HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

Today’s Buzz:  Repent, Pastor Frank!; Kiwi on Vulgarity; Small, Rural Churches and More!

Orginally published on Monday, June 04, 2007 at 7:16 AM
by Todd Rhoades

It's Monday... you may have a critic from yesterday to contend with. But what if they call you to repentance... publicly... on a blog? How would you respond? We'll discuss this; as long as the plight of many small, rural churches, a couple of follow-ups on Chuck Swindoll and vulgarity; and an idea for you to do this weekend if you get bored. It's all in today's buzz...

Repent, Pastor Frank!
I agree with Perry Noble when he says that he doesn’t pay attention to his blog critics; but what if the blog in question is one that is specifically set up to bring down your church and your ministry?  How should you respond.  Case in point. What would you do if you were Pastor Frank?  Ignore?  Confront?  This type of thing is starting to do major damage in many churches.  Don’t underestimate the power of the rogue blogger.  (By the way, I don’t know any of the situation of this church, or this blogger… I just use this as an instance to make you think about what you’d do if this type of thing happened in your church.

QUESTION:  If you were Pastor Frank, how would you respond?  Or would you at all?

A Couple More Great Posts on Vulgarity
If you took last week off, you might want to read through some of our posts last week about Chuck Swindoll and Vulgar speech.  There were a couple of new, excellent posts over the weekend that you might want to check out on the subject.  One is here from Parchment and Pen from a pastor who actually worked side by side with Chuck; and Andrew Jones (the tall skinny kiwi) has a post on language here.  They’re worth your time to read. 

QUESTION:  Were there words you were not allowed to say growing up that are now common place enough that you AND your children freely use them?  If so… why is that?

Washington Times Piece on Small Churches
“About 52 percent of American churches are in rural areas. Yet more than half of weekly churchgoers attend services in places that are among the most populous 10 percent of congregations, according to the Hartford Institute on Religion Research. That leaves some of the estimated 177,000 rural churches scattered across the country with as few as two regular worshippers.” Interesting read.

QUESTION:  Will there be little white churches still alive in rural America in ten years?  Why or why not?

Nothing to do This Weekend?  Here’s an Idea...
Balloons apparently were boring. A young man returning home from a church mission in Mexico found his family’s home completely wrapped in newspaper.
“As soon as the headlights hit the house it was like, ‘What has happened?’” said Kelly Wigington, the father of Mormon missionary Brian Wigington. “I’ve never seen anything like this before.” The family returned from the Salt Lake City airport about 1:30 a.m. Thursday to find the unusual welcome home decorations. The pranksters were Brian Wigington’s friends, who volunteered to remove the newsprint. It took three hours to wrap the house. “Some of these guys have too much free time on their hands,” Kelly Wigington said.  SOURCE

QUESTION:  What’s the craziest prank you’ve ever pulled?

OK… that’s it for today!  Have a great one!

PS—If you have something you think I should include in Today’s Buzz,


This post has been viewed 4420 times so far.


  There are 98 Comments:

  • Posted by

    Johnpaul, thanks for entering into the discussion with us in such a civil manner.  And, for the record, while I still disagree with your blog, I have to admit that I find the satirical slogan: “tithe.tithe.tithe” to be pretty funny. smile

    Blessings on you in your journey.......

  • Posted by

    John Paul,

    Please know that there are many who are and will continue to pray for you and all involved. Thank you for being willing to enter the discussion here.

    Camey

  • Posted by

    Thanks for your reply, Todd.

    There is an element of the blog that I haven’t seen discussed. That it is a place for people of common experience to meet up, talk about their experiences in Toxic churches, and experience some healing. It’s truly sad that those who have been beaten, robbed and thrown in the ditch are having to heal themselves, but in this type of situation, there are few if any Good Samaritans.

    Such a church has a revolving-door syndrome and the people who leave do so alone. Individually, most have exhausted their Biblical avenue for confrontation / reconciliation. And in the end, it is the church leadership who worships in vain, for scripture still says “if while offering your gift at the altar you remember a brother has offense against you, leave your gift at the altar and go be reconciled with your brother, THEN come back and offer your gift”. If worshiping (offering your gift) is in vain when you have unresolved offense with a brother, how much more in vain is ministry (preaching and teaching) when there is a host of brothers who have been offended?

    What the blog has done, is as Philip Melanchthon says above about Luther’s 95 thesis and the printing press which gave it wings ... the blog provides for people who were once alone and isolated, but sharing a common affiction, to link up and talk. It also occurs to me that one of the primary areas of healing that people need, is rediscovering their voice - for one of the tools used by spiritual abusers is lording it over people - the so-called “silencing of the lambs”. Many do NOT heal because they remain under the mistaken belief that they are alone, and therefore are more inclined to believe they are at fault. Surely churches default to blaming those who have left with any number of false accusations (backslidden, secret sin, et al).

    The numbers of times people have discovered the CBC blog and then posted a message saying “Thank God I found you guys, I thought I was the ONLY ONE who had that kind of experience at CBC”, is astounding. It is for this reason, I believe, that JohnPaul has not been able to shut down the blog. Because it provides a venue for people who have been abused by a chronically abusive church, to talk about it, love on one another, and begin healing.

    Like it or not, there is GOOD to come from the blog. It’s just a matter of perspective. For the one who discovers he/she is not alone, finds affirmation, validation, healing, and begins to rediscover their voice, it is a GOOD thing. For the robbers that it exposes, it could also be a good thing, IF they’d find the love of Christ and reach out to the ones they’d injured. It’s really only a BAD thing for the unrepentant, because they do not like having their sins made public.

  • Posted by

    Johnpaul, I pray for you too, and enjoy our exchanges. You wrote [I have always felt that the right or wrong line depended on my attitude. ] Can’t agree. If I have a great attitude but commit murder… Extreme example, but attitude is not the key, behavior is.

    I’m also a little weary of the comparison to Martin Luther. ML was an insider (I’m not sure he even thought nailing the theses up on the door was the best thing to do either) and a very educated and respected theologian and leader in his church. We are talking here about church members who may or may not be leaders and in many cases certainly aren’t as educated as Luther was.

    Scrupe writes [most have exhausted their Biblical avenue for confrontation / reconciliation] NOT IN THIS CASE. By jp’s own admission he started this blog BEFORE he approached those he had issue with.

    If we see injustice in the world and start blogs about our disdain for it, isn’t it interesting that there aren’t more blogs compaining about extreme poverty in this world and the AIDS nightmare in Africa and the plight of the downtrodden and things like that? We pick and choose what we get mad about, and sometimes with more self-centered reasons than we would admit…

    If we all start blogs every time that we get hurt by a church leader… the internet is going to get pretty clogged up pretty fast.

  • Posted by Andy McAdams

    OK...I said that I was done with this subject but I need to AMEN, Peter’s last post.  I too think that this is not even close to martin Luther and that attitude is not the decider for things.  I am also always amazed that I see in Johnpaul’s response that “he prayed about it and “FELT” to go ahead of things.  If I got paid for everytime I heard someone do something that wasn’t being done correctly because they said they prayed and felt OK with it...I would have retired a long time ago.

    OK...Now I’m done....whew!

  • Posted by

    Imagine what the blogger could accomplish if he took all that passion, energy, and creativity and used it toward a more noble cause.  He could really be used by Christ to impact the world in a much more substantial way.

  • Posted by Johnpaul

    Peter said:

    I don’t believe that applies. Murder is always wrong, blogging on the other hand…

    I don’t believe this applies. Muder is always wrong. Blogging on the other hand....

    Andy said:

    If I got paid for everytime I heard someone do something that wasn’t being done correctly because they said they prayed and felt OK with it......

    Andy, What am I supposed to go on then? I talked to God, talked to my pastors, talked to my family...and in the end feel ok about. I’m not sure why that isn’t good enough.

  • Posted by

    I am a frequent commenter at JohnPaul’s blog (aka FICM). I do appreciate this outside perspective that you have. As has been pointed out, John Paul and many others have exhausted Biblical methods for bringing correction to the church and have been shunned and outcast for doing so.

    I respectfully disagree with the comment:

    “I’m also a little weary of the comparison to Martin Luther. ML was an insider (I’m not sure he even thought nailing the theses up on the door was the best thing to do either) and a very educated and respected theologian and leader in his church. We are talking here about church members who may or may not be leaders and in many cases certainly aren’t as educated as Luther was.”

    If you had read the blog frequently, you would know that several of the commenters and contributors to the blog are former elders and teachers from the church. People who were once in close relationship to Pastor Frank, and who were also theologians who taught in their Bible College. These aren’t some fly-by-night grifters with an axe to grind, these are people who tried to change things from the inside for DECADES before finally giving up. That’s not to say they condone the satire, but they clearly agree with much of what is being said in the context of doctrinal error inside the church.

    In my opinion, some of you seem to hold up an impossible standard for church members to bring correction to the Body of Christ and simultaneously exalt the position of “Pastor” to idol worship. The danger of this is that there will be no correction, and many will be deceived and mislead by their teachings. Some of you say that we are absolved of guilt by following these rules and we should just let it be. But I am reminded of the story of Paul, who in Galatians 1 & 2 described his own experience with bringing correction to pastors of other churches. He *PUBLICLY* denounced Cephas for perverting the Gospel, even though he was not part of their “local” church. He set the example by demonstrating that the truth of the Gospel was more important than any one man’s reputation in the church. Paul risked alienation from the Christians in Jerusalem for doing this, but he knew (as he details in chapter 1) that his credentials are not based on knowing the right people, but by teaching the truth of the Gospel.

    So, which is more important? Following the rules for resolving the offense (which they have done), or bringing correction to the Body of Christ? Wouldn’t you consider it better to rebuke one and save thousands than to keep quiet?

    People often forget the end of the verse about dealing with sins in the church:

    “If a brother or sister sins, [a] go and point out the fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over. 16 But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ 17 If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector.”

    Jesus tells us that if we confront our brother in his sin and he still refuses, to speak about it to the WHOLE CHURCH. How does blogging about the sins of a church leadership (false doctrine) fail to follow scripture in this regard?

    Sorry, if I ranted a bit, but I felt the need to address the issue of resolving offenses and confronting sin in the church. So far, it has been used as a one-sided tool to defend pastors regardless of their standing. I am open to comments and corrections on these issues, so please fire away.

    Thanks for allowing me to speak! smile

  • Posted by

    Johnpaul,

    There are church leaders here (that number is growing) who strongly feel that what your blog is doing is wrong. Is it possible that you’ve decided that you will only listen to the people who agree with what you’ve already decided is the best course of action. Think carefully about this. I guess I’d like to know what the scriptural imperative is to continue it when it was started on the wrong foot. “God told me to” is, for me, just not good enough.

  • Posted by

    Sorry about the bolded text, I think quoting the Bible verse caused some HTML tag to slip in there. I honestly didn’t mean to shout.

  • Posted by

    I’m late to this lively discussion, but I agree with Peter, Andy and others who feel JM, that you are wrong.

    Responding to the most recent comments:

    Attitude cannot possibly be used as a gauge for whether or not something is wrong or right.  Murder is a bad example (sorry Peter).  Can’t think of a way to murder someone with a good attitude.  But any of us who has observed a co-dependent relationship is familiar with someone enabling another’s destructive behavior, usually out of deep love and care about the person.  And just last week I read again the story of tripped while carrying the Ark of the Covenant – then was struck dead for trying to catch it.  He had a good attitude for sure, respect for the Lord and the Ark, but no matter how good his attitude, he was insubordinate and his action was wrong.
    JM, you ask: [Andy, What am I supposed to go on then? I talked to God, talked to my pastors, talked to my family...and in the end feel ok about. I’m not sure why that isn’t good enough. ]

    I’ll tell you why, you are (in all likelihood) asking people who affirm you and are probably going to agree with you.  Your family and friends are certainly biased.  The hardest thing for any of us to do is figure out how to get good counsel from people who can be completely objective and will give us input that doesn’t come through the filter of their relationship with us.  Sort of like the role the prophets played in the lives of OT kings (it’s a lot safer for the adviser today, we can’t have someone killed if we don’t like their advice).  Because of the potential harm that can be (perhaps has been) wrought by your blog, I think it is imperative for you to find these people and get counsel from them (maybe you have here at MMI).

    Perhaps the biggest danger of this kind of blog is what it has the potential to do in the heart of the blogger.  Anything . . . ANYTHING . . . can become an idol.  When we become consumed with something, when we spend too many hours fretting, fussing, worrying, typing . . . hours that could (should) be spent worshiping the Lord and spending ourselves for the least, last and lost . . . then we’re probably in danger of committing idolatry.  Which is exactly why Peter’s comment about extreme world poverty or Aids/HIV in Africa is so important.  Broken hearts over these kinds of kingdom issues provide built in protection against idolatry
    And to Todd’s question about what’s a pastor to do?  Maybe we can learn a lesson from RW, considering all the web space dedicated to bringing him down.  I agree with the idea of addressing the problem on the home front.  Maybe a forum where members (which you no longer are JM) are free to ask any and all questions would be good.

    And finally to Unscrupulous Man regarding the many people who have been wounded and hurt by spiritual abuse by arrogant and power hungry church leaders . . . I think there are too many other options to make this (a blog) a spiritually sound choice.  Indeed people have been abused, I’m not denying that.  But most western Christians have to many choices to claim they were powerless against the abuse (I know there are exceptions).  Just the fact that we have scripture at our fingertips is a huge benefit many Christians on this planet can only dream about.  Plus, most American communities have many solid faith communities to choose from, even small rural towns.  Feeling the need to right our wrong, to air our grievances in order to heal . . . this is part of our American consumer thinking.  Based on the advice Jesus gave about how to deal with an enemy, I can’t quite see Him starting a blog after being hurt and wounded.  Praying “Father forgive them,” and moving to a healthy place where God can use us seems like a much better approach.
    That’s three posts in one . . . which explains the length.

    Wendi

  • Posted by Leonard

    So many issues so little time.  Johnpaul and others who added to this discussion thanks and thanks for the tone of your replies as well.  I am one of those who would be in disagreement with the blog incase you couldn’t tell from my previous posts.  I also have NO connection to the church nor have I ever heard of them until I read the posts. 

    I really think this boils down to Gossip.  Does this blog promote and provide for gossip?  A quick and a slow read of the blog would have to reveal a YES.  Is God seeking to use gossip to correct his kids? 

    All of the...”it is a last resort, it is how we protect those people in the church from abusive pastors, it is how we ... vent/heal” and the likes are not biblical responses.  Does this blog promote or provide for rampant gossip?  Then stop it because it is facilitating sin and destruction in the lives of those who participate. 

    For those who say “no, it helps me,” I ask helps you what?  If it helped then it would go away by itself because people would post a time or two and then be more whole.  What happens is there are a group of regular posters who post stuff that feeds the bitterness and self righteousness of all. 

    I believe you are some good people caught in a dangerous current.  You are worried for the people “caught under the bad teaching of Frank” but not worried that you facilitate gossip.  What about the brothers and sisters who are learning to manage their pain by blogging?  Did every person who posted go to Frank and the elders?  What about the people who get caught in the current of gossip because of this blog?  What about the self-righteousness that gets fed and the disrespect that becomes common place towards elders and shepherds all because of this blog?

    It seems that this blogs potential for doing good is biblically outweighed by the damage it causes.  It is not just the people under Frank being hurt but the people under this blog too. 

    Why not start a prayer only meeting for Frank?  Why not start a prayer only meeting for those who are truly wounded not just angry or bitter? 

    One final thought?  When my kids say I am sorry but do not change the offense made I tell them they do not understand apologizing.  To apologize involves repentance, a change of the offense.  To say sorry I started a blog wrongfully and then to continue blogging and even accelerate the blogging, that is not repentance.

  • Posted by

    </b>I wonder if the Good Samaritan had so many critics?

    There’s a man who has been left to die in a ditch, following a brutal beating and robbery at the hands of religious robbers.

    Who will go down into the muck, get dirty, lift him out, clean and bandage him, and foot the bill for his healing?

    The wrong person has been indicted.

    ‘Scrupe

  • Posted by Johnpaul

    Working backward:

    ‘Scrupe, I appreciate the support, but I think it is a stretch to compare our blog to the Good Samaritan…

    Leonard, Can my blog be a place for gossip. Yes, it can be, however there are many places that breed gossip… (and while I realize you are all going to destroy me for this I just can’t resist...) for instance...I have noticed that many “Prayer Chains” are nothing more than “Gossip Chains”. All you pastors who right now are thinking “not in my Church”, stop lying to yourself. Does this make gossip ok? No. If I am promoting gossip it is wrong, but just because you see someone use my blog for gossip does not necessarily make it bad.

    You also say:

    It seems that this blogs potential for doing good is biblically outweighed by the damage it causes.  It is not just the people under Frank being hurt but the people under this blog too.

    I would say the exact same thing about City Bible Church. There is plenty good that comes from that church, but the amount of pain and misteachings that I have seen outweigh all else.

    Wendi, Idols, Idols, Idols. I get nailed on this subject so often by God. We must watch out for Idols. Is the blog an idol for me now? Good question. 

    And Peter (my email will be coming soon). You say:

    There are church leaders here (that number is growing) who strongly feel that what your blog is doing is wrong. Is it possible that you’ve decided that you will only listen to the people who agree with what you’ve already decided is the best course of action. Think carefully about this. I guess I’d like to know what the scriptural imperative is to continue it when it was started on the wrong foot. “God told me to” is, for me, just not good enough.
    </strong>

    I listen to God first and man second. I am assuming your comment about that not being good enough is because you do not believe that God has actually told me to do this (and not that you don’t care if God did). Correct me if I am wrong here.

    For the record, and to give you all more ammo, you are right Peter, I do not feel that God has told me to do this. I also do not feel that He has told me to stop. So, here we are, with a group of random pastors from around the U.S. telling me to stop...(btw, is it possible that you pastors have made a snap judgement about something which is not so easy to judge?)...I have not listened to you yet...but that does not mean I won’t. We are having a discussion, in which I think many great points have been brought up.

    I am going spend some time reading through my Bible some more, praying about what I am doing and I will let everyone know what I come up with. I am open to the idea of quitting the blog. I can’t shut it down, but I could end my part of it. I am open to that if I feel God is telling me (through you all) to stop.

  • Posted by

    Johnpaul wrote:

    “‘Scrupe, I appreciate the support, but I think it is a stretch to compare our blog to the Good Samaritan…”

    Well bro, it’s closer to the Good Samaritan than the Judas it’s being made out to be. wink

    Gotta run Johnpaul - need to catch up with Beavis.

    ‘Scrupe

  • Posted by Andy McAdams

    Johnpaul wrote: Andy, What am I supposed to go on then? I talked to God, talked to my pastors, talked to my family...and in the end feel ok about. I’m not sure why that isn’t good enough.

    MOVE ON.  let the Spirit of God deal with things.  You may have talked to God, but the question is “did he answer you or did you answer yourself?” I have never had anyone leave a church or protest something, even in the most vial way and not say they didn’t pray first.

    John Paul’s Friend said:  Jesus tells us that if we confront our brother in his sin and he still refuses, to speak about it to the WHOLE CHURCH. How does blogging about the sins of a church leadership (false doctrine) fail to follow scripture in this regard?

    I don’t think whole church means the whole world, like a blog would do.  Doing it this way isn’t going before the “assembly” or the “Called out ones” which the word means.  If the church fails to react on this...then move on.

  • Posted by

    Don’t know where to write so I will write here

    Yes little white churches will always be around “Where two or three are gathered in my name there am I in their midst” It doesn’t matter how big your Church is it’s how big your God is. A church can will stand against all odds and rational thought if God wants it there.

  • Posted by Leonard

    Hey JP,
    I may not be right on this but you seem conflicted internally.  I add that your connection with the prayer chain is a bit of a stretch in my mind.  I do know that some prayer chains do and some do not.  However I read extensively the posts on your blog and see gossip all over the place.  The “can it be a place for gossip ship has sailed.  It is a place for gossip.  Your prolonging it only sets the table for more.  Your argument is that since a prayer chain can be it is okay if our blog is… Your argument is that since good and bad things happen at the church it is okay that good and bad things happen on our blog. 

    Isn’t this the same kind of leadership flaw you see in the pastor?  You are duplicating on your blog some of the same stuff you fault the pastor for. 

    Gossip is a sin.  It is wrong and to willingly and knowingly foster a place where it happens hurts people.  It is not an issue of if some good comes; it is an issue of whether or not gossip is a sin. 

    Scrupe… How does gossip and sarcasm rescue someone from a ditch.  If I remember correctly the good Samaritan actually at his own expense helped the guy in the ditch.  He did not sit in secrecy, hiding behind a code name, blogging someone else’s transgressions.  He did not go around posting in the Jerusalem Chronicle that the priest was a fake and his theology was bad and…

    A lot of the reasoning here in support for the blog can be lumped into a few categories

    1) At least were not as bad as the pastor…
    2) Some good still comes from this so it doesn’t matter what harm comes from it.

  • Posted by Johnpaul

    Leo,
    You didn’t even read my whole post did you? Try reading this:

    Does this make gossip ok? No. If I am promoting gossip it is wrong, but just because you see someone use my blog for gossip does not necessarily make it bad.

    I’m not using the fact that churches gossip to exuse gossip on my blog. Gossip is wrong. My point is that if you are out searching to destroy anything that is a catalyst for gossip...well...I would start with prayer chains. Prayer chains are good...even though they often spur gossip...see where I am going.

    Also, I am not conflicted internally, I simply want to be open to all rebukes. Those here have clearly rebuked me, I am not going to sit back and say “I have it all figured out you are wrong”. Pride is another sin to watch out for.

    The internal conflict you see is really me trying to be open to what God may be saying to me.

  • Posted by Johnpaul

    I have another question for all: Setting aside doctrinal issues, what is the difference between City Bible Church and City Business Chuch?

    They meet in a building, we meet online.

    They give sermons from a pulpit, we write posts.

    and we both claim to be made up by a body of Christians.

    Why then do you all feel comfortable making snap judgements about our “church” (online for the world to see)...regardless of how we act (read back through these comments...none of you care what CBC has done the issue is that it is none of our business) but it is not ok for us to talk about them? You explain.

    I’m not upset and truely do appreciate your snap judgements, I just want to make you all think. Please leave religion and tradition out of your response.

  • Posted by Leonard

    JP, I did read your whole post and you compare your blog to a prayer chain.  So what you do over there is take requests, pass them on to others?  It sounds more like you lodge complaints and let others chime in.  I don’t excuse gossip anywhere.  I shut down a prayer chain in a church because it was fostering gossip.  How about you?  Does your blog foster gossip?  Yes or no.  Does it foster bitterness?  Yes or no.  Does it promote sarcasm and harshness?  Yes or no.  You see, I read tons of your posts and the clear answer is yes to all of these questions. 

    If I am to stop gossip in a prayer chain why are you not to stop it on your blog?  Why not hold yourself to the same standards you want a prayer chain or Pastor Frank to be held to? 

    What makes you think these are snap judgments?  I have been in ministry over 27 years.  These thoughts and opinions did not just form because I heard of your blog.  You say I am open to what God says to me?  Okay, does God say anything about gossip?  I know you and I agree about this, he does and we both agree what he says is that it is bad.  Does God say anything about causing a brother or sister to stumble?  How does this blog not promote and provide for our brothers and sisters to gossip?  In your call to repentance you ask Frank to repent of the following things.  Can you give biblical support to these opinions of yours? 

    #1 Repent because of an impression you got from him
    #2 Accusation without a source
    #3 False teaching of mandatory tithe… (Opinion)
    #4 one man show opinion… opinion… opinion…
    #5 steering away from genuine academics… Opinion
    #6 charging membership opinion
    #7 Making too much money… Opinion. my sources Called gossip.
    #8 retirement plan opinion again hearsay and gossip.
    9, 10, both opinions again
    11 25% of Jesus teachings were about money and resources
    12 Extending his own ministry via simulcast.  Should Andy Stanley and the 1500+ other churches doing simulcast also repent
    13 High tech…

    Okay how are these things biblically wrong?  What is your text to support these sinful behaviors that require him to repent?  You fail to support your call to repentance biblically, your authority upon which you issue this call and you site more inferences from others than your bible.  How is that not gossip.

    This list comes across more like an “I don’t agree with your style and theology in some areas so I will blog about you list.” I really am curious how this list is not gossip?  It is your list isn’t it?

  • Posted by Johnpaul

    Leonard, I’m glad to hear you shut down a prair chain for fostering gossip. And now I may be forced to expand on this thought a bit more.

    We don’t (and shouldn’t) end everything because just because they are a source for gossip, right? Telephones for instance are probably the one single invention that create more gossip than nearly anything else...should we then, as Christians, destroy all phones? Sounds extreme right...but why do we allow them to exist? Because they do more good than bad? To fit in with our culture?

    Lets look at another example...churches...your church, my church, any church (really it’s any group of people getting together at any time) all these things are avenues for gossip. It runs rampant throughout our churches, workplace, schools...but we still go to church, go to work, go to school...and we would like to say all these things are good. Correct? Again, you think these are extreme examples...they are, but they are for a point.

    We all were born with a sin nature that will haunt us until Christ takes us home. Wherever you look there will be sin...should we shut down completely because of this? No.

    Now, THIS DOES NOT IN ANY WAY EXCUSE THE SIN OF GOSSIP. When and where there is gossip it should be addressed (see matthew 18) and eliminated if possible. If someone were gossiping at church you would request that they stop (privately) you would not shut the church down.

    Again, If we are all the Body of Christ...what is the difference between my Online Church and Your meet in a building church. Does the building make church? No. The people do. (Do I need to give a 13 week sermon series here on the Biblical mandate of a 10% tithe to get accepted around here?)

    Should I do a better job of policing the gossip levels on my blog? Yes. Your comments have convicted me of that. I will try my best to do so. Have you given me reason to shut the blog down...not yet.

    As for the call to Frank for repentance...I will have to defer to David Mackin...as he is the author of that particular post. There are many writers who have access to our blog for them to share their stories and opinions.

    For the record, and maybe I should have said this earlier, I found many of the accusations to be petty, over the top, or just plain unnecessary. I agree with much of what you say and hope that David will be able to address your points at some time. I have requested that he join in this debate and he has informed me he might not have time to check things out until this weekend.

  • Posted by

    Johnpaul,

    </b>Please don’t compare a community of faith in an established place where people grow relationally and become accountable to one another in faith and love to an online forum where anybody can hide behind a pseudonym and easily be who they wish they were instead of who they are, easily venting in extraodinary fashion without thought for others. Might as well call a TV show where people can call in for prayer a church, and the Bible gives me no indication that that is the kind of faith community implied by the word “ekklesia”. They gather together personally, in churches, in homes, in… whatever… but on a blog?

    Sorry,

    There is no comparison.

    Also, can’t compare a phone either, better to compare a TV or radio broadcast, because that is essentially what a blog does, it broadcasts.

  • Posted by Andy McAdams

    Johnpaul wrote:

    Why then do you all feel comfortable making snap judgements about our “church” (online for the world to see)...regardless of how we act (read back through these comments...none of you care what CBC has done the issue is that it is none of our business) but it is not ok for us to talk about them? You explain.

    We make those judgements because you have made them public.  You’re wrong....I personally do care about the things done wrong and problems with doctrine in churches.  Frankly that’s why I do what I do, and it’s a ministry of correcting and building up while coming along side of pastors and church leaders...not taking them apart on the net.

    You asked if its not OK for you to talk about CBC?  Well..NO...it’s not.  It doesn’t matter what they have done...it really doesn’t.  If you have dealt with things bibically and have not gotten the results you desire, I will say it again, “move on and let God deal with things.” It’s never right to do wrong, just because someone is doing wrong.

    However...that being said.  I read your posts, the comments left there as well as the comments you have left here on MMI, and I conclude that it doesn’t matter what anyone says to you...you’re going to just continue on doing what you’re doing.

    I believe that those the spread false doctrine will answer to the Jesus, the head of the church and He will deal with them.  I also believe that that same Jesus will deal with those that sow discord among the brothers and sister.

    OK...once and for all....I am done with this subject.

  • Posted by

    Leonard wrote:

    “Scrupe… How does gossip and sarcasm rescue someone from a ditch.  If I remember correctly the good Samaritan actually at his own expense helped the guy in the ditch.  He did not sit in secrecy, hiding behind a code name, blogging someone else’s transgressions.  He did not go around posting in the Jerusalem Chronicle that the priest was a fake and his theology was bad and… “

    Leonard, have you ever attended a 12 step meeting of any kind? AA, NA, etc.? Ever been in a group counseling session with people who have been systematically abused? One of the steps of healing, when one has been bitten by a viper, is to lance the wound and express the poison. Such healing is NOT a pretty process - in fact, the initial stages of healing can be quite ugly. You seem to object to the “moaning” of the person in the ditch? Or that people find validation, affirmation and healing in the open discussion of the wrongs that were done to them - in the name of Jesus, no less.

    What if the blog was titled “Toxic Church Recovery Forum”, or “Exposing and Recovery from False Teachings”, or “Recovery from Spiritual Abuse”, with a unique logo, and instead of having such a CBC/CC/MFI focus (that is JP’s background) it focused on the falsehoods and abuses common among all institutionalized churches? Would that be OK?

    It’s been my experience with institutional churches, that few if any want to get involved with healing and recovery of those who have been abused ... it’s messy ... churches for the most part, cater to the socially / economically acceptable - the lovely - and shun the awkward, poor and unlovely.

    The blog points to several needs in the institutional church: 1) accountability personal and corporate, 2) healing for the victims of religious falsehood and abuse, 3) restoration of free speech in the assembly of saints, 4) restoration of the priesthood of believers, 5) breaking down walls of division (denominations and organizations), etc.

    The blogs are not going to go away ... believers won’t be put back under iron-fisted clergy rule ... true - it’s an ugly process - but a necessary step in the next reformation.

  • Page 3 of 4 pages

    « First  <  1 2 3 4 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: