HOME | CONTRIBUTE A STORY! | ABOUT MMI | CATEGORIES OF INTEREST | CONTACT ME

image

Group Opposed to Bellevue Leadership Forms a Board of Directors

Orginally published on Monday, January 29, 2007 at 7:31 AM
by Todd Rhoades

Yes, that's correct... there is now a group of members of Bellevue Baptist that has formed it's own group officially opposing the church leadership. On their new website (integritydoescount.com) they say... "It is not uncommon for leadership changes within a church to result in some discontent and even discord within its membership. But, for a group of members inside a church of 30,000 to incorporate themselves, form a board of directors, and set out for the sole purpose of instilling accountability in its own church government and leadership is unusual and perhaps unprecedented."

We’ve talked about the Bellevue situation numerous times (here, here, and here) at MMI.  We’ve also talked about the growing propencity of people to air their grievances with church leadership over the web through websites and blogs.

Again, someone ups the stakes with an official, chartered group within a church taking their fight for ‘integrity’ public.  How will churches deal with individuals who feel “compelled to sound its voice, take necessary measures, and use all available resources for seeking the truth concerning questionable events and actions”

Admirable goals, I guess.  But to do so publically… I’m not sure.

More from their website:

Integrity Does Count, Inc., (IDC) consisting entirely of (BBC) members, announces its charter and aims to bring truth to both the unanswered questions as well as to the non-disclosed facts and records of the current administration.  Members of IDC, Inc. have been carefully following the events as they have occurred over the past 18 months at Bellevue Baptist Church under the leadership of Senior Pastor,

Integrity Does Count, Inc. will hold a church-wide meeting away from the campus of BBC on or before February 16, 2007, where it hopes to address the above concerns as well as to establish a congregation-approved framework for church governance that will include up-to-date bylaws and regulations.  An attempt was made to seek approval for an on-campus meeting. A further attempt was made to obtain a mailing list of church membership in order to inform each member of the upcoming, church-wide meeting. Both attempts were futile, and IDC’s requests were denied by BBC staff members. 

The church administration has willfully neglected to uphold the State of Tennessee Statute, T.C.A. 48-66-101 et. seq., that governs Not-For-Profit organizations and leaves this incorporated group of BBC wondering what the church administration stands to gain by locking its doors and closing its books. 

Realizing the necessity for following God’s design as illustrated in Matthew 18, and missing the fellowship of faithful members who are choosing to worship in sister churches, Integrity Does Count, Inc. is even more compelled to sound its voice, take necessary measures, and use all available resources for seeking the truth concerning questionable events and actions within Bellevue Baptist Church in Cordova, Tennessee.

A few questions, I have…

1.  When does this kind of thing (if ever) become necessary?

2.  When is it time to just let go and leave?

3.  How, particularly in a Baptist, congregational rule church, does a group all of a sudden become convinced that nearly every leader in their church (most of whom they’ve elected) are all evil and lack integrity?

4.  If you’re a member of the leadership in this church, what do you do with members who go on the record and start a splinter group from within the church to fight your leadership?

5.  Is anything EVER gained for the cause of Christ through this kind of exchange?

Please understand… I am by no means saying that all that has happened (particularly with the recent staff firing) was done correctly or incorrectly; and I’m not taking sides on which side is actually correct… my question is more:  how far should a congregant (or a group of congregants) go to get the outcome they feel is correct?  And how much of this is fueled by a ‘this is MY church’, ‘this is OUR church’ type thing?

Please… help me understand better be telling me what you think?  Take a few minutes to answer the above questions.  I think it’s valuable to do so, if only because this very well could happen in your church in the near future.  It seems to be a growing trend…

Thanks,



This post has been viewed 10155 times so far.


  There are 63 Comments:

  • Posted by Lance

    “Anyway, I think if a church is operating in maximum accountability, there would never be an opposition group forming to make it more accountable.  If the records were public, there would be nothing to expose.”

    Couldn’t agree more. And I have seen several situations where there were proclamations from the senior pastor that the books were open, but when direct requests were made, they were denied.

    I also have no idea why wordpress inserted a ‘wink’ in my previous post.

  • Posted by Leonard

    In my opinion being a part of a church does not give someone the right to know every detail of finance in the church.  If there is a financial oversight team, clearly spelled out policies, regular reports, then I think that is enough.  We had a family in our church that wanted to know the salary of every pastor in the church.  I said no, the board said no and the financial oversight team said no.  This family was looking for problems.  They were not concerned the pastors were getting paid fairly, they lacked maturity in faith, wisdom financially (their own finances showed it) and felt they were entitled to know every pastors financial details. 

    There was no impropriety, but this family would not have been happy no matter what and their track record showed it.  We showed them what all the pastors made as a whole but did not break it down into individual pastors.  They complained saying that too much money was being spent on pastors within the church even though every pastor was under the national average.  They complained the pastors had cell phones and wanted to see if the church was paying for them. 

    Too many people want information because they have no respect for leadership.  They treat pastors poorly, expect them to live on nothing and suspect every decision they make.  I got reamed by one family because I bought a new car.  A Toyota Corolla.  My other car, burned up in a fire but that didn’t matter because I was supposed to live in poverty and drive junk.

  • Posted by Lance

    I think some pastors here need a major reality check.

    The reason why people are asking churches to see the financial records is because there IS corruption.

    And the reason for that is that most men and women have inside of them a greed impulse that lies dormant like a ticking time-bomb in their 20’s and 30’s and then when they’re in their 40’s and 50’s and have access to enormous cash flows, that little time-bomb goes off, and money that isn’t theirs finds its way into their bank account.

    And there’s all sorts of spiritual-looking ways that it can be done, through the diversion of donations..through ‘love-offering’ exchange deals with other church leaders, through using church services to promote your own books, through nepotism (employing family members to help cover-up the corruption) and through self-serving theology (’give cheerfully to the House of God and He will reward you with financial blessings’).

    I’m a journalist and I’ve been reseaching corruption in the church for a few years now.

    You have a major problem in the church. I know Christians don’t like facts (another finding of my research) but that’s the fact. You are working in a church climate of corruption.

    Now, of course if there was no climate of corruption then there would be no need to have open books. But the reality is..there IS a climate of corruption, and every pastor, no matter how squeaky clean has to acknowledge the reality in which they operate.

    As a journalist I earn $36,000 AUS a year.

    There you go. What was so difficult about that?

    Has my world crumbled to the point where cockroaches have invaded my private nether regions..and vikings slaughtered my neighbours because I revealed my income?

    Of course not...and it wouldn’t hurt if pastors - if they have nothing to hide - fully open the books.

    “ I got reamed by one family because I bought a new car.  A Toyota Corolla.  My other car, burned up in a fire but that didn’t matter because I was supposed to live in poverty and drive junk.”

    A satisfactory explanation. And if your books are open and you’re full of satisfactory explanations, then it’s the idiotic people who want you to get around on a bicycle who’ll end up looking stupid.

    But because of the general systemic and structural problems associated with current church boards, who act not unlike a ceremonial guard for the senior pastor (and are usually comprised of businessmen who don’t have the first clue about pastoral ministry...because their previous or present experience is running a business, not a Christ-like ministry) then I’m sorry but another layer of accountability is needed, and if the only source of that accountability is the church members themselves and exposure on the internet...then so be it.

    I think a new level of real accountability for pastors with their fingers stuck in the honey-pot is long overdue.

    Heck, I’m old enough (40) to remember when Christianity had something to do with honesty and intregity.

    We are in desperate times with a rapidly corrupted church leadership and that calls for desperate measures.

  • Posted by Lance

    And there’s that mysterious wordpress ‘wink’ again.

  • Posted by Leonard

    Lance,
    You site your research but never site your research.  You say you are doing research on corruption, make sweeping accusations but do not even link your name to yourself.  You seem to have an anger towards the church, pastors in particular. 

    So what if I opened the books and the books showed I earned 100,000 us.  (I do not earn anywhere close to this) someone says I only earn 45,000 us and think you should earn less.  Their concern is not about corruption it is about being out earned by a pastor. 

    What thoughts do you have on this?

  • Posted by Lance

    I wrote a big long reply but Wordpress ate it.

    The summary of the post is.

    - My name is Lance White, I’m a radio journalist in Perth, Australia.

    Happy?

    - I think the vast majority of pastors are pond scum, but I would think that because I’m gay wouldn’t I?

    - The research is interspersed with dialogue with former senior Hillsong leaders at http://www.signposts.org.au which gives an eye-opening inside look at how these churches operate behind all the on-stage glamour. The bullying, the fraud, the cult-like modus operandi.

    For specific research..here’s a piece I did recently on Joyce Meyer’s fake ‘earned’ doctorate http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/04/10/hillsongs-the-next-installment/comment-page-50/#comment-154570

    Here’s also a page of transcripts of sermons of the last year ..mostly from a movement called Christian City Church, based in Sydney, Australia, but now rapidly branching out into the US. http://hillsong.bigblog.com.au/blog.do Basically it’s fraud on steroids with a self-serving ‘give money to us and God will financially reward you’ message. Just ask all the people who’ve lost their houses and their marriages after attending Christian City Church.

    I’ve got no problem with how much a pastor earns, as long as they’re not manipulating the bible and the congregation’s emotions to do it.

    Go nuts, write a book, earn a million, buy your wife a new ironing board and dishwashing gloves so she can ‘submit’ to you more lovingly, just don’t spiritually abuse the congregation with false ‘tithing’ teaching on the way.

    http://home.earthlink.net/~russkellyphd/id5.html
    http://home.earthlink.net/~russkellyphd/id10.html

  • Posted by

    The reason churches should have open books is simple… they are a “non-profit” organization in the government’s eyes and, as such, act as a “tax-exempt” entity.  By law, these types of organizations have to make their records public.  This is the how they prove their “non-profit” status is legitimate.  If a church does not want to disclose its financial records and yet keep their integrity, the answer is plain… resign your “tax-exempt” status.

  • Posted by Todd Rhoades

    Let’s get back on track guys… this isn’t a post on church finances and non-profit status.

    Thanks,

    Todd

  • Posted by

    Apologies Todd… was trying to reiterate what you wrote in your original post:

    The church administration has willfully neglected to uphold the State of Tennessee Statute, T.C.A. 48-66-101 et. seq., that governs Not-For-Profit organizations and leaves this incorporated group of BBC wondering what the church administration stands to gain by locking its doors and closing its books.

    My point is this… when a church leadership structure closes it’s books while still enjoying tax exemption, it is breaking the law.  As such, they are also breaking God’s commands (Rom.13) and this is cause for questioning.

  • Posted by Lance

    To the original point about Bellevue, having tested the waters with some Christians about their views of wrongdoing in the church, the popular mindset is ‘if what their doing is wrong, then God will deal with them.’

    I think that’s a rationalisation for apathy or an ‘I don’t want to get involved’ instinct… so I see what is happening now as really healthy..and sends a much-needed message to the rest of the church that you can’t pull any kind of stunt as a leader and people will just wear it.

    That’s been going on for a long time..and I’m personally relieved to see some Christians start standing up to it.

    Ideally, if there are good ongoing lines of communication with the congregation then this shouldn’t be necessary, but we all know that churches are now running on a corporate CEO ‘none of your business’ model...and so of course people are going to rise up if they’re being kept in the dark and fed BS.

    Many pastors need to realise that they can’t just treat people as their little playthings to build their empire.

    You care about people and you care about their life circumstances and impediments to them connecting with God, or you get the hell out of the job.

    (Maybe if the pastor here was gay and buying meth, then that would make it easier for everyone ....but because the pastor is straight, gee, we have to give him due process before ousting him...)

    The reaction you’re getting from the Bellevue people, which the internet is allowing for the first time..is...’what..you mean there’s actually an alternative to just taking this crap from the leadership?’. That’s a totally new concept for the church...and I don’t think you can put the genie back in the bottle on that new phenomenon.....now that it’s out.

    The church just needs to learn how to work with the new phenomenon ..rather than say it shouldn’t exist.

    Welcome to the world of 2007.

  • Posted by

    Followup-1. When necessary?-maybe never in a church this large.  The situation is now that the IDC group will be actively trying to “take down” the leadership @ the church.  At no time has this been done well by either side, to a degree.  The pulpit and leadership has failed to acknowledge that there is opposition.  I’m to the point that I think they should just take each accusation and have a meeting of explanation that is open to all and then shut it off.  The fact is that in a church this large, there is no way a staff can lead in any direction if they have to stop and explain every move they make.  2. Let go/leave-I’m of the opinion that if I don’t like a church any more, I leave.  I was in a liberal church and I’m not quite that way so I thought well maybe I can change some minds/hearts, nope-just a lot of arguments about doctrine.  Time to go.  Same deal here.  They are saying we won’t go and we’re going to drive Gaines away if it kills the church.  The fact is that any bad publicity prior to the child molestation thing was “church stuff” that never should have been public.  3.  I have no answer to that, I’ve wondered it myself.  4.  Don’t know, I think the church is handling it rather badly at that but again I don’t know how else they could operate if every time 100 members or 1000 members didn’t like the soup on Wed nights or the preaching on Sun morning that group became an official protest group.  5.  I don’t see a gain for the cause, it make our church look like exactly what the world says about the church, behold how they smear the reputations of one another, gossip, accuse publicly, demean and ridicule, and generally act like politicians.  The Saving Bellevue website says it all in one of their little links-Bellevue Members-- You have rights.....If that’s not worldly I don’t know what is.

  • Posted by

    I ran across your site and began reading. This Easter Sunday will be the 29th anniversary of our family joining Bellevue. However, it will probably be our last. People are saying,"If you’re not happy,” or “If you can’t trust the leadership.... just leave.” I do not agree with this and that is not why we are leaving. We are leaving due to the effect this conflict is having on my dad’s health.
    I say that I do not agree with this, because this isn’t about not liking someone because of style or because of music styles or preaching styles. This is about standing for what God’s Word says. If I may ask a question - What should church members do today if pastors preach whatever THEY wish and interpret the Scripture however THEY saw fit for that particular moment or circumstance and a week later take the same Scripture and make it say something totally different the next week if the opportunity called for it. What do church members do when a pastor says from the pulpit that, “You are NOT born lost.” ? (This was one of Steve’s sermons). 
    I have grown up around conservative SBC preachers (5 of whom are family members), and I have ALWAYS been taught to stand for TRUTH no matter who might agree or disagree.
    I believe this issue is past Bellevue. This is something that effects every Christian and church. We must take a stand by any means . I feel that “just leaving if you’re not happy” is allowing Satan to creep his way in the church. It is very evident that there are numerous “seeker sensitive” churches today that do not call sin - sin because they don’t want to offend anyone. The road is narrow not wide. If we don’t stand for our church - who will?

  • Can someone give me a Biblical method to deal with this crisis?

    I see accusatons and back-bitting, no humility and grace. Maybe I am nuts, but the Bible may be the authority in this matter and both sides need to examine their actions and heart aginst the standard of scripture and confess their sins to the body, repent of the grevious actions they have commited and begin an accountability relationship with someone (say the Peacemakers Ministry) who does not have an axe to grind. My supicion is thaat this new board doesn’t want reconciliation in any way with the leadership - they seem to only want vindication.

  • Page 3 of 3 pages

    « First  <  1 2 3
Post Your Comments:

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Live Comment Preview:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: