change without compromise

HOME | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | SUBMIT CONTENT | CONTACT US


Email Newsletter  

Each Monday Morning, we'll send you the newest church leadership headlines straight to your in-box! It's all free and you can unsubscribe at any time! Join over 12,000 other pastors who receive MMI updates each week! We respect your privacy.

image

The Beer-Drinking Poker-Playing Pastor

I've said here that I often like articles that make me think. This one did. Probably because I agreed strongly in the beginning of the article with some of the things the pastor is saying; but disagree wholeheartedly with the place that his spiritual journey has taken him. Take a read and see what you think...

This interview comes from SFGate.com...

You were the head of a pretty big Southern Baptist church, and now you’re “The Poker Pastor.” How did that happen?
It began with a personal transformation of sorts. I was busy growing a church but I never stopped to ask the hard question: Are we really doing what Jesus asked us to do in making disciples? I believe that most Christians in America believe Jesus is, if not the only way, then the best way to get to heaven. But I don’t think they believe Jesus’ way of life is a better way of life in the here and now.

Why?
If you look at the actual teachings of Jesus, he talks about turning the other cheek, about going the second mile, about forgiveness. He talks about loving people. He says the greatest of all the commandments is to love God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength, and then to love one another, just as much as you love yourself. I think that’s the way of Jesus.

And you don’t think enough Christians are living that way?
No, I don’t. I’m a nobody and I acknowledge that—please don’t hear any judgment or condemnation or any kind of condescending spirit in what I’m saying—but I think somehow we have decided it’s more important to be right than it is to act right.

When you decided to leave your church, how did your parishioners react?
It was a shock to them. And they were disappointed, many of them. But I came to a place where I realized that the church I was pastoring wasn’t able to go where I was going. So I left the church and joined a kind of a citywide ministry that gave me some room to explore some of these things.

How did your personal life change after you struck out on this different path? I remember you told me that you and your family had to downsize your lifestyle.
We went through a phase where this ministry that I was a part of couldn’t pay our salaries, and we missed paychecks. Then when I started this new little group that is the congregation I lead now, they couldn’t pay me a full-time wage. I don’t want it to sound like we sold our house or our cars. We still had stuff. I think the biggest thing that we downsized was my ego. I’m a success junkie, so growing a big church and having everybody think, “Oh wow! Look at Ken! He’s got this great thing going on,” was important to me. Suddenly, I was doing something very small and something that, in everybody’s typical perception of what success is in the Christian church, was like a failure. I had to deal with my own self-esteem issues—I still deal with some of that. In the early days, about every third day I was ready to quit and go back to doing what I knew how to do.

You started this new ministry by holding services at someone’s coffee shop. How did that work?

We began by thinking we were just starting a new church, and along the way it moved in a completely different direction. We were experimenting with different ideas, and in the midst of that we dreamed about being in a space that was not a church, that was more among the people.

We heard about a place in a community called Tomball, about 10 minutes from where we were living in Houston, where this guy had a coffee shop and live-music venue. He had some kind of ministry affiliation and was open to groups using the facility. He told us, “Why don’t you-all come do your church over here?” And so we took our church over to that place, which is called Main Street Crossing. It seats about 120 people, has a stage and sound system. So on Friday and Saturday nights we have live-music bands, that kind of thing. On weekdays, it’s a coffee shop, a place to get something to eat.

Your Web site describes Main Street Crossing “as kind of like church, but it’s not.” How is it not like church?
I think it’s not like church in that we are a venue that serves beer and wine.

Yeah! (laughter) And how is it like church, would you say?
It’s like church in that there is a lesson or a message, if you will, spoken during services. But it’s much shorter than the average sermon. It’s not 30 or 45 minutes or an hour. And I think it’s similar in that there will be time for meditation and prayer. Where people are invited and encouraged and assisted to connect with God.

Where does the poker come in?
We were looking for a way to get people into our venue, and poker seemed to be so popular that we said, “Let’s bring a poker league here.” And it just skyrocketed. Our league plays every Monday, Tuesday and Friday night. And we have anywhere from 35 to 65 players at a session.

I’ve heard that you tell people that despite being a pastor, you will “whup their ass” at poker. Is that true?
(Laughs) I don’t know where you got that quote from, but the thing is, well, I told you I was a success junkie. So whatever I do, I want to do it well. And so I decided after the first night of poker that I had to learn how to play simply because there were people there, and I’m trying to connect with people, and what better way than to sit down at a table for three hours with a group of people and play cards?

So I started reading books and learned how to play poker at a pretty good level. And actually, as of last week, I am the point leader for the league that plays at our place.

And how do your new visitors respond to an ass-whupping, poker-playing pastor?
You know, most typical church people look at me like: “You left this nice big church to come do this? And now you’re drinking beer and playing poker? You’ve lost the faith.” And I just have to live with all that. I’m not worried about impressing the church people. What I’m worried about, or what I’m most concerned with, is just connecting with these people that play poker.

And I feel like I pastor all of them. I know about when they are going in the hospital, I know about the surgeries they have, I know about their marital problems, because they have begun to see me as a pastor that they can trust.

I think the biggest issue out there today for a lot of folks is they just don’t think there is anybody they can trust with their stuff. They think he’s gonna preach to me, or just tell me to come to church or pray a little harder and everything will be fixed. I believe we’re all broken people. We’re just broken in different places, and we all have addictions, and that we just need to come clean with all that and say: “Life is a journey, and faith is a journey. Wherever you are in that journey, let’s journey together, and maybe we can help each other as we go.”

My understanding is that gambling isn’t approved of by Southern Baptists. Do your poker games include gambling?
No. They don’t. It’s just a league. The players don’t pay to play. And there can be no exchanging of money at any of our sessions. If we did, we would lose our license—our beer and wine license—and feasibly they could shut us down, and feasibly they could haul me to jail.

Your Web site invites anyone who is on a spiritual journey to come over to Main Street Crossing. Do you try to convert people who aren’t Christians, or do you tend to see all spiritual paths as valid?
That’s a great question! And I don’t know how to answer it. I’ve been taught all my life that Jesus is the only way, OK? I don’t want to say—and I hope that you won’t misinterpret this at all—I don’t want to say that I still believe that, and I don’t want to say that I don’t believe that. I’m still finding my own way as to what I believe about that. But here’s what I do believe. I believe the Bible has revealed God’s message. The Bible says that “If you seek me, you will find me. If you seek for me with all your heart.” And I believe that’s true of any person. They will find God if they seek him. And so the other stuff ... I haven’t gotten it figured out yet.

So I take it you’re not doing the hard sell, then?
No, we’re not doing the hard sell. But I do encourage people to come follow the way of Jesus, try it on and see if it works, if it’s real. And so, yeah, there is some sales involved. My view is that following Jesus is the best way to live.

Can you tell me about the faith you were raised in?
I was raised as a Southern Baptist in a small community here in Texas where you had only two choices: Either you were a Baptist or a Catholic, and if you didn’t go to church at all, you were the outcast. My little church was pretty traditional and very conservative in its ideology. You could probably use the term “fundamentalist” to describe how I was raised—meaning we took the Bible to be literally true and without error, and we believed that Jesus was the only way to get to heaven.

What do you consider your religious affiliation these days?
Until five or six years ago, I would have said to you that I was a very conservative Southern Baptist. Now I don’t know what I am. I don’t want to really label myself, because I’m still in transition. It’s not that I have given up the faith—I haven’t. I’ve got lots of questions and lots of doubts, but I’m pursuing God and I’m following Jesus as much as I ever have in my life.

Do you still believe the Bible’s absolutely true without error?
No. I look at the Bible differently now. I see it as the story of God’s relationship with people. It’s the story of God offering reconciliation. And it’s the story of right living. Typically, we think of right living as just the moral side, but it’s the social-justice side, too. And I think one of the things that has changed in me is that I’m much more aware of that aspect of the Bible.

I do think the Bible gives us instructions about life, but now I think it’s more of a story than a kind of one-two-three instruction book.
What have you learned about ministering to people at Main Street Crossing that you probably would never have learned in a traditional church?

I’ve learned that people are just people. I’ve learned that there are a lot of really good folks who don’t go to church. I’ve hung out with people at the poker table that I would never have hung out with before. They wouldn’t have come to my church or darkened my door.

Do you have any advice for other ministers?
My advice would be, first of all, don’t be afraid of personal transformation. And by that I mean huge change in a person’s life. Don’t be afraid of that.

Why would that be scary to them?
I think it scares the living daylights out of most people. Because we all are comfortable knowing what we know, doing what we do, going where we go, and it’s the unknown, it’s moving out into a realm that is so uncertain. You start to ask yourself: “Is this really right? Am I wrong? What if I’m a heretic? What if I have lost the faith? What if what I’m doing is absolutely the worst thing?” I mean, there’s all kinds of uncertainty, and most of us, I think, and I’m included in that, want certainty.

Do you have any advice for people that are following their gut reactions and pursuing what they believe is right, like you did?
One piece of advice I would give is: You cannot do this alone. You’ve got to find some people that you journey with that, whether it’s once a month, or once a week or however, who validate you and affirm you, and encourage you, and help you in the journey. Because I promise you I would have quit without that.

FOR DISCUSSION:  What are your first impressions after reading this article.

- - - - - - - - - -



This post has been viewed 1921 times and was added on July 18, 2006 by Todd Rhoades.
Filed under: Ministry-Specific Help  Evangelism & Outreach  
Share this post with a friend right now!
View reactions to this post at other blogs...

You can really help us out by subscribing to our free RSS feed with your favorite feed reader, or here at Bloglines. Also, you can add us to your favorites at Technorati.


It's easy...
Link to this URL


Like this article? Get our free weekly email newsletter for more great resources just like this...  



- - - - - - - - - -
 TRACKBACKS: (0) There are 56 Comments:
  • Posted by

    Just a thought - in the time that you have all debated inerrancy, salvation as a process, and the fact that BeHim and others think it their job to judge other followers of Christ - I wonder how many games of poker have been played, bottles of beer drank, and lives impacted for Christ?

  • Posted by

    While this discussion is fascinating, I gotta go w/ Journey Girl’s last post.  All of our theological debate and discussion accomplishes little when I think of the many people who work hard every day to bring God’s love to people who so desperately need it.  This challenges me to quit thinking so much about inerrancy and all the other big words in the Christian glossary and just do something!  Again, theological debate fascinates me and there are some great thoughts expressed on both sides of the argument.  I just think sometimes we scare off people who need Christ because of this stuff.

  • Posted by

    I’m with you Journey Girl.  I’d put money on the missional kingdom effectiveness of Ken Shuman (poker playing pastor) any day of the week over those who have made it their mission to endlessly debate inerrency, salvation as a process and every and any new, innovative and relevant (YES relevant . . . ) idea that surfaces in the church.

    Wendi

  • Posted by

    Quick note to Daniel:

    Yes, “divine dictation” is simplistic.  God inspired the writers, not dictated to them.  We see that in the individual writing styles that come through.  I like the way Ryrie put it - “God superintended the human authors of the Bible so that they composed and recorded without error His message in the words of their original writings.” So God supervised the process to ensure the proper outcome, yet the individual writers composed the text.  Some folks like the term “infallible” instead of “inerrant.” Slight difference.

    Also, I don’t think God is surprised or frustrated with anything that happens.  Just disappointed.  Or pleased.

    And thanks for pointing out that there is nothing in the article that says the pastor gets drunk. 

    To Julie - Welcome to the discussion.  It’s always thought provoking. 

    I do not believe God makes mistakes.  God never says “Oops.” Or “D’oh!” For example, he knew full well that mankind would fall in the Garden, and had the plan of redemption all figured out and ready to go before that hapened.  He gave us free will, knowing we would abuse it, but also knowing that some of us would freely choose to love Him, and that I believe is the purpose. 

    So, our tendency to err is not part of the image of God that remains in us.  We are a fallen race - we are not as we were originally created.

    Solomon is an example to us - no matter what we have been given, spiritually or materialistically, we need to intentionally keep our focus on God.  We are easily distracted. 

    And finally, other than maybe a few “KJV only” types, no one believes that our translations are error-free.  That’s probably why there are so many of them.  Still, as I originally posted, the power, authority and sufficiency remain, regardless of the very minor problems.  It’s actually amazing and, in my opinion, miraculous, that the errors in modern translations are as minor as they are.  Over thousands and thousands of years, the actual words of scripture are not in doubt.  Some folks debate over other issues, but there is great confidence that we know to a very high degree exactly what the original manuscripts said.  No significant doctrines are in question, except for how we interpret them.  There’s the tricky part. 

    Dave

  • Posted by

    Dave writes “...there is great confidence that we know to a very high degree exactly what the original manuscripts said.  No significant doctrines are in question, except for how we interpret them.  There’s the tricky part. “

    BINGO! Althought there is GREAT debate around the specific wording of many things in scripture, it is a testament to God’s Holy Spirit’s direction over His Word that there are indeed no serious textual controversies concerning doctrine. It’s one of my favorite pointers to God’s Sovereignty I know of!

    Dave, you did a GREAT job of explaining the whole thing! Thanks!

  • Posted by

    Posted by Journey Girl
    Thursday, July 20, 2006 at 9:09 AM
    Just a thought - in the time that you have all debated inerrancy, salvation as a process, and the fact that BeHim and others think it their job to judge other followers of Christ - I wonder how many games of poker have been played, bottles of beer drank, and lives impacted for Christ?

    JG. Thanks for pointing out our inconsistancies where we are not evangelizing the worldly crowd and some others (like you, I suppose are out beating the streets everyday inviting your friends and strangers) into the relationship that makes all the difference in their eternal salvation. Thanks for giving me the approval to go against the Word of God and imbibe some booze while I gamble my Saviour’ gifts away and impact others lives for Christ.

    Have a super day and remember to put Jesus first in everything you do and say. J

  • Blessings to the fellow in this interview, I share a very similar journey.

    How sad it is that we “Christians” seem incapable of having a wonderful discussion and must always resort to bickering, argument, and personal attacks.

  • Posted by

    Thanks Rev J.

    I was discussing with my Bro-n-law the other day about discipleship, which I suppose is probably counted as a waste of time to many as well.

    Anyway we were talking about those of us in the church to be duplicating ourselves as we ought to. Yyet the problem being, is many are duplicating themseves alright, but they have no foundation, and no not what they even believe or ought to believe! So here we have people out trying to duplicate themselves, who can’t even say if Jesus is the only way to heaven!  Let’s get first things first, which is most definately not a waste of time.

  • Posted by Daniel

    Jack and Andre (by the way, why are you ‘Rev’ and ‘Pastor’?  isn’t that a little redundant?--I mean no disrespect), a couple notes: to claim that this pastor goes “against the Word of God” when he drinks is false.  I don’t know if we want to start a conversation about alcohol on this thread, but I’m sure you’ll find the general consensus is that alcohol is a gift from God.  Drunkenness is merely what humans have done to pervert that gift.  Again, this pastor clearly does NOT get drunk.  And while he plays poker, to say that he “gamble[s the] Saviour’ gifts away” is to blatantly ignore the fact that there is no money at stake!!!  Did you read the article?  I’m sorry, but you both seem a little trigger happy.
    The emphasis on Jesus being “the only way to heaven” reinforces the pastor’s point that too many people believe that, but too few people believe that Jesus’ way of living on this Earth is the best way to live (here we might talk about the Gospel of fire-insurance/sin-management vs. the Gospel of the Kingdom--the latter seems more prominent in this man’s life--and also in Jesus’ teachings).
    Dave Z: I’ve been on the infallibility/inerrancy merry-go-round many times.  I’m fine with saying that “God supervised the process to ensure the proper outcome, yet the individual writers composed the text,” as long as that isn’t an excuse not to think about the text (as it usually is--this is in my experience of course).
    As for God being surprised and/or frustrated, scripture (Isaiah is a prime example) testifies to God’s openness to the future, so you can claim that God is never surprised--but that’s an interpretive claim.  Anyway, this is another can of worms that I might get shot for, so we don’t need to go there.
    Wendi and Journey Girl… thank you for putting the focus where it needs to be.
    Much love,
    -Daniel-

  • Posted by

    Rev / Pastor Andre -

    I can’t speak for Journey Girl, but the reason I resonated with her post and agreed with it was not to accuse you of NOT evangelizing, but to express my opinion that what this guy spends his time doing is much more effective in “kingdom building” (which might or might not be evangelism) than Christians spending time arguing with one another.  It’s not that I don’t care about inerrancy or the doctrine of substitution atonement, but I am VERY SURE that lost and broken people Pastor Shuman is roughing it up with don’t care one little bit.  I am admonished by him, because I am not (as you suppose), “beating the streets every day inviting friends and strangers,” at least not nearly as much as I might be.

    And did you mean to criticize him or us with your statement about not evangelizing the “worldly crowd”?  Who else needs evangelizing?  The church crowd?  Since Jesus went after the “worldly crowd” I think I will too.

    Pastor Shuman said: But I don’t think they [most Christians] believe Jesus’ way of life is a better way of life in the here and now.

    I don’t know what most Christians believe, but do think the collective actions of evangelical Christians in North America gives evidence that they don’t live as if they believe Jesus’ way of life was better here and now, otherwise they (we) would be roughing it up with the “worldly crowd” rather than spending most of our discretionary time with other Christians.  Admittedly we rough it up with the worldly 50+ hours per week in our jobs.  We don’t have any choice here so we shouldn’t give ourselves much credit.  The minute our time is our own, we run to the safety and security of those just like us.  Pastor Shuman doesn’t think this pattern looks like Jesus . . . and neither do I.

    Wendi

  • Posted by

    Not sure if my start got sent if it did it was obviously incomplete if it didnt I will try to start over;
    I find it all very interesting from the difference of ‘to err and error’ ‘innerancy and infallibility’ ‘social justice and fire insurance’.  All of it is very interesting, who said you pervert the word with your traditions?  (my paraphrase) I think it is very important to discuss the points of doctrine while not forgetting the point .  As in Jesus certainly sought out ‘sinners’ but not just to hang out with them, he seemed to have message that they needed to hear.  IMO the distressing part of the story is the apparent uncertainty regarding Jesus’ sufficiency for eternal life, yes it begins here and should have great impact personally and socially, but it is not just for here.  Why do we do what we do?  Upon what do we build?  There are times that we must allow that someone elses way is not our way while it may still be His way.  As categories there is only right and wrong, but within those categories there may be better and even best.  I do like the picture of the journey, but it must be toward Him and about Him not just a random trip.  How can we know where our journey is taking us?  I think only through what the word of God tells us.  Dont we have to agree that it does tell us, even while we may not agree what it tells us?
    Im tired gotta go

  • Posted by

    Alcohol a gift from God...no.  It first appears in the Bible with Noah falling down drunk.  Alcohol has some uses but man has perverted it.  I used to be a beer drinking Christian and I know the many times I started off with “I will only have one beer only to have my wife drive me home....” I have been clean and sober since August 8, 1985.  Maybe this pastor has better self control than I ever did but that is rare. 

    We can´t judge one another?  Last time I read some of Paul´s and John´s letters, they were naming names and telling churches to avoid certain individuals.  We look at the fruit.

    I stopped fussing over the finer points about the Bible years ago.  I believe, try to live it, apply it, and then preach it.  Right now I am in an internet cafe in Apizaco, Mexico.  My church has sent four of us to the front lines ... and loving it (23 people discipled and come to Christ!).

  • Posted by

    Dan Dan Dan, You should know that Paul lived in a different time and different culture and had special permission from God to judge because of those special circumstances.  Today, that is called hate Dan smile

    In all seriousness, praise God Dan for your comments and mission trip.

  • Posted by Chris

    Put me in the “innerant” camp.

    If you can’t believe the Bible is entirely accurate, how can you know what parts ARE accurate? How do you know that Jesus is really God? How do you know His name was even Jesus? If one piece is wrong, we have to doubt the whole thing.

    And the argument about not being able to trust that we’ve accurately represented the original documents is hooey, frankly. I stood two weeks ago in the Shrine of the Book Museum in Jerusalem and looked at the Dead Sea Scrolls Exhibit. They have almost the entire scroll of Isaiah, and it reads exactly the same as my Hebrew Bible today. I stood there and read Isaiah 53, and it said the same thing in Qumran that it says today.

    As far as being able to trust your English Bible, you can. The various translations have been done by scholars who understand the language in which the Bible was written. They made interpretive decisions when it came to words, yes, but those are very well documented and critiqued by other scholars who know the language.

    God doesn’t make mistakes. None. People (Adam, Noah, etc...) make mistakes. God allows people to make those mistakes, and redeems us anyway. 

    Finally, Journeygirl, while I appreciate the thinking behind your post - I wonder which Jesus this pastor is leading his people to? It certainly can’t be the Jesus of the Bible, because he doesn’t believe in the Bible. How does he know that Jesus really said “Love your neighbor?” Maybe Jesus really said “Love judging your neighbor,” but the writers of scripture changed His words to take the edge off?

    You see, when you through out the trustworthiness of God’s revelation about Jesus, you forfeit the ability to say anything concerning Who Jesus was at all.

  • Posted by Paul

    If this man ever stumbles upon Jesus in his “journey”, he will hear him say the same thing that He said to Nicodemus so long ago:  “...he that believeth not is condemned already.” This man doesn’t have to worry about “condemning” or not, or finding the truth.  He has seen the light and rejected it and the condemnation has already been declared against him.

    God give us “a man sent from God” (John 1:6).

  • Posted by

    Chris,

    Just for clarification, the Dead Sea Scrolls are indeed much closer to the original manuscripts, but still are dated between 600 and 800 years from the latest believed date of any original manuscript.  There are no original manuscripts in existence of either the NT or Hebrew Cannon.  There are multiple readings or copies of the ancient manuscripts from which our bible has been assembled and there are many differences between the various readings.  These are understood to be mistakes made by the scribes who copied the manuscripts for circulation and preservation.  Thus . . . any denomination whose doctrinal statement affirms inerrancy claims that the bible is without error as it was penned by its original authors – and no one knows exactly, word for word what these authors penned because their work simply doesn’t exist. 

    For many of us this is not a problem.  We can have faith in the inerrancy of the originally written words, believing that the Holy Spirit inspired these words just as we believe through faith in the miraculous works of God throughout history recorded therein.

    But, it is possible to NOT land in the inerrancy camp and still believe in the bible and Jesus of the bible (your critique of Pastor Shuman).  People on both sides of this and other issues can love Jesus and point people to God through Him.  The inerrancy issue is completely irrelevant to most of humanity that has found its way to God for centuries (and in many parts of the world even today) without ever having a bible.  I believe that it’s these kinds of arguments which caused him to feel we are failing to live the kind of life Jesus showed us (through the words he reads about Jesus which are recorded in the bible BTW).  I think he right.

    Wendi

  • Posted by Chris

    Wendi,

    Thanks for the reply. I’m aware that the Dead Sea Scrolls are not original. I’m also aware of the “differences” you speak of in early manuscripts. I’m sure you’re also aware that those variances are minimal, at best. For example, if you had four “manuscripts” that said:

    I went to the grocery store to get the tomatos

    I went to the grocery stor to get the tomatos.

    I went to the grocery store to get the tomatos.

    I went to the grocery stores to get the tomatoes.

    You could be very certain about the original reading of the text, and of it’s original meaning. Those are the kinds of variants we have - scribes changing the spellings of words, or accidentally misspelling words that are obvious. Very, very, very few “differences” make any difference in how we understand the text, and zero of them make any difference in the understanding of a major doctrine of the Christian faith. You can trust your Bible.

    Even if the Dead Sea Scrolls are 600 years removed from an original, they were more than a thousand years earlier than any other manuscripts we had when they were found. And when they were checked against today’s version, they scored a huge victory for the integrity of modern transators. Don’t you think the people who came before the Qumran Community had taken care to ensure that manuscripts were copied correctly? History has recorded the process copies went through to ensure their accuracy, and it was a fairly substantial undertaking.

    I’m intrigued by your last paragraph. How is it possible to believe in the Jesus of the Bible without believing the Bible can be trusted? What I believe you’re left with is a mail-order Jesus, who is seen only in light of the things we want to believe about Him (I mean that with the most respect possible). If you believe the Bible is errant, it’s up to you to decide which parts are error and which parts are authentic. Your guess is as good as mine. So how can you be certain that Jesus is good, loving, God, or miraculous when you can’t trust the account of Him that we have? The logic doesn’t play out.

    I’m not casting judgment on those people - I’m trying to push the errancy logic to its limit. I know lots of guys who don’t hold to the inerrancy of scripture, but believe in Jesus. I love those guys. But I don’t think their position is logical.

    And with regard to your last sentence: “I believe that it’s these kinds of arguments which caused him to feel we are failing to live the kind of life Jesus showed us...” That’s a point well taken. I’m certainly trying to present my point of view with as much love and respect as possible. But respectfully, I think Jesus would engaged in this argument as well. “Not the smallest stroke of the pen will pass away...”

    We’re talking about God’s Word, the written self-revelation of God to mankind. If I can’t trust the revelation, how can I trust the God? If I can’t know the Bible is true, how can I know that the things it says about God are true? It’s a slippery slope…

  • Posted by

    "What I believe you’re left with is a mail-order Jesus, who is seen only in light of the things we want to believe about Him (I mean that with the most respect possible). If you believe the Bible is errant, it’s up to you to decide which parts are error and which parts are authentic. Your guess is as good as mine”.

    Precisely Chris.  I believe that’s no accident in today’s Cultural Christianity, it allows everyone and anyone to interperet the Bible on “their” terms.  Here we have a Pastor no less, that won’t or can’t even take a stand that the Jesus Christ is the only way to Heaven.

    I heard a missionary from South America speaking and he commented how missionaries from outside the U.S. are looking in at our Christianity in disbelief.  We have people out there giving their lives for taking a stand on “Jesus being the only way” and Christians and even worse prominent Pastors here won’t even stand on that most fundemental fact and belief of the Christian faith.

  • Posted by

    Chris,

    Yes I know that the differences are not substantive and it DOES cause me to have great trust in the bible.  I land in the inerrancy camp myself.  I just think that it is mean-spirited and unnecessary, and in all likelihood incorrect to say that someone who is not willing to throw the inerrancy sword down “doesn’t believe in the bible” (which is what you said of Pastor Shuman).

    Fuller Seminary takes a liberal position on this (which is partly why I chose Bethel BTW).  Their position on scripture is this:

    [scripture is an essential part and trustworthy record of this [God’s] divine self-disclosure. All the books of the Old and New Testaments, given by divine inspiration, are the written word of God, the only infallible rule of faith and practice. They are to be interpreted according to their context and purpose and in reverent obedience to the Lord who speaks through them in living power.]

    This statement does not reflect my view of scripture, but there are wonderful men and women of faith who affirm this and I would never say of them that “they don’t believe in the bible” or even that they don’t believe it is trustworthy.  Trustworthy and inerrant are not synonyms.

    You have been respectful in your argument, except (IMO) when you made the statement I challenged above.

    Wendi

  • Posted by

    You know, folks, lots of people, including most, if not all of those to whom the apostles ministered, believed in Jesus for decades before there was a collection of (NT) scripture.  My faith is built on a relationship with a living Jesus, not just a guy in a book. This is not to diminish the Bible, but to put the priority where it should be - on Jesus.  I can already hear you saying “How can you know what to believe if you don’t base it on scripture?” While much of our knowledge comes from scripture (and I’ll quote it frequently to prove it) it is not our only source of truth and instruction - don’t forget the Holy Spirit!  See John 14:26 - the Spirit will teach us all things and remind us of what Jesus said.  The Spirit will guide us into all truth - John 16:13.  The Holy Spirit is what makes the Bible come to life.  Lots of people read the Bible without it having an impact on their lives, but the Spirit brings life!  2 Cor 3:6

    Some of you sound like your faith is based solely on the Bible, and not a relationship with a holy, living God, who interacts with believers on a daily basis, encouraging, convicting of sin, answering prayer, guiding decisions, protecting, strengthening… the list goes on and on.  Y’all say “If you can’t trust the Bible, how can you believe in Jesus?” I believe in Him because I know Him.  He changed my life and I have commited myself into His care and service - I am nothing but a servant, but I am a servant of the Lord! 

    You write as if your faith would crash to the ground without scripture.  I consider that sad.  The first generation or two of Christians did not have NT scripture.  I think we can safely assume that most early Gentile believers were totally unfamilier with Jewish scripture, but they were saved and filled with the Spirit anyway!  Throughout most of Church history, plain, ordinary Christians did not have scripture, and probably couldn’t have read it anyway.  Was their faith in vain?  Were only the educated church leaders, those who could read and analyse Romans, really saved?  Everyone else was lost because the Bible was not available to them?

    As much as I value the Bible and submit to it’s authority, it’s authority is not in itself, but in the author (author - authority… get it?) - God Himself, and that’s where my faith lies.  The Bible illuminates my faith as the sun illuminates our world, but our world exists with or without the sun shining on it, as Jesus exists and the Holy Spirit indwells Christians whether or not they have the Bible. 

    It’s JESUS!  And God revealed in Him

    Dave

  • Posted by

    I was thinking of this scripture as I was reading the interview: “The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they said look a glutton and a winebibber, a freind of tax collectors and sinners!"Mt 11:19...But then I thought of I Jn 2:15-16..."If any man loves the world the love of the Father is not in Him.”...I guess my biggest question and problem is this, how can you win someone to Jesus when you yourself don’t even believe Him?  As Steve Taylor sang back in the 80’s “so open minded that your brain leaks out.” But, one thing this does show is that the church if failing to reach and connect with people.  Another thought is with leaders who don’t even believe the scriptures or that Jesus is the only way to God, no wonder we aren’t reaching the world for Christ.

  • Posted by Chris

    Wendi wrote:
    “You have been respectful in your argument, except (IMO) when you made the statement I challenged above.”

    My sincere apologies if my comments came across as disrespectful. I certainly don’t mean them that way. I guess my frankness is a result of the fact that I don’t want to hijack Todd’s comment thread to type a complete dissertation on the matter! For that reason, I limited my explanation, and probably shouldn’t have in this case.

    Here’s my point: I completely understand that there are God-loving people out there who don’t believe in the inerrancy of scripture. I’m not doubting their devotion to God, or the fervor with which they seek Truth.

    What I _am_ hoping to do is follow the inerrancy logic to its natural end. What I typically hear from my friends who don’t hold to inerrancy, are people who want to pick and choose which parts of the Bible they believe are accurate and which ones have been changed/lost. Generally, they conclude that the “non-offensive” passages (ie “Love your neighbor,") are accurate where the “offensive” passages (ie “I am the Way, Truth Life...") are inaccurate. We end up picking and choosing what parts of the Bible we _like_ and decide those are true.

    If the Bible is not inerrant, it seems to me that we’re standing on shaky ground. If we can’t believe that John 14:6 is true, how can we be sure that John 1:14 is true? How can we believe _anything_ about the life of Jesus as absolutely true? Once one domino falls, how can we be sure that all the others don’t go with it? What is our source of authority concerning Jesus if the Bible can’t be completely trusted?

    That’s my concern with the pastor listed above. How can he say he is “leading people to Jesus?” On what authority does he speak about Jesus? How does he know what he believes about Jesus is true?

    It’s the whole argument we give our kids. If my kid tells me a whole string of things, and I find out one of them is a lie, how can I trust him on the others? The same with the Bible. If I find out part of the Bible is false, how can I trust the rest?

    Dave, I really appreciate your post, but fail to see how the fact that you know Jesus is any logical argument for His existence and authority at all. My best friend from high school “knows Mohammed” and Mohammed has completely changed his life. Experience has to be validated. What do we look at to know our experience reveals the true God?

  • Posted by

    First impression after reading this article?  I believe that was the original question.  I stopped reading the responses after it turned into disrespect of someone’s opinion being different from someone elses.
    So, my first impressions?
    Well, the Poker Pastor is definately drawing an specific type of audience.  One that needs to be reached.  One that perhaps could not be reached in any other way.  Just like any of the established churches of today that differ in worship styles, etc.  They all draw a specific type of audience that might not be reached in any other way.  I am not sure how many young people would be invited to this beer drinking worship service, so I am concerned if he is worried about that (again, back to my specific audience point..so I am not sure that this concern is valid).  I too worry about the message to any alcoholics in his audience.  Alcoholics will pretty much agree with anything for a chance to drink. So, my history tells me to guestion their integrity.
    My own concerns about my church are the same here...are the people motivated to know more? Do they desire a closer relationship with God and want to read his word when they go home and want to know what God says in the Bible?  Atmosphere at any church is just that, atmosphere.  It really isn’t that important.  It is how the truth of God’s word is being taught.  The Bible is the true source for that, not just feel good deeds.  Thanks for the opportunity to comment.

  • Posted by

    Amen Chris.  Thanks for the encouragement.

  • Posted by

    Jack ... you so misunderstood my comments.  I disagree that Paul and John had some special dispensation that permitted only them to judge.  Paul said we will judge angels.  It is not hate to biblically look at a person’s fruit or actions that do not measure up and then privately work with them.  Love is the motivation to seek proper change.  How do Christians hold one another accountable?  Do we, to avoid being labeled judgmental (and thus hateful) ignore the sin?  In avoiding the sin a person is making a judgment.  The wrong type but a judgment none the less.

  • Page 2 of 3 pages

     <  1 2 3 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: