HOME | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | SUBMIT CONTENT | CONTACT US


Email Newsletter  

Each Monday Morning, we'll send you the newest church leadership headlines straight to your in-box! It's all free and you can unsubscribe at any time! Join over 12,000 other pastors who receive MMI updates each week! We respect your privacy.

image

What is the Role of Entrepreneurship in Church Leadership?

I already mentioned I recently had the opportunity to meet with during a recent trip to Colorado. Rick is the lead pastor at in Longmont, CO; and one of the authors (along with Eric Swanson) of "". One of the things I immediately noticed about Rick is that he is very entrepreneurial. He has all kinds of ideas that keep him busy trying all sorts of different types of things. I find that I am very much like that as well...

But that got me thinking… what is the role of entrepreneurship in pastoring or ?  I’ve heard people talk about this in the past; but I’ve never written anything on the subject (and don’t recall reading much or anything written by someone else either).

First, let me give you an observation, then ask a question.

I’ve observed, especially recently, that virtually every pastor I’ve met or read about who has lead or is leading a growing church has a real spirit of .  They are willing to try new things.  No… make that, they are anxious to try new things.  They seem to have a real passion to grow the Kingdom; and they come up with a plan to do it.  And most of the time, they get it done.

On the other hand, most of the pastors I’ve met than have lead plateaued or declining churches are missing this entrepreneurial quality.  Don’t get me wrong, they’re great guys who really love God and love their churches and their people.  Many are really great teachers, and pastors; but their churches don’t grow much.

CAUTION:  I really don’t want to get into the argument that we’ve had here a couple times on how you measure success in the church world.  I’m not talking about success in numbers necessarily… I’m talking about churches that are growing by conversion and reaching out to their community.

And I’m not talking about just ‘innovative’ type pastors either.  I think Billy Graham had to have been very entrepreneurial.  and have been, for sure; but so has .  Even .  I would say that most every pastor we would consider ‘famous’ is entrepreneurial in some way. 

I’m not saying this is good or bad; (not everyone is wired with an entrepreneurial spirit, and that’s cool) but I am asking the question of you… what do you think?  Does the entrepreneurial spirit help grow churches?  Personally, has your abundance or lack of this spirit affected you in your ministry?

I think this should be an interesting discussion.

Blessings,

About the Author: Todd Rhoades is the Managing Editor and Publisher of MondayMorningInsight.com (MMI as most of us know it). Besides spending a good amount of time maintaining this website, Todd is on the staff of Leadership Network, helping large churches to better connect, innovate, and multiply what they do best. Todd was also the founder of ChurchStaffing.com, until he sold the site in 2005. Todd lives with his wife, Dawn, and four children in Bryan, OH. He can be reached at [email protected].

- - - - - - - - - -

This post has been viewed 630 times and was added on January 11, 2007 by Todd Rhoades.
Filed under: Leadership Issues  Leadership Development  
Share this post with a friend right now!
View reactions to this post at other blogs...

You can really help us out by subscribing to our free RSS feed with your favorite feed reader, or here at Bloglines. Also, you can add us to your favorites at Technorati.


It's easy...
Link to this URL


Like this article? Get our free weekly email newsletter for more great resources just like this...  



- - - - - - - - - -
  There are 17 Comments:
  • Posted by Noel

    Acts29 has added entrepreneurship as a key part of their accessment for potential church planters.  They realized that many church plants were failing because the lead pastor lacked this ability.

  • Posted by

    Saying you really need the entrepreneurial spirit is like saying you need comfortable chairs.  Do some have it?  Yes.  Is that ok?  If the talent is used biblically, yes (is the risk I’m taking a wise risk God really wants me to do).  Now you might say, “well we are not saying it is a must”.  Then why do we spend so much time talking about these characteristics rather than the biblical characteristics of leadership?  These are the areas where pastors are accepted without demonstration and then there is suprise when there is failure because of a sin problem that has always been there.  These are the failures in leadership that speaks volumes to folks who doubt if Christianity is true.  In fact, isn’t it more of an entrepreneurial spirit to risk speaking the full truth in our congregations or practice biblical discipline?  Why do we think a pastor has this spirit because they can convince the deacons to build a new building, etc.?  The definition of entrepreneur is one who takes risk for the sake of profit.  I know you are thinking about risk but I don’t see how you can talk about being a pastor entrepreneur without talking about the view of success (I know most really care about the gospel and not $, now some book distributors I’m not so sure about).  If there is to be any entrepreneurial spirit then it should be by all the believers in support of their gifts or responsibilities.  Jesus did say a few things about risk in light of eternal reward for all disciples.

  • Posted by Leonard

    I think that any church without an entrepreneurial spirit type of leadership will struggle.  The first century church spread because of persecution but grew because a group of entrepreneurial leaders said; “let’s send Paul and Barnabas on a trip.” The power of an entrepreneurial type of leadership is that it models and fuels more of the same in other people. 

    I want my leaders taking risks for the sake of the kingdom.  I want them aggressively seeking way to connect to and redeem people.  I think this is a part of biblical leadership.  It is apostolic in nature.

  • Posted by

    The success of the early church had nothing to do with entrepreneurial as many are trying to define it.  They were bold to proclaim the truth being rejected in many towns.  Now if you mean taking risks in this manner then I agree with you but if you want to redefine it to include “aggressively seeking ways to connect” that put this as a priority over presenting the true God of the bible then I strongly disagree.  And I know you’re are going to say that you don’t compromise the truth but I’ve been to too many churches in the last year in which it is.  Telling half-truths is compromise.  Why are we willing to do surveys and listen to the unchurched above what God has already said on the subject?  Yes, God said we become a Jew to the Jew, etc. but read on.  He says we never forsake the law of Christ (doing ministry His way).

  • Posted by Leonard

    Joe,

    I appreciate the dialog with you but your post here is the only one that gave a definition of entrepreneur.  “taking risk for profit” As for the seeking to connect and redeem, this is exactly what Paul’s strategy was.  Jews first in every town, Why?  To connect and redeem.  Then to gentiles.  Why?  To connect and redeem.  In Galatia Paul is looking for his opening and sees a man with a withered hand.  He healed it and why?  To connect and then redeem.  In Paul’s culture the way to connect was to stand a make a speech, a huge part of Greek culture was in oratory statements.

    Might I respectfully suggest that you stay away from stating you know what I/we are going to say since you really don’t and it makes this an argument not a conversation?

  • Posted by

    Then please get specific on what you mean by connect.  From what I have observed this is used by leadership to justify anything they want, to do everything they can to not offend anyone, and to teach connection philosophy rather than teaching us who God is, His ways, and who we really are.  Paul’s speaking is not limited to his time and the disciples, John the Baptist, Jesus, the OT prophets, etc. usually did not limit themselves by culture.  It is God who connects in order to redeem.  We can be as relevant as we want but the bottom line is if God isn’t in it or an unchruched person’s heart is hard, then it doesn’t matter how hard we try to connect.  Can you be confident that the lengths you go to connect do not offend our Lord where He doesn’t go with you?

  • Posted by kent

    I do not think that having an entrepreneurial orientation exludes the Holy Spirit. It may be one of those giftings that allows us to exercise the promptings of God. What made Paul more open to following the leadings of the Holy Spirit? What made James more available to staying home? Why can’t God use the entrepreneurial tendencies?

    If we are reluctant to try new thing yes it hurts our growth. How many churfch have shunned computers? How about mircowaves? Why can’t we try new thing, provided they do not violate the teachings of the Bible?

    Joe why would you equate taking a risk for the kingdom with watering the gospel? That si not what i see Leonard speaking about.

  • Posted by

    I have seen it in practice.  You can say all you want about not compromising but it is pretty frustrating to try and find a church that truly does not compromise when practicing these new philosophies of ministry.  Again, I have never implied that they cannot go hand in hand.  But when I see more teachers and preachers focus on these side issues instead of God’s involvement, I have to wonder what are we hanging our hat on.  There is a priority we cannot forget even when they do go hand in hand.  Lastly, I’m suggesting if we define it as risk taking God’s way for the profit of His glory then we are all responsible for this attitude and it is not a gift or talent.  Are there some more willing then others in practice?  Yes, but we are all still responsible for the attitude.  Do we let God lead or do we get in front of Him by trying to lead a charge?  We need to be agressive/bold with discernment.  I think the best principle for having balanced ministry (where you can be relevant and be truthful) is to be Christlike - who was fully God, having all His attributes - attributes you cannot seperate.  He is not just a God of love.  He is also not a God of wrath in one Testament but now He is the God of love.  If we are not balanced on the truth we share and win some then what did we just win them to?

  • Posted by

    Joe writes “Then why do we spend so much time talking about these characteristics rather than the biblical characteristics of leadership?”

    I’m not so sure this is not a HUGE part of the biblical Romans 12:8 gift of leadership.

    The original question “Does the entrepreneurial spirit help grow churches?” imho, YES, in that it is a gift from God for that very purpose.

  • Posted by

    That passage just mentions that there is a gift of leadership.  It says nothing about entrepreneurialship.  My point is that we are talking about an attitude that all believers should have.  If you want to talk about the specifics of what makes or breaks a leader then there are plenty of verses about that.  So why take a quality and try to make the bible say what it doesn’t instead of talking about what it clearly does state?  Mind you I’m not saying that leaders and the disciples and all were not risk takers.  The evidence that not many people are talking about what the bible says makes a leader is in the fact that when pastors, elders, deacons, or ministry leaders are nominated/confirmed/picked no one talks about evidence that supports whether they ought to be leader as the bible portrays.  Instead I think people are thinking of qualities that the bible does not mention.  Can they get the job done?  Are they going to change things the way I think they should be changed?  Will they listen to me?  We need to fill that empty chair.

  • Posted by

    Joe,

    What I’m saying is that I think the gift of leadership is entrepreneurial by NATURE! I don’t think I’m “reading into” the text, although I do freely admit that I have a particular interpretation of it.

  • Posted by

    I’m saying that it is not particular to the leadership gift.  A leader just happens to have that trait because it flows from their obedience to what God has called for all Christians to be.  Furthermore, if I’m a believer that is not in the ministry and I risk proclaiming the truth at my secular job it seems like I’m entrepreneurial.  I think traits like this are being focused on because people care more about there being change instead of putting leadership that pleases the Lord by making the right changes.  It focuses on the results as the final arbiter if you made the right risk or not.

  • Posted by

    From dictionary.com…

    lead·er [lee-der] –noun
    1.  a person or thing that leads.
    2.  a guiding or directing head, as of an army, movement, or political group.

    en·tre·pre·neur [ahn-truh-pruh-nur, -noor; Fr. ahn-truh-pruh-n?r] –noun
    1.  a person who organizes and manages any enterprise, esp. a business, usually with considerable initiative and risk.
    2.  an employer of productive labor; contractor.

    Sorry, I think being an entrepreneur is endemic to being a leader. Just my opinion, though… The “leaders in the Bible took substantial risks, for sure.

  • Posted by Daniel D

    Sorry, I started to try and read through the post above before posting my response as to try and not duplicate any statements or thoughts but after the 2nd or 3rd bickering back and forth I decided to just post my thoughts regardless…

    Hi. My name is Daniel and… umm… I’m an entrepreneur.

    As a serial entrepreneur myself in business and now as I feel my call bringing me into ministry, I know 100% that God has given me these entrepreneurial abilities so that I am not conformed by this world but rather better equipped to help make a difference in it.

    Entrepreneur and Initiative fall hand-in-hand since one of the main qualities of an entrepreneur is to take action in the face of uncertainty or risk. Initiative is just the movement past the fear and into the unknown.

    To me, Jesus was the ultimate entrepreneur. He was always moving. He was always stirring up the pot. He was bringing light into darkness (replacing fear with hope). He was never lulled into a sense of complacency or false accomplishment. He was always doing the will of the Father. He listened, He prayed, He acted when the Father spoke. He took initiative when prompted.

    I think all too often initiative is confused as well. Many, because they are not called in the same way, don’t understand initiative. The Bible tells me that when God speaks I’d better act. I take that pretty seriously and I consider that my initiative. If I pray about something and I feel God calling me in a direction, I do my best to do it.  I set my intentions and my heart to God and try my best to follow His lead.

    From my experience with some “Christians” it seems that initiative is easily confused with self but I think it’s all in the perspective of the individual. I have a friend who questions me a lot when I act. She thinks I act too quickly on some things (which I very well may do) but I see her continuously waiting… over thinking something that God has blatantly put in her path… to the point where she eventually never acts and it is a God sized opportunity that just pasted her by.

    We all need to be entrepreneurs for Christ. We need to be risk takers. We need to trust God enough to step out in faith and not become bound by the man made restraints that a bigger building, a bigger budget, a bigger staff, life, a mortgage, car payments, etc. can sometimes bring on, even so subtly to the point where it’s not even obvious that risk is replaced with status quo.

  • Posted by

    I’m sitting at home this morning reading your posts and wondering why God has not allowed me to be involved in a church where my entrepreneurial spirit is not valued. I am a 2nd chair leader at my church. Worship and Administration. But I am also the primary idea guy. When our church was struggling about 3 years ago, my ideas were listened to an adopted regularly, but now that things are going well, suddenly i “move to fast”, “don’t listen” and i am “too driven”. So bascially i am being encouraged to lay back, not work so much, and not be so aggressive in proposing and pursuing ideas. Some people, i think, are struggling to take leadership from the 2nd chair...which is a topic for a different discussion smile

    This has left me very discouraged. I feel that my gifts are being wasted - BTW… our church was in decline from 2001-2003, 2003-20005 we experienced double digit growth. 2006, the year I have been “squashed”, we basically had no growth - and no one seems concerned.

    Guess i’m venting. And also feeling affirmed that having an entrepreneurial spirit is not a “worldly” approach to leadership.

    Thanks for helping me to feel a little more normal…

  • Posted by

    Brian,

    From one guy who “moves too fast” to another, I feel for you. I am so blessed to be NEVER “squashed” where I am now. On the contrary, the people around and above me are VERY driven and I’d have it no other way. We are ALWAYS looking for new innovative ideas and we are NEVER satisfied with mediocrity… It rocks!

    It is possible (because I don’t know the facts) that perhaps you and your ideas are indeed moving too fast. Only you and God know that. But assuming you aren’t, if it were me I’d have a long talk with my SP if I could, and/or perhaps I’d look into moving on. Perhaps God has prepared you for something bigger, and maybe your ideas have outgrown your local church…

    Bless you!
    Peter

  • Posted by

    Hi!  Daniel.  I am with you all the way.  I am a business man as well as one with college and theological degrees.  Business taught me how to listen to others because listening provides great insight into the faith of that person or the lack thereof.  When it came to the subject of “risk”, i.e. “the second mile attitude”, it was the “listening habit” which enabled me to discern the presence of either “fear” or “faith”.  Consequently, I would never consider a business venture (risk) with a fearful person. That is the way of death and destruction (failure). Strange, isn’t it?  Or maybe it is just the movement of the “Holy Spirit”? Frankly, I am turned off by churches which smell of “fear”, and I am convinced that this is also why we do not see or recognized the dynamic practice of Christian Stewardship in such churches.

  • Page 1 of 1 pages

Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: