Multisite Exposed

HOME | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | SUBMIT CONTENT | CONTACT US


Email Newsletter  

Each Monday Morning, we'll send you the newest church leadership headlines straight to your in-box! It's all free and you can unsubscribe at any time! Join over 12,000 other pastors who receive MMI updates each week! We respect your privacy.

image

Martin Luther:  “Shall we then prohibit and abolish women?”

Mars Hill Church and Mark Driscoll have recently published a position paper on 'alcohol' usage. It includes quotes from Martin Luther and Homer Simpson... but really, is a well-thought out thesis on how they interpret the Bible verses related to alcohol. You might or might not agree; but at least they have taken the time to think through this issue and search the scriptures to come up with their basis of thinking. That's somewhat refreshing these days...

One of the more controversial issues related to Mars Hill Church concerns alcohol. The following is a summary of our position on the matter adapted from Pastor Mark Driscoll’s book The Radical Reformission: Reaching Out Without Selling Out.

“Do you suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying the object which is abused? Men can go wrong with wine and women. Shall we then prohibit and abolish women?”
– Martin Luther

“Mmmm . . . beer.” - Homer Simpson

Historically, God’s people have greatly enjoyed alcohol. In the European world one of the most Christian drinks was beer. Saint Gall was a missionary to the Celts and renowned brewer. After Charlemagne’s reign the church because Europe’s exclusive brewer. When a young woman was to marry her church made special bridal ale for her, from which we derive our word bridal. Pastor John Calvin’s annual salary package included upwards of 250 gallons of wine to be enjoyed by he and his guests. Martin Luther explained the entire reformation as “…while I sat still and drank beer with Philip and Amsdorf, God dealt the papacy a mighty blow.” Luther’s wife Catherine was a skilled brewer and his love letters to her when they were apart lamented his inability to drink her beer. When the Puritan’s landed on Plymouth Rock the first permanent building they erected was the brewery.

As feminism grew in America during the turn of the 20th century the women’s suffrage and prohibition movements were the practical results of a feminine piety that came to also dominate the church as more women became pastors and the church became more feminine. Some denominations began to condemn alcohol as sinful and the Methodist pastor Dr. Thomas Welch created the very “Christian” Welch’s grape juice to replace communion wine in 1869. The marriage of Christianity and feminism helped to create a dry nation that put out of business all but the largest brewers who were able to survive on near beer and root beer which explains why today American beer is largely mass produced, watered down, light on calories, and feminine in comparison to rich and dark European beers. The resurgence of micro-brews is helping to overcome the great loss and resurrect the art of brewing.

Lastly, some Christians foolishly argue that such terms as new wine and mixed wine in the Bible speak of non-alcoholic wine. But, new wine can still intoxicate according to Scripture (Isaiah 24:7; Hosea 4:11; Joel 1:5), and mixed wine refers to special wines where various wines are mixed together and/or mixed with spices and does not refer to wine cut with water (Psalm 75:8; Song of Songs 8:2). God refers to pouring out the wine of His mixed wine on His enemies which does not mean He will dilute justice (Psalm 75:8). The only time such a practice is mentioned in the Bible is in regards to merchants who cut wine with to rob customers (Isaiah 1:22). The Bible speaks of grape juice (Numbers 6:3) and if God meant to speak of non-alcoholic wine he would have used that word to avoid confusion.

Read the rest of their statement here...

- - - - - - - - - -



This post has been viewed 3049 times and was added on March 14, 2007 by Todd Rhoades.
Filed under: Leadership Issues  Leadership Development  
Share this post with a friend right now!
View reactions to this post at other blogs...

You can really help us out by subscribing to our free RSS feed with your favorite feed reader, or here at Bloglines. Also, you can add us to your favorites at Technorati.


It's easy...
Link to this URL


Like this article? Get our free weekly email newsletter for more great resources just like this...  



- - - - - - - - - -
  There are 65 Comments:
  • Posted by

    Leonard,

    Mark Driscoll would do well to hire you as his ghost writer.  Your history lesson is probably just as accurate as his, but yours isn’t the slightest bit offensive.

    Thank you so much for your willingness to re-read the post, attempting to view it through my lenses (and others who had a similar reaction).  THAT . . . is exactly the kind of selflessness and forbearance which MD lacks.

    I know Todd intended this be a thread about whether Christians should drink alcohol, and I respect your desire not to hijack the thread.  However, IMO Driscoll himself used the position paper about alcohol consumption as another platform to communicate his distain (yep, that’s what I think) for women, which I felt made comments about that fair.

    And you’re right, over the years I have been hurt by the way some in ministry have handled the women in leadership issue.  However, it’s never been by people who treat these theological differences with the kind of respect and fairness I always sense from you and most of the regular posters here on MMI.

    Pastor Al – I too would like to hear your thoughts about MD’s treatment of the scriptures on this issue, without commentary about history or statistics, even trying to filter out the influence of personal pain or biases that form your (and my) presuppositions.

    Wendi

  • Posted by

    Hey Al,
    My experience tells me that when a person makes it his ambition to warn people so passionately about one particular activity, it is ussually an indicator that something is wrong in that persons life, or double life for that matter...You have made your point about Driscoll and you have basically said that he is comprimising with his position paper, so that he can look cool...Yet it is Driscoll who is quoting scripture while you are quoting stats.

    Your type of Christianity is what many are revolting against. Whats next? A rant about how we all must pull our kids out of school because of the evils of public education? Or how we all must stay away from doctors because God wants us to be healthy all the time? See, I trust the Word of God to guide me and if the Bible told me that I should absolutely abstain I would. If the Bible told me that the days would come when alcohol would be rendered useless, then I would pay heed. Yet you come across as Bill Gothards strong armed devotee with your extra Biblical rants which put more people in bondage then the moderate use of wine could ever do.

    Hey folks, stick with the balance of the Word of God and the teachings of Jesus...Thats what Driscoll is attempting to do with this thorny subject.

  • Posted by

    EASY, everybody. Al brings balance to this discussion.

    It is pointless to discuss alcohol without including a discussion of its destructive power, something that is self-evident in both statistics and biblical admonitions. And Cal, Driscoll may be attempting to stick with a balance such as you say, but he adds in a skewed description of history.

  • Posted by Josh R

    1, I think that legalism within the church, no matter how well intentioned clouds the Gospel.

    2, Many modern Churches would brand Jesus a sinner.  Jesus was a homebrewer.  He drank wine. This is bad news for the rest of their Theology.

    3, I think that it is historically accurate to link the feminist movement to the prohibition of alcohol.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman’s_Christian_Temperance_Union for an example. I don’t think Women could pass prohibition without substantial help from men, and it was likely the Christian men who came along side them to pass the amendment.

    As a homebrewer myself, my understanding of the American “Sissy beer theory” is much like the article stated.  Prohibition put all but the largest brewers out of business.  After prohibition was over, many of the men left to go fight a war, and the breweries where forced to make a product that would sell among the female population.  When the men came back, they bought what they could get their hands on, and so there wasn’t a lot of need for the breweries to diversify their selection to meet the narrower tastes.

  • Posted by

    Pastor Cal and friends,

    Use to see alcohol the same way you did, until well my wife and I were nearly killed by a drunk driver.  You indicated I have a “problem” with alcohol, not drinking it as you implied, but yes when it comes to the damaging effects of it – I never pretended to be neutral on this subject, in fact if you read my post you would have seen I make that point very clear.  When something happens in our lives that change us forever, it is hard to get over that, but I was fair in saying where I was coming from.  I notice you didn’t argue with the facts I gave, you just called me legalistic, which is a poor attempt to shut me up, thinking that would shame me back into a corner.  Sorry, that’s not my style. 

    But then you continued on with your rant: You say I don’t like “public education” how silly you must look now, I am in public education.  You say I tell people not to go to doctors, hey Jr it was doctors who saved my life.  You say I put burdens on people? Where?  By informing them of the dangers of this drug?  By informing them of how devastating it can be?  I can see that you believe “information” in the hands of people causes them to be burdened?  Wow?  That’s very troubling. 

    And finally, all you out there who have said I want to forbid people from drinking, you’re wrong I never said that.  An accurate observation would be to say, “Al is trying to persuade as many as he can to stay clear of this drug of choice for he believe it causes more hurt, damage, pain and destruction than many would like to admit.”

    Peace out,
    Al

  • Posted by Leonard

    Pastor Al,

    Are you avoiding the question about Driscoll’s use of scripture?  It has been asked of you several times but with no answer to it.

  • Posted by

    Leonard,

    Sorry to be long on getting back to this point, I have been busy defending my honor! grin.  Driscoll takes a view of scripture that is common for those who want to support this kind of behavior and not very “new.” Now, some of his exegeses he is correct on other points he ignores the historical realities of biblical history.  There are those who stand on the complete opposite of him on this issue and use scripture as well.  So we could all get into a tit for tat answer session that wouldn’t solve much.  That is why I choose to bring out the facts regarding alcohol use in our nation.  For some that might give them pause to consider the ramifications of using this drug.

    So, what’s the bottom line that I have to conclude – Scripture does not forbid the drinking of wine, period.  But that isn’t the final issue on the subject, for scripture does not forbid sex, yet it places sex within certain boundaries.  Obviously when Paul instructed Timothy to drink a little wine for his stomach, he wasn’t telling him to grab a couple of beers on the way home from work – he was using wine for a medicinal purpose in that case.  But then again I cannot say that Jesus made wine at the wedding for medicinal purposes either, unless the food was bad! grin Yes, we should not “force” people into a legalistic view about wine, but neither should we forget that our job as ministers is to help people mature in the faith.  To ask themselves simple questions before they participate in this or that, to think: “Is what I am about to do going to further the cause of Christ or give it a black mark?” “While this drink might not send me to hell, is it the kind of example I want to exhibit to my children, that to “relax” I really need a drink?” To me it is a matter of realizing that my actions, my choices to drink will cause ramifications in my life, I have to be honest that will not always mean negative consequences, but from my standpoint it usually turns out bad.

    That my heart on the matter, maybe a little less inflammatory, but my heart none the less.

    Blessings,
    PA

  • Posted by

    Wow, Al. You call wine a drug of choice…
    Was Jesus turning water into drugs?
    Did Jesus serve drugs at the last supper?

    My point about all of this is the every one that you made about intimacy. It has been placed in the Bible within certain boundaries! That is what mark Driscoll was saying that the Bible is saying. Get it? yet you are attempting to take the boundaries away by telling us that your life was almost taken away by a drunk driver, that smacks of manipulation and that is why I told you that you have an agenda. I was almost killed by a doctor, should I warn people of the evils of doctors?

    Stick with the Word Al, do not be more righteous than Jesus or tell other people by implication that Jesus was serving drugs.

  • Posted by

    I’m gonna defend Al again. Yes. Wine is a drug! Caffeine is a drug. Chocolate is a drug.

    So, yes, Jesus turned water into drugs and served drugs at the last supper… (The alcohol content of that wine was very likely QUITE low from what I understand, btw...)

    Sal, I think you’re reading sometihng into Al’s statement. To repeatedly hold up the idea that Wine and Beer are perfectly okay --period-- is to ignore the fact that for a significant portion of the population… they are NOT! I think Al is bringing balance to this discussion. We may not agree on WHO needs to watch what they drink, but I agree whole-heartedly with him that great care must be taken with certain issues of lifestyle, and alcohol is one of them.

    Al, I think your last post was very balanced, considering your “agenda:.

    wink

  • Posted by

    Peter,

    Thanks for the reply.  Hey I am quick to tell everyone that my approach will not be a “balanced” one.  Too much water under the bridge for that, but that doesn’t mean I cannot try to be balanced.  Thanks for seeing that I was trying to do that.

    Blessings,
    Al

  • Posted by

    Pastor Sal,

    I really hope you have a blessed day.

    Peace,
    Al

  • Posted by

    Peter,
    BTW- I have never said that alcohol is perfectly OK. I have only defended the Bibles authority on the subject and Mark Driscolls use of the scripture. To me this is not about wine ( the wine that Jesus served had all the alcohol in it that todays wine has, juice didnt last long in that culture without refrigeration) this thread is about emotional please versus Scripture.

    Many people should never touch a drop of alcohol ever. They are not free to drink, they are addicted to it. I do not advocate the use of wine at all. I only advocate the clear teaching of Scripture. We should never create a pet argument against certain behaviours, if the Bible does not forbid something then why are we acting asd if we are holier than Jesus. I used to hear these arguments about hair lengths. Trust me, anyone can come up with a convincing argument as to why we should never drink but does the Bible or Jesus do that? No.

    Do I drink? No. Yet I will not judge a brother who does or try to make him feel guilty for having a glass of wine. Al is trying to bring guilt to bear on the situation and that is manipulation. Drunkeness? Now, that is a whole other matter. The Bible is clear that drunkards will not be inheriting eternal life.

  • Posted by

    Al, I believe that you are a good brother and that your motivation is from a pure heart. I just disagree with your lack of Biblical exegesis. The Bible is authority on all moral subjects. Having said that, I believe that you and I will be in heaven together!

  • Posted by

    Okay Al, and everyone whose name rhymes with it…

    I though we were going to have a perfectly good knock-down drag-out “I’m right and you’re wrong” fight… Well, the people who post on this board have disappointed me with their lack of hatred and with their genteel qualities again. What are you gonna do when we all manage to get along… Oh well…

    We’re all part of the same Kingdom… and it appearst that the people here know that. FANTASTIC!

    Bless you all. I raise a glass in your honor. (Just kidding, I can’t have a beer till Easter Sunday, but I probably won’t because I’m going to spend the whole day making up for six weeks of NO CHOCOLATE!)

  • Posted by

    “Okay Al, and everyone whose name rhymes with it… “

    Now that is funny… hey is that a chocolate smuge on your face?

    Now, don’t get me started on the evils of chocolate!!!  grin

    Next time I am buying the rounds… of M&M;’s that is! grin

    Great talking with you all today,

    Al

  • Page 3 of 3 pages

    « First  <  1 2 3
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: