HOME | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | SUBMIT CONTENT | CONTACT US


Email Newsletter  

Each Monday Morning, we'll send you the newest church leadership headlines straight to your in-box! It's all free and you can unsubscribe at any time! Join over 12,000 other pastors who receive MMI updates each week! We respect your privacy.

image

TREND:  Angry Church Members Now Turn to Blogs for Release

This has been on my mind for some time now... the power of the internet (blogs in particular) and the destruction they can do in the midst of church conflict. I've seen blogs pop up in many church conflicts in the past six months... Calvary of Albuquerque had a few blogs supporting the pastor who resigned (even one with a petition to get him to return). BCC in Nashville also had a few member blogs up and going on both sides of their recent conflict. Now, the huge Bellevue Baptist Church (Adrian Roger's old church) is in the midst of conflict; and guess what's fueling the fire... a person, and a blog. I was going to write at length about this subject, but found this article online... so let's start here:

Bellevue Baptist Church is on the cutting edge of a growing trend - at least when it comes to conflict. Like members from several other prominent churches nationwide, congregants at the Memphis-area megachurch are using web sites and blogs to post details about ongoing dissent within the ranks.

But do such high-tech tactics empower church members to address conflict or merely make the conflict worse while airing a church’s dirty laundry to the world?

The issue at Bellevue involves Pastor Steve Gaines and a group of longtime church members, who say he’s receiving an inappropriately high salary, is pushing the church toward an elder-led system, and has forced out a popular music director.

Others have said Gaines uses intimidation and arrogance as his main modus operandus. Still more say they feel it’s too soon to change the 30,000-member church after the 2005 death of legendary pastor Adrian Rogers. Gaines, along with a strong contingent behind him, has denied the allegations.

As part of their protest, Bellevue members created http://www.bellevuetruth.blogspot.com and savingbellevue, which includes letters from members, a transcript of an interview with a concerned deacon, and links to sites of churches in comparable straits. As of Sept. 26, the site had received more than 90,000 hits.

Across town at Germantown Baptist Church, and hundreds of miles away at Montrose Baptist Church in Rockville, Md., congregants have faced similar divisions and used similar methods to disseminate information and garner support. At First Baptist Church in Colleyville, Texas, bloggers brought scrutiny to financial dealings that led to the pastor’s resignation.

All four church conflicts involved conservative churches divided over leadership style and use of authority. But the trend to take those battles to cyberspace is not limited to conservative churches.

In Germantown, member Clark Finch helped organize savegbc to rally members against instituting elder rule at the 9,000-member church. Finch and other opponents used the anti-elder website to enlist historians, professors and laypeople to save their church “from the improper use of elders,” Finch told Associated Baptist Press (ABP). He supports “leading elders” but not “ruling elders,” a role he said constitutes a dangerous departure from biblical descriptions of the office. So far, the opposition to elder-rule has held sway.

In Rockville, confusion about financial conflicts of interest caused the apparent need for an alternative information source - a web site called “Friends of Montrose Baptist” (montrosebaptist). The site was instrumental in communication between church members during the scandal. Although pastor Ray Hope resigned in 2002 after church leaders investigated his involvement in recruiting students to attend the church’s school, the web site still posts chats, news and reviews for “those who have been wacked-upside-the-head [sic] with the 2x4 of spiritual abuse, but still love God.”

Blog and web site proponents claim they need the online vehicle to level the playing field. The technology lets them publish information - like church financial statements or proposed bylaws - that would otherwise be hidden by dictatorial pastors and elders. Supporters also say blogs are necessary to distribute information actively blocked by other, more conventional channels. Some supporters say opposing factions within a church need a forum to communicate their concerns.

William Thornton, an Atlanta resident who has not met Bellevue pastor Gaines, wrote on Baptistlife that the pastor had been not only inept at dealing with direct criticism, but he lacked the skills to deal with online criticism as well.

“I think it’s the same old story of blogging being ignored until it is recognized that thousands of people are reading one side of a story,” Thornton wrote. “Gaines might [do well to] drive across town and talk to Sam Shaw at Germantown Baptist, who was skewered by bloggers and web sites on a church proposal that was defeated and eventually led to his resignation.”

Bob Perry, congregational-health team leader of the Baptist General Convention of Missouri, disagrees with the need to use blogs as weapons. Perry told ABP that blogging about denominational politics on a national level is useful to inform mass audiences via a broad medium - bloggers recently helped effect reforms in the Southern Baptist Convention and its North American Mission Board - but it’s unacceptable, he continued, to use blogs for conflict resolution in individual churches.

“I think at the local church level, it is very, very wrong,” Perry said. “I just can’t imagine that there’s any real value to this.”

Read the rest of this article here at The Biblical Recorder

-----

Can you see the power of a blog during church conflict?  It can really be a mess?  How can you as a church prepare for this eventuality?  Let’s face it; if anyone gets hacked off at your church, they’re fifteen minutes away from putting up a blog and sending out emails to get people involved.  And you have no control over what they will say.  How can you defend yourself and/or your church?  Maybe there are some reading this who have been the target of a blog writer.  Please share your experience in our comments section…

- - - - - - - - - -

This post has been viewed 4525 times and was added on October 05, 2006 by Todd Rhoades.
Filed under: Leadership Issues  Church Conflict  Ministry-Specific Help  Technology in the Church  
Share this post with a friend right now!
View reactions to this post at other blogs...

You can really help us out by subscribing to our free RSS feed with your favorite feed reader, or here at Bloglines. Also, you can add us to your favorites at Technorati.


It's easy...
Link to this URL


Like this article? Get our free weekly email newsletter for more great resources just like this...  



- - - - - - - - - -
 TRACKBACKS: (1) There are 78 Comments:
  • Posted by Leonard

    OKAY – I will try.  Matthew 18 tells us that if we have a problem with someone else we are to go to that person and confront.  The purpose is restoration and forgiveness.  It then tells us if we are unable to resolve the issue take some witnesses for the purpose of restoration and forgiveness.  If that doesn’t work go to the church for the purpose of restorations and forgiveness.  Finally if that does not work make the move to cut off the person from fellowship. 

    Matthew 18 tells us when we do it this way we experiences some very important things form God.  First we experience his authority in the matter.  What we pronounce on earth is pronounced in heaven, both forgiveness and separation.  Second, we experience his presence.  Where ever 2 or 3 are gathers I am there too.  The context is the witnesses who confront. 

    The problem with the blogging is that is does not flow through the church, is not monitored by the church nor does it have the authority God gives the church.  What it does on the other hand is invites people not connected to a situation to chime in and ultimately gossip about another person.  Inviting people into conversations about another person on a blog is inviting people to gossip.  Gossip is a sin.  Tell me that on the blogs listed in the post or even the CCABQ blog spaces that none of the following ever happened.  Was every person blogging or reading in a “first person” connection to the to the issues?  Tell me that no person related another situation in the blogs similar to that?  Tell me that the open air blogging did not contain any gossip, did not invite anyone into sin, did not fuel the anger and disgust for a situation, did not add mistrust to other pastors, and brought healing and restoration to a situating. 

    The blogging of issues like that actually promote mistrust and negative interpretation.  They do not follow the biblical pattern established by the words of Jesus and do not promote healing.  Blogs like this do allow for one side to be represented, usually by someone with an agenda.  They do allow for people to pile on to issues that do not concern them.  They do allow for facts to be represented without verification.  They do allow for Christ followers to air “dirty laundry” to the world, helping them justify their disgust of Christianity, they do allow people to vent, emote, accuse with no accountability to what they write, they do give anonymity to gossip and slander, they rarely bring healing.  I know of none that have brought restoration of wounded parties and resolution to conflict.

  • Posted by

    Leonard, Amen!  Well said!

  • Posted by

    Judy,
    Again you’re showing your tendency to read into what people say and put words in their mouth.  I did not remotely suggest that you needed therapy just a wise friend to talk to!

    Leonard… excellent summation of the subject.  Totally agree with you.  As an example of that we had a situation in our church a few months back where a certain attendee was spreading gossip physically to others in our church.  Complete fabrication and conjecture about our Pastor and other staff members.  He actually believed what he was saying to be true and felt justified in “sharing”.  Fortunately it was kept quite contained and after he was confronted with the real facts he did apologize to everyone he had talked to and retracted what he’s said.  Imagine if he’d decided to blog his opinions!!!  The damage to our pastor’s reputation and others would have been irrevocable. 
    Using the web to voice ‘concerns’ can only lead to sin and and other damage.  If we just stick to biblical standards of handling conflict God will see that all things will work together for good.  Why can’t we just live biblically anymore?  Having internet does not now exempt us from that.

  • Posted by

    The Phoenix Preacher has quickly become the Jerry Springer of internet blogging and Judy is getting an earful about it. What amazes me about the Phoenix Preacher is that they attack Calvary Chapels for being too controlling, manipulative, unloving etc. yet they are as a blog the very essence of controlling, manipulative and unloving.

    Reading through some of the posts and hearing some of the things that people say, including the blog owner, is downright shocking. If you disagree with Michael he will call you names at best and bar you from his blog at worst. How anyone can defend the Phoenix Preacher as a “reformer” is besides me. He plays by none of the rules that he is supposedly holding Skip Heitzig to and he does this because he says that he is a blog and not a church. He is really nothing more than a bitter gossip…

    As Pastors, if you had a person such as the Phoenix Preacher in your church who was saying anything that he heard about another member or leader would you not confront him and ultimately remove him from fellowship? Ofcourse you would or you would have to turn your church over to him...He would win and the church would lose. The Phoenix Preacher is nothing more than a cyber bully.

  • Posted by

    Nora, I’ve been out for a while but i wanted to address
    “not because I’m a “Yes Woman” but because I am a team player, and I feel that team players should support the decisions of the team.”
    If you as a leader or staff person are in a “team” situation I agree. But when “the head coach” is calling the plays, it is difficult to feel that your input is valued - even though you too have a seminary degree and have been in ministry for 15+ years and have been at the church longer than the new “head coach”. There are times when I say “good call” but when I say “I think we need another play” it is “who’s the head coach around here”. I’m sorry, I’m venting again. I guess sometimes “its good to be king” and not some serf.

  • Posted by

    Ok there are certainly abuses of the blogging technology in regards the local church, but how do we as church leaders or even just congregants who care about the reputation of His name, and christian maturity keep the conversations honest and Christ-like?  I know that many of you have blogs what do you do to monitor them?  What if a congregant or just a plain old trouble maker tries to cause trouble?  What can we do?  If there is an over-lap of attenders and bloggers, what if there is no over-lap?  Can we do things in a public forum like a blog that should only be done in a private setting?  Is it possible to correct info adequately on a blog? (sometimes it seems like a very small tree trying to stand in an avalanche.) What are things that have been done, well and not so much.

  • Posted by

    Judy,

    The best thing you can do is back off, you’ve stated your case and it needs to stand on its own merits.

    Phoenix Preacher’s reputation has taken a hit, some of it perhaps deserved. But Michael Newnham - the man who owns and operates the blog - is trying to foster a positive relationship with Calvary Chapels, while addressing issues within that movement that, quite frankly, few others were doing. Please give the people who operate the blog the grace they need as they try to shed what Phoenix Preacher talebearer has accused PP of, and continue to steer it in a direction which reflects and glorifies Jesus Christ.

    Talebearer, if you have real, tangible ways for us to be more like Jesus and less like gossips, please share those with us...but don’t come across as an arrogant jerk. Your concerns won’t be heard....unless you want PP to crash and burn....

  • Posted by

    That may be unfair. Talebearer, you are certainly entitled to your opinion. But differening opinions and criticism of the board owner (Newnham) is allowed. Posters are banned, yes, but it would be I assume for the same reasons Todd would ban posters here.

    I can assure you that even if PP goes away, Christians won’t stop blogging - especially when they’re disgruntled. This genie can’t be put back in the bottle.

  • Posted by

    PP Poster,

    I assure you I am not going anyway. On the PP Blog, I post as Looking For Truth. I also assure you Michael is not going to crash and burn.  You are correct when you state “the genie has been let out of the bottle”, just as people on this blog are beginning to realize.  Through modern technology the world has become a much smaller place. Pastors of all types of churches are going to have to be accountable.  People no longer have to talk in dark rooms and grumble to themselves. They are now free to speak out and expose what is happening behind closed doors.

  • Posted by

    PP poster… huh - I think you just proved talebearers point!  At least you recognize the name calling as “unfair”

  • Posted by

    I do hope that people stop grumbling in dark rooms, grumbling is a sin.

    Here is the problem with all the Judys and the Phoenix Preachers...No one really knows whether these people are genuine Christians...They are incognito and disguised, just as I am here. How do I know that they are not Muslims attempting to destroy God’s work? In a local church setting people know each other and see each other. In my opinion Judy is a destroyer of God’s work, not a reformer. She is a wolf and so is the PP and they exist to taint the work of Christ through human individuals… I have never met one person that they have lead to Christ, I have witnessed no fruit from their lives. Yet the ones that they attack and grumble about have lead thousands to Christ and you can drive to their churches to see the fruit. They have real names and are out in the open...They do not belong to terror cells hanging out in chat rooms.
    What they offer is not accounatability but second and third hand knowledge from sources who remain anonymous. Can Biblical accountability come from people who are anonymous and have fake names? Get real!
    If Moses was here they would blog about his temper and call him to resign. If Paul was here they would blog about his split with John Mark and call him to be more accountable. If Jesus was here they would blog about him being a winebibber and glutton and disqualify him from ministry. If Peter was here they would blog about how he cut Malchus ear off…

  • Posted by

    Tale Bearer,

    You stand corrected. Michael and I both use our real names. We are both christians. You seem to be the one hiding behind a screen name.  I suggest you shed your wolf’s clothing and come out of the closet before you throw stones our way.

  • Posted by

    I personally think that PP Tale Bearer has some valid points...Judy said that she posts under another name. Regardless of the things you said Judy, why dont you deal with PPTB’s points about unverified gossip and the name calling?

  • Posted by

    Todd,

    I am sorry this thread has turned into a us vs. them flame war regarding Phoenix Preacher. It is not what PP intends, but Tale Bearer and Ann will believe what they will. Judy means well but may be now in the position of giving her critics ammo they don’t need just by continuing to interact with them.

    Good day.

  • Posted by

    Michael posts nothing until it is verified. Name calling is allowed only if it is the truth. We call a spade a spade. I post under looking for truth but since I post my email everyone knows who I am since my email address is the same as my name.

    Now, who are you and who is tale bearer since you both want to throw stones my way. I’m not hiding anything.

  • Posted by

    Ah, the wisdom to validate the value of all who voice a view without validating each view.  Seems that this is the balance beam that every leader or moderator walks.  James seems to be an excellent example of this in the Jerusalem Conference (see Acts 15). 

    Blogs seems to provide an opportunity for people who feel that their view cannot be heard in any other way.  It’s sure not perfect, but it is an inescapable substitute to for persons who are granted a reasonable voice before decisions are made that they are expected to accept and support.  No, the Kingdom of God is not a democracy but every member of the Body has immeasureable value and leaders are not entrusted with control but influence.

    A moderator or leader can affirm the voice of each, gently admonish those who attack others and above all encourage each to assume the best of one another.  That option is a lot better than assuming the worst because a bias of suspicion lays no foundation for dialogue, reconciliation and restoration of those who have strayed or fallen. 

    The dialogue between the ABQ folks seems to suggest that the fellowship did not value the voice of all and all are paying a painful price.  There are no winners in these situations although it sounded as though those who remained believe they were right and those who objected and left were wrong.  And vice versa.  Sounds like a need for shared sorrow and confession.  Does anyone believe that situation glorified the Lord? 

    Dean

  • Posted by Buster

    HA HA HA!  Blogs are undermining the control structures!  May the real church emerge!

    TailBarer: Your weapons are useless here!  Get back to work!

  • Posted by matt

    Judy

    We.  Don’t.  Care.

    I have nothing against you personally.  I don’t even know much about the whole Calvary thing.  But your words here on this blog are getting obnoxious and I certainly would not side with you on any disagreement.  You have hijacked this thread.  You have a right to your opinion, but you are NOT entitled to a right to post whatever you want on someone else’s property/blog.  Quite frankly...I’m surprised Todd hasn’t killed this discussion hours ago.  He must be taking an extended coffee break or something.

    Leonard asked nicely....and I think you’ve hurt your cause among the readers here FAR more than you’ve helped it.  No matter what the pastor you’re crusading against may or may not have done, you are being equally disrespectful.

    Please leave.

  • Posted by Leonard

    Sadly enough, most of you do not address the gossip, biblical confrontation and restoration or the damage to those outside of the issue who are sucked into gossip.  Gossip is not necessarily a lie.  You can gossip and still tell the truth.  Tell me that thousands of people who do not know anyone involved nor were they hurt by the situation do not know or have not participated in this blog.  I wish we would not justify our behavior as though the ends justify breaking biblical commands.  I don’t know skip or any other person involved but because of the web I can find out any of this I wanted.  I simply choose not to traffic in gossip.  When the fight for justice or the fight for truth tramples people and biblical mandates and is justified by people whose disposition comes across as hurt and angry, I wonder who is happiest about this.  Jesus or the Devil?  When the body of Christ takes it’s laundry and airs it like this it shows that God’s word and God’s design are inadequate to deal with the problems we face. 

    I find myself saddened by the words I read.  It is sad that the issues that caused this to happen are existent but just as sad are the justifications we promote as why we need to expose instead of restore.  As a Christian leader I am embarrassed that we have such a low view of God’s word that we would stoop to blogging someones sin and blogging our opinions of that sin.  It is almost as if we believe the first amendment gives me the right to gossip.  Someone said “I am entitled to my opinions” and there lies the trap.  The only thing my opinions are entitled to is to be changed and transformed by the power of God’s word and the Holy Spirit of God.  I am not entitled to my opinions, I am obligated to bring every thought captive to the obedience of Christ.  I’ll quit now.

  • Posted by

    I fully agree with Buster’s post. Blogs are undermining the control structures!  May the real church emerge!  Amen.

  • Posted by Leonard

    Judy, you still don’t deal with scripture, gossip or the thousands of people who chime into or read the gossip.  Don’t know why you wont, but till now you haven’t.  How is the expose not gossip?  How can it be justified BIBLICALLY?  Do you have an answer for that?

  • Posted by

    I implore you to listen to this powerful, moving, Biblical message.

    Please…this is so very important for us to understand.

    Go here http://www.calvarygp.com/messages/guest/guest%20page.html and click on Bob Sweat.

    Please listen to the entire message including the question and answer period.

  • Posted by Leonard

    you still don’t deal with it.  not someone elses message but how do you personally see the bible justifying blossip (Blog-gossip) Don’t send me to someone else, what do you know the bible says?

  • Posted by

    Leonard,

    You told me earlier you were a pastor. What is your problem. I sent you a beautiful message which you have not listened to. You say I sent you to someone else. Then you ask me what I know the Bible says. No matter how many scriptures I could quote you......wouldn’t I just be using someone else’s words?  I think you want to argue with me just for the sake of arguing and I won’t go there with you. What I really think you are trying to do is divert people away from the real reason this blog was created and divert the attention to me. Well, Leonard, my friend it won’t work. I will no longer address your questions.

  • Posted by

    A pastor is not ‘just a man.’ He is appointed by God to stand in Christ’s stead to His people. - 2 Corinthians 5:20

  • Page 2 of 4 pages

     <  1 2 3 4 >
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: