 |
|
The Definition of Your Church “Brand”
Orginally published on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 7:36 AM
by Todd Rhoades
A great article in Leadership Network's Advance email newsletter yesterday about church branding. Here's the premise: A church's brand is more than a professionally designed logo and an impressive website. The brand is the reputation a church has in its community. It's what the church does, who the church is at its core.
While branding a church may sound corporate and business-like – and it does take a marketing strategy to do it well – it's no less than communicating an eternal truth to a lost community.
In one sense, churches are already branded, says Jesse Palmer, owner of The Very Idea Group in Birmingham, AL. "Whether we like it or not, the name 'Christian' is a brand and a label. Much of my work is helping churches and faith-based organizations ultimately develop a brand that fairly and favorably represents the vision, values and virtues of the organization. That isn't always easy." Jesse notes that a church's brand is, first and foremost, connected with the
label or name of the organization. Sometimes those labels are suffering from negative stereotypes.
A church has a brand, whether the leaders know it or not. The decision to brand a church is the decision to take control of the way a church is perceived internally and in the community.
You can read the whole article here...
This post has been viewed 158 times so far.
There are 6 Comments:
I'm a chronic workaholic, love to connect leaders with other leaders, and would consider myself somewhat of a 'maven'. Hopefully you'll find something here at MMI you'll like and will return often. If you want, you can find out more about me or follow my every step.
MondayMorningInsight.com | PO Box 446 | Bryan, OH 43506 |
-
Posted by eric Partin
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 8:42 AM
-
Posted by Andy McAdams
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 9:32 AM
-
Posted by
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 10:09 AM
-
Posted by Bobby Chandler
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 10:12 AM
-
Posted by Peter Hamm
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 9:26 PM
-
Posted by
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Post Your Comments:Whether intentional or not, these 2 articles, Church Branding and Baptist Stigma, are related. There is a stigma that is associated with the Baptist “brand”. It just goes to show that like or not, you are branding your church or in this case denomination, even without trying to “brand” it. So,if it is going to happen anyway, why not be intentional and strategic.
I think this is true with most denominations. There was a day when the label on the sign out front of a church was important. Today in many cases, it simply means, “if you’re not one of us...stay out, or be ready to be just like us.”
There are legitimate reasons for having demoninations. We are to be united around the centrality of the gospel but there are secondary issues that create the need for denominations.
I cant remember who said it but they said that no denominations are good until it comes to time for baptism. Do you bring out a cup or a bathtub. The signs are still important. There is a distinction between a baptist and presby church. Both can be centered on the Gospel but have differences on secondary issues such as infant vs believers baptism. These are issues that all churches have to address. Non-denomination churches still have to make decisions like do we sprinkle or immerse? Do we baptize infants or believer baptism? What do we believe? What does our statement of faith look like?
I disagree. Labels or in this case do make a difference. Church signs tell the church goer what to expect. Vague church names as you see today could be any flavor of church and not necessarily a Christian church.
Most churches don’t think about their brand. I believe all churches have a brand, whether they know it or not. Some churches have an intentional brand, while others have a brand that is simply based on the unintended perception about the church.
Perception about our churches is a big deal. It’s not just about logos. It’s about word of mouth, public relations, community impact, and tons of other factors.
I actually wrote a post on this a couple of days ago on my blog - http://church-hype.typepad.com/churchhype/2008/05/what-people-thi.html
The brand is not what’s on your sign, it is what your community thinks you are. Think business for a bit. A lot of people think HP is printers. Well, they make lots of computers, too, but for many they just make printers.
We try to be the church that loves its neighbor, and more and more, our community thinks of us that way. It’s a work in progress, but it’s starting to really work for us. We are always reminding our people that we need to be the hands and feet of Jesus in our community, and the more they buy into that and go out and DO that stuff, the more we further the brand that we are trying to further… I think that’s the Kingdom of Heaven in action!
I agree with Peter. When we came to our church it was known as “The Angry Church”
That was a wow! and I heard it over and over.
Now I hear “BCC? I’ve heard so many great things and we’ve been thinking about visiting!
You guys are growing aren’t you and lots of fun! I see a lot of cars out there when I drive by.”
We talked about changing our name. But people in our community view us as THEIR community church, even if they’ve never attended. So, we’ve kept it. I think it was a smart non move because it’s starting to pay off.
As to branding and officially coming up with a bi-line or something like it, I think the size of our community makes a difference. We are small enough that word gets around without a lot of hype we might try to build up about who we would like to be or think we are.
Page 1 of 1 pages