Orginally published on Monday, December 08, 2008 at 9:19 AM
by Alan E. Nelson
In the last LeadingIdeas, I pointed out that the primary reason that churches find themselves stuck is because they’ve marginalized or run off their catalyzing leaders. These are the people who have the God-given ability to sense where organizations are stuck and are able to strategize ways to move them forward. The typical scenario is that managers or do-gooders get selected to serve on the church board, people who’ve never really led much in their lives, but find themselves in a situation where they can “be in charge.” If and when a catalyst is nominated to serve on the board or even considers the outside chance of volunteering for the role, he looks at the current board, doesn’t spot any other catalysts, and then graciously excuses himself. Fat chance they want to spend endless hours in board meetings, nit-picking over paint chips or micro-managing ministry budgets.
So how do you find these elusive, catalyzing leaders, when you’re surrounded by teaching, relational, and managerial types? The problem is a big one because the old adage is true, “it takes one to know one.” When non-catalyzing leaders try to find catalyzing leaders, they nearly always come up with their own kind. So here’s a cheat sheet of sorts to help you discern who has a catalyzing wiring in your congregation, so that you can seek them out one on one for some loving arm-twisting. Since these people almost never respond to cattle calls from the pulpit or bulletin announcements, and healthy ones rarely volunteer to help (unhealthy controlling types sometimes do), you’ll need to do some personal recruiting. Sounds a lot like Jesus’ approach to disciple-inviting, doesn’t it?
Here are 5 traits for identify catalyzing leaders:
1. They currently supervise at least 10 people in their work; 20 or more is even better. Don’t just look for talented individuals, sole business owners who sell insurance or run a ma and pa type store. People who manage more than a handful of others often have the catalyzing gene.
2. Interview the person and listen for past experience in terms of being in charge of clubs or groups. For example, “I was student body president of my high school.” “I was the captain of our debate team.” “I was the youngest to be promoted to district manager in our company.” In our work with young leaders in KidLead, we’ve found that catalyzing leaders tend to emerge early in life, as early as preschool when socializing distinguishes the followers from the followed.
3. They’ve successfully established ministry teams at church. When you give a catalyzing leader a task, he or she will round up a group of people and gidder done. Others will tend to overwork themselves, stress out over limited resources, and fail to attract others to the cause. They’ll say things such as, “Nobody showed up. Everyone was too busy. People just aren’t committed.” Use your local church as a laboratory to test for those able to catalyze others and accomplish things through teams.
4. They’re talked about when absent or are looked to when in a group. This is the EF Hutton symptom, “when they talk, others listen.” This person may not be brash, outgoing, or an extrovert, but they do carry a presence about them that is noticed when they are absent. Listen for names that get mentioned frequently and look for those who are asked about by others.
5. Look at those in your church who get things outside of the church. Catalyzing leaders can’t not lead. Because most churches don’t have enough room for them to spread their wings, they gravitate toward community, parachurch, or business arenas that recognize and reward them with opportunities. Google, read the paper, and interview those in your church who may be sitting in the back or attending sporadically, to see who is making the chips fly on the outside .
You may find one or two of these indicators in people who aren’t catalyzing leaders, but most catalyzing leaders will have at least four of them, if not all five. When you ID them positively, do your best to cast a personal vision. Better yet, find three or four of them and get them all together at one time. They’ll recognize the trait in each other and when they realize they’re not alone in the church, they’re more apt to hope things really can change. Then, let them go. Don’t tie them down with protocol and constraints. Let the horses run.
Alan E. Nelson
http://www.alanenelson.com
http://www.kidlead.com
This post has been viewed 593 times so far.
There are 10 Comments:
Here’s another “trait to identify catalyzing leaders” that you failed to mention: The pastor is highly intimidated by this person’s leadership abilities.
Or maybe that’s a way to identify that the pastor is not a catalyzing leader. Certainly not all pastors react that way. I know lots of pastors who are strong, confident leaders. Many pastors are encouraged and excited about other people with leadership abilities, not intimidated.
There are many ways that the “associate” pastors here are better equipped than our Senior Pastor. But he is a catalyzing leader, not threatened by that, in fact, he knows the value of that.
It’s probably a HUGE reason we have a healthy church!
[...we’ve found that catalyzing leaders tend to emerge early in life, as early as preschool when socializing distinguishes the followers from the followed.] WOW is this true!
[Catalyzing leaders can’t not lead. Because most churches don’t have enough room for them to spread their wings, they gravitate toward community, parachurch, or business arenas that recognize and reward them with opportunities.] Most of our good leaders are like this. In fact, basically ALL of our “Leadership Team” (what we call our board) is very busy leading in business and civic groups, and it is an outgrowth of a very easy-to-recognized SPIRITUAL gift of leadership, not just an “organic” one… They spread Christ’s love in this way, just as much, or even more, than their leadership in our Church does.
Once again, I am so fortunate to be where I am. Thanks, God!
Wow, great comments. Interesting. Peter, you are in the minority on this one, I’m convinced. Consider yourself blessed, as you already did. Every situation is different, so that many of us as pastors are intimidated by high powered laity (personal) and/or our doctrine doesn’t let us tap the influence of women leaders who make up over half of our congregation (theological), or our traditions make us believe that we are responsible for everything (cultural); in addition to simple naivety (ignorance...not a sin, BTW).
If I may add to the author’s original comment ... I am amazed at the number of former church leaders (associates and pastors) who are no longer in the church but who have take their skills and abilities and found success, fulfillment and blessing in the community, parachurch and/or business arenas. How sad that their “call” could not be fulfilled in the church that so desperately needs gifted, Spirit-led leadership.
As for the intimidation factor, there are also many pastors who, if not intimidated by catalyzing lay leadership, require all the attention and recognition as THE leader; because of their position, they cannot afford to have a lay person “out shine” them. Sad, isn’t it!
This is so interesting. I would describe both myself and my husband as this type of leader. And we’ve both had some very wonderful ministry experiences and really terrible ones.
I think the fact that catalyst leaders are moving and effecting change is a huge risk to a lot of people. The fact is that most people don’t like change. And even if they are leaders, they cautiously move forward if at all.
So, in comes the excited, enthusiastic, passionate and driven catalyst who at times may not always be wise in how he or she effects change.
It’s easy to attack the person who doesn’t respond to this type of leader, and often that’s rightfully so.
But I do think there is a fiip side to this, in that the catalyst must learn how to be effective. This means working wisely with people who won’t like what’s happening, being humble to see that maybe their plan isn’t truly the best one at that time, but the plan for the future, and giving others empowerment as they lead as a team, waiting while they buy into the plan so that all can move forward together.
I remember one of my nemesis in ministry asking me “Do you have to be good at everything?”
She was very competitive and out to get me, no doubt about that. But her question did make me think and do some personal evaluation.
Maybe God gives us people like this to keep us humble?
Enough, of my ramble. I do think that catalyst leaders often times are driven out of the church and become church planters, missionaries, or para church professionals, because they can’t find their niche. And I think it’s sad for the established church at times that this happens.
Jan, you are dead on. Another thing that gets missed in this, is the importance of catalyst leaders understanding the importance of submission to their God ordained authority. It is often difficult for this type of leader to understand that their pastor is not the enemy or the tool of Satan to keep them from fulfilling their destiny.
I’m speaking as someone who is a catalyst, was a long-term staff member, and is now in the role of pastor. I saw some of the pastors I served under as control freaks, when their goal all along was to bring a church forward, not just a few individuals. I wish I had understood my role more clearly. The Kingdom would have been served much better.
Great article…
I think i need some input though. I am a leader. I am on staff at my church as the youth pastor. I would say, based on this list, that I am not a very catalyzing leader at the moment. I think I have had many times in my life where I have been a catalyst for great change, and movement, and others when I have not.
So here is my question. Is it possible to have the non catalyst leader be effective? I guess I am wondering if I have obstacles I can overcome, or I need someone better than me to do it. Does any of this make sense?
Any thoughts are welcome…
-E
I was thinking about this more last night. And I believe there is a definite place for leaders who might not be termed “catalyst”. The church is made up of many members with different giftedness and that includes leadership styles and gifts.
A catalyst usually isn’t a person who brings a wounded congregation back to a point of healing, in my opinion. Seniors don’t usually respond to a person with a passion to move. It takes a very patient person to work with them and lead them to the Lord. (worked under one of those and really valued that).
I’m sure there are a ton more examples. I think the key is that leaders should be working together and that the catalyst should be recognized and valued, though often he/she is just seen as a conflict producer. I think this is kind of like a prophet, who people dont’ want to listen to at times.
My interpretation of “catalyst” is an igniter, one who “makes things happen.” If that was the only quality of leadership, we’d be in a heap of trouble! Eric, I think there are times when we are enabled (set free, empowered)to be catalyzing leaders, but there are other times when it is in our best interest, as well other’s, NOT to be catalystic, although we are leaders ... and leading… all the while. Those are times when we re-create, we learn, we dream, and instead of acting out our leadership, we live it in and among others. I’ve learned, not everybody relates well with these types all the time. The author referred to the “EF Hutton type.” Sometimes its good to be quiet, and listen (and learn), instead of always being “the leader of the pack.” Hang in there, Eric!!!
Page 1 of 1 pages