we should represent Christ, not as a thing we “do”, like a class or program but who we are.  Teaching a class is finite.  Raising a child is infinite.

    It’s not a disagreement Peter just a difference in point of perspective (view), which I am always ready to test with Scripture.

    The Lord be Glorified!

  • Posted by

    If George Harrison were a successful and faithful pastor, I might listen.  He’s not.  He talks about the church needing to change...to what?  George’s image of what religion is supposed to be.  George died lost...and he did not respond to the Gospel.  I believe Jesus said He would build the church. 

    We have the blueprint for building the church in the Bible.  Even the first churches made mistakes.  Read 1 & 2 Corinthians, Galatians, 1 & 2 Thessalonians.  Also, read Rev. 2 & 3.  Paul warned about false teachers in Acts to the Ephesian elders and wrote letters to Timothy and Titus about what to do as well. 

    The church is in the business of making disciples:

    - Believing:  Saving their lost souls.
    - Being: New creature in Christ.
    - Belonging: submission to the local body of Christ, the church.
    - Behaving: Living for Christ per the teachings of the Bible.

    A preferred worship style of music is never mentioned in Scripture.  In reading the Bible I find Jesus singing a psalm as part of Passover when the team left the upper room.  Hmmmm.  In reading the psalms I note that the ancient hymnal exalted God and put Him in His place of worship - above us! 

    My questions concerning style are:

    - Why the emphasis on music and style over substance?

    - What or where is the central focus of worship:  pleasing self or pleasing God?

    - Should worship services reflect a marked difference from the world’s entertainment?

    One finally comment and I will stop.  George Harrison’s comments do bear some consideration - the context of his life.  What caused him to come to that point?  What churches “turned him off” and why?  We bear the brunt of the burden when one silly pastor or church says to “Believe and shut up.” Revival comes when God cleans the house.

    Just my two cents worth.

    Dan

  • Posted by

    Dan,

    I totally agree with you when you said:

    “The church is in the business of making disciples:

    - Believing: Saving their lost souls.
    - Being: New creature in Christ.
    - Belonging: submission to the local body of Christ, the church.
    - Behaving: Living for Christ per the teachings of the Bible.”

    However, and I believe this is a large part of what is wrong with many churches today, I had a prof at the first seminary I attended (until God got it through my thick skull that where I was going was NOT where He wanted me) who almost flunked me in a Theological Ethics class for making a similar statement. His idea for the purpose of the church? To be an agent of social justice and to teach pluralism and tollerance. I forget the rest of the rhetoric.

    It’s very disheartening when many who are in our mainline seminaries who hear this, buy into it, hook, line and sinker. That will sink the church.

    Blessings,
    Tony

  • Posted by

    I’m a newcomer to this blog, but as i noticed and read all these comments i saw the theme of yeah you’re right the church is screwing this up. However, i didn’t really see a lot of people willing to take this on. I believe what the church needs is not a new style, good Lord we have so many of those I can’t stand it any more. It seems we spend so much time on what church looks like we forget about ourselves. Yeah the most important part, as leaders if we are not looking into our lives. You can read 1,000 John Maxwell books 100 times and if you are not right with God throw it out the window. We look at so many different resources (and they have their place) we forget about the Bible and the journey God has put us on.  The style of our church shouldn’t be on trend it should be on the journey that God is taking you through for your own community. Take ownership of what God has given you and look at what God has given you; be creative for your community not somebody else community.

  • Posted by

    BeHim,

    Absolutely I agree with you that what we have been taught and teach others is foundational in determining what will be an authentic representation of Jesus, how we will “do Church” (an oxymoronic phrase), and how we will walk out our mission.  I want to affirm your passion for the obvious conviction that “Doing” is a manifestation of “Being”!  It is very difficult for me to get my arms around understanding how any follower of Jesus could even consider the possibility that there could exist those who are truly “Being” the Church without the corresponding “Doing” as its natural outflow!  Yet, it is easy to believe, and, in fact, we are plagued in epidemic proportions with those who practice, teach and preach the “Doing” completely content with walking it out as priority #1 whether the being is there or not.

    I stand believing that our devotion will forever be passionately EQUAL toward both of these endeavors when we understand our mission in perspective to the role it plays in His mission.  For it to be anything short of or compromising with that level of commitment would be to set ourselves outside the realm of agreement with our Father.

    Even so, our priority in the way we walk that devotion out, will by necessity set one of the two in subservience to the other.  We have been doing this (without honestly admitting it) for generations in evangelical Christianity with evangelism (doing) ruling as our top priority, and discipleship (being) taking back seat and relegated to a supporting role of our perceived higher priority.

    What we have accomplished operating this way does not need to be mocked nor railed against as being somehow evil or even not Christian.  Father knows, I am sure, that our motives have been pure for the most part and we have truly believed this to be His plan and purposed agenda for the Church.  Why would we have been doing it this way otherwise?  We would not.  Besides that, while we cannot validate or measure our successes from His perspective, we can certainly know for sure that we have gone a long way toward extending His Kingdom and brought millions into relationship with Him through our relentless passion for doing His mission. 

    I am inclined to believe His plan is for Discipleship to take place wherever Christians (Disciples) are.  To suggest that is exclusively in the Church, is spiritually and theologically accurate, in the sense we all know the only thing that can really be called the Church Biblically is we the people who are the Church.  But we do not live or hang out in our chosen gathering places 24/7, and a good deal of our lives are lived in the world.  So it seems safe to believe there is not a designated place for Discipleship. Although, the gathering together of Christians in a local fellowship certainly needs to be wholly devoted to the work of Discipleship.

    Evangelism, on the other hand, by the very nature of its existence, and the postured state or relationship of its targeted people with God and with His Church, makes it impossible spiritually and theologically, and problematic logistically for its happening “in the Church.” But we, in our relentless tenacity, have somehow managed to pull it off.  I don’t have all the answers for this dilemma and I’m not ready to suggest we throw the baby out with the bath water either.  But I am convinced we have created a perpetually infantile and impotent majority in the Church through our process of building her for the lost in preference to the household of Faith.

    It would be wonderful and ultimately evangelistically powerful if we could be about the business of learning to love one another, develop in our gifts and Christian maturity, and be equipped for the work of the ministry, in an environment that is wholly committed to that focused purpose and mission without the invited presence of unbelief constantly in our midst.  When a gathered people of God have such an environment, what the world will see from them whenever they come into their presence, and when the Church lives it out in the world, will be nothing short of the manifest presence of Jesus Christ.

  • Posted by

    JCE you’ve said it much better than I ever could have…

    The difficult task, when the Church does decide to finally disciple in the Sound Teachings of Scripture, will be droves leaving.

    Somehow that will have to be the accepted response BUT we know today that is not so.

    Just as when Christ had thousands of followers leave His side when He said… “lest you eat of my body and drink of my blood you cannot be my disciples"… it’s hard to preach and teach the Truth but is is necessary and vital to Spiritual Growth and Maturity.

  • Posted by

    BeHim,
    At the risk of being irrelevant, antiquated and perhaps hyperspiritual..."AMEN"!

    Speaking of relevancy, I just went to get gas in my car and drove past one of the most “Cutting Edge” Churches in our area as concerns the movement of Churches driven by the “make them want to come through relevancy Doctrine”.  They have a huge electronically controlled digital flash kiosk out front and it literally says, “Join us as we celebrate the Holiday Season without the boredom of Religion.”

    That says it all!

  • Posted by

    JCE - I can’t see anything wrong with the Kiosk message.  The religion of the Pharisees WAS boring and irrelevant. Jesus said as much.  During the holiday season more unchurched people wander into churches than any other time.  Why is it bad to invite people in via a kiosk?  Those who show up will probably hear about the real message of the season - Jesus. 

    I say kudos to the kiosk church and lets pray for them.

  • Posted by

    I agree with Wendy...although I wish the kiosk actually said Merry Christmas instead of Happy Holidays.  There may be many *MANY* forces in this country trying to kill the idea of Christmas...but Christians themselves are unknowingly leading the charge.  It has lost all of its original meaning in the majority of even the Christian world.  It’s either about commercialism or about boring tales of some baby in a manger told year after year in such repetition that many Christians only pay it lip service themselves it seems.

    It’s boring.

    I applaud this church for admitting that they realize what this time has become and telling people they are attempting to change it.

    Christmas, on the whole, has lost its reverence as well as its relevance.  That church you denounce is doing something about it.

  • Posted by

    just in case I’m quoted out of context:

    I’m not saying the story of the birth of Christ is boring.  I’m saying that the passion behind that story has been lost.  It is rarely presented as the awesome and RELEVANT event it actually is.

    The quest for that term some mock has some amazing potential.  I’ve seen it change my entire home town.

  • Posted by

    Wendi and Matt,

    I did not say one word about the kiosk being wrong, nor did I denounce the Church for “doing” it.

    What I did, in fact, was acknowledge this Church as a “cutting edge” Church in the relevancy movement, and paid public tribute to the grandness of their cultural genious!

    You both had to make some real assumptions to come up with those projections. It is very umlikely that anything I write here will ever be coming from a place of “right or wrong”, or “judgement and denouncing”.

    However, the things of God are, in fact, spiritual, and impossible to be understood with the natural mind.  For that very reason we have been given the Spirit of God so that we may be able to recgnize the difference between that which is Spiritual (a thing of God)and that which is natural (a thing of man). In this light the Word tells us that a Spiritual person will judge (evaluate) ALL THINGS!

    To make such an evaluation from the dwelling place of spiritual habitation and the mind of Christ is neither an accusation of wrongness nor a denouncement in judgement.

    It is what it is! If the powers of leadership that be in any given Church know that they know that they know, that they received their direction, strategy and logistics for what they are “doing” from the Lord, there is no reason for them to ever feel a need to be defensive. 

    Paul came to the Greeks in the name of their unknown God to bring them the Gospel of the Kingdom of God in Christ Jesus.

    As a Pastor and Professor of Cross Cultural Studies & Church Growth, I am as committed to bringing the Truth, Love and message of the Gospel to people in the context of who they are as anyone you will ever meet.

    But I will assure you that when I bring them with me to Father’s House, if they don’t find it to be a house of prayer, and drstically different than the norm of their cultural comfort zone, I am going to do some serious soul searching about who is really wielding the power of influence!

  • Posted by

    ok...then I’ll admit...I could have misunderstood you and for that I apologize.  But I still highly doubt you were making “public tribute to the grandness of their cultural genious.” Just say that to yourself and read your previous post and tell me if if does not sound a little mocking.

    But again, I very well may have jumped the gun due to the disadvantages to reading posts compared to hearing it in conversation and misunderstanding.  So I apologize yet again.  truly.

  • Posted by

    Is there a right way of doing church.Yes! When two are three are gather in his name.We are doing church the right way.Its just when we gather for the other stuff its the worng way.What other stuff you say.Stuff like kicks for Christ dancing for Christ , taxes for Christ skateboarding for Christ you get the picture.When its. about anything other than Jesus its the wrong way of doing church.Lets look at rev.2:1-7 the church at Ephesus was doing alot of good stuff but they left Jesus out are maybe they just put him second like alot of us do. Question would your youth group be as big if you got rid of the video game room and turn it back in to a prayer room.Are made it 90 minutes of God time and 15 minutes of skate time.What if we gave the childern Jesus instead of sponge bob and cookies would then still come in droves.How about if the pastor gave meat instead of milk every sunday.Would your church still be full.Yes I said your church because Jesus took his lampstand and left alot of churches years ago.Repent and start over make him (JESUS)the reason you do church at all.Lets all get back to are first love and do this thing we call church the way He (JESUS) planed for us to do it .Gather in his name and his name only and we will be doing it the right way.lots of other reasons to gather but that not having church.its fellowship

  • Posted by

    JCE - One of my favorite college professors in a public speaking class taught that if our audience misunderstands our message, then we should resist the temptation find fault with the hearers for not understanding.  She said “the responsibility for understanding is on the one with the words.” That advice works fine when you can look into the eyeballs of those you are communicating with, but its a bit more difficult in cyberspace.  Really, I thought you were criticizing this church when you said:

    “They have a huge electronically controlled digital flash kiosk out front and it literally says, ‘Join us as we celebrate the Holiday Season without the boredom of Religion.’ That says it all!”

    Another of Todd’s posts this week is about healthy / unhealthy churches and the author gives the following example of a healthy church:

    Healthy Church - Cooperates with other churches in ministry (21:18 & 24:17)
    Unhealthy Church - Isolates themselves from other churches - exclusive and sectarian.

    I agree with this statement, and am very cautious about the things I say about ministry partners in my community.  I want those far from God to see me as one who “makes every effort to protect the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Eph. 4:3).  I’m glad to know that I somehow misunderstood you completely.

  • Posted by

    Wendi
    [The religion of the Pharisees WAS boring and irrelevant. Jesus said as much.]
    [Healthy Church - Cooperates with other churches in ministry (21:18 & 24:17)
    Unhealthy Church - Isolates themselves from other churches - exclusive and sectarian.]

    Jesus didn’t speak out against the Pharisees because they were “boring” or “irrelevant”, Jesus spoke out against them because they were deceiving themselves and everyone they taught.  They took the Word of God and twisted it to work for them.

    I wonder if Jesus, Peter, Paul, John and James were cooperating with other “churches” (belief systems) or isolating themselves from the other churches - exclusive (One Way) and sectarian (dogmatic and narrow gat… I mean minded).

  • Posted by

    BeHim,

    Well, I’ll give you that perhaps the Pharisees weren’t boring - but they certainly were irrelevant, as well as decieving themselves and others as you point out.

    I don’t think Garrett (author of other post I referenced) was suggesting we cooperate with other belief systems (Mormans and Hindus) but with other CHRISTIAN churches, even those that hold to different points of doctrine within the circle of historic Christian orthodoxy (the AG and Lutheran, the Baptist and Presbyterian all serving the community together).  As I see it, to do less it to violate “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” I just don’t think God is surprised or bothered by the differences evidenced by denominationalism.  On the contrary, I think it is part of the richness of our faith.

  • Posted by

    Wendi
    Wait a minute, in one post you agree sectarianism is wrong: ["I agree with this statement"… Unhealthy Church - Isolates themselves from other churches - exclusive and sectarian.]

    Now, you think denominationalism (sects, ie… sectarianism) is the “richness of our faith”.

    This isn’t a “play” on words, they are synonyms…

    Remember, denominations came to be because of differences in doctrine and beliefs and are more a testimony akin to moving Scripture more to fit our own needs and wants than to holding to a dogmatic doctrine (much like the Pharisees did in their day - which to me would suggest that denominations are not a good thing… BUT neither is unity in the name of tolerance).

    Also, I do think God has something negative to say about our “sects” or… “denominations” ("NAMES"):

    “And to the angel of the church in Sardis write,
    ‘These things says He who has the seven Spirits of God and the seven stars: “I know your works, that you have A NAME that you are alive, but you are dead. 2 Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die, for I have not found your works perfect before God.[a] 3 Remember therefore how you have received and heard; hold fast and repent. Therefore if you will not watch, I will come upon you as a thief, and you will not know what hour I will come upon you. 4 YOU HAVE A FEW NAMES even in Sardis who have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with Me in white, for they are worthy. 5 He who overcomes shall be clothed in white garments, and I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life; but I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels.
    6 “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”’

    Also, notice in the passage to the church of Laodicea; Christ is standing outside of the church (as opposed to IN it), knocking on the door… Many unfortunately use this passage out of context to refer to the door of your heart ("spiritualizing" the passage).

    I may be wrong, but hey, I’m willing to test it with Scripture!

  • Posted by

    Matt,

    No need for you or Wendi to apologize. I did not feel attacked nor took offense. I just wanted to point out that you were making assumptions and interpreting my statements as accusatory and mocking.

    I too would see them as that, if, I read them exclusively with my natural mind, and favored “doing” ministry from a marketing strategist’s perspective as opposed to Holy Spirit led guidance birthed in intercession.

    Now, don’t think I’m saying that is where you are coming from.  I wouldn’t know.  But that is where I would be coming from if I received it that way.

    Obviously, I am not a cheer leader for tickling the ears of the masses.  Nor do I embrace the need to cater to the culturally mandated humanistic spirits of individualism, materialism, extremism and social narcicism that drive the American market place in order to make the Gospel relevant. 

    I just cannot personally go there when I have to live knowing that the Gospel is in and of itself going to call them to turn and walk away from those very heart issues.

    Friends, we cannot proclaim to have preached the Gospel of Jesus Christ and His Kingdom, if our invitation does not call our hearers to come out of the world to follow Jesus. The world...is the “ethnos”...not the “cosmos”. It is the very culture that dominates the lifestyle and dictates the belief system of the society that makes up that culture.

    So, what you hear from me is about issues of the heart, and why we really do what we do. 

    I could not care less about the techniques and tools we use in and of themselves. But we sure better make sure we are not just as much enslaved by the need for comfort, entertainment and self-gratification as the rest of our society, before we take up the banner of making the Gospel relevant by serving it up the only way their going to buy into it!

    It’s awfully difficult to persuade an addict to stop when I’m his supplier!

  • Page 2 of 3 pages

     <  1 2 3 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: