HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

Money-Driven Worship:  How Song Writers Have Prostituted Our Worship Services

Orginally published on Wednesday, May 09, 2007 at 7:32 AM
by Todd Rhoades

Attention-grabbing title, I know. But that's, essentially, the thesis put down by Warren Smith (a guest writer over at Dan Burrell's blog recently.) Warren writes that in the church worship music arena "money is the real driving force, and most evangelicals don’t even know it..."

Smith continues…

“To understand this, consider that when a congregation sings Martin Luther’s “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God,” no money changes hands.  But when that same congregation sings “God of Wonders,” written by Steve Hindalong and Marc Byrd, both men – and their music publishing company, get a small payday.  Why is that?  Because “A Mighty Fortress” is in the public domain, but “God of Wonders” is owned by Hindalong and Burd and both they and their publishers have an economic self interest in seeing that these songs are sung and played in churches around the country.”

This phenomenon of Sunday morning worship becoming not a day of praise, but a day of pay, is a recent one.  It can be traced to the birth of an organization called Christian Copyright Licensing International (CCLI).  CCLI collects fees from churches and then pays the copyright holders – keeping a percentage for itself, of course.  The size of the copyright fee depends on the size of the church, but a 500-member church would pay about $300 per year.  Currently, approximately 140,000 churches are CCLI license holders.  That means that $40- to $50-million per year is collected and re-distributed to copyright owners.

...Now, a kind of unholy trinity exists that has turned the ministry of Christian music into the industry of Christian music.  Christian radio promotes the songs, the churches use them in worship, and CCLI collects fees for the copyright holders.  The big winners are the Christian record companies, many of them now owned by secular corporations, who sell records into the millions.  The big loser is the church itself, which now pays to have itself marketed to every Sunday morning at 11 am.

Contrast this with the “old” method.  Hymn books contain songs that are mostly in the public domain and have little or no licensing fees.  They have historically been published by denominational publishers who make them available to congregations more or less at cost.  They were not aggressively marketed or promoted because they are typically denominationally specific, reflecting the doctrine and liturgy of a particular church.  But that is a key point:  the hymnals are informed by and reinforce the theology of the church.  Said plainly, hymnals are discipleship tools.

Contemporary worship songs, on the other hand, are a revenue stream for copyright holders and music publishers.  They are aggressively promoted and now make up a significant share of the $4.5-billion Christian retail market.”

Todd comments:  I’m no copyright lawyer, but copyrights in Christian music have been around far before 1984 with the inception of CCLI. 

For example, Great is Thy Faithfulness was first copyrighted in 1923 and is still copyrighted.

People like Ralph Carmichael and Bill Gaither were very pre-1984.  (Don’t you remember the line, “God wrote the song, but Bill Gaither owns the copyright?”

In fact, many denominations hold copyrights on some of the hymns they publish.  Concordia (the Lutheran Publishing House) and the United Methodist Publishing house are just two examples.

For example:  “Why should we pay Concordia Publishing House a fee for use of a copyrighted work?” Answer:  Permission fees compensate the copyright holder for the use of creative material.

Last time I looked, Concordia wasn’t pumping out too much ‘contemporary’ worship music.

As a former worship leader, I know that noone was putting a gun to my head to make me use “God of Wonders” in the services I arranged.  And when I filled out my CCLI report, I didn’t get any more credit, and absolutely not more kick-back for choosing “God of Wonders” over “Great is Thy Faithfulness”.

Truth be told:  I don’t even know Steve Hindalong OR Marc Byrd.

Possibly even more embarrassing:  I didn’t even know they wrote the song.  (I was thinking, maybe, Paul Baloche).

Warren ends his article with this statement after lamenting that most large churches do not even have a traditional service these days:  “And that, my friends, is a tragedy – another triumph of Mammon in the modern evangelical church.”

Sorry, Warren… but I must disagree.

PS—I wonder how many people who would agree with Warren Smith’s assessment secretly harbor a stash of Bill Gaither Homecoming Videos at home?  Bill’s been the marketing genius (far more than most ‘contemporary’ worship writers) in making gospel music profitable.

What are your thoughts?

Todd


This post has been viewed 5379 times so far.


  There are 50 Comments:

  • Posted by

    This is a great discussion!  I hear both sides of the story! 

    This is my viewpoint: I have led worship for over 15 years in several churches.  Sometimes, I get paid and sometimes I don’t.  Either way, I am not in it for the money.  I do it because God has given me a gift and I use it for His glory.  I prefer contemporary music over traditional, though I write my own songs as well. 

    There is a Christian band called “Supertones” that discusses this subject in their lyrics… “Mammon is an unforgiving god, I cast him away.  I live my life for God not to get paid.  Monet can’t save soul, I don’t think I can.  I turned to God and I fell like a little man.  Oh, let my pride fall down, I’m a little man.”

    Personally, I don’t worship God for money.  I use the gifts He gave me free of charge.

  • Posted by

    My two cents. Someone mentioned books. It’s copywrited, the author gets royalties. So, if you purchase the book are you then entitled to photocopy it and give it away? Churches are not being charged per se to “sing” the songs; they are paying to make copies. Make a power point; thats a copy. Enlarge- retype; thats a copy. As I understand copywrites, a live performance doesn’t have to be payed for; displaying, distributing or posting the lyrics and music does. Also about the whole hymn book thing. If no one is “out for mammon” with hymns then I suggest that churches buy 1 copy of their next hymn book choice and photocopy copies for the backs of the pews; most copiers now days only cost churches what......2 cents a copy? http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j240/aj1374/smile.gif

  • Posted by Indiana Jim

    Behold they who chase the ox with the muzzle!

  • Just two more cents from a songwriter and worship leader:

    I don’t make a lot of money.  I do my best to feed my family.  I’m in service to my Lord, and I do my best to write songs that express and affirm the worship of God from scripture.  I put in a lot of hours at the church. 

    The laws in question are the laws of the United States.  CCLI assists churches in administrating the legal aspects of copyright.  They make a profit for doing so.  They are not the church.  ASCAP and BMI do the same thing for secular venues. 

    The amount of “double dipping” I get from singing my songs at my church is about 1/3 of 1% of my annual salary, which, as I stated, is not exorbinant.  It’s enough to be grateful for.

  • Posted by

    If songwriters are prostituting our worship services, what have our pastors been doing with the selling of sermon CD’s, Tapes, Videos, and books.  How ‘bout Hymn Book and Bible Publishers, I suppose they gave away all their hymn books and bibles to churches for free.

  • Posted by Clyde McLennan

    Hi,
    For me, the copyright for Christian music seems to go against so much of the concepts of Christian service.

    Here are some of my thoughs:

    (a) I reflect on the work of our missionaries and Christian workers who give their life to reach others, often with minimal financial return.  Why should Christian composers expect to be paid handsomely for their contribution to the Church?

    (b) As one that seeks to provide free quality accompaniments to Churches, I find the problems assoicated with the collection of royalty payments for even publishing my own playing of the music of others totally prohibitive.

    (c) The internet provides a great way of distributing Christian music, but the current copyright models are based on a 20th Century concepts of book publishing and CD pressings (ie, you pay based on the amount produced). Copyright laws make it very difficult to offer current music for user download on the internet. (This is seen in the secular world with their music)

    Blessings ... Clyde

  • Posted by

    Lowell Mason was the first person in the United States to made over a million dollars as a musician. He was no rock star either.  He earned it in large part on the sales of a hymnbook back in the 1800s.

  • Posted by

    Jason, that’s a very interesting statement that you made concerning Lowell Mason. I presently serve at the same church that he did, and had never heard that before. Do you have a source by which you could refer me to for that information?

  • Posted by guy melton

    Hey Todd
    I thought of this article when this happened in Miami/South Florida this past week. Trinity International Up your way sold the Radio Station to a Public Radio for 20 Million Bucks, yes $20,000,000, It had been on the air for 37 years. It had scraped and clawed with the churches and persons each year to stay on the air. Then trinity bought it a number of years ago. Well to say it lightly the South Florida Christian Community is not happy!! Im pulled as to exactly how I feel about some of it, but I did blog about it and you might want to check out the blog, and the link to some of the articles, blogs and the Miami Herald article this week on the blog.
    At the very least its controversial and it definately squeaks of another major Ministry selling thier soul to the devil. If you want to link or use my blog you are welcome to do so. I know you have lots of guys in your area that are probably connected with Trinity of Chicago and probably dont even know what happened here in South Florida
    God bless and have a great week.
    Guy Melton
    Oasis Church
    http://guymelton.typepad.com/my_weblog/current_affairs/index.html

  • Peter--perhaps I have not been exposed to the ‘good theology’ songs out there. Though I hate to say this, based on my (granted, limited) experience, Marc Driscoll is right when he says lots of the stuff out there sounds like fluffy boyfriend love songs to a romanticized American Jesus.  ..
    thanks for providing such an cute article.

    regards,
    best bodybuilding supplements

  • Since much contemporary Christian music is drivel, I’m surprised churches pay money for them.  Perhaps it’s understandable for smaller churches who don’t have their own band/songwriters.

    thanks for excellent article..
    nice to see in this website..

    regards,
    istria accommodation

  • Posted by Typing Games

    Very nice article
    this article gives a warning before writing any songs.
    Thanks for sharing

  • This is a great discussion!  I hear both sides of the story!

    This is my viewpoint: I have led worship for over 15 years in several churches.  Sometimes, I get paid and sometimes I don’t.  Either way, I am not in it for the money.  I do it because God has given me a gift and I use it for His glory.  I prefer contemporary music over traditional, though I write my own songs as well. 

    thanks
    regards,
    Free Typing Games

  • I was really amazed to see this post.
    thanks a lot.
    regards,
    Home Improvement
    Home Improvement

  • Posted by
  • Posted by car hifi

    thanks for great article..
    A little strong on the judgment coffee there pal.  Not sure that will send them to hell but the might have to listen to me sing for hours on end, Jesus Take the Wheel.  I have no trouble with the licensing since most Christian musicians are way underpaid.  We’re not talking about the church paying thousands upon thousand anyway.  It is a few hundred a year.

  • Posted by hm clothing

    money driven worship is bad

  • Great thoughts behind this concept. nice to share

  • Posted by Door Handles UK

    God entered music in our souls.. and we say music is the food of soul///

  • Posted by

    Best IT certification exams are:n10-003exam,640-863exam,350-018exam,642-845exam,642-892exam,sy0-101exam,220-601exam,70-290exam,70-270exam,350-001exam (stats from pass4sure.nl)

  • Posted by
  • Buy Warcraft(wow power leveling)please point machine to enter the website(wow power leveling)of Warcraft
    nmbnm

  • Posted by movers

    thank u
    great post

  • Posted by tower defense

    What if the Church had songwriters who produced songs on an ‘open source’ license? 

    If artists are having to charge for their services, it’s because the Church doesn’t value its musicians enough to give them what they need to live. 

    But redistribution of wealth in the Church according to need is an idea of the past.

  • Page 2 of 2 pages

     <  1 2
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: