Multisite Exposed

HOME | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | SUBMIT CONTENT | CONTACT US


Email Newsletter  

Each Monday Morning, we'll send you the newest church leadership headlines straight to your in-box! It's all free and you can unsubscribe at any time! Join over 12,000 other pastors who receive MMI updates each week! We respect your privacy.

image

New Life Church:  Ted Haggard Should NOT Return to Vocational Ministry

New Life Church sent out a letter from Pastor Brady Boyd last week ahead of a press release to the general media. Evidently, Ted Haggard has asked to end his relationship with the New Life Church Restoration Team. The church has agreed (what else could they do); and the result was this press release:

Dear New Life Church family and friends,

Today, our church’s board of trustees will release a statement regarding the end of the restoration process for Ted Haggard. This process may receive some media attention, and I want you to hear of it from us before you read about it in the newspaper or hear it on the evening news.

Let’s continue to pray for Ted, Gayle, and their family.

God bless you,

Brady Boyd
Senior Pastor
New Life Church
Colorado Springs, CO

--
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Ted Haggard’s leadership of New Life Church for many years was extraordinary and the depth of spiritual maturity that is found today in the church is in large part attributed to his leadership as the founding senior pastor.

In January 2007, Ted Haggard voluntarily agreed to enter a process of spiritual restoration.  He has selected Phoenix First Assembly and Pastor Tommy Barnett as his local church fellowship and is maintaining an accountability relationship there. He has recently requested to end his official relationship with the New Life Church Restoration Team and this has been accepted by them.

New Life Church recognizes the process of restoring Ted Haggard is incomplete and maintains its original stance that he should not return to vocational ministry. However, we wish him and his family only success in the future. 

Because spiritual restoration is a necessarily confidential process, the church does not anticipate that it, or its Overseers or Restorers, will make further comment about it.

SOURCE

FOR DISCUSSION:  What do you think this means for Ted Haggard?  (My one note:  I continue to be impressed with the way New Life Church has conducted itself throughout this whole ordeal.) What think you?

- - - - - - - - - -



This post has been viewed 5925 times and was added on February 10, 2008 by Todd Rhoades.
Filed under: Engaging Culture  Current Events and the Church  
Share this post with a friend right now!
View reactions to this post at other blogs...

You can really help us out by subscribing to our free RSS feed with your favorite feed reader, or here at Bloglines. Also, you can add us to your favorites at Technorati.


It's easy...
Link to this URL


Like this article? Get our free weekly email newsletter for more great resources just like this...  



- - - - - - - - - -
  There are 47 Comments:
  • Posted by Derek

    I have been following this story since it broke in November 2006. I have done extensive research on the connection between spiritual transformation and leadership, particularly in a Pentecostal/charismatic context. Ted Haggard is just the latest in a long string of moral failures in charismatic leadership. I do know where Haggard goes from here. I am concerned that he would end his relationship with the restoration team BEFORE they are ready.

    I think New Life Church has conducted themselves with class and dignity. A real testimony to Haggard’s leadership IMHO. It makes his fall that more tragic.

    Todd—Thanks for the Sunday Afternoon Update. Maybe we should change the name to SAU!

    Derek

  • Posted by Danny

    I agree that New Life has been very kind and gracious through this process.  I do believe they are correct in recommending he not enter the vocational ministry again.

    His ministry would be ever tainted with this hanging over his head.  I think their recommendation is in his best interest, and in the best interest of Christians in general.  He certainly would have the potential to be a stumbling block to those that would come into the church, especially those not understanding grace. 

    I do believe that God can change a person’s heart from ANY former state.  I believe God can change Haggard’s heart and restore him despite my above comments.  If that is the case, I’ll rejoice with fellow believers in the miracle that will have taken place.
    I would, however, have an extremely hard time sitting under him as a minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. 
    Just my $.02.

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    New Life has indeed handled itself well. Ted has not. I wonder, if I were in his shoes, if I wouldn’t be the same.

  • Posted by

    Tommy Barnett is a true valley walker reaching out to and restoring individuals many in the church world have given up on. Ted is in great hands and this should be perceived as a positive direction for both New Life and the Haggards.

  • Posted by

    Comments on this situation should be weighed carefully.  Most of us are not in the know of all the details and facts.  A man’s life and family is on the line.  Perhaps the better is no comment.

  • Posted by

    it seems to me that a long distance relationship in this context (ministerial restoration) would be tough on both parties in that how could New Life really keep track of Ted, and trust him etc.... and if he is submitted to Tommy barnett who has a very proven track record then i think it makes sense. hey Derek, I appreciate research as much as the next preacher, but I don’t understand how you could know what the next step for Mr. Haggard is. You might want to temper your intellectual speculation, it might just be me but that statement seemed a little like Dave Hunt was in the 80’s and early 90’s
    Just a thought for what it is worth

  • Posted by

    Roderick Logan is right on. We are reading these miniscule pieces of news on Monday morning and in the media and any of us who has worked in this type of ministry knows that we know little of what is really happening.  I am going to keep praying for Ted and his family, as I should do.

  • Posted by

    I think New Life has handled this well.  I think what would have been best was if Haggard had seen the process through with them before moving on.  It seems evident to me in their statement ("the process of restoring Ted Haggard is incomplete and maintains its original stance that he should not return to vocational ministry.") that though they agreed to end the relationship, this was not the course they would have liked to take in the matter.

  • Posted by Jerry

    New Life Church is a model in the ways in which they met the Haggard crash and the murders on their campus.  Their openness, their quick, yet intentional actions, their compassion tempered by care and protection of the Body should inspire us all.

    Perhaps Haggard led a solid foundation, perhaps there are others behind the scenes, but ultimately the glory must go to the Spirit of God who has led them.

  • Posted by

    If I’m not mistaken, the restoration process is usually to restore someone back to a leadership position.  I have not been following the case that closely, so I may be wrong.  However, if this is the case, and God is moving him away from New Life Church, it wouldn’t make sense for him to be restored through that avenue.  And wouldn’t it make more sense for him to be restored through another ministry or leadership team (i.e. Phoenix First)?

    Derek, it does the body of Christ no benefit to segment it out, as you have.  I’m sure that if you do your Church History research, you will find that there have been plenty of mistakes all over the spectrum of doctrinal background, not just charismatic/pentecostal.

    Lastly, let’s not look at Haggard and act like God hates his sin more than ours.  If not for the love of God, all of us would be lost.  If you have followed the story so closely, why not stop to pray for him than gossip about his sin.

  • Posted by Derek

    Don—Let me clarify.

    My research is in the area of spiritual transformation in pastoral leadership. I use the term “research” because this was my doctor of ministry dissertation. I am not researching Haggard per se, but researching how theology, leadership, and spiritual intersect in pastoral ministry. 

    My goal is to find ways to help other leaders (myself included) PREVENT moral failures. I haven’t done much research on why these guys have fallen. I am certainly not one of the Hunt,Hanegraaf, MacAuthur watchdog types, but I care deeply about leadership in the local church.

    And as I stated in my early post, I don’t know what Haggard should do and I am certainly not presuming that I have all of the answers.

    We do not need to gossip, but it is good for leaders to think, consult, dialog, reflect, brainstorm, etc. about leadership and its pitfalls. So it is worth our time to discuss issues surrounding Haggard and his restoration...IMHO.

    Derek

  • Posted by Derek

    Kevin,

    Moral failure is not specifically Pentecostal, but it is valuable to think about how leaders do pastoral leadership in a Pentecostal/charismatic (p/c) context. I am speaking as an insider. The p/c tradition is my tribe.

    The distinctives of p/c theology affects how they (we?) do leadership. There is something uniquely Pentecostal or charismatic about doing leadership in a p/c church. One of my arguments is that a faulty view of Spirit baptism can prevent p/c leaders from experiencing spiritual transformation. This effects their leadership.

    We can certainly learn from each other....and we should. One of the conclusions from my dissertation research in this area is that p/c leaders need to learn, read, dialogue with others outside of the p/c tradition.

    But p/c leaders need to think about how they do leadership within their tradition and make appropriate changes from a p/c perspective before looking out to other traditions.

    Derek

  • Posted by

    At first it sounded as if this was Ted pulling out of the restoration process and New Life restating that they didn’t want him to enter ministry again.  Now after re-reading I get that it could be Tommy Barnett will be overseeing the restoration process locally and this isn’t Ted thumbing his nose at the restoration team.  I’ve been a little of where Ted is… I won’t go into my story, but thankfully God preserved me from entering a sexual relationship. Still I lost my credentials and restoration has been slow (5 years now). I have felt the need to remain submitted even though I felt in some ways the penalty may be overly harsh. I’ve watch Tommy’s success rate with Jim B. and others and I have to say if a transfer is taking place then its for the best.  New Life might have responded better in saying there was a transfer of responsibility as this sounds a little like they may felt he was “pulling out.”

    I personally believe restoration is possible, but seldom exercised by the church.  Its unfortunate but we talk a good game until it comes to leaders who break our trust.  Sometimes I wonder how we can counsel a spouse who has been hurt by adultry to forgive and let trust be rebuilt but at the same time we practice not forgiving out leaders who were frankly human.

    I will say this in closing. Many who poo poo Ted’s situation (and it is serious) and say how they think he’s awful and should never be allowed back into ministry often have been surfing porn sites themselves before posting. What I’m saying is sometimes its not he who is without sin that throws the first stone, sometimes its he who has some of the biggest sins and desires to get the focus off of him or herself.  Having said that, I don’t think we should rush Ted back into ministry. Again I think a great example is Jim B. Tommy helped restore him and Jim is in a much better place spiritually now. It doesn’t mean he’ll stay there, after all there are no guarentees that even the strongest most vocal disciple won’t deny Christ… (remember Peter?)
    My prayers are with Ted, and New Life both have obviously been under serious spiritual attack.  Lets not add fuel to the enemy’s fire.

  • Posted by

    Galatians 6:1
    All of the intellectualizing, pretention and moral posing must not take place.  Who are we to assume that God cannot and will not restore anyone?  Let his fruit be his judge.  If you could not sit under his pastoral leadership (assuming he does pursue such again), then don’t go to his hypothetical church.  God can and does restore people.  He is the Healer.  If this is fatal then that is up to God.  We often forget that 1 John 1:9 was written to believers.  We also conveniently forget that the man known as the “man after God’s own heart” was a murderer and adulterer.  We forget that Rahab was a harlot, that Ruth was a Moabitis.  We forget that all of these were part of the geneology of our Savior.  We forget that we are failures in our own right and do not deserve to proclaim the grace of God.  Which by that very definition is grace.  We forget all of the humanity of all of the “Great men and women” of the scripture.  We take one look at Paul’s letter to Timothy (Paul a murderer himself) and make an entire theology out of a few verses.  Let’s remember.  Let’s remember it is not about trusting the Ted Haggards of this world, but about trusting the Creator of it.  I for one have no right to render judgment.  I have not done what this brother has done, but as was stated by Ken above (I think) none of are without sin.  So stop throwing the stones and go and sin no more!

  • Posted by

    Dear Derek, I wonder where you got your thoughts concerning the restoration of “pentecostal/Charismatic preachers. It had to come from the ones who would not cooperate. As a minister with the Assemblies of God I can tell you it is not so easy to re-enter public ministry with the A/G. So don’t throw us all in the same sake. It is a Baptest etc. problem as well.

    Rich

  • Posted by

    I’d like to clarify a few things to address some the above posted comments.

    Rev. Barnett was one of three ministers overseeing the restoration process.  Only one was affiliated with New Life.  Secondly, he agreed to complete this process with all three and work through all the “hoops” and in exchange, New Life provided him a severance package that included the rest of his salary for a year.  These facts were made public.  Because he has decided not to continue, as well as late last year sending out a ministry fundraising letter in violation of his restoration agreement, it seems that more is going on here than a logistical problem. 

    Lastly, New Life is stating that they feel, because of his lack of submission to the the process (it has only been a little over a year) that he should not return the VOCATIONAL ministry.  There are many ways he can be involved in kingdom building w/o being a pastor.  The Bible has plenty of examples of fallen people, restored, but with consequences that last a lifetime and loss of previous ministry status.

    I too pray for him and his family, but let’s not forget to pray for those hurt directly and indirectly because of this situation as well as the damage to our Christian testimonies to the world.

  • Posted by Derek

    Rich,

    Most of my research is in leadership development and not leadership restoration, so I don’t know if I have an informed opinion about the restoration process. I think that a p/c leader can be restored. Where should certainly show grace to those who are fallen and help them in the restoration process if they have fallen.

    You are right, I can’t throw all p/c denominations or movements into the same pile. Many of them approach leadership differently. I interviewed 20 pastors on the issue of spiritual transformation and leadership and I did get a variety of responses. There are some shared values of Pentecostal spirituality and theology that are common among p/c Christian. There are enough commonalities to talk about p/c leadership and p/c spirituality, although some who call the p/c movement home may disagree with some of the details.

    And again let me say that I am not claiming that only p/c churches have problems. I am doing research in that area because it has been the incubator of my faith.

    Derek

  • Posted by Derek

    Bill in KY,

    I would say MORE intellectualizing needs to take place, particularly in p/c leadership. We should think deeply and biblically about how we do leadership both in the congregation and how we lead our own hearts.

    I agree that pretention and moral posing has no value, but we certainly need more intellectualizing in the p/c tradition.

    Derek

  • Posted by

    Lori,

    Your response is well thought out. However, I have to question ONE of your points.  You said..."The Bible has plenty of examples of fallen people, restored, but with consequences that last a lifetime and loss of previous ministry status.”

    Really? Can you name ONE with a “loss of previous ministry status?” I can’t. Seems Peter was restored by Christ himself to an even great status.  Judas, of course, chose to end the process so he doesn’t really count.  What I’m saying is biblically I see NO person who was willing to be restored who was not restored to previous ministry status!  Granted there aren’t a lot of restoration stories in the Bible, but those there are are pretty clear to me that if you submit to God, he restores completely and sometimes to a ‘better place” than before.

  • Posted by

    We have to be careful.  Yes, Ted sinned.  But so have I and so have you.  We have this tendency to make one sin greater than another, and that is compounded exponentially on leadership.

    The press release by New Life was totally inappropriate.  Ted has not removed himself from submission, but has chosen to submit in a different way.  Just because a “chosen” group oversees the restoration, does not mean that they are right, and it does not mean that God has given them that authority .

    The point being, the church has got to get a grip, and that, yes, time is needed to restore, but it is God’s job to restore.  The church is quick to judge and EXTREMELY slow forgive and restore.  It’s almost as if the church has usurped God’s authority in many many many cases.

    The church SAYS that it has forgiven him, but I don’t believe that.  I do believe that GOD has forgiven him.

    Pastor Tommy Barnett is a humble man that God has used mightily, and Ted’s submission to his leadership is a positive thing.  The New Life team needs to retract and beg for forgiveness for this act, and they need to REALLY forgive Ted.  This press release is classic unforgiveness, and I am confident that God is not impressed.

  • Posted by

    It causes me great confusion to think that the Grace of God may not be deep and strong enough to forgive even the grossest of sins; and that God only chooses to remember special sexual sins, and then chooses to remember no more other sins.

    It is also disconcerting to think that when God calls one to the vocational ministry, and that son falls into sin, but becomes reconciled to the Lord, we have the audacity to now inform God and the Church that they should no longer be considered called of God.  If ones life has been changed by the Holy Spirit through the Biblical process of confession, renewal, restoration, restitution, etc., are we not again One in Christ?  Or does such a person become an ugly step child for whom the Church cannot forgive —even those same sins which God remembers no more? 

    It is gutsy for any of us to point out sexual (or any other) sins of one who falls to the temptations of satan and the flesh in such unacceptable sins as Ted Haggard —and then tend to hide in closest the sins of scores of pastors and church workers who who have fallen into heterosexual sin or other less terrible sins[?].  And—of all the nerve—pointing out this in charasmatic groups!  Shall we all sit down and write lists of Who’s Who In Sin”—and list their affiliations.  I’m afraid all of our churches will be on that list—and probably equally so. 

    Satan truly is seeking to destroy the Church and its testimony to the world, as well as seeking to devour those who are Christ’s servants—irrespective of the sin used to devour them or the affiliated church from which they come.  Our job should be one of total forgiveness and reconciliation, particularly after a proven period of time. 

    God bless Ted Haggard, Tommy Barnett and New Life CHurch—and may God help us all to be lifters up to those who fall—not pushers away.  There is no sin that God’s grace will not cover!

  • I think it’s ignorant of anyone to say that the moral issue of Ted Haggard is linked to the continual problems charismatics are having.

    When a christian leader falls we all feel it. To focus on the leaders circle of primary influence it forces one to think that the old addage is true “the christian army is the only army that turns and attacks itself.

    Let’s be broader,

  • Posted by Derek

    Sheeesh….I feel so misunderstood.

    Sergio,
    I am not saying that Ted Haggard’s moral failure is connected to moral failures in charismatic leadership. I am not saying that Ted Haggard’s fall is because he is a charismatic Christian. I am not saying that charismatics are the only Christians with problems. All I am saying is that Haggard is the latest in a long history of Pentecostal/charismatic leaders who have fallen. This is an observation and not a criticism. I am not attacking Haggard or judging him.

    I do think there are some theological problems with some Pentecostal/charismatic Christians and leaders that put them in a place where they are more likely to have a moral collapse. Some of the reasons why leaders fall are common to the Body of Christ. Some reasons are specific to certain kinds of Christians. Different Christian traditions have different spiritual disciplines that they emphasize and they have different concepts of leadership. So leadership development will look different in different Christian traditions.

    My concern is not restoration (although I think leaders who have fallen can and very often should be restored), my concern is that we who are Christian leaders today (and specifically those of us who are leaders in Pentecostal/charismatic churches) do not repeat the mistakes of those who have fallen. This is what has fueled my research. I know that I am as fallible as Haggard. I am aware of my own sin and weaknesses, and so I am asking, “What do I need to do as a leader to prevent myself from being in the position Haggard got into?

    I desire this not just for myself, but for other leaders. What is it that we can do to partner with the Holy Spirit to allow him to shape us to be men and women like Jesus? What kind of spiritual habits should I practice? What kind of relationships do I need? How does my theology and practice of leadership need to change so that the Holy Spirit can change me?

    I have followed the Haggard story with sorrow, not with detached academic indifference. I care deeply for the Church and for the Pentecostal/charismatic tradition. We should certainly not “shoot our own wounded,” but we should care for, love, restore, pray for, and show compassion for those who have fallen. BUT at the same time we need to rethink our own leadership and practice of spiritual disciplines so we are in the best place to allow the Spirit to change us, so that we can faithfully live out the gospel. 

    Derek

  • Posted by

    Derek:

    What I mean is...all of these comments are based upon yours or others thinking.  Get into your Bible and let it speak.  I am not stating that we should not think, I am an advocate for thinkiing deeply on the things of God, not the rationalizations of man.  I am not on some high horse regarding my position, I am stating that where “Sin abounds, grace much more abounds.” And if you remember what the Apostle Paul stated, before we come to judgment, “And such were some of you” but you have been delivered and freed from your bondage to sin...thinking is theology, when that thinking is upon the Truth of God and His grace.  It becomes arrogance when we think what we think and that becomes our truth.  IMHO.  I am a biblical conservative, meaning that I believe what the Bible states, that is my authority.  Traditions, creeds and the like are secondary to the plain, Holy Spirit generated Word of God.  Again, Galatians 6:1, 1 John 1:9.  Make what you will of what I have said.  But, I know that the will of God, according to His own words are that people are to be restored.  Not partially, but completely.  I am glad He did not partially save me....

  • Posted by

    Larry C., You are dead on track!

  • Page 1 of 2 pages

     1 2 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: