HOME | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | SUBMIT CONTENT | CONTACT US

image

So…These Two Pastors Walk Into a Bar…

Orginally published on Sunday, February 03, 2008 at 5:23 PM
by Todd Rhoades

Beyond the darts arcing through the smoky air, apparently unaffected by the heavy bass throbbing through speakers, the Rev. Chuck Kish tapped at the keyboard of his laptop, a tall, cool glass of Diet Coke near at hand, as the Friday night crowd milled around at the Market Cross Pub in downtown Carlisle, PA. A few tables away, Kish's counterpart, Carol Wetzel, sat and waited through the evening, just in case somebody felt the need to talk. Nobody did, except for a couple of reporters and photographers. Friday was the first night of Kish's plan to put clergy in Carlisle-area bars one night a month to listen to those in need. "It's going to take time," Kish said. "It's going to take time, and one person at a time coming over just to chat and learn to trust. This is going to work. I know it is." Kish, a senior pastor at the Bethel Assembly of God in Carlisle, set up the pilot program at the Market Cross Pub after talking to owner Jeff Goss.

Wetzel, who works as an administrative assistant at the church, signed on and has become a chaplain in the cause.

“I just felt called to do it,” said Wetzel, 55. “When he talked about it in church that day, it was like the spirit just leapt at me. I want to reach out to people. I want them to unload their troubles to me.”

Kish and Wetzel said they weren’t there to preach the gospel or go on about the dangers of alcohol.

“Sometimes when people go to a bar, they’ve got something weighing on their minds, and what they really need is somebody who is not going to be judgmental to talk to and help them,” Kish said.

“I don’t have a problem” with chaplains in the bar,” said Market Cross patron Mike Dean, 33, of Carlisle. “My uncle was a Baptist preacher. It probably gives them an extra outlet for reaching people.”

An story on Kish’s plan ran in The Patriot-News on Jan. 26. The story was picked up by news organizations around the world.

Kish thinks he knows why a story about a pastor hanging out in a bar has such resonance.

“When you become a Christian, you’re told to burn those bridges that connected you to that world you are walking away from,” he said. “But sometimes the churches forget to tell you that once you’ve recovered and become strong, you need to rebuild those bridges so you can re-enter that world and share your light.”

He sees his ministry as being at the core of what his faith is about.
You can read more here in the Patriot-News...

What do you think of this new approach to ministry?  I’d love to hear your thoughts…


This post has been viewed 2445 times so far.



  There are 32 Comments:

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    GREAT idea. However, I would suggest that they may eventually learn that just sitting at a table waiting for somebody to talk might not be enough. Playing pool with a complete stranger? That might work. Watching the game while sitting AT the bar and engaging the patrons around you? That, too.

    Closing up the laptop and engaging the culture around you? That will work…

  • Posted by

    How come everyone knew you were going to do this? Just going and being there because God told you to should be all there is to it… no hype or “here’s a pastor going to a bar"… just obedience to God...or maybe God didn’t tell you to and you’re just doing it because it seems to be a good “outreach” idea/strategy.
    Jesus builds the church…
    Do people care if you are a “pastor” or that you just truly want to be there in the bar with them?
    I have found that being a “pastor” (an I am one!) is often more of a barrier than a help with people who are not church people.
    Authentic, MUTUAL relationships that are anointed and orchestrated by the Spirit when we humbly yield and obey and go where He leads us is what needs to happen - then God is glorified not anything that we do!
    PLEASE don’t do this if you only think it’s a great outreach strategy because then all sorts of people will be on the lookout and have their defenses up to avoid anyone who may have genuine desire and CALL from God to be in a relationships of significance with people who frequent the bars.
    Peace!

  • Posted by

    I agree with Peter...relational engagement appropriately applied would likely give the entree to conversation they are looking for. Close up the laptop. I applaud these guys. Too many times salvation is viewed to be a fragile commodity that we have to hold on to and in so doing we miss opportunities to take the gift within us to the marketplace where the incarnational presence of Christ will touch someone in need.

  • Posted by

    I also think it is a great idea, with some modifications in the plan.  I agree w/ Peter that sitting alone isn’t going to bring anyone over to talk, except someone who is looking for a pick-up. 

    Andrea – I think the story got picked up because Wetzel was recruiting a team of pastors from his community.  Plus, I believe he wants it to become known frequent patrons that on particular Friday nights a pastor can be found in community pubs and bars. 

    I agree that sometimes simply being a pastor can be off-putting.  On the other hand, many still perceive members of the clergy as the kind of person who is wise and able to help with life’s problems.  Most unchurched folks who feel this way wouldn’t know how to pick a pastor to talk to, except to open their local yellow pages . . . . or now stop in for a cold one on the first Friday of the month.  Still, I think it will confirm the perception some have of Christians as arrogant and “holier than thou” if the “pub pastors” sit off by themselves, aloof from the crowd, waiting for some poor soul to come to them. 

    Wendi

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not slighting what this guy is doing. I’m CELEBRATING it. If he has an ongoing commitment to being engaged in community, and leans on Jesus, and builds real friendships, this is gonna be a GREAT story of Kingdom living!

    Keep it up.

  • Posted by

    I’ll drink to that...Diet coke of course.

  • Posted by

    i think thats a great thing to do, go to the sinners like jesus did,and if the lord started it he will lead them in what to do and when to do,

  • Posted by

    I have been hitting the pub weekly for about 6 months.  I first met with skepticism and distrust regarding why I was drinking coffee or a diet cola.  I had identified myself as only “Becky”.  After just getting acquainted for several months, the word “got out” that I was the local area minister and the deeper life stories, heartaches, needs, hopes and concerns began to surface.  There are still the skeptics, but those who have come to know and trust me defend my presence. I am now invited to the potluck dinners they hosted at Thanksgiving and Christmas and even questions are being asked about God and my faith and what that means.  There is subtle searching and attempts to understand part of MY life that is deeply buried in theirs.  It is not easy ministry, but rich and rewarding, as I go with Jesus to visit and eat with the “outsiders”.

  • Like it? I love it! This idea reminds me of Craig Gross’ great book The Gutter. All of us think “those sinners” should come to us. Jesus went to them. Sounds like this pastor has found The Gutter. Sounds like something Jesus did. Most of the people who go to The Gutter are criticized by “church people”. Instead we should be praying for them and encouraging them.

  • Posted by

    I’m in the Salvation Army.  We’ve been doing this for years.  We started off selling the War Cry and still take them with us - but few people take them and the money we take rarely covers the petrol to get there.  The beauty of the War Cry and collecting box is that it gives you an excuse to touch base at every table and it gives patrons an excuse to talk to you without attracting attention from their friends.

    In earlier years I built up some awesome contacts, did funerals, visited regulars in hospital, etc.  Strangely enough we’ve found it’s dried up a bit recently because in NZ the pub culture has changed.  “The local” with lots of regulars hasn’t existed in our recent appointments and my experience would say that people need to see your face weekly for at least six months before they really start to open up.

  • Posted by

    I think it’s great, and I applaud these people for doing this.  But I would go one step further like Peter said by getting up and chit-chatting and hanging out with the people.  Don’t wait for them to come to you; go to them.  And another thing—have a beer for pete’s sake.  When you sit at a bar with a diet Coke, you are instantly marked as an outsider.  If you have a beer, people will be more likely to accept you, and you can show people how to responsibly drink in moderation.  I fully believe that Jesus would do the same, no matter how it offended the Pharisees in the churches.

  • Posted by Tony Story

    I hate to rain on your parades but, I began my ministry doing street work and Bar Ministry has always proven to be “unfruitful”.  It’s just as hard to reach a drunk in a bar as it is to reach a crack head smoking in a crack house.  They are not rational enough to make a command decision to follow Jesus.

    Having said that, I’m all for believers being unconventional in reaching the lost and if this is what God led him to do, so be it.

  • Posted by

    A pub or a bar is a community of people.  I know from the days when my grandparents who would take my and my sister to their favorite watering hole in Racine, WI.  The TV show “Cheers” was so successful because it was not about the alcohol ... it was about relationships. 

    Showing up to a bar or pub will never be enough.  There has to be bridges to cross to relate to these people.  Probably one, which I have pondered, would be to be the “designated driver"… imagine the impact of such a ministry plus you would discover the other relationships as well when you deliver the passenger home. 

    Such a ministry does require folks who have the spiritual strength, wisdom, and foresight to endure the culture one finds in each bar and then seek to relate, engage, minister, and evangelize.

  • Posted by

    “Kish and Wetzel said they weren’t there to preach the gospel...”

    Mark 16:15. And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

    Huh.  Something doesn’t match up here.

    --
    CS

  • Posted by

    CS - I actually think they WERE preaching the gospel, unless we reduce the gospel to a 4-point formula that requires only one kind of response.  They were preaching in the way of St. Francis of Assisi; “preach the Gospel at all times and when necessary use words.” In so doing, these “pub pastors” will earn the right to communicate the elements of the gospel to which you refer.  Do you “preach the gospel” to every waitress who serves you in a restaurant, store clerk at Target.? Do you stand up at every PTA meeting to preach?  Every time your neighbors invite you to their block party?  I’d say, yes you probably do, but I’d bet that sometimes you don’t use words.

  • Posted by

    Wendi:

    How about this: feed the masses and when necessary use food.

    Sounds ridiculous, right?  Yet, this is what we are being told is the right way of spreading the Gospel.  Yes, we should let our light shine before men so that they may glorify God, as it says in Matthew 5:16.  But if we are going to say that we are trying to reach the lost, spreading the Gospel requires sharing it, not sitting there and waiting for people to ask for it or trying to forge relationships before it can be shared.

    Romans 10:14-15.  “How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? 
    And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!”

    --
    CS

  • Posted by

    CS –

    I think you are missing my point.  Of course these pastors want to offer food to the starving people they encounter, in fact that is what they are doing.  The gospel cannot (should not) be reduced to four steps that fit into a pocket sized tract.  You didn’t answer my question, and if you did I think it would make my point.  I’m sure you don’t preach “you’re a sinner, need to repent and accept Jesus” to every single person you encounter during the day.  Why would you accuse them because they don’t march into the bar with a bullhorn and call every person to repent?  Like them, as you live your life in a Christ-like way, you open relational doors that earn you the right (and the HS opens hearts) to communicate the fundamentals you speak of. 

    Kish and Wetzel are interacting with folks in the bar the same way that Jesus interacted with the woman caught in adultery.  First He addressed her need, saved her life.  AFTER she believed He cared, He said “go and sin no more” and she responded.  Kish and Wetzel and their team have the goal of earning the right to say to those they serve “go and sin no more.” Since Jesus didn’t simply wander around saying in every encounter “you are a sinner, better repent or go to hell,” why would we?

    Wendi

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    CS,

    I also think that perhaps you are reading “preach the gospel” in a different sense than he is saying it.

    It is, I would argue from Scripture, imperative that we as Christians be in the world (but not of it) by living out our faith in front of people. And, as Jesus modeled with the woman at the well, that might mean building a relationship with people before explaining the gospel message to them in detail. Would you concur?

    I think that this story (incomplete and flawed as it might be) is an excellent example of that.

  • Posted by

    i believe that the holy spirit will lead them into what to do, what to say, and when to say it, if you are around a person that is full of the holy spirit, the holy spirit will convict a person of sin, and when we speak the word of god in love it will convict them, because the word of god is spirit and life, and that life produces life, everything produces after its own kind, we do not have to worry about god keeping his word, it will accomplish what he sent it to do, in a church building, in a bar, anywhere you are at, but we have to go by the leading of the spirit, and if we are sent somewhere we are sent for a reason, and we will know what to do. i can not tell those people what to say are do, and no one can but the holy spirit, that is his ministery on the earth , he guides us , every situation is different, but he knows the answer to all of them, we just guess the answers on our own, but he knows for sure what is needed.

  • Posted by

    Wendi and Peter:

    Here is the key question behind all of this: do we have a standard to establish relationships before we share the Gospel?  While this depends on how you define “relationship,” I would say that the answer, through looking in the Bible, is, “No.”

    In the case of the woman at the well, Jesus engaged her with a conversation.  He used a combination of supernatural knowledge and the use of the Law in speaking to her.  But He did not forge a relationship with her in the modern sense of the word, which implies knowing someone for a good length of time before speaking about our faith to them.

    When Philip was walking down the road and heard the Ethiopian eunuch reading, he sat down next to him and explained what the eunuch was reading.  The eunuch was convicted and immediately wanted to be baptized.  Philip didn’t need to sit down with the eunuch and establish a relationship at the local grocery store or PTA meeting before explaining to him what he was reading (then again, what would a eunuch be doing at the PTA?).

    What I accuse these people of doing, and I accuse many other people of doing nowadays, is thinking that they need a relationship and a sign before sharing the Gospel, while in the meantime these people are perishing.  The philosophy that we have to earn the right to speak with people is wrong.  We are called to spread the Gospel actively, not through sitting and biding our time.

    Now, if someone can demonstrate for me the relationship method in the Bible, as it is promoted today, with a long-standing relationship outside of familial bonds that leads to repentance and that person being saved, I will totally be willing to revise my stance on things.

    And since Wendi geared the question towards me about what I do concerning the Gospel, here is what I will say.  Since I was saved, I have witnessed or shared the Gospel with, on average, one person per day.  And I’m not talking about street preaching or mass forums.  I’m talking sharing it with people in one-on-one or one-with-few settings, because I desperately care what happens to these people.  And I let my light shine before men as well.

    Lastly, Wendi said, “Since Jesus didn’t simply wander around saying in every encounter “you are a sinner, better repent or go to hell,” why would we?”

    The Bible says in Matthew 4:15, “From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”

    --
    CS

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    CS writes

    [The philosophy that we have to earn the right to speak with people is wrong.] Sorry, in my experience, it isn’t wrong at all. I’ve seen too many lives changed because people were in relationships with believers who didn’t always preach at them, but lived their lives as Christ-followers in front of them.

    Being the salt of the Earth is what we’re talking about. Being in the world for sure (and not of it) is what we’re talking about.

    Since there’s not biblical precedent for church buildings, organ music, and Pancake breakfasts, should we assume those are bad as well? Certainly not.

  • Posted by

    Peter:

    We should always examine things in light of Scripture.  If we need to earn the right to speak with people, please direct me to the place where I can find this in the Bible.  It will help me learn how to be more effective in my witnessing.

    --
    CS

  • Posted by

    cs you are right, because jesus has told us to tell people to repent. and also the holy spirit knows everyones needs, one word from god can change everything, we sometimes forget that he works with us with his word, he told us to speak his word, and he works with his word that is spoken, it is up to god to keep his word, and it is up to me to believe on whom he has sent, and he gives us power to believe, so all in all it is god in us that does the work, we got to believe that he will work through us with his word. he is the same god that is in all that is born again, we got the same word. so his word will work anywhere at any time if we believe, if a person does not accept jesus , it is not because the word with its power was not there,but that does not mean they they may later accept him. befour i was saved i saw a billbourd that said jesus saves, and i would dream about that sign a lot of times before i was saved, and i would think about what i had heard preached almost every day, the gospel will not let you go, i guess i have said enough.

  • Posted by Peter Hamm

    CS,

    You don’t believe that the woman at the well is an example of that kind of relationship. I do.

    I don’t believe that every life/ministry method/technique or system has to be grounded in Scripture the way you are implying as much as our idea of who God is and what he’s about needs to be. You obviously disagree.

    I don’t think either one of us is going to change minds here. So I’m not being drawn into this argument (again).

  • Posted by

    Yes, with the woman at the well Jesus went first to relationship, then to the message.  He did this also (IMO) with the woman caught in adultery, the calling of Zachias from the tree, the making of water to wine, the feeding of 5000, and most of His healing miracles. 

    I assert that in all these cases, Jesus was indeed doing what Matthew 4:15 says of Him, even though the historical record does not indicate that in every case He said the words, “Repent, for the kingdom of God is at hand.” In all these ways, Jesus preached the kingdom by building relationships.

    And I’m with Peter, I could give you many examples of people who have come to repentance and acceptance of the gospel through a relationship, and very few through a chance encounter in Starbucks or the corner bar.  None of us defending this idea used the word “longstanding” as you have.  I think you are assuming these pastors are going to wait years before talking about Jesus, but this isn’t even implied in the article.  All that is implied is that they are going to a place where hurting people are looking for answers, that they listen and show they care, and in so doing open the door to offer the one real answer. 

    If you don’t think we’ve made a case that this was Jesus’ method, then I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree.

    Wendi

  • Page 1 of 2 pages

     1 2 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: